Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T20:10:28.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter I - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2018

Get access

Summary

AN EXAMPLE OF DIALOGUE: THE HEARSAY SAGA

In the early 2000s, Mr Al-Khawaja was convicted of indecent assault and Mr Tahery of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm. They were both sentenced to custodial sentences in the UK. These convicts have in common that they felt that their trials had been unfair because their conviction was principally based on hearsay evidence. At Mr Al-Khawaja's trial, the statement to the police of a woman who made complaints against him was read to the jury. This woman could not testify at trial because she had passed away. A witness statement in Mr Tahery's case was also read to the jury because the witness feared attending trial. The UK courts to which the applicants complained concluded that their right to a fair trial had not been infringed. Consequently, the two men brought an application to the European Court of Human Rights (Court) in Strasbourg, which decided otherwise. Sitting as a chamber of seven, it held unanimously that the admission of the hearsay evidence at trial was in violation of the right to a fair trial, which is protected by Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Convention). A little less than three years later, the Court's Grand Chamber concluded upon referral that Mr Tahery's Article 6-rights had been violated and that there had been no violation of Article 6 in respect of Mr Al-Khawaja. The latter ruling was supported by a solid majority of fifteen votes to two and amongst the fifteen was Judge Bratza, who also sat in the chamber that had found a violation in the same case. Why did the Grand Chamber reverse the chamber's judgment in Mr Al-Khawaja's case? And why did Judge Bratza vote, first, for a violation and, then, against finding one in that case? Clues to these questions can be found in a judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (UK) in the case of R. v. Horncastle and Others.

The UK Supreme Court spoke after the chamber had decided and before the Grand Chamber considered the case of Mr Al-Khawaja and Mr Tahery anew.

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • R. Glas Lize
  • Book: The Theory, Potential and Practice of Procedural Dialogue in the European Convention on Human Rights System
  • Online publication: 21 September 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780687391.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • R. Glas Lize
  • Book: The Theory, Potential and Practice of Procedural Dialogue in the European Convention on Human Rights System
  • Online publication: 21 September 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780687391.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • R. Glas Lize
  • Book: The Theory, Potential and Practice of Procedural Dialogue in the European Convention on Human Rights System
  • Online publication: 21 September 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780687391.001
Available formats
×