Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:05:43.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Moving away from the United States, 1933–1934

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2009

Brian J. C. McKercher
Affiliation:
Royal Military College of Canada, Ontario
Get access

Summary

As you know, a very great part of my work has been to create good understanding between America and ourselves, and I regret most profoundly that during the last twelve months, solely owing to the action of the President, that work has been largely undone, which is a great grief to me.

MacDonald, June 1934

From the British viewpoint, Roosevelt's election did not spell the end of Anglo-American co-operation. MacDonald, Chamberlain, and others looked towards an amicable resolution of war debts once general American opinion understood the distress that continued payments created for the British government. Moreover, despite concern about the World Disarmament Conference after Hitler's appointment as German chancellor, hope existed in some quarters that joint efforts by London and Washington might produce headway in arms limitation. Yet, diplomacy differs little from other human enterprise: a willingness to align cannot come from one side alone. Roosevelt refused to follow the more internationalist path taken by Hoover and Stimson. There were compelling reasons, all stemming from the domestic economic crisis that, in his election campaign, he promised to overcome: widespread bank failures menaced the country's fiscal solvency; with the dollar tied to gold, one-half of American gold reserves had drained away in 1932; a high dollar had savaged American exports; reduced demand for consumer goods at home and abroad saw industrial unemployment reach record highs, with attendant social distress; and farm prices and income had declined 40 per cent from their 1929 value. Thus, Roosevelt and his advisers, especially Rexford Tugwell and Raymond Moley, two Columbia University professors, concluded that the United States should solve its problems before tackling international issues.

Type
Chapter
Information
Transition of Power
Britain's Loss of Global Pre-eminence to the United States, 1930–1945
, pp. 157 - 185
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×