Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: April 2015

7 - International human rights law

Summary

The epithet ‘subversive’ had such a vast and unpredictable reach, the struggle against the ‘subversive’ had turned into a demential generalized repression with the drift that characterizes the hunting of witches and the possessed.

(National Commission on the Disappeared, Argentina, 1984)

Defending human rights … is a prerequisite to every aspect of any effective counter-terrorism strategy. It is the bond that brings the different components together. That means the human rights of all – of the victims of terrorism, of those suspected of terrorism, of those affected by the consequences of terrorism.

(UN Secretary-General, Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy Launch 2006)

The starting point for an analysis of IHRL is the principle of universality: human rights stem from the intrinsic value or the inherent dignity of the human being, irrespective of nationality, status, or indeed alleged wrongdoing. In this vein, as the German Constitutional Court has noted, ‘dignity is not therefore at the disposal of the individual’, just as it is not at the disposal of the state. Rather, IHRL at its core seeks to ensure a basic standard of protection for all human beings at all times, in all places. It becomes more critical, not redundant, in the face of situations of crisis.

Much state practice post-9/11 has challenged this fundamental premise of the universality of human rights law, as will be seen in Part B below. An exceptionalist approach has emerged recurrently, questioning the ‘applicability’ of the human rights framework (whether it is applicable at all, rather than simply as to how it applies) to certain classes of individuals, offshore locations, in a ‘war’ on terror, or in security-challenged situations more broadly. Likewise, the pitting of ‘security’ against ‘human rights’, or resort to the war paradigm, has at times brought into question whether human rights are a luxury we can afford in the face of international terrorism, and questioned how apt or well equipped the human rights framework is to adjust and respond to security challenges.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Argentine National Commission on the Disappeared (CONADEP), Nunca Mas: The Report of the Argentine National Commission on the Disappeared (1984).
Eckert, J., ‘Legal Roots of Human Dignity in German Law’, in Kretzmer, D. and Klein, E. (eds.), The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse (Leiden, 2002), p. 148.
Roach (James Terry) and Jay Pinkerton v. United States, Case 9647, Res. 3/87, September 22, 1987
Certain Attributes of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Advisory Opinion OC-13/93, 16 July 1993
Simma, B. et al. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (Oxford, 2002), 2nd edn, pp. 92–3
Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law (Oxford, 2008), 7th edn, p. 532.
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. The Netherlands), ICJ Reports 1969, p. 43
Meron, T., Human Rights and Humanitarian Law as International Customary Norms (Oxford, 1991).
ICJ in Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), Merits, ICJ Reports 1986, p. 14.
Higgins, R., Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford, 1994), pp. 19–22.
Lillich, R. B., ‘Civil Rights’, in Meron, T. (ed.), Human Rights in International Law: Legal and Policy Issues (Oxford, 1984) p. 118
Fitzpatrick, J., Human Rights in Crisis: The International System for Protecting Rights During States of Emergency (Washington, 1994), p. 67
Piandong, Morallos and Bulan v. Philippines (Comm. No. 869/1999), decision of 19 October 2000
Denzil Roberts v. Barbados (Comm. No. 504/992), decision of 19 July 1994, HRC, UN Doc. CCPR/C/51/D/504/1992 at para. 6.3
Loayza Tamayo v. Peru, Judgment of 17 September 1997 at para. 80.
Increasing the Impact of Human Rights Litigation: Implementation of Judgments and Decisions’, INTERIGHTS Bulletin, 16(2) (2010), available at:
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, 9 July 2004
Omar Awadh Omar v. The Attorney General Republic of Kenya, App. No. 4 of 2011
Duffy, H., ‘Human Rights Cases in Sub-Regional African Courts: Towards Justice for Victims or Just More Fragmentation?’, in van den Herik, L. and Stahn, C. (eds.), The Diversification and Fragmentation of International Criminal Law (Leiden, 2012).
Leyla Şahin v. Turkey [GC], No. 44774/98 at para. 136, ECHR 2005.
Celiberti de Casariego v. Uruguay, Comm. No. 56/1979, Views of 29 July 1981
Montero v. Uruguay, Comm. No. 106/1981, HRC, Views of 31 March 1983
Loizidou v. Turkey (Merits), Appl. No. 15318/89, 18 December 1996, 23 (1996) EHRR 513.
Cyprus v. Turkey (Merits), Appl. No. 25781/94, Judgment, ECtHR, 10 May 2001
Banković and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States, Appl. No. 52207/99, ECtHR, Admissibility Decision, 19 December 2001
Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and the Russian Federation, Appl. No. 48797/99, ECtHR Judgment of 8 July 2004
Catan & Others v. Moldova and Russia, Appl. Nos. 4337/04, 8252/05, 8454/06, 19 October 2012
Al-Skeini v. The United Kingdom, Appl. No. 55721/07, ECHR Grand Chamber, Judgment, 7 July 2011.
Coard et al. v. The United States, IACHR, Case 10.951, Report No. 109/99, 29 September 1999, Annual Report of the IACHR (1999)
IACHR, Precautionary Measures in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, 13 March 2002.
Drodz and Janousek v. France and Spain, Appl. No. 12747/87, Judgment of 26 June 1992
United Kingdom, Appl. No. 6231/73, Commission Decision on Admissibility, 28 May 1975
Reinette v. France, Appl. No. 14009/88, European Commission of Human Rights, Commission Decision on Admissibility, 2 October 1989, 63 DR 189 (on French responsibility for detaining persons on St Vincent)
Radio Televizije Srbije by NATO forces on 26 April 1999.
Lawson, R. A., ‘Really Out of Sight? Issues of Jurisdiction and Control in Situations of Armed Conflict under the ECHR’, in Buyse, A. (ed.), Margins of Conflict: The ECHR and Transitions to and from Armed Conflict (Cambridge, 2011), pp. 57–76.
Andreou v. Turkey, Appl. No. 45653/99, ECtHR (2008)
Medvedyev and Others v. France, Appl. No. 3394/03, ECtHR, 29 March 2010
Issa and Others v. Turkey, Appl. No. 31821/96, ECtHR, Decision on Admissiability, 20 May 2000
Öcalan v. Turkey, Appl. No. 46221/99, ECtHR, Admissibility Decision of 14 December 2000
Jaloud v. Netherlands, Appl. No. 47708/08, 20 Nov. 2014
Hassan v. UK (2014)
R. (Abbasi and Another) v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, [2002] EWCA Civ. 1598 at para. 49
A & Others v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 3455/05, ECHR (Grand Chamber), Judgment, 19 February 2009
inter alia, Ahmed v. Austria, Appl. No. 25964/94, ECtHR, 17 December 1996, 24 (1997) EHRR 278
Tapia Paez v. Sweden (1997) at para. 14.5
M. B. B. v. Sweden, Comm. No. 154/1998, CAT, 5 May 1999 at para. 6.4. Saadi v. Italy, ECtHR, Appl. No. 37201/03, 2008.
Media Rights Agenda and Constitutional Rights Project v. Nigeria (Comm. Nos. 105/93, 128/94, 130/94, 152/96), AfCommHPR, 31 October 1998
Lawless v. Ireland, Appl. No. 332/57, Judgment of 1 July 1961
Ireland v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 5310/71, 18 January 1978
A and Others v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 3455/0, ECtHR Judgment, 19 February 2009
Nowak, M., UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary (Kehl am Rhein, 1993), p. 79.
Landinelli Silva et al. v. Uruguay, Comm. No. 34/1978, HRC, Views of 8 April 1981
Greek Case (Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Netherlands v. Greece), Appl. Nos. 3321/67, 3322/67, 3323/67, 3344/67, ECHR, 18 November 1969
Aksoy v. Turkey, Appl. No. 21987/93, ECtHR, Judgment, 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI at para. 68
The Civilian Jurisdiction: The Anti-Terrorist Legislation, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.106, Doc. 59 rev., 2 June 2000 at para. 70 ff.
Brannigan and McBride v. United Kingdom, Appl. Nos. 1453/89 and 1454/89, Judgment, 26 May 1993, ECtHR, Series A, No. 258-B at paras. 49–50.
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion 8 July 1996, ICJ Reports 1996, 226 at para. 25
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Rep. 2005 at para. 216
Bámaca-Velásquez v. Guatemala, Case No. 11/129 (Merits), IACtHR Series C, No. 70 (2000) at para. 207.
Duffy, H., ‘Harmony or Conflict? The Interplay between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law in the Fight Against Terrorism’, in van den Herik, L. and Schrijver, N. (eds.), Counterterrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges (Cambridge, 2013).
Pejic, J. and Droege, C., ‘The Legal Regime Governing Treatment and Procedural Guarantees for Persons Retained in the Fight Against Terrorism’, in van den Herik, L. and Schrijver, N. (eds.), Counterterrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges (Cambridge, 2013).
Doswald-Beck, L., ‘The Right to Life in Armed Conflict: Does International Humanitarian Law Provide All the Answers?’, 88(64) (2006) International Review of the Red Cross, pp. 881–904, 897.
Hampson, F., ‘The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law from the Perspective of a Human Rights Treaty Body’, 90(871) (2008) International Review of the Red Cross, pp. 549–72, pp. 560–1
Sassóli, M. and Olson, L. M., ‘The Relationship between International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law where it Matters: Admissible Killing and Internment of Fighters in Non-International Armed Conflicts’, 90 (2008) International Review of the Red Cross, pp. 599–627, p. 615
Lindroos, A., ‘Addressing Norm Conflicts in a Fragmented Legal System: The Doctrine of Lex Specialis’, 74 (2005) Nordic Journal of International Law27.
Precautionary Measures in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, IACommHR, 13 March 2002
Özkan v. Turkey, Appl. No. 21689/93, ECtHR, 6 April 2004) at para. 297
citing Ergi v. Turkey, Appl. No. 23818/94, ECtHR, 28 July 1998, 32 (2001) EHRR 388)
Isayeva and Others v. Russia, No. 1 and Isayeva v. Russia, Appl. No. 57950/00, 24 February 2005 at para. 191
Scheinin, M., ‘Terrorism’, in Moeckli, D., Shah, S. et al. (eds.), International Human Rights Law (Oxford, 2010), p. 583.
Prison Castro Castro versus Peru, Case No. 11.015, ACtHR, Judgment, Separate Opinion Trindade J, 2008 at para. 23.
Clapham, A., ‘Non-state Actors’, in Moeckli, D., Shah, S. et al. (eds.), International Human Rights Law (Oxford, 2010), p. 577
Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras, (Merits), 29 July 1988 IACtHR, Series C, No. 4 at para. 162, 29 July 1988
Osman v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 23452/94, 28 October 1998, ECtHR, Reports 1998-VIII
Abu Zubaydah v. Poland, Appl. No. 7511/13, Judgment, 24 July 2014)
Purohit and Moore v. The Gambia, Comm. 241/2001
Sabbah and Others v. Egypt, Afr. Comm. 334/06 (2012)).
González v. Mexico, 16 November 2009
Barrios Altos Case (Chumbipuma Aguiree et al. v. Peru), (Merits), 3 September 2001
Cepeda Vargas v. Colombia, Judgment, IACtHR., 26 May 2010 at para. 116
Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala, IACtHR, series C and Abu, No. 211, 24 November 2009 at paras. 130–131
Gomes-Lund et al. (Guerrilha do Araguaia) v. Brazil (Merits), Reparations and Costs, 24 November 2010
Musayeva et al. v. Russia (Merits), 26 July 2007, 47 EHRR 25
Aydin v. Turkey (Merits), Appl. No. 23178/94, ECtHR, 25 September 1997, 25 (1998) EHRR 251, 314
EIPR and INTERIGHTS (on behalf of Sabbeh and Others) v. Egypt, ACHPR, No. 334/06 (2012).
Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal), Judgment, ICJ Reports 20 July 2012, p. 422 available at:
Orentlicher, D., ‘Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime’, 100 (1991) Yale Law Journal2537
Barrios Altos Case (Chumbipuma Aguirre et al. v. Peru) (Merits), Judgment, 14 March 2001
cert. denied, 131 S.Ct. 2442 (May 16, 2011) (No. 10–778), available at:
any breach of an engagement involves an obligation to make reparation.’ Chorzów Factory (Germany. v. Poland), 1928 PCIJ (Series A) No. 17, at 29 (13 September) (emphasis added)
Mazzeschi, R., ‘Reparation Claims by Individuals for State Breaches of Humanitarian Law and Human Rights: An Overview’, 1 (2003) Journal of International Criminal Justice339
Bassiouni, M. C., ‘International Recognition of Victims’ Rights’, 6 (2006) Human Rights Law Review203
Henckaerts, J.-M. and Doswald-Beck, L., Customary International Humanitarian Law, Vol. I: Rules, ICRC(Geneva, 2005) Rule 150 at 537–550 (2005).
Prosecutor v. Lubanga, Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to be Applied to Reparations (Reparations), Case No. ICC-01/04–01/06, 7 August 2012, available at: .
e.g., Cordova v. Italy, Judgment, Appl. No. 40877/98, ECtHR, 30 April 2003 at para. 58.
Kaya v. Turkey, Appl. No. 22535/93, ECtHR, 28 March 2000)
E and Others v. UK, Appl. No. 33218/96, ECtHR, 26 November 2002 at para. 110
Keenan v. UK, Appl. No. 27229/95, 33 EHRR 3 April 2001, para. 130
Myrna Mack-Chang v. Guatemala, Merits, Reparations and Costs, 25 November 2003, Series C, No. 101 at para. 274.
El-Masri v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, [GC], No. 39630/09, 13 December 2012 at para. 191
Abu Zubaydah and al Nashiri v. Poland, public hearing 3 December 2013.
Salman v. Turkey [GC], Merits, 27 June 2000, 34 EHRR 17 111 at para. 100
Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], Nos. 16065–16073/90, 18 September 2009, § 184;
Magomed Musayev and Others v. Russia, No. 8979/02, 23 October 2008 at paras. 85–86.
McCann, Farrell and Savage v. United Kingdom, ECtHR, Appl. No. 18984/91, 27 September 1995, ECtHR, Series A, No. 324.
McKerr v. United Kingdom (Merits), Appl. No. 28883/95, Judgment, May 2001, ECtHR, Reports 2001-III.
Toteva v. Bulgaria, Appl. No. 42027/98, 19 May 2004 at para. 50
Öneryildiz v. Turkey, Judgment, Appl. No. 48939/99, ECtHR, 18 June 2002
Asencios Lindo et al. (Case 11.182), Report No. 49/00, Annual Report of the IACHR 1999 at para. 58
Kiliç v. Turkey, Appl. No. 22492/93, 28 March 2000, ECtHR, Reports 2000-III
Maskhadovy v. Russia, Appl. No. 18071/05, ECtHR 6 June 2013 at: .
Catan, & Others v. Moldova and Russia, 2012
Crawford, J., Third Report on State Responsibility (52nd session of the ILC (2000)), UN Doc. A/CN.4/507 and Add. 1–4, p. 44 at para. 92
Armando Alejandre, Jr. et al. (Case 11.589), IACmHR Report No. 86/99 (1999)
Guerrero v. Colombia, HRC Views on Communication 45/1979, 1982.
Finogenov & Others v. Russia (Appl. Nos. 18299/03 and 27311/03), 20 December 2011, ECtHR
Tagayeva & Others v. Russia, Appl. No. 26562/07, 4 October 2012.
Abella v. Argentina (Case 11.137), Report No. 5/97, Annual Report of the IACtHR 1997 at para. 161
Gross, E., ‘Thwarting Terrorist Attacks by Attacking the Perpetrators or Their Commanders as an Act of Self Defence: Human Rights Versus the State’s Duty to Protect its Citizens’, 15 (2001) Temple International and Comparative Law Journal195.
Isayeva v. Russia, Appl. Nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, 24 February 2005.
Kretzmer, D., ‘The Legal Regime Governing the Use of Lethal Force in the Fight against Terrorism’, in van den Herik, L. and Schrijver, N. (eds.), Counterterrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges (Oxford, 2013).
Report on Terrorism and Human Rights, 22 October 2002, OAS Doc. OEA/Ser.L/V/II.116, para. 87.
Ben-Naftali, O. and Michaeli, K. R., ‘“We Must Not Make a Scarecrow of the Law”: A Legal Analysis of the Israeli Policy of Targeted Killings’, 36 (2003) Cornell International Law Journal233
Ogur v. Turkey, Appl. No. 21594/93, 20 May 1999
Semsi Onen v. Turkey, Appl. No. 22876/93, Judgment, 15 May 2002, ECtHR at para. 87.
Sabbah and Others v. Egypt, 2012
Saadi v. Italy, Appl. No. 37201/06, ECHR, Judgment, 28 February 2008 at para. 127.
Prosecutor v. Delalić et al., Case IT-96–21-T, Judgment, 16 November 1998, at para. 517
jus cogens; Belgium v. Senegal, ICJ, 20 July 2012
Prosecutor v. Kunarać, Kovać and Vuković, Case No. IT-96–23-T, Judgment, 22 February 2001 at para. 466
R. v. Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate and Others ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 3), [2000] AC 147
Chahal v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 22414/93, Judgment, 15 November 1996, ECtHR, Reports 1996-V
Al-Skeini and Others v. Secretary of State for Defence for the United Kingdom, Appl. No. 55721/07, ECHR, 7 July 2011.
Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], Appl. No. 22978/05, 2010 ECHR 75
The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. The State of Israel et al., HCJ 5100/94, Israeli Supreme Court, 1999.
Loayza Tamayo v. Peru, Judgment, IACtHR, 17 September 1997.
Selmouni v. France, Appl. No. 25803/94, Judgment, ECtHR, 28 July 1999, Reports 1999-V.
Prosecutor v. Blaškic, Case No. IT 95–14-T, Judgment, (Trial Chamber), 3 March 2000 at paras. 154–155.
Opuz v. Turkey Appl. No. 33401/02, ECtHR, 2009 at para. 158.
Castillo Petruzzi and Others v. Peru (Merits), Judgment, 30 May 1999, IACtHR, Series C, No. 52
Ramishvili and Kokhreidze v. Georgia, Appl. No. 1704/06, 27 January 2009 at para. 83
Onoufriou v. Cyprus, Appl. No. 24407/04, 7 January 2010 at para. 71.
Yussef El-Megreisi v. Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, UN HRC (HRC) Comm. No. 440/1990; UN Doc. CCPR/C/50/D/440/1990, 23 March 1994 at para. 5.4
Ryabikin v. Russia, 19 June 2008, Appl. No. 8320/04 at para. 121
María del Carmen Almeida de Quinteros et al. v. Uruguay, HRC Comm. No. 107/1981, UN Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 138 (1990) at para. 14
Mojica v. Dominican Republic, HRC Comm. No. 449/1991, HRC 10 Auguest 1994, UN Doc. CCPR/C/51/D/449/1991 (1994) at para. 5.7
Vinter and Others v. UK [ac] Appl. No. 66069/09, ECtHR, Judgment, 9 July 2013
Einhorn v. France, Appl. No. 71555/01, Decision on admissibility, 16 October 2001, ECtHR, Reports 2001-X1.
Akkoc v. Turkey, Appl. Nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, Judgment, ECtHR, 10 October 2000, at para. 118
Carabulea v. Romania, Appl. No. 45661/99, ECtHR, 13 July 2010 at para. 112.
Othman (Abu Qatada) v. UK, Appl. No. 8139/09, ECtHR, Judgment, 17 January 2012
Yousri Ktiti v. Morocco, Comm. No. 419/2010, UNCAT, Views from 5 July 2011
El-Haski v. Belgium, Appl. No. 649/08, Judgment, 25 September 2012, 35 (2005) 41 EHRR 494.
Case of Babar Ahmed and Others v. The United Kingdom, Appl. Nos. 24027/07, 11949/08, 36742/08, 66911/09 and 67354/09, Judgment, 10 April 2012, ECtHR.
Rodley, N., ‘Detention as a Response to Terrorism’, in de Frías, A. Salinas, Samuel, K. and White, N. (eds.), Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice (Oxford, 2012), p. 472.
Saadi v. The United Kingdom [GC], Appl. No. 13229/03, ECHR 2008 at para. 74
A v. Australia, Comm. No. 560/1993 at para. 9.2, UN Doc. CCPR/C/59/D/560/1993 (1997)
Sarikaya v. Turkey, Appl. No. 36115/97, Judgment, ECtHR, 22 April 2004
Gaforov v. Russia, Appl. No. 25404/09, Judgment, ECtHR, 21 October 2010.
McVeigh, O’Neill and Evans v. United Kingdom, Appl. Nos. 8022/77, 8025/77, 8027/77, Report of the Commission, 18 March 1981, 25 DR 15
Murray v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 14310/88, Judgment, ECtHR, 28 October 1994
A & Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, X and Another v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56 (A & Others (Derogation))
Habeas Corpus in Emergency Situations, (Article 27(2) and 7(6) of the American Convention on Human Rights), Advisory Opinion OC-8/87 of 30 January 1987
Meron, T., ‘On a Hierarchy of International Human Rights’, 80 (1986) AJIL1
Incal v. Turkey, Appl. No. 22678/93, Judgment, ECtHR, 9 June 1998 (2000) 29 EHRR 449
Polay Campos v. Peru, Comm. No. 577/1994, HRC Views of 9 January 1998
Grieves v. The United Kingdom, Appl. No. 57067/00, Judgment, ECtHR, 16 December 2003
Sadak et al. v. Turkey, Appl. Nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, Judgment, ECtHR, 17 July 2001
Demirel v. Turkey, Appl. No. 39324/98, Judgment, ECtHR, 28 January 2003, at paras. 68–71
First Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Chile, OAS Doc. OEA/Ser.L/V/II.34, doc. 21 (1974)
Report on the Situation of Human Rights in the Republic of Colombia, OAS Doc. OEA/Ser.L/V/II.53, doc. 22 (1981)
Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Argentina, OAS Doc. OEA/Ser.L/V/II.49, doc. 19 (1980)
Lino César Oviedo v. Paraguay, Case No. 12.013, Report No. 88/99, 27 September 1999, at para. 30.
P.G. and J.H. v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 44787/98, Judgment ECtHR, 25 September 2001, Reports 2001-IX at para. 29
Lamanna v. Austria (Merits), Appl. No. 28923/95, Judgment ECtHR, 10 July 2001
B. and P. v. United Kingdom, Appl. Nos. 36337/97 and 35974/97, Judgment, ECtHR, 24 April 2001, Reports 2001-III
Fejde v. Sweden, Appl. No. 12631/87, Judgment, ECtHR, 29 October 1991
Kavanagh v. Ireland, Comm. No. 819/98, Views of 4 April 2001
Guardian News Media v. AB and CD, Cr. App. 12 June 2014
Bank Mallat v. Her Majesty’s Treasury (No. 2) [2013] UKSC 39
Allenet de Ribemont v. France, Appl. No. 15175/89, Judgment, ECtHR, 7 August 1996, Series A, No. 308.
Ashworth, A., ‘Four Threats to the Presumption of Innocence’, 10(4) (2006) The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 241–78.
Guariglia, F., ‘The Rules of Procedure and Evidence for the International Criminal Court: A New Development in International Adjudication of Individual Criminal Responsibility’, in Cassese, A., Gaeta, P. and Jones, J. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (Oxford, 2002), pp. 1111 ff. at pp. 1125–6.
Kress, C., ‘Witnesses in Proceedings Before the International Criminal Court’, in Fischer, H., Kress, C. and Lüder, S. R. (eds.), International and National Prosecution of Crimes under International Law (Berlin, 2001), pp. 375 ff.
Miguel González del Rio v. Peru, Comm. No. 263/1987, HRC, Decision of 28 October 1992, UN Doc. CCPR/C/46/263/1987.
McCallum v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 9511/81, Judgment, ECtHR, 30 August 1990, Series A, No. 183
Murray (John) v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 14310/88, Judgment, ECtHR, 28 October 1994, Series A, No. 300-A.
Austria v. Italy, Appl. No. 788/604, 11 January 1961, 4 Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights 116 at 140
C.R. v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 20190/92, Judgment ECtHR, 22 November 1995
Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany, Appl. Nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, Judgment, ECtHR, 22 March 2001, 33 EHRR 31 at para. 50.
Gómez Casafranca v. Peru, Comm. No. 981/2001, HRC, Views of 19 September 2003, UN Doc. CCPR/C/78/D/981/2001.
Welch v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 17440/90, Judgment, ECtHR, 9 February 1995
Kokkinakis v. Greece, Appl. No. 14307/88, Judgment, ECtHR, 25 May 1993, Series A, No. 260-A.
Saul, B., ‘Legislating from a Radical Hague: The United Nations Special Tribunal for Lebanon Invents an International Crime of Transnational Terrorism’, 24 (2011) Leiden Journal of International Law.
Sunday Times v. United Kingdom (No. 1), Appl. No. 6538/74, ECtHR, 29 March 1979, Series A, No. 30 at para. 65.
Lingens v. Austria, Appl. No. 9815/82, Judgment, ECtHR, 8 July 1986
Castells v. Spain, Appl. No. 11798/85, Judgment, ECtHR, 23 April 1992
Sener v. Turkey, Appl. No. 26680/95, Judgment, ECtHR, 18 July 2000
Keun-Tae Kim v. Korea Comm. No. 574/1994, HRC, Views of 4 January 1999
Halis Doğan v. Turkey (No. 2), Appl. No. 71984/01, ECtHR, 25 July 2006
Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, Appl. No. 40984/07, Judgment, 22 April 2010
Ozgur Gundem v. Turkey, Appl. No. 23144/93, Judgment, ECtHR, 16 March 2000
Sürek v. Turkey (No. 2), Appl. No. 24122/94, Judgment, ECtHR, 8 July 1999
Thorgeirson v. Iceland, Appl. No. 13778/88, Judgment, ECtHR, 25 June 1992, Series A, No. 239 at para. 63
Sürek and Özdemir v. Turkey, Appl. Nos. 23927/94 and 24277/94, Judgment, 8 July 1999
Erdogdu v. Turkey, Appl. No. 25723/94, Judgment, ECtHR, 15 June 2000
Ceylan v. Turkey, Appl. No. 23556/94, Judgment, ECtHR, 8 July 1999, Reports 1999-IV.
United Communist Party and Others v. Turkey, Appl. No. 19392/92, Judgment, ECtHR, 30 January 1998
Refah Partisi (Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey, Appl. Nos. 41340/98; 41342/98; 41343/98; 41344/98, Judgment, ECtHR, 13 February 2003, Reports 2003-II.
Cisse v. France, Appl. No. 51346/99, Judgment, ECtHR, 9 April 2002
X and Y v. The Netherlands, Appl. No. 8978/80, ECtHR, 26 March 1985
S. and Marper v. The United Kingdom [GC], Appl. Nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, 4 December 2008 at para. 66.
Rotaru v. Romania, Appl. No. 28341/95, 4 May 2000 at paras. 57–58.
Timishev v. Russia, Appl. Nos. 55762/00 and 55974/00, 13 December 2005, at paras. 54–57.
Klass and Others v. Germany, Appl. No. 15473/89, 22 September 1993 at para. 55
Stran Greek Refineries and Statis Andreadis v. Greece, Appl. No. 13427/87, Judgment, ECtHR, 9 December 1994, Series A, No. 301-B at para. 72
Phillips v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 41087/98, Judgment, ECtHR, 5 July 2001, Reports 2001-VII, at paras. 35 and 53.
Lieven, A., ‘The Roots of Terrorism, and a Strategy Against It’, 68 (2001) Prospect Magazine13.
Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, Appl. No. 2947/06, ECtHR, 2009 at para. 126.
Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 61498/08, Judgment, ECtHR, 30 June 2009
Wouters, C., ‘Reconciling National Security and Non-Refoulement: Exceptions, Exclusion and Diplomatic Assurances’, in de Frías, A. Salinas, Samuel, K., and White, N. (eds.), Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice (Oxford, 2012), Ch. 22, p. 580.
Chitat Ng v. Canada, 1994
Cox v. Canada, Comm. No. 539/1993, HRC, UN Doc. CCPR/C/5210/539/1993, 1994
G.T. v. Australia (1997).
IACHR Report on Terrorism and Human Rights (2004).
Dugard, J. and Van den Wyngaert, C., ‘Reconciling Extradition with Human Rights’, 92 (1988) AJIL2, 187–212, 200
Bader and Kanbor v. Sweden (2005), 46 EHRR 1497
ARJ v. Australia, Comm. No. 692/1996 (28 July 1997), CCPR/C/60/D/692/1996.
Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, at para. O-III14
Tomić v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 17837/03, Admissibility Decision, 14 October 2003
Al Nashiri v. Poland, Appl. No. 28761/11, Judgment, 21 July 2014 at paras. 565–569
Ahmad & Others v. United Kingdom, Appl. Nos. 24027/07, 11948/08, 36742/08, 66911/09 and 67312/09, Judgment, ECtHR, 12 April 2012 at paras. 51–52
El-Masri v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, [GC], Appl. No. 39630/09, 13 December 2012 at para. 239
Abu Zubaydah v. Poland at para. 525 and Al Nashiri v. Poland (2014) at para. 531
F. v. UK, Appl. No. 17341/03, decision on admissibility, 22 June 2004 at para. 2.
M.A.R. v. UK, Appl. No. 28038/95, decision of 16 January 1997.
Special Adjudicator ex parte Ullah, House of Lords, (2004) UKHL 26 at para. 43
Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, Appl. No. 50963/99, ECtHR, 20 June 2002
CG and Others v. Bulgaria, Appl. No. 1365/07 (2008) 47 EHRR 51
Maslov v. Austria, Appl. No. 1638/03, Judgment, ECtHR (Grand Chamber), 23 June 2008
Kaushal and Others v. Bulgaria, Appl. No 1537/08, Judgment, ECtHR, 2 September 2010
Aylor Davis v. France, Appl. No. 22742/93, ECHR, Admissibility Decision, 20 January 1994, DR 76-B, 164
X. v. Bundesamt für Polizeiwesen (1991), ATF 117 Ib 210
Annual Report of the IACHR 1985
Guzman, F. A., Terrorism and Human Rights No. 2 (Geneva, 2003), p. 246.
Cf. Duffy, A., ‘Expulsion to Face Torture? Non-Refoulement in International Law’, 20(3) (2008) International Journal of Refugee Law
Agiza v. Sweden, Comm. No. 233/2003, UN Doc. CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 (2005) at para. 13.8
Aemei v. Switzerland Comm. No. 34/1995, CAT, 29 May 1997 at para. 9.8
Arana v. France, Comm No. 63/1997, CAT, 2 June 2000, 11.5
N. v. Finland, Appl. No. 38885/02, ECtHR, 26 July 2005
Ahmed v. Austria, Appl. No. 25964/94, ECtHR, 17 December 1996
Seekers within the Canadian Refugee Determination System (2000, at para. 154)
E.A. v. Switzerland, Comm. No. 28/1995, (28/1995), Views of 10 November 1997, CAT/C/19/D/28/1995, at para. 11.5
S.C. v. Denmark Comm. No. 143/1999, CAT, Views of 10 May 2000
Zare v. Sweden Comm. No. 256/2004, Views of 17 May 2006, CAT/C/36/D/256/2004, at para. 9.3.
Kindler v. Canada, Comm. No. 470/1991, HRC, Views of 11 November 1993, UN Doc. CCPR/C/45/D/470/1991
Ng v. Canada, Comm. No. 469/1991, HRC, Views of 7 January 1994, UN Doc. CCPR/C/49/D/469/1991.
Ayas v. Sweden, Comm. No. 97/1997, Views of 12 November 1998, CAT, UN Doc. CAT/C/21/D/97/1997.
Ramzy v. The Netherlands, Appl. No. 25424/05, Judgment, ECtHR, 20 July 2010.
A. v. The Netherlands (1998).
A.S. v. Sweden (2000) at para. 8.6
HRC, Jonny Rubin Byahuranga v. Denmark (2004) at paras. 11.2–3
ECHR in the Cruz Varas case (1991).
Agiza v. Sweden, CAT/C/34/D/233/2003, 20 May, 2005 at para. 13.7, available at: .
Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, Appl. No. 2947/06, ECtHR, 2009 49 ECHRR 42
Mole, N., ‘Restricted Immigration Procedures in National Security Cases and the Rule of Law: An Uncomfortable Relationship’, in de Frías, A. Salinas, Samuel, K. and White, N. (eds.), Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice (Oxford, 2012), pp. 738–9.
Affaire Gebremedhin v. France, CAT, Appl. No. 25389/05, Judgment ECtHR, 26 April 2007 at para. 66
Report of the UNHCHR on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism, UN Doc. A/HRC/4/88, 9 March 2007
Agga v. Greece (No. 2), Appl. Nos. 50776/99, 52912/99, Judgment, ECtHR, 17 October 2002.
Cháre Shalom ve Tsedek v. France, Appl. No. 2741/95, Judgment, ECtHR, 27 June 2002.
Murillo v. Costa Rica, IACHR, 27 November 2012.
Rees v. The United Kingdom, Appl. No. 9532/81, Judgment, 17 October 1986
Goodwin v. The United Kingdom, Appl. No. 28957/95, Judgment, 11 July 2002.
Marckx v. Belgium, Appl. No. 6833/74, ECtHR, 1979
Al-Adsani v. The United Kingdom, Appl. No. 35763/97, Judgment, ECtHR, 21 November 2001.
The Washington Post, December 26, 2002, available at: .
Bennoune, K., ‘All Necessary Measures?: Reconciling International Legal Regimes Governing Peace and Security and the Protection of Persons in the Realm of Counter-Terrorism’, in van den Herik, L. and Schrijver, N. (eds.), Counterterrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order (Cambridge, 2013).
Szasz, Paul C., ‘The Security Council Starts Legislating’, 96 (2002) AJIL901, pp. 960–5
Talmon, S., ‘The Security Council as World Legislator’, 99 (2005) AJIL175
Happold, M., ‘Security Council Resolution 1373 and the Constitution of the United Nations’, 16 (2003) Leiden Journal of International Law593; see also SC Res 2178 (2014).
Schachter, O., ‘The Quasi-Judicial Role of the Security Council and the General Assembly’, 58 (1964), The American Journal of International Law4.
O’Donnell, T., ‘Naming and Shaming: The Sorry Tale of Security Council Resolution 1530’, 17 (2004) The European Journal of International Law5, 945–68.
Mégret, F. and Hoffman, F., ‘The United Nations as a Human Rights Violator? Some Reflections on the United Nations Changing Human Rights Responsibilities’, Human Rights Quarterly, 25(2) (May 2003), p. 317
Bianchi, A., ‘Security Council’s Anti-Terror Resolutions and their Implementation by Member States’, 4 (2006) Journal of International Criminal Justice5, p. 1062.
Akande, D., ‘The Security Council and Human Rights: What is the Role of Art. 103 of the Charter?’, EJILTalk, 30 March 2009
Paust, J., ‘The UN Is Bound by Human Rights: Understanding the Full Reach of Human Rights, Remedies and Non-Immunity. Responding to Tom Dannenbaum, Translating the Standard of Effective Control Into a System of Effective Accountability’, 51 (2010) Harvard International Law Journal301.
Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention Arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libya v. United States), Provisional Measures, Order of 14 April 1992, ICJ Reports 1992 [1998] ICJ Rep. 110
Nabil Sayadi and Patricia Vinck v. Belgium, Comm. No. 1472/06, HRC, UN Doc. CCPR/C/94/D/1472/2006, 29 December 2008
Nada v. Switzerland [GC], Appl. No. 10593/08, Judgment, ECtHR, 12 September 2012.
Milanović, M., Posting, 14 January 2008, Opinio Juris, available at: .
Abousfian Abdelrazik v. The Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Attorney General of Canada, 2009 FC 580, at para. 4
Al-Jedda v. Secretary of State for Defence, Judgment, 12 December 2007
Questions of the Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libya v. United States), Preliminary Objections, Judgment of 27 February 1998, [1998] ICJ Reports. 115
‘Leiden Policy Recommendations on Counter-terrorism and International Law’, in van den Herik, L. and Schrijver, N. (eds.), Counterterrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges (Cambridge, 2013)
European Commission and Others v. Yassin Abdullah Kadi Appeal, 18 July 2013
Milanović, M., ‘European Court Decides Nada v. Switzerland’, EJIL, 14 September 2012, available at:
Thienel, T., ‘Nada v. Switzerland: The ECHR Does Not Pull a Kadi (But Mandates It for Domestic Law)’, Weblog of the Netherlands School of Human Rights Research, 12 September 2012, available at: .
Chinoy, M., ‘Marines setting up detention center’, CNN.com, December 15, 2001, available at: .
Wolfowitz, P. and Pace, Gen, DoD News Briefing, December 18, 2001
Precautionary Measures in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, IACommHR, 13 March 2002
Hassan v. UK, Appl. No. 29750/09, 19 September 2014
Al-Skeini v. Secretary of State for Defence, [2007] UKHL 26, 13 June 2007.
Alston, P., Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, Study on Targeted Killings, Human Rights Council, UN Doc. A/HRC/14/24/Add.6, 28 May 2010, available at: (hereinafter, ‘Study on Targeted Killings’).
Tondini, M., ‘Beyond the Law of the Enemy: Recovering from the Failures of the Global War on Terrorism through (Criminal) Law’, in 3(5) (2003) Processi Storici e Politiche di Pace/Historical Processes and Peace Politics59–81
Böhm, M. L., Rubila, R. González-Fuentes and Sandino, D. F. T.Terrorism and Anti-Terrorism in South America with a Special Consideration of Argentina, Chile and Colombia’, 4(1) (2012) Sistema Penal y Violência46–74.
Schmitt, M. N., ‘State Sponsored Assassination in International and Domestic Law’, 17 (1992) Yale Journal of International Law609.
Doswald-Beck, L., ‘The Right to Life in Armed Conflict: Does International Humanitarian Law Provide All the Answers?’, 88(64) (2006) International Review of the Red Cross881–904 at 897.
Presidency of the Council of Ministers v. Markovic and Others, Application for preliminary order on jurisdiction, No. 8157; ILDC 293 (IT 2002)
Obama, , ‘Remarks by the President on National Security’, The White House Office of the Press Secretary, May 21, 2009, available at:
Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94–1-A, Judgment (Trial Chamber), 7 May 1997, 35 ILM (1996) 32
Garraway, and Dinstein, , ‘The Manual on the Law of Non-International Armed Conflict: With Commentary’, 36 (2006) International Institute of Humanitarian Law, p. 71.
Pejic, J., ‘Conflict Classification and the Law Applicable to Detention and the Use of Force’, ICRC, in Wilmshurst, E. (ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts (Oxford, 2012). While IHL considers no explicit detention power in non-international armed conflicts, this is often considered implicit, on the basis that if it is lawful to kill it must logically be lawful to detain instead.
Pejic, , ‘Procedural Principles and Safeguards for Internment/Administrative Detention in Armed Conflict and Other Situations of Violence’, 87(858) (2005) International Review of the Red Cross375.
Al-Maqaleh et al. v. Gates et al., US Court of Appeals for District of Columbia, Case No. 09–5265 decided May 21, 2010.
Goodman, , ‘Rationales for Detention: Security Threats and Intelligence Value’, 85 (2009) International Law Studies.
A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors and Lawyers (2003)
Brogan v. United Kingdom (1988)
Pejic, J., ‘The European Court of Human Rights’ Al-Jedda Judgment: The Oversight of International Humanitarian Law’, 93(883) (2011) International Review of the Red Cross837.
Kretzmer, , ‘Rethinking the Application of International Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts’, 42 (2009) Israel Law Review1.
‘CIA Missile Kills al-Qaida Suspects’, Guardian, 5 November 2002, available at: .
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ), an independent journalist organisation, reports that drone strikes killed 2,525–3,613 people in Pakistan from June 2004 through mid October 2012, at: .
Harris, P., ‘ACLU takes CIA to Court as Agency Denies Existence of Drone Programme’, Guardian, 19 September 2012, available at: (hereinafter, ‘ACLU Takes CIA to Court’).
Canestaro, N., ‘American Law and Policy on Assassinations of Foreign Leaders: The Practicality of Maintaining the Status Quo’, 26 (2003) Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 1, p. 24.
Panetta, Leon admitted to using drones in October 2011, he referred to them as ‘the only game in town’. ‘Panetta Admits to Employing Drones in Pakistan’, The Tribune, October 8, 2011, available at: .
Gross, E., ‘Thwarting Terrorist Attacks by Attacking the Perpetrators or Their Commanders as an Act of Self-Defence: Human Rights Versus the State’s Duty to Protect its Citizens’, 15 (2001) Temple International and Comparative Law Journal195.
Bowcott, O., ‘Drone Strikes Threaten 50 Years of International Law, Says UN Rapporteur’, Guardian, 21 June 2012, available at:
Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Government of Israel (Supreme Court of Israel, HCJ 769/02, December 2006)
Milanović, M., ‘Lessons for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law in the War on Terror: Comparing Hamdan and the Israeli Targeted Killings Case’, 89(866) (2007) International Review of the Red Cross373 at 383.
Al-Aulaqi v. Obama, 727 F.Supp. 2d 1 (DDC 2010) (No. 10 Civ. 1469)
Norberg, N., ‘Terrorism and International Criminal Justice: Dim Prospects for a Future Together’, 8(11) (2010) Santa Clara Journal of International Law35.
Brannigan and McBride v. United Kingdom Appl. Nos. 1453/89 and 1454/89, Judgment, ECtHR 26 May 1993, Series A, No. 258 at paras. 43–47
Ireland v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 5310/71, Judgment, ECtHR, 18 January 1978
Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (2010)
Campbell, C., ‘Beyond Radicalization: Towards an Integrated Anti-Violence Rule of Law Strategy’, in de Frías, A. Salinas, Samuel, K. and White, N. (eds.), Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice (Oxford, 2012).
Maskhadovy v. Russian Federation, Appl. No. 1807/05, ECtHR 6 June 2013
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 415 F.3d 33 (2005)
van Zyl Smit, D. and Ashworth, A., ‘Disproportionate Sentences as Human Rights Violations’, 67(4) (2006) Modern Law Review pp. 541–60.
Prosecutor v. Todorović, ICTY ‘Trial Chamber I’, 31 July 2001, 29.
Prosecutor v. Plavšić Case Nos. IT-w-39 and 401, ICTY Trial Chamber III, 27 February 2003, 23
Prosecutor v. Furundzija Case No. IT-95–17/1-T, Judgment, Trial Chamber, ICTY, 10 December 1998, 290
Prosecutor v. Deronjić, Case No. IT-02–61, Trial Chamber II, 30 March 2004 at para. 154
Prosecutor v. Goran Jelisić (Appeal Judgment), Case No. IT-95-10-A, ICTY, 5 July 2001 at para. 96.
EIPR and INTERIGHTS (on behalf of Sabah and others) v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Comm. No. 334/06, 13 February 2012, before the ACHPR, available at: .
Francisco Juan Larranaga v. The Philippines Comm. No. 1421/2005, HRC, 24 July 2006
Carter, P., ‘The Road to Abu Ghraib’, 35 (2004) Washington Monthly20, 29
Smith, J. W., III, ‘A Few Good Scapegoats: The Abu Ghraib Courts-Martial and the Failure of the Military Justice System’, 27 (2006) Whittier Law Review671, 677, 693.
Ganesalingam, V. S., ‘Case Study of Custodial Torture Survivors’, in Beyond the Wall: Home for Human Rights Quarterly Journal on Human Rights News and Views, Colombo, Sri Lanka, January–March 2005, p. 21.
Gage, Hon. W., The Report of the Baha Mousa Inquiry, vols. I–III. (London, 2012), available at: .
‘Guantánamo Record Contradicts Claims that Prisoner Abuse Was Isolated’, Guardian, 19 May 2004
Isikoff, M., ‘“We Could Have Done This the Right Way”: How Ali Soufan, an FBI agent, got Abu Zubaydah to talk without torture’, Newsweek, April 24, 2009, available at: (hereinafter, ‘Ali Soufan Statements’).
Paust, J., ‘Above the Law: Unlawful Executive Authorizations Regarding Detainee Treatment, Secret Renditions, Domestic Spying, and Claims of Unchecked Executive Power’, (2007) Utah Law Review345 (hereinafter, ‘Above the Law’).
Doyle, L., former advisor on terrorism to the US Departments of Homeland Security, Special Operations and Intelligence, ‘Waterboarding is Torture – I did it Myself, says US Advisor’, Independent, 1 November 2007, available at: .
Woodward, B., ‘Guantánamo Detainee Was Tortured Says Official Overseeing Military Trials’, The Washington Post, January 14, 2009, available at: .
Lewis, N. et al., ‘A Guide to the Memos on Torture’, The New York Times (2002), available at:
Sands, Phillipe, Torture Team: Deception, Cruelty and the Compromise of Law (London, 2008).
Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc., 586 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2008).
Sullivan, K., ‘Role of British Intelligence in Alleged Torture To Be Examined’, The Washington Post Foreign Service, March 27, 2009, available at:
Bush, G. W., Decision Points (New York, 2010)
Rodriguez, J., Hard Measures: How Aggressive CIA Actions After 9/11 Saved American Lives (New York, 2012), p. 64.
Yoo, J., War by Other Means: An Insider’s Account of the War on Terror (New York, 2006), p. ix.
Savage, C., ‘Senate Declines to Clarify Rights of American Qaeda Suspects Arrested in US’, The New York Times, December 1, 2011.
‘Goss Says CIA “Does Not Do Torture,” but Reiterates Need for Interrogation Flexibility’, Frontrunner, November 21, 2005
‘Director for Torture’, The Washington Post, November 23, 2005.
‘Executive Order 13491 – Ensuring Lawful Interrogations’, The White House, January 22, 2009, available at:
McCoy, A., ‘Impunity at Home, Rendition Abroad’, Huffington Post, August 14, 2012, available at:
Cobain, I., ‘British Personnel Reveal Horrors of Secret US Base in Baghdad’, Guardian, 1 April 2013, accessed at .
The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. The State of Israel et al., Judgment of 6 September 1999
Maritza Uruttia v. Guatemala, 27 November 2003
Luban, D., ‘Liberalism, Torture, and the Ticking Bomb’, 91 (2005) Virginia Law Review1425
Dershowitz, A., ‘Tortured Reasoning’, in Levinson, S., Torture: A Collection (Oxford, 2006), p. 257.
Joseph, S., ‘The Killing of Osama Bin Laden: His Right to Life and the New Torture Debate’, Castan Centre, 5 May 2011, available at:
Fallon, M., ‘Interrogators Speak Out: Torture is Illegal, Immoral and Ineffective,’ Human Rights First, 30 April 2012, available at:
‘Interrogators: Torture Undermines US Intelligence’, Human Rights First, 26 April 2012, available at:
Costanzo, M. A. and Gerrity, E., ‘The Effects and Effectiveness of Using Torture as an Interrogation Device: Using Research to Inform the Policy Debate’, 3(1) (2009) Social Issues & Policy Review179, available at: .
El-Haski v. Belgium, Appl. No. 649/08, Judgment, 25 September 2012, 35 (2005) 41 EHRR 494.
Murphy, S., ‘Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law’, 94 (2000) American Journal of International Law, pp. 348–81
Murphy, S., ‘US Abuse of Iraqi Detainees at Abu Ghraib Prison’, 98 (2004) American Journal of International Law, pp. 591–6
Bingham, J., ‘Baha Mousa Inquiry: Innocent Father Died Due to Army’s Failings’, Telegraph, 8 September 2011, available at: .
Savage, C., ‘Court Dismisses a Case Asserting Torture by CIA’, The New York Times, September 8, 2010, available at: .
McCoy, A., ‘Impunity at Home, Rendition Abroad’, Huffington Post, August 14, 2012, available at:
Brody, R., ‘What about the Other Secret US Prisons?’, International Herald Tribune, May 4, 2004.
Human Rights First, In Liberty’s Shadow – US Detention of Asylum Seekers in the Era of Homeland Security (New York, 2004), in particular pp. 7–16.
Sarma v. Sri Lanka, Comm. No. 950/2000, Views of 31 July 2003, UN Doc. CCPR/C/78/D/950/2000.
Landa, C., ‘Executive Power and the Use of the State of Emergency’, in de Frías, A. Salinas, Samuel, K. and White, N. (eds.), Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice (Oxford, 2012)
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) v. JJ and Others (FC) (Respondents), House of Lords, [2007] UKHL 45, decided 31 October 2007
Steel and Others v. UK (1998) and Schwabe and MG v. Germany (2011)
Gillan and Quinton v. UK (2010), concerning stop and search powers, the Court considered it unnecessary to determine the issue as it found a violation of private life under, Article 8.
Saul, B., ‘Criminality and Terrorism’, in de Frías, A. Salinas, Samuel, K. and White, N. (eds.), Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice (Oxford, 2012), p. 167.
Metcalfe, E., ‘Secret Evidence’, Justice (2009)
Special Advocates: The Face of Secret Justice, FBIJ, 1 November 2012.
Abousfian Abdelrazik v. The Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Attorney General of Canada, 2009 FC 580, at para. 53
Rosas, A., ‘Counter-Terrorism and the Rule of Law: Issues of Judicial Control’, in de Frías, A. Salinas, Samuel, K. and White, N. (eds.), Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice (Oxford, 2012)
Yassin Abdullah Khadi v. Council and Commission, [2005] ECR II-3649
Kadi v. Commission [2010] ECR II-5177
European Commission and Others v. Yassin Abdullah Kadi, Appeal 18 July 2013 (Kadi II Appeal)
Cortright, D. and de Wet, E., Human Rights Standards for Targeted Sanctions, Report by the Sanctions and Security Research Program, Policy Brief SSRP 1001–01 (2010), p. 10.
European UnionReturns’ Directive, ‘Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals’, 328 Official Journal of the European Union98, 24 December 2008
Frosch, D., ‘Friends of US, Terrorists in Eyes of Law’, The New York Times, 19 September 2011.
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) v. Al-Jedda (Respondent) [2013] UKSC 62. On appeal from [2012] EWCA Civ. 358, 9 October 2013
Kapferer, S., “Ends and Means in Politics”: International Law on Framework for Political Decision-making’, 15 (2000) Revue quēbēquoise de droit international101 124–5.
Daoudi v. France, 3 December 2009
Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, Appl. No. 2947/06 at paras. 96–100. 24 April 2008
Agiza v. Sweden, Comm. No. 233/2003, UN Doc. CAT/C/34/D/233/2003, Decision of 20 May 2005
Pelit v. Azerbaijan, Comm. No. 281/2005, Decision of 29 May 2007
Brada v. France, Comm. No. 195/2002, UNCAT UN Doc. CAT/C/34/D/195/2002, 24 May 2005
Alzery v. Sweden, Comm. No. 1416/2005, UNCAT Views of 10 November 2006
Jordan; ‘Withdraw From Human Rights Law to Deport Qatada, say Tory MPs’, Telegraph, 22 February 2012, available at:
Somaiya, R., ‘Drone Strike Prompts Suit, Raising Fears for US Allies’, The New York Times, January 30, 2013)
Joint report of Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the International Commission of Jurists, 2 December 2005, vol. 1, pp. 179–223; Human Rights Watch, ‘Not the Way Forward: The UK’s Dangerous Reliance on Diplomatic Assurances’, October 2008, available at:
‘Letter from Lord Lester’, Guardian, 20 February 2009, available at: .
Mahjoub v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 2006 FC 1503
Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) [2002] 1 SCR 3, The Supreme Court of Canada.
Special Adjudicator ex parte Ullah, House of Lords, (2004) UKHL 26
CAT, Decision: Brada v. France, CAT/C/34/D/195/2002, 24 May 2005, available at:
Falakaoglu and Saygili v. Turkey (2006)
Gözel and Özur v. Turkey (2010)
Belek & Özkurt v. Turkey, Appl. No. 1544/0, ECtHR, 13 July 2013.
Leroy v. France (2008)
Balikowa, D. O., ‘The Anti-Terrorism Act 2002: The Media and Free Speech’, 8.1 (2003) The Defender, 6.
Bunglawala, I., ‘Don’t Even Think About It’, Guardian, 6 December 2007, available at:
Dent, S., ‘Don’t Ban the Lyricist’, The Times, 6 December 2007
Gillan and Quinton v. UK, 4158/05 [2010] ECHR 28, 12 January 2010.
Moeckli, D., ‘Anti-Terrorism Laws, Terrorist Profiling, and the Right to Non-Discrimination’, in de Frías, A. Salinas, Samuel, K. and White, N. (eds.), Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice (Oxford, 2012)
Ellmann, S., ‘Racial Profiling and Terrorism’, 46 (2002–3) New York Law School Law Review675
‘Only Non-US Persons Outside the US Are Targeted’, Huffington Post, June 6, 2013.
‘As US Cities Step Up Surveillance, Privacy Fears Increase’, The New York Times, October 13, 2013.
‘US Confirms That it Gathers Online Data Overseas’, The New York Times, June 6, 2013
‘Ex-Worker at CIA Says he Leaked Data on Surveillance’, The New York Times, June 9, 2013
‘Revelations on the French Big Brother’, Le Monde, 4 July 2013
‘GCHQ Taps Fibre-Optic Cables for Secret Access to World’s Communications’, Guardian, 21 June 2013
German Parliament. ‘Germany: Parliamentary Committee Criticises EU Data Retention Directive’, ICJ E-Bulletin on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights, May 2011
ICJ Bulletin on Terrorism and Human Rights, August 2013.
Margulies, J., ‘Abu Zubaydah, the man justice has forgotten’, Los Angeles Times May 16, 2012, available at:
Brody, R., ‘The Road to Abu Ghraib’, in Torture (New York, 2005), p. 150.
‘Abu Ghraib Soldier Sentenced to Three years in Jail’, Guardian, 28 September 2005, available at:
‘What Happens in War Happens’, Guardian, 3 January 2009, available at:
Jordan, Steven L.. Flaherty, C., ‘Abu Ghraib Officer Acquitted of not Controlling Soldiers’, JURIST, August 28, 2011, available at:
‘Ringleader of US Army “Kill Team” Sentenced to Life for Murder of Afghans’, Telegraph, 11 November 2011, available at:
‘Military Prosecution Faces Major Hurdles in Massacre Case’, CNN News, March 23, 2012
‘US Troops Escape Criminal Charges for Incidents that Outraged Afghanistan’, Guardian, 28 August 2012, available at:
‘US Army Inquiry Implicates 28 Soldiers in Deaths of 2 Afghan Detainees’, The New York Times, October 15, 2004
Johnston, D. and Savage, C., ‘Obama Reluctant to Look Into Bush Programs’, The New York Times, January 11, 2009, available at: .
Strohm, C., ‘Holder: Justice to Drop Investigations Into CIA Officials Involved in Torture’, National Journal, June 30, 2011, available at: .
Gerstein, J., ‘Detainee Deaths Prosecutor Backs Secrecy of CIA Files’, POLITICO, July 3, 2012, available at: .
‘US Justice Department Rules Out Prosecutions over CIA Prison Deaths’, Guardian, 31 August 2012, available at:
Greenwald, G., ‘Obama’s Justice Department Grants Final Immunity to Bush’s CIA Torturers’, Guardian, 31 August 2012, available at: . The ACLU stated it was ‘nothing short of a scandal’. ‘US Justice Department Rules Out Prosecutions Over CIA Prison Deaths’, Guardian, 31 August 2012, available at: .
‘UK Investigations into Torture and Rendition – A Guide’ (hereinafter, ‘UK investigations guide’), Guardian, 13 February 2012, available at:
‘Royal Military Police Removed from Iraq Prisoner Abuse Inquiry’, Guardian, 26 March 2012, available at: .
‘Afghanistan: List of Investigations and Prosecutions of British Troops’, Guardian, 29 March 2012, available at:
Woolf, Marie, ‘Legality of Iraq Occupation “Flawed”’, Independent, 5 May 2004
Greenwald, G., ‘Obama’s Justice Department Grants Final Immunity to Bush’s CIA Torturers’, Guardian, 31 August 2012, available at: .
OSCE Handbook on Terrorism (1999) p. 27
Karvelas, P., ‘Mamdouh Habib to Drop Case against Canberra’, Telegraph, 8 January 2011, available at:
Wintour, P., ‘Guantánamo Bay Detainees to be Paid Compensation by UK Government’, Guardian, 16 November 2012, available at:
El-Masri v. Tenet 437 F.Supp. 2d 530, 532–4 (Eastern District of Virginia, 2006)
In re Iraq & Afghanistan Detainees Litigation, 479 F.Supp. 2d 85, 91 (DDC 2007)
Ali v. Rumsfeld, No. 07–5178 (DC Cir. 21 June 2011)
Wilson, E., ‘“Damages or Nothing”: The Post-Boumediene Constitution and Compensation for Human Rights Violations After 9/11’, 41 (2011) Seton Hall Law Review4, 1491–1517
Kant, E., Fondements de la métaphysique des moeurs (1785) (Paris, 1999)
Is Torture Ever Justified?’, The Economist, 366, 11–17 January 2003.