Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T11:53:59.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Information, Communication, and Manipulability

from Part I - The Concept of Information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

Olimpia Lombardi
Affiliation:
University of Buenos Aires, Argentina, and National Council of Scientific and Technical Research
Sebastian Fortin
Affiliation:
University of Buenos Aires, Argentina, and National Council of Scientific and Technical Research
Federico Holik
Affiliation:
National University of La Plata, Argentina, and National Council of Scientific and Technical Research
Cristian López
Affiliation:
University of Buenos Aires, Argentina, and National Council of Scientific and Technical Research
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adriaans, P. (2013). “Information.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/information/.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y. (1964). Language and Information: Selected Essays on Their Theory and Application. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y. and Carnap, R. (1953). “Semantic Information.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4: 147157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brukner, Č. and Zeilinger, A. (2009). “Information Invariance and Quantum Probabilities.” Foundations of Physics, 39: 677689.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1979). “Causal Laws and Effective Strategies.” Noüs, 13: 419437.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (2002). “Against Modularity, the Causal Markov Condition, and Any Link Between the Two: Comments on Hausman and Woodward.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53: 411453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañeda, H.-N. (1984). “Causes, Causity, and Energy.” Pp. 1727 in French, P., Jr.Uehling, T., and Wettstein, H. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy IX. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Chaitin, G. (1966). “On the Length of Programs for Computing Binary Sequences.” Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 13: 547569.Google Scholar
Cook, T. and Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Cover, T. and Thomas, J. (1991). Elements of Information Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Deutsch, D. and Hayden, P. (2000). “Information Flow in Entangled Quantum Systems.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 456: 17591774.Google Scholar
Dowe, P. (1992). “Wesley Salmon’s Process Theory of Causality and the Conserved Quantity Theory.” Philosophy of Science, 59: 195216.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (2001). “The Concept of Information and the Development of Modern Logic.” Pp. 423427 in Stelzner, W. (ed.), Non-classical Approaches in the Transition from Traditional to Modern Logic. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Duwell, A. (2008). “Quantum Information Does Exist.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39: 195216.Google Scholar
Ehring, D. (1986). “The Transference Theory of Causality.” Synthese, 67: 249258.Google Scholar
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N. (1935). “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?Physical Review, 47: 777780.Google Scholar
Fair, D. (1979). “Causation and the Flow of Energy.” Erkenntnis, 14: 219250.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. (1925). “Theory of Statistical Estimation.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 22: 700725.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (2011). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frisch, M. (2014). Causal Reasoning in Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. and Woodward, J. (1999). “Independence, Invariance, and the Causal Markov Condition.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50: 521583.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. and Woodward, J. (2004). “Modularity and the Causal Markov Condition: A Restatement.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55: 147161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiddleston, E. (2005). “Review of Making Things Happen. ” Philosophical Review, 114: 545547.Google Scholar
Hoel, E., Albantakis, L., and Tononi, G. (2013). “Quantifying Causal Emergence Shows that Macro Can Beat Micro.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110: 1979019795.Google Scholar
Holevo, A. (1973). “Information Theoretical Aspects of Quantum Measurement.” Problems of Information Transmission (USSR), 9: 177183.Google Scholar
Jozsa, R. (1998). “Quantum Information and Its Properties.” Pp. 4975 in Lo, H.-K., Popescu, S., and Spiller, T. (eds.), Introduction to Quantum Computation and Information. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Khinchin, A. (1957). Mathematical Foundations of Information Theory. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Kistler, M. (1998). “Reducing Causality to Transmission.” Erkenntnis, 48: 124.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. (1965). “Three Approaches to the Quantitative Definition of Information.” Problems of Information Transmission, 1: 47.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. (1968). “Logical Basis for Information Theory and Probability Theory.” Transactions on Information Theory, 14: 662664.Google Scholar
Landauer, R. (1991). “Information Is Physical.” Physics Today, 44: 2329.Google Scholar
Landauer, R. (1996). “The Physical Nature of Information.” Physics Letters A, 217: 188193.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O. (2004). “What Is Information?Foundations of Science, 9: 105134.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O. (2005). “Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information.” Synthese, 144: 2339.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Fortin, S., and López, C. (2016). “Deflating the Deflationary View of Information.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6: 209230.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Fortin, F., and Vanni, L. (2015). “A Pluralist View about Information.” Philosophy of Science, 82: 12481259.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Holik, F., and Vanni, L. (2016a). “What Is Quantum Information?Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 56: 1726.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Holik, F., and Vanni, L. (2016b). “What Is Shannon Information?Synthese, 193: 19832012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, D. (1956). “Towards an Information-Flow Model of Human Behaviour.” British Journal of Psychology, 47: 3043.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. (1969). Information, Mechanism and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzies, P. and Price, H. (1993). “Causation as a Secondary Quality.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44: 187203.Google Scholar
Nauta, D. (1972). The Meaning of Information. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, M. and Chuang, I. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1998). “Quantum Computation, Entanglement and State Reduction.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 356: 19271939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. (1991). “Agency and Probabilistic Causality.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 42: 157176.Google Scholar
Reza, F. (1961). Introduction to Information Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rovelli, C. (1996). “Relational Quantum Mechanics.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35: 16371678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1912). “On the Notion of Cause.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13: 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1948). Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Schumacher, B. (1995). “Quantum Coding.” Physical Review A, 51: 27382747.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. (1948). “The Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379423, 623656.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Solomonoff, R. (1964). “A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference.” Information and Control, 7: 122, 224254.Google Scholar
Stonier, T. (1990). Information and the Internal Structure of the Universe: An Exploration into Information Physics. New York-London: Springer.Google Scholar
Stonier, T. (1996). “Information as a Basic Property of the Universe.” Biosystems, 38: 135140.Google Scholar
Suárez, M. (2013). “Interventions and Causality in Quantum Mechanics.” Erkenntnis, 78: 199213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timpson, C. (2004). Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. PhD diss., University of Oxford (quant-ph/0412063).Google Scholar
Timpson, C. (2006). “The Grammar of Teleportation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57: 587621.Google Scholar
Timpson, C. (2013). Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Von Wright, G. (1971). Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2003). Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2007). “Causation with a Human Face.” Pp. 66105 in Price, H. and Corry, R. (eds.), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell’s Republic Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2013). “Causation and Manipulability.” Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/causation-mani/.Google Scholar
Zeilinger, A. (1999). “A Foundational Principle for Quantum Mechanics.” Foundations of Physics, 29: 631643.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×