Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T23:54:32.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Contributions and lessons from WTO accessions: the present and future of the rules-based multilateral trading system

from PART II - Overview: systemic outcomes from accessions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Chiedu Osakwe
Affiliation:
WTO Accessions Division
Uri Dadush
Affiliation:
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC
Chiedu Osakwe
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization, Geneva
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

WTO accession still holds a magnetic attraction for non-members. Why is this so, in spite of the challenges faced by the organisation, conclusions by analysts of deadlock in the Doha Development Agenda, assessments that trade policy action has shifted elsewhere to preferential trade arrangements (bilateral and regional trade agreements, including more recently, ‘mega-regionals’) and repeated forecasts about the WTO's ‘irrelevance’ and ‘unravelling’? Systemically, what have WTO accessions contributed to the rules-based trading system through their processes, procedures, best practices and results? What effects have accession negotiations had on domestic reforms in Article XII members? Are there broader lessons for the WTO? This chapter demonstrates that, after the coming into force of the WTO in 1995, results from WTO accession negotiations served to update trade rules continuously (including influencing WTO jurisprudence), enlarged market access opportunities, provided acceding governments with a critical multilateral instrument for legislation-based domestic reforms, and supported geopolitical and geo-economic transformations from centrally planned to market-based economies, the rule of law and good governance. The changes associated with these results were evident from the 1989 fall of the Berlin Wall and the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union. The evidence strongly suggests that the accession process and its results have established a legal framework for international cooperation, contributed to the global economic transformation of command to market economies and provided a platform for Article XII members to implement their development and modernisation priorities. Overall, the legal, economic and trade policy impact from the deposited Accession Protocols and the process of accession negotiations per se have not only reinforced existing rules and raised the systemic bar, with associated catalytic effect for domestic reforms, but have also staked out the parameters for the future of the rules-based trading system, including a future WTO work programme.

The rules governing the multilateral trading system were last updated comprehensively in 1994 with the results from the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations. In 2001, the Doha Round was launched based on the rationale of achieving a further clarification, review, reform and update of the rules from previous multilateral trade negotiations and expanding market access to support global economic growth and recovery. From 2005, a systemic message stressed in WTO argumentaires was that concluding the Doha Round negotiations would serve to ‘update’ organisational rules (Supachai and Lamy, 2005; Azevêdo, 2013).

Type
Chapter
Information
WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism
Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty
, pp. 219 - 308
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azevêdo, R. (2014). ‘Bali Package – trade multilateralism in the 21st Century’, Interpress Service (IPS), 20 January.
Baldwin, R. (2008). ‘The tipping point’, VoxEU.org.
Baldwin, R. (2013). ‘APEC-like duties for a post-Bali WTO’, in Evenett, S. J. and Jara, A. (eds.), Building on Bali: A Work Programme for the WTO. VoxEU.org e-Book.
Evenett, J. S. and Jara, A. (eds.) (2013). Building on Bali: A Work Programme for the WTO. VoxEU.org e-Book.
Froman, M. (2014). ‘The Strategic Logic of Trade’. Remarks at the Council on Foreign Relations, New York, 16 June.
Harbinson, S. (2013). ‘How to reassert the WTO's negotiating authority’, in Evenett, S. J. and Jara, A. (eds.), Building on Bali: A Work Programme for the WTO. VoxEU.org e-Book.
Hoekman, B. (2014). Supply Chains, Mega-Regionals and Multilateralism: A Road Map for the WTO. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (2007). ‘Trouble with trade’, New York Times, 28 December, p. A23.
Lawrence, R. (2007). ‘The Globalisation Paradox: More Trade Less Inequality’. Retrieved from www.voxeu.org/article/globalisation-paradox-more-trade-less-inequality.
Marceau, G. (2002). ‘A map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods: The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’, Journal of World Trade, 36(5): 81; also revised in F. Ortino and E. U. Petersmann (eds.) (2003), WTO Dispute Settlement Jurisprudence. International Law Association, London, Kluwer, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marceau, G. and Trachtman, P. J. (2014). ‘A map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods: The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’, Journal of World Trade, 48(2): 351–432. Retrieved from https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=TRAD2014013.Google Scholar
Mead, Walter Russell (2014). ‘The return of geopolitics: the revenge of the revisionist powers’. Retrieved from www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/141211/walter-russell-mead/the-return-of-geopolitics.
Osakwe, C. (2011). ‘Developing countries and GATT/WTO rules: dynamic transformations in trade policy behaviour and performance’, Minnesota Journal of International Law, 20(2): 365–436; also republished in P. D. Steger (ed.) (2014), World Trade Organization: Critical Perspectives on the World Economy. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Summers, L. (2008a). ‘America needs to make a new case for trade’, Financial Times, 28 April.
Summers, L. (2008b). ‘A strategy to promote healthy globalisation’, Financial Times, 5 May.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×