Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T04:26:56.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Political Theory Question in Political Science, 1956–1967

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2006

DAVID KETTLER
Affiliation:
Bard College

Abstract

Despite the postwar rise of behavioralism in political science, the Review gave surprising prominence to traditional political theory during Harvey C. Mansfield's ten-year term as editor (1956–1965), all the more striking for the prominence of Leo Strauss and his students during the first half of this period. This article considers several factors that help explain the surprising recognition given this subfield and its unexpected bargaining power.

Type
“THE EVOLUTION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE” ESSAYS
Copyright
© 2006 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloom Alan. 1960. “Cosmopolitan Man and the Political Community: An Interpretation of Othello.” American Political Science Review 54 (March): 13057.Google Scholar
Burckhardt Sigurd. 1960. “English Bards and APSR Reviewers.” American Political Science Review 54 (March): 15866.Google Scholar
Diamond Martin. 1957. “American Political Thought and the Study of Politics: Comment on McCloskey.” American Political Science Review 51 (March): 13034.Google Scholar
Eckstein Harry. 1956. “Political Theory and the Study of Politics: A Report of a Conference.” American Political Science Review 50 (June): 47587.Google Scholar
Eulau Heinz. 1969. “A Note on Discipline: Quo Vadimus?” PS 2 (Winter): 1213.Google Scholar
Hauptmann Emily. 2004. “A Local History of ‘The Political’,” Political Theory 32 (February): 3460.Google Scholar
Hollinger David. 1996. Science, Jews, and Secular Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jaffa Harry V. 1957. “Comment of Oppenheim: In Defense of “The Natural Law Thesis.” American Political Science Review 51 (March): 5464.Google Scholar
Katznelson Ira. 2003. Desolation and Enlightenment. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kettler David. 1970. “The Vocation of Radical Intellectuals,Politics and Society (March): 2349.Google Scholar
Kettler David. 1989. “REVIEW Reviewed.” PS: Political Science and Politics 22 (June): 18790.Google Scholar
Kettler David. 2002. “Political Education for a Polity of Dissensus: Karl Mannheim and the Legacy of Max Weber.” European Journal of Political Theory 1 (July): 3151.Google Scholar
Kettler David, and Gerhard Lauer. 2005. Exile, Science, and Bildung: The Contested Legacies of German Emigre Intellectuals. New York and London: Palgrave.
Kettler David, and Thomas Wheatland. 2004. “Contested Legacies: Political Theory and the Hitler Regime.” European Journal of Political Theory 3 (April): 11720.Google Scholar
McCloskey Robert G. 1957. “American Political Thought and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 51 (March): 11529.Google Scholar
Morgenthau Hans J. 1957. “Dilemmas of Freedom.” American Political Science Review 51 (September): 71423.Google Scholar
Millis Walter. 1958. Arms and the State. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
Oppenheim Felix E. 1957. “The Natural Law Thesis: Affirmation of Denial.” American Political Science Review 51 (March): 4153.Google Scholar
Prothro James W. 1956. “Verbal Shifts in the American Presidency: A Content Analysis.” American Political Science Review 50 (September): 72639.Google Scholar
Rockefeller Foundation Archives (RF). 1952. RF/RG3/910/9/81-2. October 31, November 1–2, 1952.
Rockefeller Foundation Archives (RF). 1954. RF/RG1.2/200E/255/2470. September 13–14, 1954.
Rockefeller Foundation Archives (RF). 1957. RF/RG3/910/9/83. March 22, 1957.
Rockefeller Foundation Archives (RF). 1957a. RF/RG1/200E/2470: 57490–57491. 1957.
Stewart John B. 2005. Personal Communication to the Author.
White Howard B. 1956. “Commentary on Prothro's Analysis.” American Political Science Review 50 (September): 74050.Google Scholar
White Howard B. 1957. “Comment on Morgenthau's ‘Dilemmas of Freedom’.” American Political Science Review 51 (September): 72433.Google Scholar
Wolin Sheldon. 1969. “Political Theory as a Vocation.” American Political Science Review 63 (December): 106282.Google Scholar
Young Roland, ed. 1958. Approaches to the Study of Politics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern.