Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:57:57.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dynamics of Negotiated Protectionism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1987

Vinod K. Aggarwal ,
Robert O. Keohane  and
David B. Yoffie
Vinod K. Aggarwal
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Robert O. Keohane
Affiliation:
Harvard University
David B. Yoffie
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent protectionism by the United States has principally taken the form of negotiated barriers to trade, such as voluntary export restraints. These barriers tend to evolve over time and to display three patterns, which we label institutionalized, temporary, and sporadic protectionism. Cartel theory and studies of the politics of protection suggest that the dynamics of negotiated protectionism will depend on three variables: the barriers to entry into an industry, the size of the domestic industry, and the exit barriers for domestic firms. Low barriers to entry will lead to institutionalized protectionism when the domestic industry is large and exit difficult; temporary protectionism results when the domestic industry is small and exit easy; and sporadic protectionism is likely when barriers to entry are high. Brief studies of U.S. protectionism in textiles and apparel, steel, footwear, televisions, and automobiles illustrate the value of this framework.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 81 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 345 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Walter, and Dirham, Joel. 1979. Unfair Competition in International Trade. In Tariffs, Quotas, and Trade: The Politics of Protectionism, ed. author. San Francisco: Institute of Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. with Haggard, Stephan. 1983 The Politics of Protection in the U.S. Textile and Apparel Industries. In American Industry in International Competition: Government Policies and Corporate Strategies, ed. Zysman, John and Tyson, Laura, 249–312. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. 1985. Liberal Protectionism: The International Politics of Organized Textile Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
American Iron and Steel Institute. 1968–1980. Annual Statistical Report. Washington, DC: American Iron and Steel Institute.Google Scholar
American Textile Manufacturers Institute. 1985. Textile Highlights. March.Google Scholar
Auto and Truck Industry. 1986. The Value Line Investment Survey. 28 March.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Robert E. 1986. The Political Economy of U.S. Import Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Raymond A., de Sola Pool, Ithiel, and Dexter, Lewis Anthony. 1972. American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade, 2d ed. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Bergsten, Fred C. 1975. On the Non-Equivalence of Voluntary Export Restraints and Quotas. In Toward a New World Trade Policy: The Maidenhead Papers, ed. author, 239–271. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Borrus, Michael. 1983. The Politics of Competitive Erosion in the U.S. Steel Industry. In American Industry in International Competition: Government Policies and Corporate Strategies, ed. Zysman, John and Tyson, Laura, 60–105. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Caves, Richard, and Porter, Michael. 1976. Barriers to Exit. In Essays on Industrial Organization in Honor of Joe S. Bain, ed. Masson, Robert G., et al., 36–69. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, Edward H. 1962. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, 8th ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cline, William R., ed. 1983. Trade Policy in the 1980s. Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Congressional Record. 1966. 89th Cong., 2d sess. Vol. 112, pt. 16.Google Scholar
Crandall, Robert. 1981. The U.S. Steel Industry in Recurrent Crisis. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Crandall, Robert. 1984. The EEC-U.S. Steel Trade Crisis. Paper presented at the College of Europe Symposium on European-American Trade Relations and Global Economic Interdependence, Bruges.Google Scholar
Destler, I. M. 1980. Making Foreign Economic Policy. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1986a. The Political Economy of Trade: Institutions of Protection. American Political Science Review 80:162–84.10.2307/1957089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1986b. Ideas, Institutions, and American Trade Policy. Paper presented at the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Political Economy of Trade Conference, Dedham, MA.Google Scholar
Gutfleish, Ronald. N.d. Why Protection? U.S. Corporate and State Response to a Changing World Economy. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1971. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hunsberger, Warren. 1964. Japan and the United States in World Trade. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Itoh, Makoto, and Ono, Yoshihiko. 1981. Tariffs, Quotas, and Market Structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics 96:295–305.Google Scholar
Kierzkowski, Henry K., ed. 1984. Monopolistic Competition in International Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lavergne, Real P. 1983. The Political Economy of U.S. Tariffs. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McKeown, Timothy. 1984. Firms and Tariff Regime Change: Explaining the Demand for Protection. World Politics 36:215–33.10.2307/2010232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millstein, James. 1983. Decline in an Expanding Industry: Japanese Competition in Color Televisions. In American Industry in International Competition: Government Policies and Corporate Strategies, ed. Zysman, John and Tyson, Laura, 106–41. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pastor, Robert A. 1980. Congress and the Politics of U.S. Foreign Economic Policy 1929–1976. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Michael E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
The Profits Lie Abroad. 1984. The Economist, 14 July, 68–69.Google Scholar
Reagan, Ronald. 1985. Economic Report of the President. Washington: GPO.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1935. Politics, Pressures, and the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Scherer, Frederic M. 1980. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1985. Protectionism and World Politics. International Organization 39:233–59.10.1017/S0020818300026965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Textiles: An Essential Industry. 1982. America's Textiles, August, 32c–32v.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. 1977. World Steel Trade: Current Trends and Structural Problems. 95th Cong., 1st sess.. Vol. 33.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Transportation. 1981. The U.S. Automobile Industry: 1980. Washington: GPO.Google Scholar
U.S. International Trade Commission. 1978. The History and Current Status of the Multifiber Agreement. Doc. no. 850. Washington: U.S. International Trade Commission, January.Google Scholar
U.S. International Trade Commission. 1980. Color Television Receivers and Subassemblies Thereof. Doc. no. 1068. Washington: U.S. International Trade Commission, May.Google Scholar
U.S. International Trade Commission. 1984. Color TV Receivers from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan. Doc. no. 1514, Washington: U.S. International Trade Commission, April.Google Scholar
U.S. International Trade Commission. 1984. U.S. Imports of Textile and Apparel Products Under the Multifiber Arrangement, 1976–83. Doc. no. 1539. Washington: U.S. International Trade Commission, June.Google Scholar
U.S. International Trade Commission. 1985. Nonrubber Footwear. Doc. no. 1717. Washington: U.S. International Trade Commission, July.Google Scholar
Walter, Ingo. 1981. Economics and Politics of Trade Policy in the Steel Industry. Paper presented at the National Science Foundation (NSF) Workshop on the Politics and Economics of Protectionism, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Ward's Automotive Report. 1982. Importers Feast on Record 27.3% Slice of U.S. Market in 1981. Vol. 57, no. 2. Detroit: Ward's Automotive Report.Google Scholar
Yoffie, David B. 1981. Orderly Marketing Agreements as an Industrial Policy: The Case of the Footwear Industry. Public Policy 29:93–119.Google Scholar
Yoffie, David B. 1983a. Power and Protectionism: Strategies of the Newly Industrializing Countries. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/yoff92388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoffie, David B. 1983b. Adjustment in the Footwear Industry: The Consequences of Orderly Marketing Agreements. In American Industry in International Competition: Government Policies and Corporate Strategies, ed. Zysman, John and Tyson, Laura, 313–49. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.