Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T23:43:47.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Case study – Guantanamo Bay detentions under international human rights and humanitarian law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Helen Duffy
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Get access

Summary

Following the commencement of the military campaign in Afghanistan on 7 October 2001, the United States, assisted by its allies, began detaining persons in Afghanistan and elsewhere ‘for reasons related to the conflict’. Since early January 2002, hundreds of people, including nationals of some forty states, have been transferred to and held in detention facilities on the United States Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (‘Guantanamo Bay’).

The location of the detention centre on Guantanamo Bay, which the United States authorities claim is beyond US sovereign territory, is an apparent attempt to circumvent the application of human rights protections in the United States constitution and access to United States courts. The detainees are referred to as ‘enemy combatants’, which is then relied upon in turn to justify the non-application of the protections of international humanitarian law. They have been held in what has correspondingly been described as a ‘legal black hole’ or ‘legal limbo’.

This chapter will analyse the application of the framework of international human rights and humanitarian law, set out at Chapters 6 and 7, to the Guantanamo detainees. The ‘plight’ of the Guantanamo detainees raises multiple human rights concerns, but this chapter focuses specifically on the procedural rights of the Guantanamo detainees. In particular, it addresses the right to have the basis of their detention, and status as detainees, determined, if appropriate, by a competent tribunal; to be informed of the reasons for detention; to judicial review of detention; and, so far as the reason for their detention relates to their possible implication in criminal offences, to basic due process guarantees, including access to legal counsel and the right of appeal.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×