Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: September 2011

Chapter 8 - 3D Ultrasonography and infertility

from Section 2: - Ultrasonography in infertility


1. SchefferGJ, BroekmansFJ, BancsiLF, HabbemaDJF, LoomanCWN, te VeldeER.Quantitative transvaginal two- and three dimensional sonography of the ovaries: reproducibility of antral follicle counts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 270–5.
2. KupesicS, KurjakA, BjelosD, VujisicS.Three-dimensional ultrasonographic ovarian measurements and in vitro fertilization outcome are related to age. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 190–7.
3. OyesanyaOA, ParsonsJH, CollinsWP, CampbellS.Total ovarian volume before human chorionic gonadotropin administration for ovulation induction may predict the hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 3211–12.
4. NgE, ChanC, YeungW, HoP.Effect of pituitary downregulation on antral follicle count, ovarian volume and stromal blood flow measured by three-dimensional ultrasound with power Doppler prior to ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2811–15
5. PanH, WuM, ChengY, WuL, ChangF.Quantification of ovarian stromal Doppler signals in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization with three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 338–44.
6. MerceLT, BarcoMJ, BauSTroyanoJM.Prediction of ovarian response and IVF/ICSI outcome by three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler angiography. Eur J Obstetr Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 132: 93–100.
7. KupesicS.Three-dimensional ultrasound in reproductive medicine. Ultrasound Rev Obstetr Gynecol 2005; 5: 304–15.
8. Raine-FenningNJ, CampbellBK, KendallNR, ClewesJS, JohnsonIR.Quantifying the changes in endometrial vascularity throughout the normal menstrual cycle with three-dimensional power Doppler angiography. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 330–8.
9. JokubkieneL, SladkeviciusP, RovasL, ValentinL.Assessment of changes in endometrial and subendometrial volume and vascularity during the normal menstrual cycle using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 672–9.
10. NargundG.Time for an ultrasound revolution in reproductive medicine. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 107–11.
11. LindhardA, RavnV, Bentin-LeyU, et al. Ultrasound characteristics and histological dating of the endometrium in a natural cycle in infertile women compared with fertile controls. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 1344–55.
12. Raine-FenningNJ, CampbellBK, KendallNR, ClewesJS, JohnsonIR.Endometrial and subendometrial perfusion are impaired in women with unexplained subfertility. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2605–14.
13. NgEH, ChanCC, TangOS, YeungWS, HoPC.Comparison of endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound between stimulated and natural cycles in the same patients. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2385–90.
14. ZaidiJ, CampbellS, PittrofR, TanSL.Endometrial thickness, morphology, vascular penetration and velocimetry in predicting implantation in an in vitro fertilization program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 191–8.
15. PiersonRA.Imaging the endometrium: are there predictors of uterine receptivity?J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003; 25: 360–8.
16. RagaF, Bonilla-MusolesF, CasanEM, KleinO, BonillaF:Assessment of endometrial volume by three-dimensional ultrasoundprior to embryo transfer: clues to endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2851–4.
17. RichterKS, BuggeKR, BromerJG, LevyMJ.Relationship between endometrial thickness and embryo implantation, based on 1,294 cycles of in vitro fertilization with transfer of two blastocyst-stage embryosFertil Steril 2007; 87: 53–9.
18. ZhangX, ChenCH, ConfinoE, BarnesR, MiladM, KazerRR.Increased endometrial thickness is associated with improved treatment outcome for selected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 336–40.
19. PuertoB, CreusM, CarmonaF, CivicoS, VanrellJA, BalaschJ.Ultrasonography as a predictor of embryo implantation after in vitro fertilization: a controlled study. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1015–22.
20. Garcia-VelascoJA, IsazaV, CaligaraC, PellicerA, RemohiJ, SimonC.Factors that determine discordant outcome from shared oocytes. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 54–60.
21. SoaresS, TroncosoC, BoschE, et al. Age and uterine receptiveness: predicting the outcome of oocyte donation cycles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90(7): 4399–404.
22. YamanC, EbnerT, SommergruberM, PolzW, TewsG.Role of three-dimensional ultrasonographic measurement of endometrium volume as a predictor of pregnancy outcome in an IVF-ET program: a preliminary study. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 797–801.
23. KupesicS, BekavacI, BjelosD, KurjakA.Assessment of endometrial receptivity by transvaginal color Doppler and three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization procedures. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20: 125–34.
24. SchildRL, HolthausS, d’AlquenJ, et al. Quantitative assessment of subendometrial blood flow by three-dimensional-ultrasound is an important predictive factor of implantation in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 89–94.
25. WuHM, ChiangCH, HuangHY, ChaoAS, WangHS, SoongYK.Detection of the subendometrial vascularization flow index by three-dimensional ultrasound may be useful for predicting the pregnancy rate for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 507–11.
26. JarvelaIY, SladkeviciusP, KellyS, OjhaK, CampbellS, NargundG.Evaluation of endometrial receptivity during in-vitro fertilization using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 765–76.
27. NgEh, ChanCC, TangOS, YeungWS, HoPC:The role of endometrial and subendometrial blood flows measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 164–70.
28. MercéLT, BarcoMJ, BauS, TroyanoJ.Are endometrial parameters by three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler angiography related to in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer outcome?. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 111–17.
29. NgEH, ChanCC, TangOS, YeungWS, HoPC.The role of endometrial and subendometrial vascularity measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1612–17.
30. NgEH, ChanCC, TangOS, YeungWS, ChungH.Endometrial and subendometrial vascularity is higher in pregnant patients with livebirth following ART than in those who suffer a miscarriageHum Reprod 2007; 22: 1134–41.
31. AlcázarJL.Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2006; 4: 56.