Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
September 2009
Print publication year:
2008
Online ISBN:
9780511487033

Book description

Ellipsis occurs when certain portions of a sentence are not spoken - for example 'Mary has read more books than Bill has [read books]' and 'Jack called, but I don't know where [he called] from'. These constructions interest linguists because the meaning of the sentence cannot be traced directly to the words it contains. This volume brings together a team of leading syntacticians to propose new and original solutions to some key questions in the study of ellipsis: What characterises ellipsis? Under what conditions is it possible? What kinds of meanings are allowed to go unspoken? Drawing on a variety of authentic constructions, they examine ellipsis in the context of a range of syntactic phenomena such as binding, raising, anaphora, movement and scrambling. Making significant progress towards solving some central problems in syntactic theory, this volume will be of key interest to anyone working on theoretical syntax, semantics and psycholinguistics.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References
References
Abbott, Barbara. 1976. Right node raising as a test for constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 639–642.
Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ackema, Peter, and Szendrői, Kriszta. 2002. Determiner sharing as an instance of dependent ellipsis. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 3–34.
Albert, Chris. 1993. Sluicing and weak islands. Unpublished manuscript, UC, Santa Cruz.
Asher, Nicholas. 1993. Reference to abstract objects in English. Kluwer Academic Press.
Asher, Nicholas, Daniel Hardt, and Joan Busquets. 1997. Discourse parallelism, scope, and ellipsis. In Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, ed. Lawson, Aaron, 19–36. The Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago, IL.
Asher, Nicholas, Hardt, Daniel, and Busquets, Joan.2001. Discourse parallelism, ellipsis, and ambiguity. Journal of Semantics 18, 1–25.
Bach, Emmon. 1979. Control in Montague Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 515–531.
Bach, Emmon.1980. In defense of passive. Linguistics and Philosophy 3: 297–341.
Bach, Emmon, and Cooper, Robin. 1978. The NP-S analysis of relative clauses and compositional semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 145–149.
Bach, Emmon, and Barbara H. Partee. 1980. Anaphora and semantic structure. In Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, eds. Kreiman, Jody and Ojeda, Almerindo E., 1–28. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Baker, C. L., and Brame, Michael. 1972. “Global rules”: a rejoinder. Language 48: 51–75.
Baltin, Mark. 1987. Do antecedent-contained deletions exist?Linguistic Inquiry 18: 579–596.
Baltin, Mark.2003. The interaction of ellipsis and binding: implications for the sequencing of Principle A. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 215–246.
den Besten, Hans, and Gert Webelhuth. 1990. Stranding. In Scrambling and barriers, eds. Grewendorf, Günther and Sternefeld, Wolfgang, 77–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bhatt, Rajesh, and Pancheva, Roumyana. 2004. Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 1–46.
Booij, Geert. 1985. Coordination reduction in complex words: a case for prosodic phonology. In Advances in nonlinear phonology, eds. Hulst, Harry and Smith, N., 143–160. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Bouton, L. F. 1970. Antecedent contained pro-forms. In Chicago Linguistics Society, 154–167. The Chicago Linguistics Society: University of Chicago, IL.
Brame, Michael. 1983. Ungrammatical notes 4: smarter than me. Linguistic Analysis 12: 323–328.
Bresnan, Joan. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 275–343.
Bresnan, Joan.1975. Comparative deletion and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Analysis 1: 25–74.
Bruening, Benjamin. 2001. QR obeys superiority: frozen scope and ACD. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 233–273.
Büring, Daniel. 2005. The syntax and semantics of binding theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burton, Strang, and Grimshaw, Jane. 1992. Coordination and VP-internal subjects. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 305–312.
Camacho, José. 1996. The structure of NP coordination. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California.
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Chao, Wynn. 1987. On ellipsis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. Dynamics of meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1972a. Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. In The goals of linguistic theory, ed. Peters, Stanley, 63–130. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chomsky, Noam.1972b. Spheres of influence in the age of imperialism; papers submitted to the Bertrand Russell centenary symposium, Linz, Austria, September 11th to 15th, 1972. Nottingham: Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation for The Spokesman.
Chomsky, Noam.1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam.1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam.1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam.1986b. Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, Noam1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from building, volume XX, eds. Hale, Ken and Keyser, Jay, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam.1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam.2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Martin, Roger, Michaels, David, and Uriagereka, Juan, 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993. Principles and parameter theory. In Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research, eds. Stechow, Arnim, Sternefeld, W., and Vennemann, T., 506–569. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Chung, Sandra, Ladusaw, William A., and McCloskey, James. 1995. Sluicing and Logical Form. Natural Language Semantics 3: 239–282.
Collins, Chris. 1994. Economy of derivation and the generalized proper binding condition. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 45–62.
Cooper, Robin. 1979. The interpretation of pronouns. In Syntax and Semantics, volume X, Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table, eds. Heny, Frank and Schnelle, H., 61–92. New York: Academic Press.
Coppock, Elizabeth. 2001. Gapping: in defense of deletion. In Chicago Linguistics Society, eds. Andronis, Mary, Ball, Christopher, Elston, Heidi, and Neuvel, Sylvain, volume XXXVII, 133–148. University of Chicago.
Cormack, A. 1984. VP anaphora: variables and scope. In Varieties of formal semantics, eds. Landman, F. and Veltman, F., 81–102. Dordrecht: Foris.
Corver, Norbert. 1990. The syntax of left branch extractions. Doctoral Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.
Culicover, Peter W., and Rochemont, Michael S.. 1990. Extraposition and the complement principle. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 23–47.
Dahl, Östen. 1974. How to open a sentence: abstraction in natural language. In Logical grammar reports, volume XII.
Dalrymple, Mary. 1991. Against reconstruction in ellipsis. Unpublished manuscript, Xerox-PARC and CSLI.
Dalrymple, Mary, Sheiber, Stuart M., and Pereira, Fernando C. N.. 1991. Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 399–452.
Diesing, Molly. 1992a. Bare plural subjects and the derivation of logical representations. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 353–380.
Diesing, Molly.1992b. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dimitriadis, Alexis. 2001. Function domains in variable free semantics. In Proceedings of SALT 11, eds. Hastings, Rachel, Jackson, Brendan, and Zvolenszky, Zsofia, 134–151. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Doron, Edit. 1999. V-movement and VP ellipsis. In Studies in ellipsis and gapping, eds. Lappin, Shalom and Benmamoun, Elabbas, 124–140. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dougherty, Ray C. 1970. A grammar of coordinate conjoined structures, I. Language 46: 850–898.
Dowty, David. 1982. Grammatical relations and Montague grammar. In The nature of syntactic representation, eds. Jacobson, Pauline and Pullum, Geoffrey K., 79–130. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Dowty, David 1988. “Type raising, functional composition, and non-constituent conjunction,” in Categorial Grammars and natural language structures, eds. Oerhle, R., Bach, E., and Wheeler, D.. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Drubig, Hans Bernhard. 1994. Island constraints and the syntactic nature of focus and association with focus. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340 (working paper). University of Tübingen.
Eisenberg, Peter. 1973. A note on “Identity of constituents.” Linguistic Inquiry 4: 417–420.
Elbourne, Paul. 2001. E-type anaphora as NP deletion. Natural Language Semantics 9: 241–288.
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1986. Constituent questions. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Epstein, Samuel. 1995. A derivational approach to syntactic relations. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.
Evans, Frederic. 1988. Binding into anaphoric verb phrases. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 122–129. ESCOL Publications Committee: Linguistics Department, The Ohio State University.
Evans, Gareth. 1977. Pronouns, quantifiers, and relative clauses. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7: 467–536.
Evans, Gareth.1980. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 337–362.
Farkas, Donka. 1981. Quantifier scope and syntactic islands. In Papers from the 17th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, eds. Hendrick, Randall, Masek, Carrie, and Miller, Mary Frances, 59–66. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, IL.
Farkas, Donka, and Anastasia Giannakidou. 1995. How clause-bounded is the scope of universals? In Proceedings of SALT 6, ed. Gallway, T., 35–52. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Fiengo, Robert. 1980. Surface structure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fiengo, Robert, and May, Robert. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fintel, Kai von, and Irene Heim. 2002. Notes on intensional semantics. URL www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/summerschool2002/fintel.pdf, unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge.
Fox, Danny. 1998. Locality in variable binding. In Is the best good enough?, eds. Barbosa, Pilar, Fox, Danny, Hagstrom, Paul, McGinnis, Martha, and Pesetsky, David, 129–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fox, Danny.1999a. Focus, parallelism, and accommodation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, eds. Matthews, T. and Strolovitch, Devon, 70–90. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Fox, Danny.1999b. Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 157–196.
Fox, Danny.2000. Economy and semantic interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fox, Danny.2002. Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 63–96.
Fox, Danny, and Lasnik, Howard. 2003. Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: the difference between Sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143–154.
Fox, Danny, and Jon Nissenbaum. 1999. Extraposition and scope: a case for overt QR. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 18, eds. Bird, Sonya, Carnie, Andrew, Haugen, Jason D., and Norquest, Peter, 132–144. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Frampton, John, and Gutmann, Sam. 1999. Cyclic computation: A computationally efficient Minimalist syntax. Syntax 2: 1–27.
Frege, Gottlob. 1879. Begriffsschrift. eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle, Germany: Neubert.
Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 1997. Generalized transformations and beyond. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Frankfurt/Main.
Gawron, Jean Mark, and Peters, Stanley. 1990. Anaphora and quantification in Situation Semantics. Stanford University: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Geach, P. 1972. A program for syntax. In Semantics of natural language, eds. Davidson, Donald and Harman, Gilbert H., 483–497. Reidel Publishing Company.
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridicality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Giannakidou, Anastasia.2001. The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 659–735.
Goldberg, Lotus Madelyn. 2005. Verb-stranding VP ellipsis: a cross-linguistic study. Doctoral Dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
Goodall, Grant, 1987. Parallel structures in syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grimshaw, Jane. 1991. Extended projection. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis University.
Grinder, John, and Postal, Paul M.. 1971. Missing antecedents. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 269–312.
Grodzinsky, Yosef, and Reinhart, Tanya. 1993. The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 69–102.
Groenendijk, J., and M. Stokhof. 1983. Interrogative quantifiers and skolem functions. In Connectedness in sentence, discourse and text, eds. Ehlich, K. and Riemsdijk, Henk, 71–110. Tilburg University.
Hackl, Martin. 2000. Comparative quantifiers. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Haïk, Isabelle. 1984. Indirect binding. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 185–224.
Haïk, Isabelle.1985. The syntax of operators. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
Haïk, Isabelle.1987. Bound VPs that need to be. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 503–530.
Hankamer, Jorge. 1973a. Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 17–68.
Hankamer, Jorge.1973b. Why there are two than's in English. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 9, 179–191. The Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago, IL.
Hankamer, Jorge.1978. On the nontransformational derivation of some null VP anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 66–74.
Hankamer, Jorge.1979. Deletion in coordinate structures. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Hankamer, Jorge, and Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.
Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag.1977. Syntactically vs. pragmatically controlled anaphora. In Studies in language variation, eds. Fasold, R. and Shuy, R., 121–135. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Hardt, Daniel. 1992a. VP ellipsis and semantic identity. In Proceedings of SALT 2, 145–162. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Hardt, Daniel.1992b. VP ellipsis and semantic identity. In Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop, eds. Berman, Steve and Hestvik, Arild. Stuttgart.
Hardt, Daniel.1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning and processing. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hardt, Daniel.1999. Dynamic interpretation of verb phrase ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 185–219.
Harris, Zellig. 1957. Co-occurrence and transformation in linguistic structure. Language 33: 283–340.
Hartmann, Katharina. 1998. Right node raising and gapping. Doctoral Dissertation, Goethe-Universität zu Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt.
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite Noun Phrases. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Heim, Irene.1983. On the projection problem for presuppositions. In Proceedings of WCCFL 2, ed. Flickinger, Daniel P., 114–125. Stanford University, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Heim, Irene.1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas-Austin.
Heim, Irene.1990. E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 137–178.
Heim, Irene.1993. Anaphora and semantic interpretation: a reinterpretation of Reinhart's approach. SfS-Report 7–93, Universität Tübingen, Germany.
Heim, Irene.1994. Puzzling reflexive pronouns in de se reports. Unpublished Handout, March, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Heim, Irene.1997. Predicates or formulas? evidence from ellipsis. In Proceedings of SALT VII, eds. Lawson, Aaron and Cho, Enn, 197–221. Cornell University: CLC Publications.
Heim, Irene.2000. Degree operators and scope. In Proceedings of SALT X, eds. Jackson, Brendan and Matthews, Tanya, 40–64. Cornell University: CLC Publications.
Heim, Irene.2001. Degree operators and scope. In Audiatur vox sapientiae. A festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, eds. Fery, Caroline and Sternefeld, Wolfgang, 214–239. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Heim, Irene, and Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hellan, Lars. 1981. Towards an integrated theory of comparatives. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Heycock, Caroline. 1995. Asymmetries in reconstruction. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 547–570.
Heycock, Caroline, and Kroch, Anthony. 1994. Verb movement and coordination in a dynamic theory of licensing. The Linguistic Review 11: 257–284.
Higginbotham, James. 1983. Logical form, binding, and nominals. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 395–420.
Higginbotham, James.1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–594.
Hirschberg, Julia, and Ward, Gregory. 1991. Accent and bound anaphora. Cognitive Linguistics 2: 101–121.
Hirschbühler, Paul. 1978. The syntax and semantics of wh-constructions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Hirschbühler, Paul.1982. VP deletion and across-the-board quantifier scope. In NELS, eds. Pustejovsky, James and Sells, Peter, 132–139. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA.
Hobbs, Jerry, and Kehler, Andrew. 1997. A theory of parallelism and the case of VP Ellipsis. In Proceedings of the ACL 35, 394–401. Madrid, Spain.
Hoeksema, Jack. 1984. To be continued: the story of the comparative. Journal of Semantics 3: 93–107.
Höhle, Tilman N. 1990. Assumption about asymmetric coordination in German. In Grammar in progress: GLOW essays for Henk van Riemsdijk, eds. Mascaró, Joan and Nespor, Marina, 221–235. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Höhle, Tilman N.1991. On reconstruction and coordination. In Representation and derivation in the theory of grammar, eds. Haider, Hubert and Netter, Klaus, volume XXII, 139–198. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hoji, Hajime, and Teruhiko Fukaya. 1999. Stripping and sluicing in Japanese and some implications. In Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. Bird, S., Carnie, A., Haugen, J., and Norquest, P., 145–158. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Hornstein, Norbert. 1995. Logical Form: from GB to Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1993. Reconstruction and the structure of VP: some theoretical consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 103–138.
Hudson, Richard A. 1976. Conjunction reduction, gapping and right-node raising. Language 52: 535–562.
Jacobson, Pauline. 1977. The syntax of crossing coreference sentences. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Jacobson, Pauline.1982. On the syntax and semantics of multiple relatives in English. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Jacobson, Pauline.1987. Phrase structure, grammatical relations, and discontinuous constituents. In Syntax and semantics, volume XX: Discontinuous constituency, eds. Huck, Geoffrey and Ojeda, Almerindo E., 27–69. New York Academic Press, Inc.
Jacobson, Pauline.1992a. Antecedent contained deletion in a variable-free semantics. In SALT 2, eds. Barker, Chris and Dowty, David, 193–213. Linguistics Department, Ohio State University.
Jacobson, Pauline.1992b. Flexible categorical grammars: questions and prospects. In Formal grammar: Theory and implementation, ed. Levine, Robert D., 129–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jacobson, Pauline.1994. Binding Connectivity in Copular Sentences. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, eds. Harvey, M. and Santelmann, L.. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Jacobson, Pauline.1998. ACE and pied-piping: evidence for a variable-free semantics. In Proceedings of SALT 8, eds. Strolovitch, Devon and Lawson, Aaron, 74–91. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Jacobson, Pauline.1999. Towards a variable-free semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 117–184.
Jacobson, Pauline.2000a. Paycheck pronouns, Bach–Peters sentences, and variable-free semantics. Natural Language Semantics 8: 77–155.
Jacobson, Pauline 2000b. Paychecks, stress, and variable free semantics. In Proceedings of SALT X, eds. Matthews, T. and Jackson, B., 65–82. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Jacobson, Pauline.2002. The (dis)organization of the grammar: 25 years. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 601–626.
Jacobson, Pauline.2003. Binding without pronouns (and pronouns without binding). In Binding and resource sensitivity, eds. Kruiff, G.-J. and Oehrle, Richard, 57–96. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jacobson, Pauline.2004. Kennedy's puzzle: What I'm named or who I am? In Proceedings of SALT 14, ed. Young, Robert B., 145–162. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University.
Jayaseelan, K. A. 1990. Incomplete VP deletion and Gapping. Linguistic Analysis 20: 64–81.
Johnson, Kyle. 2001. What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can't, but not why. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, eds. Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris, 439–479. Oxford: Blackwell.
Johnson, Kyle.2003. In search of the English middle field. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Johnson, Kyle.2004. How to be quiet. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 39.
Kadmon, Nirit. 1987. On unique and non-unique reference and asymmetric quantification. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard S. 1998. Overt vs. covert movement. Syntax 1: 128–191.
Kehler, Andrew, and Shieber, Stuart. 1997. Anaphoric dependencies in ellipsis. Computational Linguistics 23: 457–466.
Kennedy, Christopher. 1994. Argument contained ellipsis. Linguistics Research Center Report LRC-94-03, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Kennedy, Christopher.1995. An indexical account of certain ambiguities. In Proceedings of ESCOL 95, 103–115. Ohio State University: ESCOL Publications Committee, Linguistics Department.
Kennedy, Christopher.1997a. Antecedent contained deletion and the syntax of quantification. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 662–688.
Kennedy, Christopher.1997b. Projecting the adjective: the syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Kennedy, Chris, and Merchant, Jason. 2000. Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 89–146.
Kennedy, Christopher, and Jeffrey Lidz. 2001. A (covert) long distance anaphor in English. In Proceedings of the 20th West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics, eds. Megerdoomian, Karine and Anne Bar-el, Leora, 318–331. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 1986. Subjects in Japanese and English. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa.1991. Copying identity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 497–536.
Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1999. Eliminating * as a feature (of traces). In Working minimalism, eds. Epstein, Samuel and Hornstein, Norbert, 77–93. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Klein, E. 1986. VP ellipsis in DR theory. In Studies in DRT and the theory of generalized quantifiers, eds. Groenendijk, J., Jongh, , and Stokhof, , 161–187. Dordrecht: Foris.
Koopman, Hilda Judith, and Sportiche, Dominique. 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 85: 211–258.
Koopman, Hilda Judith, and Szabolcsi, Anna. 2000. Verbal complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Koster, Jan. 1978. Locality principles in syntax. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. The representation of focus. In Semantics: an international handbook of contemporary research, eds. Stechow, Arnim and Wunderlich, Dieter, 825–834. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Kratzer, Angelika.1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tense. In Proceedings of SALT VIII, eds. Strolovitch, Devon and Lawson, Aaron, 92–110. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Krifka, Manfred. 1999. Additive particles under stress. In Proceedings of SALT 8, eds. Strolovitch, Devon and Lawson, Aaron, 111–128. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1988. Whether we agree or not. Linguisticae Investigationnes 12: 1–47.
Lakoff, George. 1971. On generative semantics. In Semantics, eds. Steinberg, D. and Jakobovits, L., 232–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, George.1972. The arbitrary basis of transformational grammar. Language 48: 76–87.
Lappin, Shalom. 1996. The interpretation of ellipsis. In The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, ed. Lappin, Shalom, 145–175. Oxford: Blackwell.
Larson, Richard K. 1985. On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 217–264.
Larson, Richard K., and May, Robert. 1990. Antecedent containment or vacuous movement: reply to Baltin. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 103–122.
Lasnik, Howard. 1976. Remarks on coreference. Linguistic Analysis 2: 1–22.
Lasnik, Howard.1995. Verbal morphology: Syntactic structures meets the minimalist program. In Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory, eds. Campos, Hector and Kempchinsky, Paula, 251–275. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Lasnik, Howard.1999a. A note on pseudogapping. In Minimalist analysis, ed. Lasnik, Howard, 151–174. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lasnik, Howard.1999b. On feature strength: three minimalist approaches to overt movement. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 197–217.
Lasnik, Howard.1999c. Pseudogapping puzzles. In Fragments: Studies in ellipsis and gapping, eds. Lappin, Shlom and Benmamoun, Elabbas, 141–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lasnik, Howard.2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 31, eds. Kim, Minjoo and Strauss, Uri, 301–320. Georgetown University: GLSA.
Lasnik, Howard, and Saito, Mamoru. 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 235–290.
Lasnik, Howard, and Saito, Mamoru.1992. Move α. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lebeaux, David. 1988. Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lebeaux, David.1990. Relative clauses, licensing, and the nature of the derivation. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 20, eds. Carter, Juli, Rose-Marie, Dechaine, Philip, Bill, and Sherer, Tim, 318–332. University of Massachusetts at Amherst: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
Lechner, Winfried. 1998. Comparative deletion. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lechner, Winfried.1999. Comparatives and DP-Structure. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lechner, Winfried.2000. Conjunction reduction in subordinate structures. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 30, eds. Hirotani, Masako, Coetzee, Andries, Hall, Nancy, and Kim, Ji-yung, 455–468. Rutgers University: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
Lechner, Winfried.2001. Reduced and phrasal comparatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 683–735.
Lechner, Winfried.2004. Ellipsis in Comparatives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Levin, Beth, and Rappaport, Malka. 1986. The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 623–661.
Levin, Lori. 1982. Sluicing: A lexical interpretation procedure. In The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. Bresnan, Joan, 590–654. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levin, Nancy. 1986. Main-verb ellipsis in spoken English. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Levine, Robert D. 1985. Right Node (non)-Raising. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 492–497.
Lin, Jo-Wang. 1996. Polarity licensing and wh-phrase quantification in Chinese. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lin, Vivian. 2002. Coordination and sharing at the interfaces. Doctoral Dissertation, Linguistics Department, MIT.
Lobeck, Anne. 1991. The phrase structure of ellipsis. In Perspectives on phrase structure, ed. Rothstein, Susan, 81–103. San Diego: Academic Press.
Lobeck, Anne.1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing and identification. New York: Oxford University Press.
López, Luis. 1994. The syntactic licensing of VP-ellipsis: a comparative study of Spanish and English. In Issues and theory in Romance linguistics: selected papers from the linguistic symposium on Romance languages XXIII, ed. Mazzola, Michael L., 333–354. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
López, Luis.1999. VP-ellipsis in Spanish and English and the features of Aux. Probus 11: 263–297.
López, Luis, and Susanne Winkler. 2003. Variation at the syntax-semantics interface: evidence from gapping. In The interfaces: Deriving and interpreting omitted structures, eds. Schwabe, Kerstin and Winkler, Susanne, 227–248. John Benjamins.
May, Robert. 1977. The grammar of quantification. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
May, Robert.1985. Logical form: its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McCawley, James D. 1970. Where do noun phrases come from? In Readings in English transformational grammar, eds. Jacobs, R. A. and Rosenbaum, Peter S., 166–183. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company.
McCawley, James D. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91–106.
McCawley, James D. 1998. The syntactic phenomena of English. Chicago: University of Chicago.
McCloskey, James. 1991. Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish. Lingua 85: 259–302.
Merchant, Jason. 1999. The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Merchant, Jason.2000. Islands and LF-movement in Greek sluicing. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1: 39–62.
Merchant, Jason.2001. The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, Jason.2002. Swiping in German. In Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, eds. Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter and Abraham, Werner, 295–321. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Merchant, Jason.2005. On the role of unpronounced syntactic structures. Talk given at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Moltmann, Friederike. 1992. Coordination and comparatives. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
Montague, Richard. 1974. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, ed. Thomason, Richmond H., 247–270. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Muadz, H. 1991. Coordinate structures: a planar representation. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Müller, Gereon. 1996. A constraint on remnant movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 355–407.
Müller, Gereon, and Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 1993. Improper movement and unambiguous binding. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 461–508.
Muskens, Reinhard. 1996. Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 143–186.
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1983. Comparative ellipsis: a phrase structure analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 675–694.
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1998. “Multiple sluicing” in Japanese and the functional nature of wh-phrases. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 121–152.
Nunes, Jairo. 1995. The copy theory of movement and linearization of chains in the Minimalist Program. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland.
Oehrle, Richard T. 1991. Categorial frameworks, coordination, and extraction. In The Proceedings of the Ninth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. Halpern, Aaron L., 411–426. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Partee, Barbara Hall. 1975. Montague grammar and transformational grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 203–300.
Partee, Barbara Hall.1976. Some transformational extensions of Montague grammar. In Montague grammar, ed. Partee, Barbara Hall, 51–76. Academic Press, Inc.
Partee, Barbara Hall, and Mats Rooth. 1983. Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. In Meaning, use and interpretation of language, eds. Bäuerle, R., Schwarze, C., and Stechow, Arnim, 362–383. De Gruyter.
Percus, Orin. 2000. Constraints on some other variables in syntax. Natural Language Semantics 8: 173–229.
Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Perlmutter, David, and Ross, John Robert. 1970. Relative clauses with split antecedent. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 350.
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In The representation of (in)definiteness, eds. Reuland, Eric J. and Meulen, Alice G. B., 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, David.2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Phillips, Colin. 1996. Order and structure. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Pinkham, Jessie E. 1982. The formation of comparative clauses in English and French. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Pollard, Carl. 1984. Generalized phrase structure grammar. Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.
Pollard, Carl Jesse, and Sag, Ivan A.. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Postal, Paul M. 1969a. Anaphoric islands. In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistics Society, eds. Binnick, Robert I., Davison, Alice, Green, Georgia M., and Jerry, L. Morgan, 205–239. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Postal, Paul M.1969b. On so-called “pronouns” in English. In Modern studies in English, eds. Reibel, D. and Schane, Sandford, 201–224. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Postal, Paul M. 1971. Cross-over phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Postal, Paul M. 1974. On raising. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Postal, Paul M. 1993. Some defective paradigms. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 347–364.
Postal, Paul M. 1998. Three investigations of extraction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Potts, Christopher. 1999. Vehicle change and anti-pronominal contexts. University of California, Santa Cruz.
Prüst, Hub, Scha, Remko, and Berg, Martin. 1994. Discourse grammar and verb phrase anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 17: 261–327.
Pullum, Geoffrey, and Zwicky, Arnold. 1986. Phonological resolution of syntactic feature conflict. Language 62: 751–773.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The syntactic domain of anaphora. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Reinhart, Tanya.1983a. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Reinhart, Tanya.1983b. Coreference and bound anaphora: a restatement of the anaphora questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 47–88.
Reinhart, Tanya, and Reuland, Eric. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720.
Richards, Norvin. 1998. In full pursuit of the unspeakable. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, eds. Tamanji, Pius N. and Kusumoto, Kiyomi, 153–168. University of Toronto: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
Riemsdijk, Henk. 1982. A case study in syntactic markedness. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roberts, Craige. 1991. Distributivity and reciprocal distributivity. In Proceedings of the First Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, eds. Moore, Steven and Wyner, Adam Zachary, 209–230. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Working Papers in Linguistics.
Romero, Maribel. 1998. Focus and reconstruction effects in wh-phrases. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Romero, Maribel.2000. Antecedentless sluiced wh phrases and islands. In Ellipsis in conjunction, eds. Schwabe, Kerstin and Zhang, Ning, 195–220. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Rooth, Mats E. 1981. A comparison of three theories of verb phrase ellipsis. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, eds. Chao, Wynn and Wheeler, Dierdre, 212–244. GLSA.
Rooth, Mats E.1985. Association with focus. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Rooth, Mats E. 1992a. Ellipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy. In Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop, eds. Berman, Steve and Hestvik, Arild. Stuttgart.
Rooth, Mats E. 1992b. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 117–121.
Rooth, Mats E.1996. Focus. In The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, ed. Lappin, Shalom, 271–297. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ross, John Robert.1969. Guess who? In Chicago Linguistics Society, eds. Binnick, Robert I., Davison, Alice, Green, Georgia M., and Morgan, Jerry L., 252–286. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago.
Ross, John Robert.1970. Gapping and the order of constituents. In Progress in linguistics, eds. Bierwisch, Manfred and Heidolph, Karl E., 249–259. The Hague: Mouton.
Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in the semantics of wh-constructions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14: 479–493.
Safir, Ken. 1986. Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 663–689.
Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deletion and logical form. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Sag, Ivan.1980. Deletion and logical form. New York: Garland Publishing.
Sag, Ivan, and Hankamer, Jorge. 1984. Toward a theory of anaphoric processing. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 325–345.
Sauerland, Uli. 1996. Guess how? In Proceedings of ConSoLE, 297–311. Leiden, The Netherlands: SOLE, University of Leiden/Luch.
Sauerland, Uli.1998. The meaning of chains. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Sauerland, Uli.1999. Why variables? In North East Linguistics Society, eds. Pius, Tamanji, Hirotani, Masako, and Hall, Nancy, 323–338. University of Delaware: GLSA.
Sauerland, Uli.2000. The content of pronouns: Evidence from focus. In Proceedings of SALT X, eds. Matthews, Tanya and Jackson, Brendan, 167–184. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Sauerland, Uli.2003. A new semantics for number. In Proceedings of SALT 13, 258–275. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Sauerland, Uli.2004. The interpretation of traces. Natural Language Semantics 12: 63–127.
Schachter, Paul. 1977. Constraints on coordination. Language 53: 86–103.
Schuyler, Tamara. 2001. Wh-movement out of the site of VP ellipsis. In Syntax at Santa Cruz, ed. Mac Bhloscaidh, Séamas, 1–20. UC, Santa Cruz: Linguistics Department.
Schwarz, Bernhard. 1999. On the syntax of either … or. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 339–370.
Schwarz, Bernhard.2000. Topics in ellipsis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. Givenness, avoid F and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7: 141–177.
Schwarzschild, Roger, and Wilkinson, Karina. 2002. Quantifiers in comparatives: a semantics of degree based on intervals. Natural Language Semantics 10: 1–41.
Sharvit, Yael. 1998. Possessive wh-expressions and reconstruction. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, eds. Tamanji, Pius N. and Kusumoto, Kiyomi, 409–424. University of Toronto: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
Sharvit, Yael.1999. Functional relative clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 447–478.
Simpson, Andrew. 2000. Wh-movement and the theory of feature-checking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Soames, Scott. 1989. Presupposition. In Handbook of philosophical logic, eds. Gabbay, Dov and Guenther, Franz, volume IV, 553–616. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Sproat, Richard. 1988. On anaphoric islandhood. In Theoretical morphology, eds. Hammond, Michael and Noonan, Michael, 291–304. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77.
Steedman, Mark. 1987. Combinatory grammars and parasitic gaps. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 403–439.
Steedman, Mark.1996. Surface structure and interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stockwell, Robert P., Schachter, Paul, and Partee, Barbara Hall. 1968. Integration of transformational theories of English syntax. Los Angeles: UCLA.
Takahashi, Shoichi. 2004. Pseudogapping and cyclic linearization. In Proceedings of the thirty-fourth meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, eds. Moulton, Keir and Wolf, Matthew, volume XXXIV, 571–585. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
Takahashi, Shoichi.2006a. Decompositionality and identity. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Takahashi, Shoichi.2006b. More than two quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics 14: 57–101.
Takahashi, Shoichi, and Danny Fox. 2006. MaxElide and the re-binding problem. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, eds. Georgala, Effi and Howell, Jonathan, volume XV, 223–240. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Takano, Yuji. 1996. Movement and parametric variation. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
Takano, Yuji.2000. Illicit remnant movement: an argument for feature-driven movement. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 141–156.
Tancredi, Christopher. 1992. Deletion, deaccenting and presupposition. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1979. The theoretical interpretation of a class of marked extractions. In Theory of markedness in generative grammar, eds. Belletti, A., Brandi, L., and Rizzi, R., 475–516. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.
Tiedeman, Robyne. 1995. Some remarks on antecedent contained deletion. In Minimalism and Linguistic Theory, eds. Haraguchi, Shosuke and Funaki, Michio, 67–103. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Tomioka, Satoshi. 1997. Focussing effects in VP ellipsis and NP interpretation. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Tomioka, Satoshi.1999. A sloppy identity puzzle. Natural Language Semantics 7: 217–241.
Tomioka, Satoshi.2001. A certain scope asymmetry in VP ellipsis contexts. In Linguistic form and its computation, eds. Roher, Christian, Rossdentscher, Antje, and Kamp, Hans, 183–203. Stanford University: CSLI Publications.
Tomioka, Satoshi.2004. Another sloppy identity puzzle. In Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective: Proceedings of the Fourth GLOW in Asia, ed. Yoon, Han-Jin, 383–404. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Generative Linguistics of the Old World.
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1995. Phonological phrases: their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
Wasow, Thomas. 1972. Anaphoric relations in English. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Webber, Bonnie. 1978. A formal approach to discourse anaphora. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.
Wesche, B. 1995. Symmetric coordination. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Wescoat, Michael. 1989. Sloppy readings with embedded antecedents. Manuscript, Stanford University.
Wiese, R. 1993. Tilgung prosodischer konstituenten. Paper presented at 15th annual meeting of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft. Mainz, Germany: University of Mainz.
Wilder, Chris. 1995. Antecedent containment and ellipsis. In FAS Papers in Linguistics, volume IV, 132–165.
Wilder, Chris.1997. Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In Studies on universal grammar and typological variation, eds. Alexiadou, Artemis and Hall, T., 59–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Williams, Edwin. 1974. Rule ordering in syntax. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Williams, Edwin.1977. Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 101–139.
Williams, Edwin.1978. Across-the-board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 31–43.
Williams, Edwin.1986. A reassignment of the functions of LF. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 264–300.
Williams, Edwin.1990. The ATB-theory of parasitic gaps. The Linguistic Review 6: 265–279.
Wiltschko, Martina. 1997. Superiority in German. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. Curtis, Emily, Lyle, James, and Webster, Gabriel, 431–445. University of Washington: Stanford Linguistics Association.
Wiltschko, Martina.1998. On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 143–181.
Winkler, Susanne. 1996. Focus and secondary predication. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1997. Morphosyntax of verb movement: A minimalist approach to the syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.