Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T03:56:31.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preceramic Maize in the Central Andes: A Necessary Clarification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Duccio Bonavia  and
Alexander Grobman
Duccio Bonavia
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2C6, and Department of Biology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Apartado 5045, Lima 1, Peru
Alexander Grobman
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Agraria, Lima, Peru, and Grobman Genotecnica S. A. (Gentec), Apartado 5161, Lima 1, Peru
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a series of articles Robert McK. Bird systematically has denied that preceramic maize has been discovered in the central Andes. The authors consider Bird's methodology to be unscientific and illustrate this by demonstrating the value of a significant body of archaeological evidence in support of preceramic maize.

Résumé

Résumé

Robert Mck. Bird en una serie de artículos ha negado sistemáticamente los hallazgos de maíz precerámico en los Andes centrales. Los autores consideran que la metodología empleada por Bird no es científica y presentan la prueba de ello, para que los colegas puedan juzgar, señalando además las evidencias que demuestran fehacientemente la existencia de maíz en contexto precerámico.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 1989 , pp. 836 - 840
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bonavia, D. 1982 Preceramico Peruano. Los Gavilanes. Mar, Desierto y Oasis en la Historia del Hombre. Corporation Financiera de Desarrollo S. A. COFIDE-Instituto Arqueologico Aleman, Lima.Google Scholar
Bonavia, D., and Grobman, A. 1989 Andean Maize : Its Origins and Domestication. In Foraging and Farming : The Evolution of Plant Exploitation, edited by Harris, D. R. and Hillman, G. C., pp. 456–470. Unwin-Hyman, London.Google Scholar
Bird, R. McK. 1978 Archaeological Maize from Peru. Maize Genetics Cooperation News Letter 52 : 90–92.Google Scholar
Bird, R. McK. 1984 South American Maize in Central America? In Pre-Columbian Plant Migration, edited by Stone, D., pp. 39–65. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 76. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Bird, R. McK. 1987 A Postulated Tsunami and Its Effects on Cultural Development in the Peruvian Early Horizon. American Antiquity 52 : 285–303.Google Scholar
Bird, R. McK., and Bird, J. B. 1980 Gallinazo Maize from the Chicama Valley, Peru. American Antiquity 45 : 325–332.Google Scholar
Burger, R. L., and Salazar-Burger, L. 1980 Ritual and Religion at Huaricoto. Archaeology 33 : 26–32.Google Scholar
Burger, R. L., and Salazar-Burger, L. n. d. Maize and the Origin of Highland Chavin Civilization : An Isotopic Perspective. American Anthropologist, in press.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. A. 1977 Preceramic Corporate Architecture from Aspero : Evidence for the Origin of the Andean State. Paper presented at the 76th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Houston.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. A. 1978 Informe Preliminar sobre Excavaciones en Aspero, Peru y sus Implicaciones Teoricas. Investigaciones Arqueologicas 2 : 20–27.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. A. 1980 Aspero, Peru : Architecture, Subsistence Economy and Other Artifacts of a Preceramic Maritime Chiefdom. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grobman, A. 1980 Informe sobre el Maiz Preceramico de Aspero Enviado a Robert Feldman. Ms. in possession of author.Google Scholar
Grobman, A. 1982 Maiz ﹛ Zea Mays). In Preceramico Peruano. Los Gavilanes. Mar, Desierto y Oasis en la Historia del Hombre, by Bonavia, D., pp. 157–179. Corporation Financiera de Desarrollo S. A. COFIDE-Instituto Arqueologico Aleman, Lima.Google Scholar
Grobman, A., Bonavia, D., Kelley, D. H., Mangelsdorf, P. C., and Camara-Hernandez, J. 1977 Study of Pre-ceramic Maize from Huarmey, North Central Coast of Peru. Botanical Museum Leaflets 25 : 221–242. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. F. 1980 Guitarrero Cave : Early Man in the Andes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. F., Gillespie, R., Gowlet, J. A. J., and Hedges, R. E. 1985 Chronology of Guitarrero Cave, Peru. Science 229 : 864–867.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, P. C. 1974 Corn : Its Origins and Improvement. Belknap Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moseley, M. E., and Willey, G. R. 1973 Aspero, Peru : A Reexamination of the Site and its Implications. American Antiquity 38 : 452–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. E. Jr., 1980 Ancient Peruvian Highland Maize. In Guitarrero Cave : Early Man in the Andes, edited by Lynch, T. F., pp. 121–143. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Towle, M. A. 1954 Plant Remains. In Early Ancon and Early Supe Culture : Chavin Horizon Sites on the Central Peruvian Coast, by Willey, G. R. and Corbett, J. M., pp. 130–138. Studies in Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 3. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Vescelius, G. S. 1981a Early and/or Not-So-Early Man in Peru : The Case of Guitarrero Cave, Part 1. The Quarterly Review of Archaeology 2(1) : 11–15.Google Scholar
Vescelius, G. S. 1981b Early and/or Not-So-Early Man in Peru : Guitarrero Cave Revisited. The Quarterly Review of Archaeology 2(2) : 8–13, 19–20.Google Scholar
Weir, G., and Bonavia, D. 1985 Coprolitos y Dieta del Preceramico Tardio de la Costa Peruana. Boletin del Instituto Frances de Estudios Andinos 16(1-2) : 85–140.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R., and Corbett, J. M. 1954 Early Ancon and Early Supe Culture : Chavin Horizon Sites on the Central Peruvian Coast. Studies in Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 3. Columbia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar