Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:11:02.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analytical Methods and Prehistoric Textiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Abstract

The special problems of textile analysis in archaeology are reviewed. The present state of the art concerning identification of fibers, analysis of structure and technique, dyes, and analytical techniques is outlined. Suggestions are made for securing comparative collections and for recording archaeological specimens.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adovasio, J. M. 1974 Prehistoric North American basketry. NevadaSlate Museum Anthropological Papers No. 16.Google Scholar
Adovasio, J. M. n.d. Basketry teċhnology. In press, ms. 1976. AldinePress, Chicago.Google Scholar
Appleyard, H. H., and Wildman, A. B. 1969 Fibres of archaeological interest: their examinationand identification. In Science in archaeology, edited by Brothwell, Don and Higgs, Eric, pp. 624–33. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Balfet, Hélène 1957 Basketry: a proposed classification. Universityof California Archaeological Survey Reports, No. 37; Papers on California Archaeology, No.47, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Bell, Willis H., and King, Carl J. 1944 Methods for the identification of the leaf fibersof Mescal (Agave), Yucca (Yucca), Bear-grass (Nolina), and Sotol (Dasyrylion) . American Antiquity 10:15060.Google Scholar
Biek, Leo 1960 Archaeology and the microscope. FrederickA. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
Brothwell, Don 1969 The study of archaeological materials bymeans of the scanning electron microscope; animportant new field. In Science in archaeology, edited by Brothwell, Don and Higgs, Eric, pp. 564–66. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Brothwell, Don and Higgs, Eric 1963 Science in archaeology. Thames and Hudson, London Google Scholar
Brothwell, Don 1969 Science in archaeology, 2nd edition. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Brothwell, Don, Molleson, Theya, and Harcourt, Ralph 1969 The application of x-rays to the study of archaeologicalmaterials. In Science in archaeology, edited by Brothwell, Don and Higgs, Eric, pp. 511–25. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Burnham, H. 1965 Çatal Hüyük—the textiles and twine fabrics. Anatolian Studies 15:16974.Google Scholar
Clune, Doris 1960 Textiles and matting from Waterfall cave,Chihuahua. American Antiquity 26:27477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePuy, C. H., Quinlivan, Sandra, and TomaskoPerry, Mary Ann 1974 The identification of ancient organic dyestuffsby mass spectrometry. Paper presented at the39th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Douglas, Charles L. 1965 Biological techniques in archaeology. AmericanAntiquity 31:193201.Google Scholar
Emery, Irene 1966 The primary structures of fabrics. The TextileMuseum, Washington.Google Scholar
Fester, G. A. 1954 Some dyes of the ancient South Americancivilizations. Dyestuffs 4:23844.Google Scholar
Fester, G. A., and Cruellas, Jose 1934 Colorantes de Paracas. Re vista de Museo National 3:15456.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Peter 1964a Emperors’ dye of the Mixtecs. Natural History 73:2631.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Peter 1964b Shellfish dye in America. XXXV CongressoInternational de Americanistas, Mexico, 1962, Adas y Memorias 3:17791.Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. M. 1971 Archaeological site science. AmericanElsevier Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
Grant, Julius 1954 A note on the materials of ancient textiles and baskets. In A history of technology, edited by Singer, Charles, et al., Vol. 1, pp. 447–51. Oxford University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henrickson, James, and Felger, Richard S. 1973 Microanalysis and identification of a basketfragment from Sonora, Mexico. The Kiva 38:17377.Google Scholar
Holmes, William 1884 Prehistoric textile fabrics of the United States,derived from impressions on pottery. SmithsonianInstitution, Bureau of Ethnology 3rd Annual Report,pp. 393425.Google Scholar
Hurley, William M.n.d. Varieties of cords: identification and descriptionfrom a ceramic perspective. Aldine Press, Chicago. In press, ms. 1976.Google Scholar
Kasha, Michael. 1948 Chemical notes on the coloring matter of Chihuahua textiles of precolumbian Mexico. InTextiles of precolumbian Chihuahua, by O'Neale, Lila M., Contributions to American Anthropologyand History 45, pp. 151–57. Carnegie Institutionof Washington, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
King, Mary Elizabeth 1965 Textiles and basketry of the Paracas period,lea valley, Peru. Ph.D. dissertation, Departmentof Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
King, Mary Elizabeth n.d. Grant report. American Philosophical SocietyYearbook, 1976. In press, manuscript 1976.Google Scholar
Marcos, Jorge G. n.d. Two loomed textiles in a late Valdivia context(Ecuador). In The Junius B. Bird precolumbiantextile conference. The Textile Museum andDumbarton Oaks, Washington. In press, manuscript 1975.Google Scholar
Mason, Otis T. 1904 Aboriginal American basketry: studies in atextile art without machinery. Annual Report ofthe U.S. National Museum for 1902. pp. 171548. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. Google Scholar
Matthews, J. Merritt 1924 Textile fibers, 4th edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Mauersberger, Herbert R. 1954 Matthews’ textile fibers: their physical microscopic,and chemical properties. John Wileyand Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Morris, Earl H., and Burgh, Robert F. 1941 Anasazi basketry, Basket Maker II throughPueblo III. Carnegie Institute of Washington,Publication 533.Google Scholar
O'Neale, Lila M. 1948 Textiles of precolumbian Chihuahua. Contributionsto American Anthropology and History, No. 45. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
O'Neale, Lila M. 1949 Weaving. In Handbook of South American indians,edited by Julian H. Steward, pp. 97138. Bureau of American Ethnology. Bulletin 143, Vol. 5.Google Scholar
Quimby, George 1961 Cord marking versus fabric impressing ofWoodland pottery. American Antiquity 26:426–28.Google Scholar
Rachlin, Carol King 1960 The rubber mold technic for the study oftextile-impressed pottery. American Antiquity 20:39496.Google Scholar
Saltzman, Max 1963 The identification of colorants in ancient textiles. Dyestuffs 44:24151.Google Scholar
Strelis, I., and Kennedy, R. W. 1976 Identification of North American commercialpulpwoods and pulp fibres. University of TorontoPress, Toronto.Google Scholar
Titie, M. S. 1972 Methods of physical examination in archaeology. Seminar Press, New York.Google Scholar
Towle, Margaret Ashley 1961 The ethnobotany of precolumbian Peru. VikingFund Publications in Anthropology, No. 30. Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, New York.Google Scholar
Vollmer, John 1975 Textile pseudomorphs. In Chinese bronzes inarchaeological textiles. Irene Emery roundtableon museum textiles, 1974 proceedings, pp. 175–90.Google Scholar
von Bergen, Werner, and Krauss, Walter 1942 Textile fiber atlas. American Wool Handbook Company, New York.Google Scholar
Whitford, A. 1941 Textile fibers used in eastern aboriginal NorthAmerica. American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
Yacovleff, Eugenio, and Muelle, Jorge C. 1934 Notes al trabajo “Colorantes de Paracas.“ Revista de Museo Nacional 3:15763.Google Scholar
Young, William J. 1957a Appendix IV: analysis of textile dyes. In aChancay-style grave at Zapallan, Peru: ananalysis of its textiles, pottery, and other furnishings,by Samuel K. Lothrop and Joy Mahler, pp.3334. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeologyand Ethnology Vol. 50.Google Scholar
Young, William J. 1957b Appendix III: analysis of textile dyes. InLate Nazca burials in Chavina, Peru, by SamuelK. Lothrop and Joy Mahler, pp. 5354. Papers ofthe Peabody Museum of Archaeology andEthnology Vol. 50.Google Scholar