Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:22:19.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The past hypothesis meets gravity

from Part I - The arrows of time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

By
Craig Callender
Edited by
Gerhard Ernst  and
Andreas Hüttemann
Gerhard Ernst
Affiliation:
Universität Stuttgart
Andreas Hüttemann
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Why does the universe have a thermodynamic arrow of time? The standard reasoning relies on the truism: no asymmetry in, no asymmetry out. If the fundamental laws of Nature are time symmetric invariant (that is, time reversal), then the origin of the thermodynamic asymmetry in time must lie in temporally asymmetric boundary conditions. However, this conclusion can follow even if the fundamental laws are not time reversal invariant. The more basic question is whether the fundamental laws – whether time symmetric or not – entail the existence of a thermodynamic arrow. If not, then the answer must lie in temporally asymmetric boundary conditions. No asymmetry of the right kind in, no asymmetry out. As it happens, as I understand them, none of the current candidates for fundamental law of Nature entail the thermodynamic arrow. String theory, canonical quantum gravity, quantum field theory, general relativity, and more all admit solutions lacking a thermodynamic arrow. So a first pass at an answer to our initial question is: the universe has a thermodynamic arrow due in part to its temporally asymmetric boundary conditions.

Merely locating the answer in boundary conditions, however, is not to say much. All it does is rule out thermodynamic phenomena being understood as a corollary of the fundamental laws. But that's true of almost all phenomena. Few events or regularities can be explained directly via the fundamental laws. If we are to have a satisfying explanation, we need to get much more specific.

Type
Chapter
Information
Time, Chance, and Reduction
Philosophical Aspects of Statistical Mechanics
 , pp. 34 - 58
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, D. Z. (2000). Time and Chance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Balescu, R. (1963). Statistical Mechanics of Charged Particles. New York: Interscience Publishers.
Binney, J. J. and Tremaine, S. (1987). Galactic Dynamics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Callender, C. (2004). Measures, explanations and the past: should ‘special’ initial conditions be explained?The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55(2), 195–217.Google Scholar
Callender, C. (2010). The past histories of molecules. In Probabilities in Physics, ed. Beisbart, C. and Hartmann, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chavanis, P. H. (1998). On the ‘coarse-grained’ evolution of collisionless stellar systems. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 300, 981–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavanis, P. H. (2005). On the lifetime of metastable states in self-gravitating systems. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 432, 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauxois, T., Ruffo, S., Arimondo, E. and Wilkens, M. (eds.) (2002). Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Systems with Long Range Interactions. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef
DeRoeck, W., Maes, C. and Netočný, K. (2006). H-theorems from macroscopic autonomous equations. Journal of Statistical Physics, 123(3), 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning-Davies, J. (1983). On the Meaning of Extensivity. Physics Letters, 94A, 346–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, J. (2006). The past hypothesis: not even false. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 37(3), 399–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, T. (2005). Nonlinear Fokker–Planck Equations. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Frigg, R. (2009). Typicality and the approach to equilibrium in Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics. Philosophy of Science (Suppl.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrido, P. L., Goldstein, S. and Lebowitz, J. L. (2004). Boltzmann entropy for dense fluids not in local equilibrium. Physical Review Letters, 92, 50602-1–50602-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, S. (2002). Boltzmann's approach to statistical mechanics. In Chance in Physics, Foundations and Perspectives, ed. Bricmont, J., Durr, D., Galavotti, M. C.et al., Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Goldstein, S. and Lebowitz, J. L. (2004). On the (Boltzmann) entropy of non-equilibrium systems. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 193, 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. S. (1952). Markoff random processes and the statistical mechanics of time dependent phenomena. Journal of Chemical Physics, 20, 1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heggie, D. C. and Hut, P. (2003). The Gravitational Million-body Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Hertel, P., Narnhofer, H. and Thirring, W. (1972). Thermodynamic functions for fermions with gravostatic and electrostatic interactions. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 28, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandrup, H. (1981). Generalized Landau equation for a system with a self-consistent mean field–Derivation from an N-particle Liouville equation. The Astrophysical Journal, 244, 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandrup, H. Theoretical techniques in modern galactic dynamics, unpublished class notes available at http://www.astro.ufl.edu/~galaxy/papers/.
Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. (1969). Statistical Physics, part 1. Oxford: Pergamon.
Lavis, D. A. (2005). Boltzmann and Gibbs: an attempted reconciliation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 36(2), 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy-Leblond, J.-M. (1969). Nonsaturation of gravitational forces. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 10(5), 806–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liboff, R. L. and Fedele, J. B. (1967). Properties of the Fokker–Planck equation. Physics of Fluids, 10, 1391–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieb, E. H. and Yngvason, J. (1998). A guide to entropy and the second law of thermodynamics. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 45, 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D. (1967). Statistical mechanics of violent relaxation in stellar systems. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 136, 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D. and Wood, R. (1968). The gravo-thermal catastrophe in isothermal spheres and the onset of red-giant structure for stellar systems. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 138, 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nauenberg, M. (2003). Critique of Q-entropy for thermal statistics. Physical Review E, 67(3), 036114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogorodnikov, K. F. (1965). Dynamics of Stellar Systems. New York: Pergamon.
Padmanabhan, T. (1990). Statistical mechanics of gravitating systems. Physics Reports, 188(5), 285–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. (1996). Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reichenbach, H. (1999). The Direction of Time. Dover, NY: Mineola.
Risken, H. (1989). The Fokker–Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef
Rowlinson, J. S. (1993). Thermodynamics of inhomogeneous systems. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 65, 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saslaw, W. C. (2000). The Distribution of the Galaxies: Gravitational Clustering in Cosmology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schrödinger, E. (1989 [1948]). Statistical Thermodynamics. Dover reprint.
Spohn, H. (1991). Large Scale Dynamics of Interfacing Particles. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Touchette, H. (2002). When is a quantity additive, and when is it extensive?Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 305(1–2), 84–88.Google Scholar
Uffink, J. (2007). Compendium of the foundations of classical statistical physics. In Philosophy of Physics, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, eds. Butterfield, J. and Earman, J.. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 923–1047.CrossRef
Kampen, (1981). Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. Amsterdam North-Holland.
Wald, R. M. (2006). The arrow of time and the initial conditions of the Universe. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 37(3), 394–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×