Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T17:45:26.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Myth and Reality in Business Support for Democrats and Republicans in the 1936 Presidential Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Michael J. Webber
Affiliation:
University of San Francisco
G. William Domhoff
Affiliation:
University of Californiaat Santa Cruz

Abstract

Using campaign contributions by business leaders as an indicator of their political preferences, this paper tests two different claims concerning the 1936 presidential elections: (1) Business leaders in mass-consumption industries differentially favored the Democrats for reasons of economic policy; and (2) business leaders in capital-intensive and internationally oriented industries differentially favored the Democrats for reasons of economic policy. The paper shows that in the 1936 election no industrial sector was more likely to support the Democrats when region, religion, and the special circumstances of the brewing industry (gratitude toward the Democrats for ending Prohibition) are taken into consideration. Democratic financial support came predominantly from southerners, members of the Jewish community, officers and directors of smaller businesses, and top-level business leaders from New York City.

Type
Research Note
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, Herbert. 1971a. Financing the 1968 Election. Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
Alexander, Herbert. 1971b. “Financing Presidential Campaigns.” In History of American Presidential Elections, 1789–1968, ed. Schlesinger, Arthur and Israel, Fred L.. New York: Chelsea House.Google Scholar
Alexander, Herbert. 1972. Money in Politics. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael Patrick. 1991. “Capitalist Response to State Intervention: Theories of the State and Political Finance in the New Deal.” American Sociological Review 56(10):679–89.Google Scholar
Allswang, John. 1978. The New Deal and American Politics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Bohrnstedt, George, and Knoke, David. 1994. Statistics for Social Data Analysis, 3d ed. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.Google Scholar
Brody, David. 1985. “The CIO after 50 Years.” Dissent 32(Fall):457–72.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Burris, Val. 1987. “The Political Partisanship of American Business.” American Sociological Review 52(12):732–44.Google Scholar
Camilli, Gregory. 1995. “The relationship between Fisher's exact test and Pearson's chi-square test: A Bayesian perspective.” Psychometrika 60(06):305–12.Google Scholar
Camilli, Gregory, and Hopkins, Kenneth D.. 1978. “Applicability of chi-square to 2×2 contingency tables with small expected cell frequencies.” Psychological Bulletin 85(01):163–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camilli, Gregory, and Hopkins, Kenneth D.. 1979. “Testing for association in 2×2 contingency tables with very small sample sizes.” Psychological Bulletin 86(09):1011–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, William E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Clawson, Dan, Neustadtl, Alan, and Bearden, James. 1986. “The Logic of Business Unity: Corporate Contributions to the 1980 Congressional Elections.” American Sociological Review 51(12):797811.Google Scholar
Clawson, Dan, and Su, Tie-ting. 1990. “Was 1980 Special? A Comparison of 1980 and 1986 Corporate PAC Contributions.” Sociological Quarterly 31(Summer):371–87.Google Scholar
Clawson, Dan, Neustadtl, Alan, and Scott, Denise. 1992. Money Talks: Corporate PACs and Political Influence New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Clubb, Jerome M., Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H.. 1990. Partisan Realignment: Voters, Parties, and Government in American History. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Cohen, Steven. 1989. The Dimensions of American Jewish Liberalism. New York: American Jewish Committee.Google Scholar
Domhoff, G. William. 1990. The Power Elite and the State. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ferguson, George. 1981. Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education, 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Thomas. 1984. “From Normalcy to New Deal: Industrial Structure, Party Competition and American Public Policy in the Great Depression.” Industrial Organization 38(Winter):4192.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Thomas. 1995. Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Steve. 1984. “From the ‘New Unionism’ to the New Deal.” Labor History 25(Summer):422–33.Google Scholar
Fraser, Steve. 1989. “The ‘Labor Question.’” In The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order, 1930–1980, ed. Fraser, Steve and Gerstle, Gary. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Peter. 1987. “The Origins of the Welfare State: Elite and the Second New Deal.” Wayne State University. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter. 1985. “Breaking with Orthodoxy: The Politics of Economic Policy Response to the Depression of the 1930's.” International Organization 38(Winter):95129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, Alexander. 1962. The Costs of Democracy New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Stephen. 1974. Jews and American Politics Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Kennedy, John. 1992. Analyzing Qualitative Data, 2d ed. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17(02):318.Google Scholar
Ladd, Everett Carl, with Hadley, Charles D.. 1978. Transformations of the American Party System. 2d ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William E. 1963. Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932–1940. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William E. 1995. The FDR Years: On Roosevelt and His Legacy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nardulli, Peter F. 1995. “The Concept of a Critical Realignment, Electoral Behavior, and Political Change.” American Political Science Review 89(03): 1022.Google Scholar
National Archives. [1936] Records of the U.S. House of Representatives (1936 Presidential Campaign). Record Group 233.Google Scholar
National Archives. [1936] “Democratic National Committee (Receipts) January 1, 1936-December 31, 1936.” Vol. 50 Google Scholar
National Archives. [1936] “Democratic Miscellaneous Reports.” Vol. 53.Google Scholar
National Archives. [1936] “Reports No. 645–No. 1039.” Vol. 54.Google Scholar
National Archives. [1936] “Republican National Committee Receipts and Disbursements January 1936-August 31 1936.” Vol. 56.Google Scholar
National Archives. [1936] “Republican National Committee Contributions September 1, 1936-December 31, 1936.” Vol. 57.Google Scholar
Neustadtl, Alan, and Clawson, Dan. 1988. “Corporate Political Groupings: Does Ideology Unify Business Political Behavior?American Sociological Review 53(04): 172–90.Google Scholar
Neustadtl, Alan, Scott, Denise, and Clawson, Dan. 1991. “Class Struggle in Campaign Finance? Political Action Committee Contributions in the 1984 Elections.” Sociological Forum 6(06):219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R.. 1976. The Changing American Voter, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moody's Manual of Investments. 1937. Banks, Insurance, Real Estate and Trusts. New York: Moody's Investment Service.Google Scholar
Moody's Manual of Investments. 1937. Industrial Securities. New York: Moody's Investment Service.Google Scholar
Overacker, Louise. 1933. “Campaign Funds in a Depression Year.” American Political Science Review 27(10):769–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ovracker, Louise. 1937. “Campaign Funds in the Presidential Election of 1936.” American Political Science Review 31(06):473–98.Google Scholar
Overacker, Louise. 1941. “Campaign Finance in the Presidential Election of 1940.” American Political Science Review 35(08):701–27.Google Scholar
Overacker, Louise. 1945. “Presidential Campaign Funds, 1944.” American Political Science Review 39(10):899925.Google Scholar
Poor's Register of Directors of the United States and Canada. 1936. New York: Standard and Poor's Corporation.Google Scholar
Quadagno, Jill. 1984. “Welfare Capitalism and the Social Security Act of 1935.” American Sociological Review 49(10):632–47.Google Scholar
Reynolds, H. J. 1984. Analysis of Nominal Data, 2d ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Robert, and Rubin, David. 1982. “A Simple General Purpose Display of Magnitude of Experimental Effect.” Journal of Educational Psychology 74(02):166–9.Google Scholar
Salt, James. 1989. “Sunbelt Capital and Conservative Political Realignment in the 1970s and 1980s.” Critical Sociology 16(Summer-Fall): 145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur. 1960. The Politics of Upheaval. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1980. “Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal.” Politics and Society 10(2):155201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Tie-ting, Neustadtl, Alan, and Clawson, Dan. 1995. “Business and the Conservative Shift: Corporate PAC Contributions, 1976–1980.” Social Science Quarterly 76(03):2040.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1975. Historical Statistics of the United States from Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
Webber, Michael J. 1990. “The Material Bases of the Democratic Party: Class and Campaign Finance in the 1930s.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Webber, Michael J. 1991a. “Campaign Finance and the New Deal: Did the Mass-Consumption Industries Support the Democrats in the 1936 Presidential Election?Journal of Political and Military Sociology 19(Winter):253–70.Google Scholar
Webber, Michael J. 1991b. “Business, the Democratic Party, and the New Deal: An Empirical Critique of Thomas Ferguson's ‘Investment Theory of Politics.’ ” Sociological Perspectives 34(Winter):473–92.Google Scholar
Webber, Michael J. 1996. “Was Capital-Intensive, Internationalist Big Business behind the New Deal Democrats?” Manuscript, University of San Francisco.Google Scholar
Who's Who in America. 1936–1937. Vol. 19. Chicago: A. N. Marquis Company.Google Scholar
Who's Who in American Jewry. 1938/1939. New York. Jewish Biographical Bureau.Google Scholar
Who's Who in New York (City and State). 1938. 10th ed. New York: Lewis Historical Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Wolfskill, George, and Hudson, John A.. 1969. All but the People: Franklin D. Roosevelt and his Critics, 1933–1939. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.