Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T20:50:46.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Evaluating pension reforms in the German context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Hans Fehr
Affiliation:
University of Würzburg, Germany
Christian Habermann
Affiliation:
University of Würzburg, Germany
Juha M. Alho
Affiliation:
University of Joensuu, Finland
Svend E. Hougaard Jensen
Affiliation:
Odense Universitet, Denmark
Jukka Lassila
Affiliation:
Research Institute of the Finnish Economy
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Compared to other industrialized countries, the German old-age insurance system has some special characteristics. First, the public system is very generous, offering high replacement rates at fairly low effective retirement ages. Second, since benefits are strictly linked to former contributions the system is intragenerationally fair. Finally, the system is highly centralized since the unfunded public pension system (Gesetzliche Rentenversicherung (GRV)) covers about 85 per cent of the workforce and income from funded components only amounts to about 15 per cent of current retirement income in Germany. Given these facts, it is not surprising that the German public pension system is quite expensive compared to those of other countries. Total outlays amount to about 12 per cent of GDP and the contribution rate is currently fixed at 19.5 per cent although direct government transfers already cover about a quarter of total expenditures.

In the seventies and eighties the system was almost universally accepted. However, during the last decade it came under heavy pressure in political and economic debate. One reason was the weak performance of the German economy from the mid-nineties. Rising unemployment rates and early retirement schemes decreased the contribution base and increased expenditure at the same time. The second reason was the medium-term demographic development. Due to extremely low fertility rates, Germany is ageing very fast such that the dependency ratio will almost double within thirty years.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alho, J., Jensen, S. E. H., Lassila, J. and Valkonen, T. (2005). ‘Controlling the Effects of Demographic Risks: the Role of Pension Indexation Schemes’. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 4: 139–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alho, J. and Spencer, B. D. (1997). ‘The Practical Specification of the Expected Error of Population Forecasts’. Journal of Official Statistics, 13: 201–25.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. J. and Kotlikoff, L. J. (1987). Dynamic Fiscal Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bomsdorf, E. (2003). Sterbewahrscheinlichkeiten der Periodensterbetafeln für die Jahre 2000 bis 2100. Cologne: Eul Verlag.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A. and Wilke, C. B. (2006). ‘The German Public Pension System – How It Will Become an NDC System Look-Alike’, in Pension Reform, ed. Holzmann, R. and Palmer, E.. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 573–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundesministerium für Gesundheit und Soziale Sicherung (BMGS) (2003). ‘Nachhaltigkeit bei der Finanzierung der sozialen Sicherungssysteme’, Report of the Commission, Berlin.
Federal Statistical Office of Germany (2003). ‘Population of Germany Today and Tomorrow’, Wiesbaden.
Fehr, H. (1999). Welfare Effects of Dynamic Tax Reforms. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.Google Scholar
Fehr, H. (2000). ‘Pension Reform during the Demographic Transition’. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102: 419–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, H. and Habermann, C. (2006). ‘Pension Reform and Demographic Uncertainty: The Case of Germany’. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 5: 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, H. and Halder, G. (2006). ‘Reforming Long-term Care in Germany’. Applied Economics Quarterly, 52: 75–98.Google Scholar
Fehr, H., Jokisch, S. and Kotlikoff, L. J. (2005). ‘The Developed World's Demographic Transition – the Roles of Capital Flows, Immigration, and Policy’, in Social Security Reform, ed. Brooks, R. and Razin, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–43.Google Scholar
Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft (2005). ‘Deutschland in Zahlen’, Cologne.
Knell, M. (2005). ‘High Age – No Kids, Demographic Adjustment Factors for Sustainable PAYG Systems’, Austrian National Bank, Vienna.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×