Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:24:12.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Archaeological Survey in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, 1940-1947: A Landmark Study in American Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert C. Dunnell*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology DH-05, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195

Extract

One of the hallmarks of the new archaeology was a shift from “sites” to regions as the investigatory universe appropriate to most archaeological problems (e.g., Binford 1964). This new emphasis was accompanied by a call for multidisciplinary investigations. The precedents usually cited are studies such as MacNeish's Tehuacan Valley project (Byers 1967-1972) and Braidwood's Jarmo project (Braidwood and Howe 1960). Archaeological Survey in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, 1940-1947 (Phillips, Ford, and Griffin 1951), which shares many of these features, is not commonly cited and is one of the more undervalued classics of its time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Binford, Lewis R. 1964 A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design. American Antiquity 29 : 425441.Google Scholar
Braidwood, Robert J., and B. Howe, 1960 Prehistoric Investigations in Iraqi Kurdistan. riental Institute of the University of Chicago, Studies in Ancient Civilization, 31.Google Scholar
Byers, Douglas S. (editor) 1967-1972 The Prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley. 4 vols. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Fisk, Harold N. 1944 Geological Investigation of the Alluvial Valley of the Lower Mississippi River. Mississippi River Commission, Publication 52. Vicksburg.Google Scholar
Ford, James A. 1936 Analysis of Indian Village Site Collections from Louisiana and Mississippi. Louisiana Geological Survey, Anthropological Study, 2.Google Scholar
Ford, James A. 1952 Measurements of Some Prehistoric Design Developments in the Southeastern States. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 44(3).Google Scholar
Ford, James A. 1954a Comment on A. C. Spaulding, “Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artifact Types.” American Antiquity 19 : 390391.Google Scholar
Ford, James A. 1954b On the Concept of Types. American Anthropologist 56 : 4253.Google Scholar
Ford, James A. 1962 A Quantitative Method for Deriving Cultural Chronology. Pan American Union, Technical Manual, 1.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B. (editor) 1952 Archaeology of the Eastern United States. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Haag, William G. 1953 Review of Archaeological Survey in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, 1940-1947, by Phillips, P. J. A., Ford, and Griffin, J. B. American Antiquity 18 : 275277.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1916 Zuni Potsherds. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 18(1) : 737.Google Scholar
Martin, Paul S., George, I. Quimby, and Donald, Collier 1947 Indians Before Columbus. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Morse, Dan F., and Morris, Phyllis A. 1983 Archaeology of the Central Mississippi Valley. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Phillips, Philip 1958 The Application of the Wheat-Gifford-Wasley Taxonomy to Eastern Ceramics. American Antiquity 24 : 117125.Google Scholar
Phillips, Philip 1970 Archaeological Survey in the Lower Yazoo Basin, Mississippi, 1949-1955. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, 60 (2 vols.).Google Scholar
Phillips, Philip, Ford, James A., and Griffin, James B. 1951 Archaeological Survey in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, 1940-1947. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, 25.Google Scholar
Phillips, Philip, and Willey, Gordon R. 1953 Method and Theory in American Archaeology : An Operational Basis for Culture-Historical Integration. American Anthropologist 55 : 615633.Google Scholar
Rouse, Irving B. 1939 Prehistory in Haiti : A Study in Method. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, 21.Google Scholar
Saucier, Roger 1974 Quaternary Geology of the Lower Mississippi Valley. Arkansas Archaeological Survey, Research Series 6.Google Scholar
Scully, Edward 1951 Some Central Mississippi Valley Projectile Point Types. Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan (mimeo).Google Scholar
Spaulding, Albert C. 1953a Review of Measurements of Some Prehistoric Design Developments in the Southeastern States , by Ford, J. A.. American Anthropologist 55 : 588591.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Albert C. 1953b Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artifact Types. American Antiquity 18 : 305313.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Albert C. 1954a Reply to Ford. American Antiquity 19 : 391393.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Albert C. 1954b Reply. American Anthropologist 56 : 112114.Google Scholar
Swanton, John R. 1946 The Indians of the Southeastern United States. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 137.Google Scholar
Whallon, Robert, and Brown, James A. (editors) 1982 Essays on Archaeological Typology. Center for American Archaeology, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. 1953 Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the Viru Valley, Peru. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 155.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R., and Phillips, Philip 1955 Method and Theory in American Archaeology, II : Historical-Developmental Interpretations. American Anthropologist 57 : 723819.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R., and Phillips, Philip 1958 Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Williams, Stephen 1954 An Archaeological Study of the Mississippian Culture in Southeast Missouri. Ph. D. dissertation, Yale University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar