Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

  • Jeffrey A. Segal (a1) and Albert D. Cover (a1)

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that Supreme Court justices' votes largely reflect their attitudes, values, or personal policy preferences. Nevertheless, this assumption has never been adequately tested with independent measures of the ideological values of justices, that is, measures not taken from their votes on the Court. Using content analytic techniques, we derive independent and reliable measures of the values of all Supreme Court justices from Earl Warren to Anthony Kennedy. These values correlate highly with the votes of the justices, providing strong support for the attitudinal model.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Berry, William D., and Feldman, Stanley. 1985. Multiple Regression in Practice. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Coombs, Clyde Hamilton. 1964. A Theory of Data. New York: Wiley.
Danelski, David. 1966. “Values As Variables in Judicial Decision-Making: Notes toward a Theory.” Vanderbilt Law Review 19:721–40.
Douglas, William O. 1970. Points of Rebellion. New York: Vintage.
Fazio, R. H., and Zanna, M. P.. 1981. “Direct Experience and Attitude-Behavior Consistence.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 14, ed. Berkowitz, Leonard. New York: Academic.
Gibson, James L. 1978. “Judges' Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive Model.” American Political Science Review 72:911–24.
Henschel, A. M. 1971. “The Relationship between Values and Behavior: A Developmental Hypothesis.” Child Development 42:19972007.
Krippendorff, Klaus. 1980. Content Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
McGuire, William J. 1985. “Attitudes and Attitude Change.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 2, ed. Lindzey, Gardner and Aronson, Elliot, New York: Random House.
Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nagel, Stuart. 1963. “Off-the-bench Judicial Attitudes.” In Judicial Decision-Making, ed. Schubert, Glendon. New York: Free Press.
Nardulli, Peter F., Flemming, Roy B., and Eisenstein, James. 1984. “Unraveling the Complexities of Decision Making in Face-to-Face Groups: A Contextual Analysis of Plea-Bargained Sentences.” American Political Science Review 78:912–28.
Petty, Richard, and Cacioppo, John T.. 1981. Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
Pritchett, Charles Herman. 1948. The Roosevelt Court. New York: Macmillan.
Puro, Steven. 1971. “The Role of the Amicus Curiae in the United States Supreme Court.” Ph.D. diss. State University of New York, Buffalo.
Puro, Steven. 1981. “The United States as Amicus Curiae.” In Courts, Law, and Judicial Processes, ed. Ulmer, S. Sidney. New York: Free Press.
Rohde, David, and Spaeth, Harold. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Scalia, Antonin. 1976. “Oversight and Review of Agency Decision Making.” Administrative Law Review 28:569742.
Scheir, M. F., and Carver, C. S.. 1980. “Individual Differences in Self-concept and Self-processes.” In The Self in Social Psychology, ed. Wegner, Daniel M. and Vallacher, R. R.. New York: Oxford.
Schubert, Glendon. 1963. “Civilian Control and Stare Decisis.” In Judicial Decision-Making, ed. Schubert, Glendon. New York: Macmillan.
Schubert, Glendon. 1965. The Judicial Mind: The Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946–1963. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Schubert, Glendon. 1974. The Judicial Mind Revisited: A Psychometric Analysis of Supreme Court Ideology. New York: Free Press.
Scigliano, Robert. 1971. The Supreme Court and the Presidency. New York: Free Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1984. “Predicting Supreme Court Decisions Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases (1962–1981).” American Political Science Review 78:891900.
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1986. “Supreme Court Justices As Human Decision Makers: An Individual Level Analysis of the Search and Seizure Cases.” Journal of Politics 48:938–55.
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1988. “Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts.” Western Political Quarterly 41:135–44.
Segal, Jeffrey A., Cover, Albert D., and Cameron, Charles. 1988. “The Puzzle of Roll Call Voting on Supreme Court Nominees.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Reedy, Cheryl D.. 1988. “The Supreme Court and Sex Discrimination: The Role of the Solicitor General.” Western Political Quarterly 41:553–68.
Sjoberg, Lars. 1978. “Beliefs and Values As Attitude Components.” Presented at the International Symposium on Social Psychophysics, Mannheiem.
Spaeth, Harold. 1964. “The Judicial Restraint of Mr. Justice Frankfurter: Myth or Reality?Midwest Journal of Political Science 5:165–80.
Spaeth, Harold, and Teger, Stuart. 1982. “Activism and Restraint: A Cloak for the Justices' Policy Preferences.” In Supreme Court Activism and Restraint, ed. Halpern, Stephen C. and Lamb, Clark M.. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Tanenhaus, Joseph, Schick, Marvin, Muraskin, Matthew, and Rosen, Daniel. 1963. “The Supreme Court's Certiorari Jurisdiction: Cue Theory.” In Judicial Decision-Making, ed. Schubert, Glendon. New York: Macmillan.
Tate, C. Neal. 1981. “Personal Attribute Models of Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978.” American Political Science Review 75:355–67.
Wicker, A. W. 1969. “Attitudes versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude Objects.” Journal of Social Issues 25:4178.

Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

  • Jeffrey A. Segal (a1) and Albert D. Cover (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed