Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Making Offenders Vote: Democratic Expressivism and Compulsory Criminal Voting

  • ANDREI POAMA (a1) and TOM THEUNS (a2)

Abstract

Is criminal disenfranchisement compatible with a democratic political order? This article considers this question in light of a recently developed view that criminal disenfranchisement is justified because it expresses our commitment to democratic values. We call this view expressive disenfranchisement and refer to the general conception in which it is grounded as democratic expressivism. Contra supporters of expressive disenfranchisement, we argue that democratic expressivism does not offer a sound justification of criminal disenfranchisement. Additionally, we argue that, insofar as one really cares about answering serious criminal wrongs via an expression of democratic values, criminal disenfranchisement should be abandoned and replaced with a policy that temporarily obliges the relevant criminals to vote. Democratic expressivists should, in other words, move from supporting the disenfranchisement of serious offenders to endorsing a policy of compulsory criminal voting for a finite period of time.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Making Offenders Vote: Democratic Expressivism and Compulsory Criminal Voting
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Making Offenders Vote: Democratic Expressivism and Compulsory Criminal Voting
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Making Offenders Vote: Democratic Expressivism and Compulsory Criminal Voting
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

*Andrei Poama, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Governance and Global Affairs, Leiden University, a.poama@fgga.leidenuniv.nl.
Tom Theuns, Postdoctoral Researcher, Utrecht University; Research Associate, University College Roosevelt; and Associate Researcher, Centre for European Studies, and Comparative Politics, Sciences Po Paris, t.j.h.theuns@uu.nl.

Footnotes

Hide All

The authors would like to thank the participants of the panel on The Politics and Ethics of Disenfranchisement held at the MANCEPT conference in Manchester in September 2017, the ‘Philosophy and Public Affairs’ seminar held at the University of Amsterdam in October 2017, the colloquium in practical philosophy held at Utrecht University in October 2018, and the seminar of the Center for Political Philosophy at the University of Leiden. Particular thanks are given to Bert van den Brink, Marcus Carlsen Häggrot, Carlo Invernizzi Accetti, Eva Groen-Reijman, Steven Klein, Annabelle Lever, Tom Parr, Diana Popescu, Milena Tripkovic, Alexandru Volacu, Fabio Wolkenstein, Toon Kerkhoff, Natascha van der Zwan, Alexandre Afonso, and Sarah Giest. Tom Theuns would like to acknowledge funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 727112 since February 2018.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Allen, Jessie. 2011. “Documentary Disenfranchisement.” Tulane Law Review 86 (2): 389464.
Altman, Andrew. 2005. “Democratic Self-Determination and the Disenfranchisement of Felons.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (3): 263–73.
Anderson, Elizabeth S. 2009. “Democracy: Instrumental versus Non-instrumental Value.” In Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy, eds. Thomas Christiano and John Christman. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell, 213–27.
Anderson, Elizabeth S., and Pildes, Richard H.. 2000. “Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148: 1503–75.
Beckman, Ludvig. 2009. The Frontiers of Democracy: The Right to Vote and its Limits. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bennett, Christopher. 2016. “Penal Disenfranchisement.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3): 411–25.
Birch, Sarah. 2008. Full Participation: A Comparative Study of Compulsory Voting. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Blais, André, Massicotte, Louis, and Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2004. Establishing the Rules of the Game. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Brennan, Geoffrey, and Lomasky, Loren E.. 1993. Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Brennan, Jason, and Hill, Lisa. 2014. Compulsory Voting: For and Against. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bülow, William. 2016. “Felon Disenfranchisement and the Argument from Democratic Self-Determination.” Philosophia 44 (3): 759–74.
Burch, Traci. 2011. “Turnout and Party Registration Among Criminal Offenders in the 2008 General Election.” Law & Society Review 45: 699730.
Carr, David. 1991. “Education and Values.” British Journal of Educational Studies 39 (3): 244–59.
Chapman, Emilee. 2016. “Voting Matters: A Critical Examination and Defense of Democracy’s central Practice.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Princeton University.
Cholbi, Michael J. 2002. “A Felon’s Right to Vote.” Law and Philosophy 21 (4/5): 543–65.
Clegg, Roger. 2001. “Who Should Vote.” Texas Review of Law & Politics 6: 160–78.
Dewey, John. 1937. “Democracy and Educational Administration.” School and Society 45: 457–67.
Drucker, Ernest, and Barreras, Ricardo. 2005. “Study of Voting Behavior and Felony Disenfranchisement Among Individuals in the Criminal Justice System in New York, Connecticut, and Ohio.” The Sentencing Project. Available at: https://www.reentry.net/ny/search/item.110853.
Elliott, Kevin J. 2017. “Aid for Our Purposes: Mandatory Voting as Precommitment and Nudge.” The Journal of Politics 79 (2): 656–69.
Ewald, Alec. 2002. “Civil Death: The Ideological Paradox of Criminal Disenfranchisement Law in the United States.” Wisconsin Law Review 5: 1045–147.
Ewald, Alec. 2003. “Punishing at the Polls: The Case against Disenfranchising Citizens with Felony Convictions.” Demos. Available at: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/demos/punishing_at_the_polls.pdf.
Fujiwara, Thomas, Meng, Kyle, and Vogl, Tom. 2016. “Habit Formation in Voting: Evidence from Rainy Elections.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8 (4): 160–88.
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Shachar, Ron. 2003. “Voting May Be Habit‐forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 540–50.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hampton, Jean. 1998. “Punishment, Feminism, and Political Identity: A Case Study in the Expressive Meaning of Law.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 11 (1): 2345.
Hill, Lisa. 2010. “On the Justifiability of Compulsory Voting: A Reply to Lever.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 917–23.
Hill, Lisa, and Koch, Cornelia. 2011. “The Voting Rights of Incarcerated Australian Citizens.” Australian Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 213–28.
Hintikka, Jakko. 1962. “Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance?Philosophical Review 71 (1): 332.
Kahan, Dan. 1996. “What Do Alternative Sanctions Mean?University of Chicago Law Review 63 (2): 591653.
Kirshner, Alexander S. 2014. A Theory of Militant Democracy: The Ethics of Combatting Political Extremism. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Lardy, Heather. 2004. “Is There a Right Not to Vote?Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (2): 303–21.
Lacroix, Justine. 2007. “A Liberal Defence of Compulsory Voting.” Politics 27 (3): 190–5.
Lerman, Amy E., and Weaver, Vesla M.. 2014. Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lever, Annabelle. 2010.“Compulsory Voting: A Critical Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 40: 897915.
Lewis, Clarence I. 1969. Values and Imperatives. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma Presidential Address, American Political Science Association.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 114.
Lippke, Richard. 2001. “The Disenfranchisement of Felons.” Law and Philosophy 20 (6): 553–80.
Loewenstein, Karl. 1937. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, I.” American Political Science Review 31 (3): 417–32.
López-Guerra, Claudio. 2014. Democracy and Disenfranchisement: The Morality of Electoral Exclusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackie, John L. 1964. “Self-Refutation—A Formal Analysis.” The Philosophical Quarterly 14 (56): 193203.
ManfrediChristopher, P. Christopher, P. 1998. “Judicial Review and Criminal Disenfranchisement in the United States and Canada.” Review of Politics 60 (2): 277306.
Meredith, Marc. 2009. “Persistence in Political Participation.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4 (3): 187209.
Peters, Richard S. (1977) 2005. Education and the Education of Teachers. London: Routledge.
Pettit, Philip, and Brannan, Geoffrey. 1986. “Restrictive Consequentialism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (4): 438–55.
Popper, Karl. (1945) 2012. The Open Society and its Enemies. Abingdon: Routledge.
Ramsay, Peter. 2013. “Voters Should Not Be in Prison! the Rights of Prisoners in a Democracy.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (3): 421–38.
Reiman, Jeffrey. 2005. “Liberal and Republican Arguments against the Disenfranchisement of Felons.” Criminal Justice Ethics 24 (1): 318.
Rocque, Michael, Posick, Chad, and Hoyle, Justin. 2016. “Age and Crime.” In Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment, eds. Jennings, Wesley, Higgins, George E., Maldonado-Molina, Mildred M., and Khey, David N.. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 18.
Saunders, Ben. 2010. “Tasting Democracy: A Targeted Approach to Compulsory Voting.” Public Policy Research 17 (3): 147–51.
Saunders, Ben. 2017. “A Defence of the Right Not to Vote.” In Ethics in Politics: The Rights and Obligations of Individual Political Agents, eds. Crookston, Emily M., Killoren, David, and Trerise, Jonathan. New York: Routledge, 254–68.
Saunders, Ben. 2018. “A Further Defence of the Right Not to Vote.” Res Publica 24 (1): 93108.
Schall, Jason. 2006. “The Consistency of Felon Disenfranchisement with Citizenship Theory.” Harvard Blackletter Law Journal 22: 5393.
Searle, John. (1979) 2008. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R., and Vanderveken, Daniel. 1985. “Speech Acts and Illocutionary Logic.” In Logic, Thought and Action. Dordrecht: Springer, 109–32.
Sigler, Mary. 2014. “Defensible Disenfranchisement.” Iowa Law Review 99: 1725–44.
Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Just Elections: Creating a Fair Electoral Process in the United States: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tripkovic, Milena. 2016. “The Modern Cives Sine Suffragio: Dimensions of Criminal Disenfranchisement in Europe.” The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 1 (2): 424.
Uggen, Christopher, and Manza, Jeff. 2004. “Voting and Subsequent Crime and Arrest: Evidence from a Community Sample.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 36: 193215.
Uggen, Christopher, Manza, Jeff, and Behrens, Angela. 2004. “‘Less Than the Average Citizen’: Stigma, Role Transition and the Civic Reintegration of Convicted Felons.” In After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration, eds. Maruna, Shadd and Immarigeon, Russell. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Willan, 261–92.
Whitt, Matt S. 2017. “Felon Disenfranchisement and Democratic Legitimacy.” Social Theory and Practice 43 (2): 283311.
Winkler, Adam. 1993. “Expressive Voting.” NYU Law Review 68: 330–88.
Wringe, William. 2016. An Expressive Theory of Punishment. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed