Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:25:18.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tepimans, Yumans, and Other Hohokam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

David Leedom Shaul  and
Jane H. Hill
David Leedom Shaul
Affiliation:
Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721—0030
Jane H. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721–0030
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Proto-Tepiman speech community—that is, the community that spoke the language ancestral to all the contemporary Tepiman languages—can be located at the northern end of the present-day Tepiman range, perhaps as far north and west as the Gila-Colorado confluence, and probably within the Hohokam region, during the Hohokam time period in the first millennium A.D. Evidence for the northern location of Proto-Tepiman includes, first, attestation of language contact with Proto-River Yuman, including data from phonology, syntax, and lexicon. This evidence suggests that the Hohokam were a multi-ethnic community; we present evidence that by the fourteenth century this multi-ethnic system probably included speakers of Zuni. Second, the greatest internal diversity in Tepiman is among the northernmost varieties. Third, we can reconstruct a word meaning “saguaro cactus,” a plant not found south of Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, for Proto-Tepiman. While the linguistic evidence strongly suggests the involvement of the Proto-Tepiman speech community in the Hohokam system, the evidence provided by contemporary Upper Piman languages (Akimel O’odham [Pima] and Tohono O’odham [Papago]) neither confirms nor excludes the involvement of speakers of these languages in the core Hohokam complex in the late prehistoric period.

Résumé

Résumé

La comunidad de habla prototepimana—es decir, la comunidad de hablantes del idioma antecesor a los idiomas contemporáneos tepimanos—puede ubicarse en el extremo norte de la distributión actual de estos idiomas, y probablemente dentro de la región donde se encuentra evidencia de habitatión hohokam, durante la época asignada a esta manifestatión arqueológica. Evidencia de la ubicación propuesta incluye el contacto lingüístico entre prototepimanas y protoyumanos ribereños. Tal evidencia sugiere que los hohokam fueron una manifestatión multiétnica. Argumentamos que esta comunidad multiétnica incluyó no solamente tepimanos y yumanos, sino también hablantes del zuni en el siglo XIV. Además presentamos evidencia de una diversidad lingüística más compleja en los idiomas tepimanos norteños que en los sureños, y la reconstructión en el prototepimano de una palabra que se refiere al cacto gigante “Saguaro,” el cual no se encuentra más al sur de Ciudad Obregón, Sonora. Mientras que la evidencia sugiere una participatión de hablantes del prototepimano en el sistema hohokam, los datos sobre los idiomas contemporáneos de la Pimería Alta (ákimel ó’odham [pima] y tóhono ó;'odham [pápago]) ni niegan ni apoyan la posibilidad de que hablantes de estos idiomas participaran en el complejo nuclear hohokam durante los últimos días de la prehistoria.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , July 1998 , pp. 375 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adams, E. C. 1991 The Origin and Development of the Pueblo Katsina Cult. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1981 Arte y vocabulario de la lengua dohema, heve, o eudeve. edited by Pennington, C. W.. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico, D.F. Google Scholar
Bahr, D. 1971 Who Were the Hohokam? The Evidence from Pima- Papago Myths. Ethnohistory 18 : 245–266.Google Scholar
Bahr, D., Smith, J., Smith Allison, W., and Hayden, J. 1994 The Short Swift Time of Gods on Earth : The Hohokam Chronicles. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bascom, B. W., Jr. 1965 Proto-Tepiman. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Bascom, B. W., Jr. 1982 Northern Tepehuan. In Uto-Aztecan Grammatical Sketches, pp. 267–393. Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar, vol. 3, edited by Langacker, R. W.. Summer Institute of Linguistics, Dallas, Texas.Google Scholar
Bunzel, R. 1935 Zuni. Handbook of American Indian Languages 4 : 389–515. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, New York.Google Scholar
Cornell, J. R. 1971 Field notes on Onavas Piman. Manuscript deposited in the Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Cortina-Borja, M., and Valinas C., L. 1989 Some Remarks on Uto-Aztecan Classification. International Journal of American Linguistics 55 : 214–239.Google Scholar
Crown, P. L. 1991 The Hohokam : Current Views of Prehistory and the Regional System. In Chaco and Hohokam : Prehistoric Regional Systems in the American Southwest, edited by Crown, P. L. and Judge, W.J. pp. 135–158. School of American Research, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Crown, P. L., and Judge, W. J. (editors) 1991 Chaco and Hohokam : Prehistoric Regional Systems in the American Southwest. School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Crown, P. L., and Judge, W. J. (editors) 1991 The Changing Role of the Tucson Basin in the Hohokam Regional System. In Exploring the Hohokam, edited by Gumerman, G. J., pp. 279–345. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Doyel, D. E. 1991 Hohokam Exchange and Interaction. In Chaco and Hohokam : Prehistoric Regional Systems in the American Southwest, edited by Crown, P. L. and Judge, W.J. pp. 225–252. School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Dozier, E. 1956 Two Examples of Linguistic Acculturation : The Yaqui of Sonora and Arizona and the Tewa of New Mexico. Language 32 : 146–157.Google Scholar
Escalante H., R., and Estrada Fernandez, Z. 1993 Textos y gramdtica del pima bajo. Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.Google Scholar
Estrada Fernandez, Z. 1992 Arguments and Clausal Relations in Pima Bajo. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Estrada Fernandez, Z. 1994 Pima Bajo Dialectal Variation. Anthropological Linguistics 36 : 223–239.Google Scholar
Fontana, B. L. 1989 Foreword. In Sonora, A Description of the Province, by I. Pfefferkorn, pp. xi-xviii. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. S. 1983 Some Lexical Clues to Uto-Aztecan Prehistory. International Journal of American Linguistics 49 : 224–257.Google Scholar
Gordon, L. 1987 Maricopa Morphology and Syntax. University of California Publications in Linguistics 108. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A. 1991 Form and Variation in Hohokam Settlement Patterns. In Chaco and Hohokam : Prehistoric Regional Systems in the American Southwest, edited by Crown, P. L. and Judge, W.J. pp. 159–194. School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Gumerman, G., and Haury, E. W. 1979 Prehistory : Hohokam. In Southwest, edited by Ortiz, A., pp. 75–90. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 9, W. C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Gumperz, J., and Wilson, R. 1971 Convergence and Creolization : A Case from the Indo- Aryan/Dravidian Border. In Language in Culture and Society, edited by Hymes, D. H., pp. 151–168. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Hale, K. 1965 Some Preliminary Observations on Papago Morphophonemics. International Journal of American Linguistics 31 : 295–305.Google Scholar
Hale, K. 1983 Papago (k)c. International Journal of American Linguistics 49 : 299–327.Google Scholar
Hale, K., and Harris, D. 1979 Historical Linguistics and Archaeology. In Southwest, edited by Ortiz, A., pp. 170–177. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 9, W. C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1976 The Hohokam : Desert Farmers and Craftsmen. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Hill, J. H. 1985 On the Etymology of Classical Nahuatl teekw-tli ‘lord, master.’ International Journal of American Linguistics 51 : 451–543.Google Scholar
Hill, J. H. 1994 Spanish Loanwords as Sociolinguistic Markers and Historical Clues in Tohono O'odham (Papago) Regional Variation. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hill, J. H. 1997 The Prehistoric Differentiation of the Uto-Aztecan Languages and the Lexicon of Early Southwestern Agriculture. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Friends of Uto-Aztecan Conference, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.Google Scholar
Hinton, F. 1991 Takic and Yuman : A Study in Phonological Convergence. International Journal of American Linguistics 57 : 133–157.Google Scholar
Khera, S., and Mariella., P. S. 1983 Yavapai. In Southwest, edited by Ortiz, A., pp. 38–54. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 10, W. C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Kroskrity, P. 1993 Language, History, and Identity : Ethnolinguistic Studies of the Arizona Tewa. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Langdon, M. 1975 Boundaries and Lenition in Yuman Languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 41 : 218–233.Google Scholar
Langdon, M. 1978 Auxiliary Verb Constructions in Yuman. The Journal of California Anthropology Papers in Linguistics : 93-130. Google Scholar
Lange, C. H. 1959 Cochiti : A New Mexico Pueblo Past and Present. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Leap, W. L. 1993 American Indian English. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Lionnet, A. 1986 Eudeve : Un idioma extincto de Sonora. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico, D.F. Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, D. (editor) 1949 Time Perspective in Aboriginal American Culture : A Study in Method. In Selected Writings of Edward Sapir, pp. 389^162. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Martinez Fabian, C. 1997 Algunos problemas en la formalization de materiales para la ensefianza del Yaqui. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Friends of Uto-Aztecan Conference, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.Google Scholar
Mason, J. A. 1916 Tepecano, A Piman Language of Western Mexico. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, XXV, pp. 309–410.Google Scholar
Masse, W. B. 1991 The Quest for Subsistence Sufficiency and Civilization in the Sonoran Desert. In Chaco and Hohokam : Prehistoric Regional Systems in the American Southwest, edited by Crown, P. L. and Judge, W.J. pp. 195–223. School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Miller, W. R. 1967 Uto-Aztecan Cognate Sets. University of California Publications in Linguistics, vol. 48. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Miller, W. R. 1984 The Classification of the Uto-Aztecan Languages based on Lexical Evidence. International Journal of American Linguistics 50 : 1–24.Google Scholar
Mills, H. E. 1932 Jacobo Sedelmayr : A Jesuit in Pimeria Aha, 1736-1767. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of History, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Mills, H. E. 1936 Father Jacobo Sedelmayr, S. J. : A Forgotten Chapter in Arizona Mission History. Arizona Historical Review 7 : 3–18.Google Scholar
Moctezuma Zamarron, J. L. 1992 Reduplication, acento y cantidad en el Tepehuano de Milpillas Chico, Durango. Noroeste de Mexico 11 : 121–126. ca. 1780 Sermons in Altar Piman; ca. 1770s. Manuscript at Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Munro, P. 1983 Selected Studies in Uto-Aztecan Phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics 49 : 277–298.Google Scholar
Newman, S. 1958 Zuni Dictionary. International Journal of American Linguistics 24(1), Part II.Google Scholar
Nials, F. L., Gregory, D. A., and Graybill, D. A. 1989 Salt River Streamflow and Hohokam Irrigation System. In The 1982-1984 Excavations at Las Colinas : Environment and Subsistence, by Graybill, D. A., Gregory, D. A., Nials, F. L., Fish, S. K., Gasser, R., Miksicek, C., and Szuter, C.. Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series, no. 162, vol. 5, pp. 59–78. University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. P. 1973 Northern Paiute historical grammar. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ortiz, A. (editor) 1983 Southwest. Handbook of North American Indians, W C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Parsons, E. W. C. 1939 Pueblo Indian Religion. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Pennington, C. W (editor) 1979 Vocabulario en la lengua Nevome. The Pima Bajo of Central Sonora, Mexico. Vol. n. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Pfefferkorn, I. 1989 Sonora, A Description of the Province. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G. 1989 The Role of Coronal in Articulator Based Features. In Part One : The General Session, edited by Wiltshire, C., Graczyk, R., and Music, B., pp. 380–393. CLS 25 : Papers from the 25th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Reid, T. J., and Whittlesey., S. 1997 The Archaeology of Ancient Arizona. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Rinaldini, B. 1743 Arte de la lengua Tepeguana, con vocabulario, confessionario y catechismo. Mexico, D.F. Google Scholar
Russel, F. 1908 The Pima Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology Annual Report 26 : 3–389. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Saxton, D. 1982 Papago. In Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar, edited by Langacker, R. W., pp. 93–266. Uto-Aztecan Grammatical Sketches, vol. III. Summer Institute of Linguistics, Dallas.Google Scholar
Saxton, D., and Saxton, L. 1973 O'othham Hoho'ok A'agitha/Legends and Lore of the Papago and Pima Indians. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Saxton, D., Saxton, L., and Enos, S. 1983 Papago/Pima-English,0'othham-Mil-gahn;English- PapagolPimaMU-gahn-0'othharn Dictionary. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Schoenhals, L. C. 1988 A Spanish-English Glossary of Mexican Flora and Fauna. Instituto Lingiiistico de Verano, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Shaul, D. L. 1986 Topics in Nevome Syntax. University of California Publications in Linguistics Vol. 109. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Shaul, D. L. 1989 Tegiiima (Opata) Phonology. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 9 : 150–162.Google Scholar
Shaul, D. L. 1993 The Altar Piman Manuscript. In Language, Music and Dance in the Pimeria Alta during the 1700s. Tumacacori National Historic Park, Tumacacori, Arizona.Google Scholar
Shaul, D. L. 1994 A Sketch of the Structure of Oob No'ok (Mountain Pima). Anthropological Linguistics 36 : 277–365.Google Scholar
Shaul, D. L. 1996 Comparative Tepiman II : Phonological Change and Inflectional Categories. Manuscript available from the author, Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Shaul, D. L., and Andresen, J. M. 1989 A Case for Yuman Participation in the Hohokam Regional System. Kiva 54 : 105–126.Google Scholar
Shreve, F., and Wiggins, I. L. 1964 Vegetation and Flora of the Sonoran Desert. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (editor) 1970 [1865] Grammar of the Pima or Nevome, a Language of Sonora, by Baltasar de Loaysa. Shea's Library of American Linguistics 5. AMS Press, New York.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M. C. 1904 The Zuni Indians : Their Mythology, Esoteric Societies, and Ceremonies. 23rd Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology 1901-1902. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Swadesh, M. 1959 Linguistics as an Instrument of Prehistory. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 15 : 20–35.Google Scholar
Teague, L. S. 1993 Prehistory and the Traditions of the O'odham and Hopi. Kiva 58 : 435–454.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G., and Kaufman, T. 1988 Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Tyler, H. A. 1979 Pueblo Birds and Myths. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Underhill, R. M. 1939 The Social Organization of the Papago Indians. Contributions to Anthropology Vol. XXX. Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
White, L. A. 1942 The Pueblo of Santa Ana, New Mexico. Memoir No. 60. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. R. 1986 The Tepiman Connection : A Model of Mesoamerican Southwestern Interaction. In Ripples in the Chichimec Sea : New Considerations of Southwestern-Mesoamerican interactions, edited by Mathien, F. J. and McGuire, R.H. pp. 135–153. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. R. 1991 Hohokam Social Complexity. In Chaco and Hohokam : Prehistoric Regional Systems in the American Southwest, edited by Crown, P. L. and Judge, W.J. pp. 253–276. School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Willett, T. L. 1991 A Reference Grammar of Southeastern Tepehuan. Summer Institute of Linguistics, Dallas.Google Scholar
Zepeda, O. 1983/1 Grammar of Papago. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar