Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: September 2011

Chapter 11 - Ultrasonography of uterine fibroids

from Section 2: - Ultrasonography in infertility


A careful vaginal examination allows detection of pathology of the pouch of Douglas, such as nodules of the rectovaginal septum or fixed retroverted uterus. The five steps in the fertiloscopy procedure are: hydropelviscopy, dye test, salpingoscopy, microsalpingoscopy, and hysteroscopy. Hydropelviscopy is performed by first inserting a Verres needle into the pouch of Douglas. This needle is inserted 1 cm below the cervix, and then saline solution is instilled through a perfusion line using no other pressure than gravity. Introduction of a Verres needle and then of the fertiloscope in the pouch of Douglas sometimes raises fear of rectal injury. The fundamental question was to know at an early stage whether fertiloscopy was as accurate as laparoscopy, which was considered at that time the "gold standard" in infertility investigation. The only real complication is represented by rectal injury. However, such injury may be always treated conservatively with antibiotics without surgical intervention.


1. Practice Committee of the ASRM. Myomas and reproductive function. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: S111–16.
2. MarshallLM, SpiegelmanD, BarbieriRL, et al. Variation in the incidence of uterine leiomyoma among premenopausal women by age and race. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 967–73.
3. WamstekerK, de BlokS.Resection of intrauterine fibroids In: LewisBV, MagosAL, eds. Endometrial Ablation. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone, 1993.
4. CohenL, ValleR. Role of vaginal sonography and hysterosonography in the endoscopic treatment of uterine myomas. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 197–204.
5. ReddyN, JainKA, GerscovichEO. A degenerating cystic uterine fibroid mimicking an endometrioma on sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22(9), 973–6.
6. FerenczyA. Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update 1998: 4(4): 312–22.
7. SylvestreC, ChildTJ, TulandiT, TanSL. A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of two- and three-dimensional sonohysterography in women with intrauterine lesions. Fertil Steril 2003; 79(5): 1222–5.
8. BhattS. Doppler imaging of the uterus and adnexae. Ultrasound Clin 2006; 1(1): 201–21.
9. ExacoustosC, RosatiP. Ultrasound diagnosis of uterine myomas and complications in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 97–101
10. KatzVL, DottersDJ, DroegemuellerW. Complications of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 593–6.
11. BensonCB, ChowJS, Chang-LeeW, HillJA, DoubiletPM. Outcome of pregnancies in women with uterine leiomyomas identified by sonography in the first trimester. J Clin Ultrasound 2001; 29: 261–4.
12. QidwaiIG, CaugheyAB, JacobyAF.Obstetric outcomes in women with sonographically identified uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 376–82.
13. FarhiJ, AshkenaziJ, FeldbergD, DickerD, OrvietoR, Ben RafaelZ. The effects of uterine leiomyomata on in-vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 2576–8.
14. PrittsEA.Fibroids and infertility: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2001; 56: 483–91.
15. KlatskyP, TranD, CaugheyA, FujimotoV.Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008: 198(4): 357–66.
16. ShokeirTA.Hysteroscopic management in submucous fibroids to improve fertility. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 273(1) 50–4.
17. NarayanR, Rajat, Goswamy K. Treatment of submucous fibroids, and outcome of assisted conception. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994; 1: 307–11.
18. StovallDW, ParrishSB, Van VoorhisBJ, HahnSJ, SparksAET, SyropCH. Uterine leiomyomas reduce the efficacy of reproduction cycles. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 192–7.
19. HartR, KhalafY, YeongCT, SeedP, TaylorA, BraudeP. A prospective controlled study of the effect of intramural uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted conception. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2411–17.
20. CheckJH, ChoeJK, LeeG, DietterichC. The effect on IVF outcome of small intramural fibroids not compressing the uterine cavity as determined by a prospective matched control study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1244–8.
21. Elder-GevaT, MeagherS, HealyDL, MaclachlanV, BrehenyS, WoodC. Effect of intramural, subserosal, and submucosal uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology treatmentFertil Steril 1998; 70: 687–91.
22. RinehartJ. Myomas and infertility: small intramural myomas do not reduce pregnancy rate in vitro fertilization. Presented at the 53rd Annual meeting of the American Society for Reproductive medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1997; 18–22.
23. YaraliH, BukulmezO. The effect of intramural and subserous uterine fibroids on implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in patients having intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2002; 266: 30–3.
24. SurreyES, LietzAK, SchoolcraftWB. Impact of intramural leiomyomata in patients with a normal endometrial cavity on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle outcome. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 405–10.
25. BullettiC, De ZeiglerD, SettiP, CicinelliE, PolliV, StefanettiM.Myomas, pregnancy outcome and in vitro fertilization. Ann NY Acad Sci 2004; 1034; 84–92.
26. ButtramVCJr, ReiterRC.Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomology, and management. Fertil Steril 1981;36: 433–45.
27. DonnezJ, JadoulP.What are the implications of myomas on fertility? – A need for a debate?Hum Reprod 2002; 17(6): 1424–30.
28. HasanF, ArumugamK, SivanesaratnamV. Uterine leiomyomata in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1990 34, 45–58.
29. KanelopoulosN, DendrinosS, OikonomouA, PanagopoulosP, MarkussisV. Doppler-ultrasound as a predictor of uterine fibroid response to GnRH therapy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Jul; 82(1): 41–7.
30. WalkerWJ, BratbyMJMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of fibroid location in women achieving pregnancy after uterine artery embolizationCardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30(5): 876–81.
31. ACOG Committee Opinion. Uterine artery embolization. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103(2): 403–4.
32. GhaiS, RajanDK, BenjaminMS, AschMR, GhaiS. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: pre- and postprocedural evaluation with US. Radiographics 2005 Sep-Oct; 25(5): 1159–72; discussion 1173–6.
33. MikamiK, MurakamiT, OkadaA, OsugaK, TomodaK, NakamuraH. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids: early clinical experience. Radiat Med 2008; 26(4): 198–205.