Skip to main content Accessibility help

Efficiency of different selection strategies against boar taint in pigs

  • A. M. Haberland (a1), H. Luther (a2), A. Hofer (a2), E. Tholen (a3), H. Simianer (a1), B. Lind (a4) and C. Baes (a2) (a5)...


The breeding scheme of a Swiss sire line was modeled to compare different target traits and information sources for selection against boar taint. The impact of selection against boar taint on production traits was assessed for different economic weights of boar taint compounds. Genetic gain and breeding costs were evaluated using ZPlan+, a software based on selection index theory, gene flow method and economic modeling. Scenario I reflected the currently practiced breeding strategy as a reference scenario without selection against boar taint. Scenario II incorporated selection against the chemical compounds of boar taint, androstenone (AND), skatole (SKA) and indole (IND) with economic weights of −2.74, −1.69 and −0.99 Euro per unit of the log transformed trait, respectively. As information sources, biopsy-based performance testing of live boars (BPT) was compared with genomic selection (GS) and a combination of both. Scenario III included selection against the subjectively assessed human nose score (HNS) of boar taint. Information sources were either station testing of full and half sibs of the selection candidate or GS against HNS of boar taint compounds. In scenario I, annual genetic gain of log-transformed AND (SKA; IND) was 0.06 (0.09; 0.02) Euro, which was because of favorable genetic correlations with lean meat percentage and meat surface. In scenario II, genetic gain increased to 0.28 (0.20; 0.09) Euro per year when conducting BPT. Compared with BPT, genetic gain was smaller with GS. A combination of BPT and GS only marginally increased annual genetic gain, whereas variable costs per selection candidate augmented from 230 Euro (BPT) to 330 Euro (GS) or 380 Euro (both). The potential of GS was found to be higher when selecting against HNS, which has a low heritability. Annual genetic gain from GS was higher than from station testing of 4 full sibs and 76 half sibs with one or two measurements. The most effective strategy to reduce HNS was selecting against chemical compounds by conducting BPT. Because of heritabilities higher than 0.45 for AND, SKA and IND and high genetic correlations to HNS, the (correlated) response in units of the trait could be increased by 62% compared with scenario III with GS and even by 79% compared with scenario III, with station testing of siblings with two measurements. Increasing the economic weights of boar taint compounds amplified negative effects on average daily gain, drip loss and intramuscular fat percentage.


Corresponding author



Hide All
Annor-Frempong, IE, Nute, GR, Whittington, FW and Wood, JD 1997. The problem of taint in porc: 1. Detection thresholds and odour profiles of androstenone and skatole in a model system. Meat Science 46, 4555.
Badke, YM, Bates, RO, Ernst, CW, Schwab, C and Steibel, JP 2012. Estimation of linkage disequilibrium in four US pig breeds. BMC Genomics 13, 24.
Baes, C, Mattei, S, Luther, H, Ampuero Kragten, S, Sidler, X, Bee, G, Spring, P and Hofer, A 2013. A performance test for boar taint compounds in live boars. Animal 7, 714720.
Bergsma, R, Knol, E and Feitsma, H 2007. Parameters of AI boars and predicted correlated responses of selection against boar taint. Book of abstracts of the 58th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, August 26–29, 2007, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 25–29. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Cleveland, MA, Forni, S, Garrick, DJ and Deeb, N 2010. Prediction of Genomic Breeding Values in a Commercial Pig Population. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August 1st–6th 2010, Leipzig, Germany, p. 506.
Daetwyler, HD, Pong-Wong, R, Villanueva, B and Woolliams, JA 2010. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 185, 10211031.
Dekkers, JCM 2007. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 331341.
Desmoulin, B and Bonneau, M 1982. Consumer testing of pork and processed meat from boars: The influence of fat androstenone level. Livestock Production Science 9, 707715.
Elsen, JM and Mocquot, JC 1974. Méthode de prévision de l'évolution du niveau génétique d'une population soumise à une opération de sélection et dont les générations se chevauchent. INRA Bulletin technique du département de la génétique animale 17, 3054.
Erbe, M, Reinhardt, F and Simianer, H 2011. Empirical determination of the number of independent chromosome segments based on cross-validated data. Book of abstracts of the 62th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, August 29--September 2, 2011, Stavanger, Norway, p. 115. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
European Commission 2010. European Declaration on alternatives to surgical castration of pigs. Retrieved March 16, 2013, from
Fàbrega, E, Velarde, A, Cros, J, Gispert, M, Suárez, P, Tibau, J and Soler, J 2010. Effect of vaccination against gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, using Improvac®, on growth performance, body composition, behaviour and acute phase proteins. Livestock Science 132, 5359.
Garrick, DJ, Taylor, JF and Fernando, RL 2009. Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Genetics Selection Evolution 41, 55.
Goddard, ME and Hayes, BJ 2007. Genomic selection (Review article). Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 323330.
Goddard, ME, Hayes, BJ and Meuwissen, THE 2011. Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 128, 409421.
Grindflek, E, Meuwissen, THE, Aasmundstad, T, Hamland, H, Hansen, MHS, Nome, T, Kent, M, Torjesen, P and Lien, S 2011. Revealing genetic relationships between compounds affecting boar taint and reproduction in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 89, 680692.
Haberland, AH, Ytournel, F, Luther, H and Simianer, H 2010. Evaluation of selection strategies including genomic breeding values in pigs. Book of abstracts of the 61st Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, August 23–27, Heraklion, Greece, p. 354. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Haberland, AH, Pimentel, ECG, Ytournel, F, Erbe, M and Simianer, H 2013. Interplay between heritability, genetic correlation and economic weighting in a selection index with and without genomic information. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics (published online on 29 August 2013) (DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12051).
Hazel, LN 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28, 476490.
Hill, WG 1974. Prediction and evaluation of response to selection with overlapping generations. Animal Production 18, 117139.
Mathur, PK, ten Napel, J, Bloemhof, S, Heres, L, Knol, EF and Mulder, HA 2012. A human nose scoring system for boar taint and its relationship with androstenone and skatole. Meat Science 91, 414422.
Merks, JMM, Hanenberg, EHAT, Bloemhof, S and Knol, EF 2009. Genetic opportunities for pork production without castration. Animal Welfare 18, 539544.
Merks, JWM, Bloemhof, S, Mathur, PK and Knol, EF 2010. Quantitative genetic opportunities to ban castration. Book of abstracts of the 61st Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, August 23–27, Heraklion, Greece, p. 135. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Meuwissen, THE, Hayes, BJ and Goddard, ME 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 18191829.
Prunier, A, Bonneau, M, von Borell, EH, Cinotti, S, Gunn, M, Fredriksen, B, Giersing, M, Morton, DB, Tuyttens, FAM and Velarde, A 2006. A review of the welfare consequences of surgical castration in piglets and the evaluation of non-surgical methods. Animal Welfare 15, 277289.
Ramos, AM, RPMA, Crooijmans, Affara, NA, Amaral, AJ, Archibald, AL, Beever, JE, Bendixen, C, Churcher, C, Clark, R, Dehais, P, Hansen, MS, Hedegaard, J, Hu, Z-L, Kerstens, HH, Law, AS, Megens, H-J, Milan, D, Nonneman, DJ, Rohrer, GA, Rothschild, MF, Smith, TPL, Schnabel, RD, Van Tassell, CP, Taylor, JF, Wiedmann, RT, Schook, LB and Groenen, MAM 2009. Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology. PLoS One 4, e6524. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006524.
Rohrer, GA, Alexander, LI, Hu, Z, Smith, TP, Keele, JW and Beattie, CW 1996. A comprehensive map of the porcine genome. Genome Research 6, 371391.
Rydhmer, L, Lundström, K and Andersson, K 2010. Immunocastration reduces aggressive and sexual behavior in male pigs. Animal 4, 965972.
Sellier, P and Bonneau, M 1988. Genetic relationships between fat androstenone level in males and development of male and female genital tract in pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 105, 1120.
Sellier, P, Le Roy, P, Fouilloux, MN, Gruand, J and Bonneau, M 2000. Responses to restricted index selection and genetic parameters for fat androstenone level and sexual maturity status of young boars. Livestock Production Science 63, 265274.
Täubert, H, Reinhardt, F and Simianer, H 2010. ZPLAN+, a new software to evaluate and optimize animal breeding programs. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August 1–6 2010, Leipzig, Germany.
Uimari, P and Tapio, M 2011. Extent of linkage disequilibrium and effective population size in Finnish Landrace and Finnish Yorkshire pig breeds. Journal of Animal Science 89, 609614.
Vazquez, JM, Parrilla, I, Roca, J, Gil, MA, Cuello, C, Vazquez, JL and Martínez, EA 2009. Sex-sorting sperm by flow cytometry in pigs: issues and perspectives. Theriogenology 71, 8088.
von Borell, E, Baumgartner, J, Giersing, M, Jäggin, N, Prunier, A, Tuyttens, FAM and Edwards, SA 2009. Animal welfare implications of surgical castration and its alternatives in pigs. Animal 3, 14881496.
Walstra, P 1974. Fattening of young boars: quantification of negative and positive aspects. Livestock Production Science 1, 187196.
Willam, A, Nitter, G, Bartenschlager, H, Karras, K, Niebel, E and Graser, H-U 2008. ZPLAN- Manual for a PC-program to optimize livestock selection schemes.
Windig, JJ, Mulder, HA, ten Napel, J, Knol, EF, Mathur, PK and Crump, RE 2012. Genetic parameters for androstenone, skatole, indole, and human nose scores as measures of boar taint and their relationship with finishing traits. Journal of Animal Science 90, 21202129.
Willeke, H, Claus, R, Müller, E, Pirchner, F and Karg, H 1987. Selection for high and low level of 5α-androst-16-en-3-one in boars. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 104, 6473.
Wright, S 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15, 323354.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Efficiency of different selection strategies against boar taint in pigs

  • A. M. Haberland (a1), H. Luther (a2), A. Hofer (a2), E. Tholen (a3), H. Simianer (a1), B. Lind (a4) and C. Baes (a2) (a5)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.