Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T07:34:13.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2018

Monica R. Gale
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
J. H. D. Scourfield
Affiliation:
Maynooth University, Ireland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abel, L. 1963. Metatheatre: A New View of Dramatic Form. New York.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. London.Google Scholar
Adelman, M. 2003. ‘The Military, Militarism, and the Militarization of Domestic Violence’, Violence against Women 9: 1118–52.Google Scholar
Africa, T. W. 1971. ‘Urban Violence in Imperial Rome’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 2: 321.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. 1976. Lucan: An Introduction. Cornell Studies in Classical Philology 39. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. 1985. Metaformations: Soundplay and Wordplay in Ovid and Other Classical Poets. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Allen, D. S. 2000. The World of Prometheus: The Politics of Punishing in Democratic Athens. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Alston, R. 1998. ‘Arms and the Man: Soldiers, Masculinity and Power in Republican and Imperial Rome’, in Foxhall, L. and Salmon, J. (eds.), When Men Were Men: Masculinity, Power and Identity in Classical Antiquity. Leicester–Nottingham Studies in Ancient Society 8. London: 205–23.Google Scholar
Alston, R. 2011. ‘Seeing Caesar in Ruins: Towards a Radical Aesthetic of Ruins’, in Kahane, A. (ed.), Antiquity and the Ruin/L’Antiquité et les ruines (= European Review of History/Revue européenne d’histoire 18.5–6). Abingdon: 697716.Google Scholar
Alston, R. and Spentzou, E. 2011. Reflections of Romanity: Discourses of Subjectivity in Imperial Rome. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Alton, E. H., Wormell, D. E. W., and Courtney, E. (eds.). 1985. P. Ovidi Nasonis Fastorum libri sex, 2nd edn. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1960. ‘Imagery in the Satires of Horace and Juvenal’, AJPh 81: 225–60, reprinted in Anderson 1982a: 115–50.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1982a. Essays on Roman Satire. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1982b. ‘The Roman Socrates: Horace and his Satires’, in Anderson 1982a: 13–49.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1993. Barbarian Play: Plautus’ Roman Comedy. Toronto.Google Scholar
Andújar, R. M. 2012. ‘Charicleia the Martyr: Heliodorus and Early Christian Narrative’, in Futre Pinheiro, Perkins, and Pervo 2012: 139–52.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 1970. On Violence. New York.Google Scholar
Arjava, A. 1996. Women and Law in Late Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Arjava, A. 1998. ‘Paternal Power in Late Antiquity’, JRS 88: 147–65.Google Scholar
Armstrong, N. and Tennenhouse, L. (eds.). 1989. The Violence of Representation: Literature and the History of Violence. London.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1988. ‘New Evidence for the Opening of Menander’s Perikeiromene?’, ZPE 71: 1115.Google Scholar
Ash, R. 1998. ‘Waving the White Flag: Surrender Scenes at Livy 9.5–6 and Tacitus, Histories 3.31 and 4.62’, G&R 45: 2744.Google Scholar
Ash, R. 1999. Ordering Anarchy: Armies and Leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. London.Google Scholar
Ash, R. 2002. ‘Epic Encounters? Ancient Historical Battle Narratives and the Epic Tradition’, in Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Mnemosyne Supplementum 224. Leiden: 253–73.Google Scholar
Ash, R. 2003. ‘“Aliud est enim epistulam, aliud historiam … scribere” (Epistles 6.16.22): Pliny the Historian?’, Arethusa 36: 211–25.Google Scholar
Ash, R.(ed.). 2007. Tacitus: Histories, Book II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ashworth, W. D. and Andrewes, M. 1957. ‘Horace, Sat. i. 6. 104–5’, CR 7: 107–8.Google Scholar
Aubert, J.-J. 2002. ‘A Double Standard in Roman Criminal Law? The Death Penalty and Social Structure in Late Republican and Early Imperial Rome’, in Aubert, J.-J. and Sirks, B. (eds.), Speculum iuris: Roman Law as a Reflection of Social and Economic Life in Antiquity. Ann Arbor, MI: 94133.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (ed.). 1955. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber quartus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G.(ed.). 1977. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber sextus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (ed.). 1922. Lucreti De rerum natura libri sex, 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.(ed.). 1947. Titi Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. 2000. ‘Bang Bang Bang Bang, ad nauseum [sic]’, in Prince 2000a: 79–85.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by Emerson, C. and Holquist, M.. University of Texas Press Slavic Series 1. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Bal, M. 1991. Reading ‘Rembrandt’: Beyond the Word-Image Opposition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bannet, E. T. 1989. Structuralism and the Logic of Dissent: Barthes, Derrida, Foucault, Lacan. Urbana, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannon, C. J. 1997. The Brothers of Romulus: Fraternal Pietas in Roman Law, Literature, and Society. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. Forthcoming. ‘The Bitter Medicine of History: Seneca on the Genre of Declamation’, in Dinter, Guérin, and Martinho forthcoming.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1997. The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (ed.). 2005. Ovidio: Metamorfosi, vol. I. Milan.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. and Cucchiarelli, A. 2005. ‘Satire and the Poet: The Body as Self-Referential Symbol’, in Freudenburg 2005a: 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barigazzi, A. 1987. ‘Lucrezio e la gioia per il male altrui’, in Boldrini, S. et al. (eds.), Filologia e forme letterarie: studi offerti a Francesco della Corte. 5 vols. Urbino: II.269–84.Google Scholar
Barkan, L. 1986. The Gods Made Flesh: Metamorphosis and the Pursuit of Paganism. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Barker, M. and Petley, J. (eds.). 2001a. Ill Effects: The Media/Violence Debate, 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Barker, M. and Petley, J. (eds.). 2001b. ‘Introduction: From Bad Research to Good – a Guide for the Perplexed’, in Barker and Petley 2001a: 1–26.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 2010. Early Christian Hagiography and Roman History. Tria corda: Jenaer Vorlesungen zu Judentum, Antike und Christentum 5. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Barrett, W. S. (ed.). 1964. Euripides: Hippolytos. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. A. (ed.). 1973. Ovid’s Amores, Book 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1973. Mythologies. Translated by Lavers, A.. St Albans.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1977. Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes. Translated by Howard, R.. New York.Google Scholar
Barton, C. A. 1989. ‘The Scandal of the Arena’, Representations 27: 136.Google Scholar
Barton, C. A. 1993. The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans: The Gladiator and the Monster. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1997. Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 2006. The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaensen, A. A. R. 1993. ‘Prudentius in Recent Literary Criticism’, in den Boeft, J. and Hilhorst, A. (eds.), Early Christian Poetry: A Collection of Essays. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 22. Leiden: 101–34.Google Scholar
Bate, J. 1993. Shakespeare and Ovid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Beacham, R. C. 1991. ‘Violence on the Street: Playing Rough in Plautus’, in Redmond, J. (ed.), Violence in Drama. Themes in Drama 13. Cambridge: 4768.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E. S. 1992. Tragic Pleasures: Aristotle on Plot and Emotion. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Bellido, J. A. 1989. ‘El motivo literario de la militia amoris en Plauto y su influencia en Ovidio’, Estudios clásicos 31: 2132.Google Scholar
Benediktson, D. T. 1985. ‘Propertius’ “Elegiacization” of Homer’, Maia 37: 1726.Google Scholar
Benton, C. 2002. ‘Split Vision: The Politics of the Gaze in Seneca’s Troades’, in Fredrick 2002a: 31–56.Google Scholar
Berger, J. 1972. Ways of Seeing. London.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, L. 2000. ‘Some Effects of Thoughts on Anti- and Prosocial Influences of Media Events: A Cognitive-Neoassociation Analysis’, in Prince 2000a: 205–36.Google Scholar
Bernstein, N. W. 2009. ‘Adoptees and Exposed Children in Roman Declamation: Commodification, Luxury, and the Threat of Violence’, CPh 104: 331–53.Google Scholar
Bernstein, N. W. 2012. ‘“Torture Her Until She Lies”: Torture, Testimony, and Social Status in Roman Rhetorical Education’, G&R 59: 165–77.Google Scholar
Berthet, J. F. 1980. ‘Properce et Homère’, in Thill, A. (ed.), L’élégie romaine: enracinement, thèmes, diffusion. Bulletin de la Faculté des lettres de Mulhouse 10. Paris: 141–55.Google Scholar
Beye, C. R. 1963. ‘Lucretius and Progress’, CJ 58: 160–9.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. 1997a. Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. 1997b. ‘Schooling in Persona: Imagination and Subordination in Roman Education’, ClAnt 16: 5778.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. 2011. The School of Rome: Latin Studies and the Origins of Liberal Education. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bömer, F. (ed.). 1958. P. Ovidius Naso: Die Fasten, vol. II. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bömer, F. 1969–86. P. Ovidius Naso: Metamorphosen. Kommentar. 7 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. 1977. Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. London.Google Scholar
Booth, J. 2001. ‘Moonshine: Intertextual Illumination in Propertius 1.3.31–3 and Philodemus, Anth. Pal. 5.123’, CQ 51: 537–44.Google Scholar
Booth, J. 2009. ‘The Amores: Ovid Making Love’, in Knox, P. E. (ed.), A Companion to Ovid. Chichester: 6177.Google Scholar
Bosworth, C. E. 1976. The Mediaeval Islamic Underworld: The Banū Sāsān in Arabic Society and Literature. 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 2004. ‘Gender and Symbolic Violence’, in Scheper-Hughes and Bourgois 2004: 339–42.Google Scholar
Bowditch, P. L. 2001. Horace and the Gift Economy of Patronage. Classics and Contemporary Thought 7. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1994. Fiction as History: Nero to Julian. Sather Classical Lectures 58. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. W. 1997. Ovid’s Literary Loves: Influence and Innovation in the Amores. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (ed.). 1987. Seneca’s Phaedra. Latin and Greek Texts 5. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. 1997. Tragic Seneca: An Essay in the Theatrical Tradition. London.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (ed.). 2014. Seneca: Medea. Oxford.Google Scholar
Braden, G. 1985. Renaissance Tragedy and the Senecan Tradition: Anger’s Privilege. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. R. 1987. Slaves and Masters in the Roman Empire: A Study in Social Control. New York.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. R. 1994. Slavery and Society at Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, P. (ed.). 1902. P. Ovidi Nasonis De arte amatoria libri tres. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Braund, D. 1993. ‘Piracy under the Principate and the Ideology of Imperial Eradication’, in Rich and Shipley 1993: 195–212.Google Scholar
Braund, S. 1992. Roman Verse Satire. Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics 23. Oxford.Google Scholar
Braund, S. (ed.). 2009. Seneca: De clementia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Braund, S. and Gill, C. (eds.). 1997. The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. and Formisano, M. (eds.). 2012. Perpetua’s Passions: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Passio Perpetuae et Felicitatis. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bright, D. F. 1971. ‘The Plague and the Structure of De rerum natura’, Latomus 30: 607–32.Google Scholar
Bright, D. F. 1978. Haec mihi fingebam: Tibullus in His World. Cincinnati Classical Studies 3. Leiden.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. 1971. Horace on Poetry. II. The ‘Ars poetica’. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bronfen, E. 1992. Over Her Dead Body: Death, Femininity and the Aesthetic. Manchester.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. 1984. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York.Google Scholar
Brougham, H. 1818. A Letter to Sir Samuel Romilly, M.P. from Henry Brougham, Esq. M.P. F.R.S. upon the Abuse of Charities. London.Google Scholar
Brown, P. 1989. The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. London.Google Scholar
Brown, R. D. 1987. Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De rerum natura IV, 1030–1287, with Prolegomena, Text, and Translation. Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition 15. Leiden.Google Scholar
Brown, S. 1992. ‘Death as Decoration: Scenes from the Arena on Roman Domestic Mosaics’, in Richlin 1992b: 180–211.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, S. 1975. Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. London.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1971. Italian Manpower, 225 B.C.–A.D. 14. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1978. ‘Laus imperii’, in Garnsey, P. D. A. and Whitaker, C. R. (eds.), Imperialism in the Ancient World. Cambridge: 159–91, reprinted in C. B. Champion (ed.), Roman Imperialism: Readings and Sources (Malden, MA, 2004), 163–85.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. and Moore, J. M. (eds.). 1967. Res gestae divi Augusti: The Achievements of the Divine Augustus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bryen, A. Z. 2013. Violence in Roman Egypt: A Study in Legal Interpretation. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1971. ‘Epikurs Triumph des Geistes’, Hermes 99: 303–23, published in English as ‘Epicurus’ Triumph of the Mind’, in Gale 2007: 104–31.Google Scholar
Burkowski, J. M. C. 2013. ‘The Symbolism and Rhetoric of Hair in Latin Elegy.’ Unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Burrus, V. 1995. ‘Reading Agnes: The Rhetoric of Gender in Ambrose and Prudentius’, JECS 3: 2546.Google Scholar
Burrus, V. 2004. The Sex Lives of Saints: An Erotics of Ancient Hagiography. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Butler, H. E. 1909. Post-Augustan Poetry: From Seneca to Juvenal. Oxford.Google Scholar
Butler, H. E. and Barber, E. A. (eds.). 1933. The Elegies of Propertius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Butler, S. 2002. The Hand of Cicero. London.Google Scholar
Cahoon, L. 1988. ‘The Bed as Battlefield: Erotic Conquest and Military Metaphor in Ovid’s Amores’, TAPhA 118: 293307.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. 2005. ‘Bullish Looks and Sidelong Glances: Social Interaction and the Eyes in Ancient Greek Culture’, in Cairns, (ed.), Body Language in the Greek and Roman Worlds. Swansea: 123–55.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1972. Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1979. Tibullus: A Hellenistic Poet at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1984. ‘The Etymology of militia in Roman Elegy’, in Gil, L. and Aguilar, R. M. (eds.), Apophoreta philologica Emmanueli Fernández-Galiano a sodalibus oblata. 2 vols. Estudios clásicos 87–8. Madrid: 211–22, reprinted in Cairns, Papers on Roman Elegy: 1969–2003 (Eikasmos Studi 16; Bologna, 2007), 298–307.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 2006. Sextus Propertius: The Augustan Elegist. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Calder, W. M. III. 1976. ‘Seneca: Tragedian of Imperial Rome’, CJ 72: 111.Google Scholar
Calderwood, J. L. 1971. Shakespearean Metadrama. Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1989. ‘Virginity as Metaphor: Women and the Rhetoric of Early Christianity’, in Cameron, (ed.), History as Text: The Writing of Ancient History. London: 181205.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1994. ‘Early Christianity and the Discourse of Female Desire’, in Archer, L. J., Fischler, S., and Wyke, M. (eds.), Women in Ancient Societies: An Illusion of the Night. Basingstoke: 152–68, reprinted (with an afterword) in J. A. North and S. R. F. Price (eds.), The Religious History of the Roman Empire: Pagans, Jews, and Christians (Oxford, 2011), 505–30.Google Scholar
Cantarella, E. 1991. I supplizi capitali in Grecia e a Roma. Milan.Google Scholar
Cappello, O. Forthcoming. ‘Nomination and Systematisation in Seneca’s Controversiae’, in Dinter, Guérin, and Martinho forthcoming.Google Scholar
Carter, C. and Weaver, C. K. 2003. Violence and the Media. Buckingham.Google Scholar
Castelli, E. A. 2004. Martyrdom and Memory: Early Christian Culture Making. New York.Google Scholar
Caston, R. R. 2012. The Elegiac Passion: Jealousy in Roman Love Elegy. New York.Google Scholar
Cave, T. 1988. Recognitions: A Study in Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Caviness, M. H. 2001. Visualizing Women in the Middle Ages: Sight, Spectacle, and Scopic Economy. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. 2007. ‘Antiquity and Authority in Nonius Marcellus’, in Scourfield, J. H. D. (ed.), Texts and Culture in Late Antiquity: Inheritance, Authority, and Change. Swansea: 6996.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2005. ‘Victory’s Verdict: The Violent Occupation of Territory in Hellenistic Interstate Relations’, in Bertrand, J.-M. (ed.), La violence dans les mondes grec et romain: actes du colloque international (Paris, 2–4 mai 2002). Histoire ancienne et médiévale 80. Paris: 455–64.Google Scholar
Charney, L. 2001. ‘The Violence of a Perfect Moment’, in Slocum 2001a: 47–62.Google Scholar
Chew, K. 2003a. ‘The Chaste and the Chased: σωφροσύνη, Female Martyrs, and Novelistic Heroines’, Syllecta Classica 14: 205–22.Google Scholar
Chew, K. 2003b. ‘The Representation of Violence in the Greek Novels and Martyr Accounts’, in Panayotakis, S., Zimmerman, M., and Keulen, W. (eds.), The Ancient Novel and Beyond. Mnemosyne Supplementum 241. Leiden: 129–41.Google Scholar
Chiesa, P. 1996. ‘Un testo agiografico africano ad Aquileia: gli Acta di Gallonio e dei martiri di Timida Regia’, AB 114: 241–68.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000. Rogue States: The Rule of Force in World Affairs. London.Google Scholar
Chong, S. 2004. ‘From “Blood Auteurism” to the Violence of Pornography: Sam Peckinpah and Oliver Stone’, in S. J. Schneider 2004: 249–68.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. M. (ed.). 2000. Plautus: Amphitruo. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Citti, F. 2000. Studi oraziani: tematica e intertestualità. Testi e manuali per l’insegnamento universitario del latino 65. Bologna.Google Scholar
Cixous, H. 1988. Manne: aux Mandelstams aux Mandelas. Paris.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 1993. Women in Late Antiquity: Pagan and Christian Life-Styles. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clark, P. 1998. ‘Women, Slaves, and the Hierarchies of Domestic Violence: The Family of St Augustine’, in Joshel and Murnaghan 1998: 109–29.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. 1993. ‘Principi e concetti morali nelle satire di Orazio’, in Atti del convegno di Venosa, 8–15 novembre 1992. Venosa: 111–28.Google Scholar
Clay, D. 1983. Lucretius and Epicurus. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Clover, C. J. 1992. Men, Women, and Chain Saws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film. London.Google Scholar
Cobb, L. S. 2008. Dying to Be Men: Gender and Language in Early Christian Martyr Texts. New York.Google Scholar
Coffey, M. 1976. Roman Satire. London.Google Scholar
Coffey, M. and Mayer, R. (eds.). 1990. Seneca: Phaedra. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cohn, C. 2004. ‘Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals’, in Scheper-Hughes and Bourgois 2004: 354–61.Google Scholar
Cole, S. G. 2004. Landscapes, Gender, and Ritual Space: The Ancient Greek Experience. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. 1990. ‘Fatal Charades: Roman Executions Staged as Mythological Enactments’, JRS 80: 4473.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (ed.). 2006. M. Valerii Martialis Liber spectaculorum. Oxford.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. (ed.). 1977. Vergil: Eclogues. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Commager, H. S. 1957. ‘Lucretius’ Interpretation of the Plague’, HSCPh 62: 105–18, reprinted in Gale 2007: 182–98.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2007. The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2009. ‘The Strange Art of the Sententious Declaimer’, in Hardie, P. R. (ed.), Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford: 330–49.Google Scholar
Connors, C. 1998. Petronius the Poet. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1994. Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia. Translated by Most, G. W.. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Cooper, K. 1996. The Virgin and the Bride: Idealized Womanhood in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Copley, F. O. 1947. ‘Servitium amoris in the Roman Elegists’, TAPhA 78: 285300.Google Scholar
Coppieters, S., Praet, D., Bossu, A., and Taveirne, M. 2014. ‘Martyrdom, Literary Experiment and Church Politics in Jerome’s Epistula prima, to Innocentius, on the septies percussa’, VChr 68: 384408.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. 1996. Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Corbier, M. 2001. ‘Child Exposure and Abandonment’, in Dixon, S. (ed.), Childhood, Class and Kin in the Roman World. London: 5273.Google Scholar
Cornell, D. 1992. The Philosophy of the Limit. New York.Google Scholar
Corsaro, F. 1997. ‘Amore e morte nel Peristephanon liber di Prudenzio’, SicGymn 50 : 123–34.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (ed.). 1993. The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. 2006. ‘Lucretius and Others on Animals in Warfare’, MH 63: 152–3.Google Scholar
Crook, J. 1967a. ‘Patria potestas’, CQ 17: 113–22.Google Scholar
Crook, J. 1967b. ‘A Study in Decoction’, Latomus 26: 363–76.Google Scholar
Crowther, N. B. 1979. ‘Water and Wine as Symbols of Inspiration’, Mnemosyne 32: 111.Google Scholar
Cunningham, M. P. (ed.). 1966. Aurelii Prudentii Clementis Carmina. Corpus Christianorum, series Latina 126. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Curran, L. C. 1978. ‘Rape and Rape Victims in the Metamorphoses’, Arethusa 11: 213–41, reprinted in J. Peradotto and J. P. Sullivan (eds.), Women in the Ancient World: The Arethusa Papers (Albany, NY, 1984), 263–86.Google Scholar
Curtis, L. 1998. Ireland: The Propaganda War. The British Media and the ‘Battle for Hearts and Minds’, 2nd edn. Belfast.Google Scholar
Dalzell, A. 1980. ‘Homeric Themes in Propertius’, Hermathena 129: 2936.Google Scholar
Damon, C. (ed.). 2003. Tacitus: Histories, Book I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dauge, Y. A. 1981. Le barbare: recherches sur la conception romaine de la barbarie et de la civilisation. Collection Latomus 176. Brussels.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. 1997. The Roman Conquest of Italy. Translated by Nevill, A.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Day, H. J. M. 2013. Lucan and the Sublime: Power, Representation and Aesthetic Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Deacy, S. and Pierce, K. F. (eds.). 1997. Rape in Antiquity. London.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 1991. Narrative in Drama: The Art of the Euripidean Messenger-Speech. Mnemosyne Supplementum 116. Leiden.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. H. 1964. ‘Distant Views: The Imagery of Lucretius 2’, CJ 60: 4955, reprinted in Gale 2007: 146–57.Google Scholar
de Lauretis, T. 1987. ‘The Violence of Rhetoric: Considerations on Representation and Gender’, in de Lauretis, , Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction. Bloomington, IN: 3150.Google Scholar
Delehaye, H. 1921. Les passions des martyrs et les genres littéraires. Brussels.Google Scholar
den Boeft, J. and Bremmer, J. 1991. ‘Notiunculae martyrologicae IV’, VChr 45: 105–22.Google Scholar
Dench, E. 2005. Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1982. Margins of Philosophy. Translated by Bass, A.. Brighton.Google Scholar
Desmond, M. 2006. Ovid’s Art and the Wife of Bath: The Ethics of Erotic Violence. Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Souza, P. 1999. Piracy in the Graeco-Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
de Ste. Croix, G. E. M. 1981. The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World: From the Archaic Age to the Arab Conquests. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
de Wijze, S. 2008. ‘Between Hero and Villain: Jack Bauer and the Problem of “Dirty Hands”’, in Weed, Davis, and Weed 2008: 17–30.Google Scholar
Diggle, J. (ed.). 1994. Euripidis Fabulae, vol. III. Oxford.Google Scholar
Diken, B. and Laustsen, C. B. 2007. Sociology through the Projector. London.Google Scholar
Dimundo, R. 2003. Ovidio: lezioni d’amore. Saggio di commento al I libro dell’ Ars amatoria. Scrinia 22. Bari.Google Scholar
Dinter, M., Guérin, C., and Martinho, M. (eds.). Forthcoming. Seneca the Elder: Reading Roman Declamation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dixon, S. 1992. The Roman Family. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (ed.). 1960. Euripides: Bacchae, 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Domínguez, M. J. and Martos Fernández, J. 2011. ‘Violación’, in Moreno Soldevila 2011: 453–8.Google Scholar
Dossey, L. 2008. ‘Wife Beating and Manliness in Late Antiquity’, P&P 199: 340.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 1982. ‘Apuleius and the Art of Narration’, CQ 32: 419–35.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 1993. ‘The Unity of Apuleius’ Eighth Book and the Danger of Beasts’, in Hofmann, H. (ed.), Groningen Colloquia on the Novel, vol. V. Groningen: 91109.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A. (ed.). 2006. Violence in Late Antiquity: Perceptions and Practices. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. and Rabinow, P. 1982. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, M. O. 2013. ‘Militia amoris: Fighting in Love’s Army’, in Thorsen 2013: 194–206.Google Scholar
Dryden, J. (tr.). 1709. Ovid’s Art of Love: Book I, in Dryden, J. et al., Ovid’s Art of Love, in Three Books, together with his Remedy of Love. Translated into English Verse by Several Eminent Hands. London.Google Scholar
duBois, P. 1991. Torture and Truth. New York.Google Scholar
Duff, J. D. (ed., tr.). 1928. Lucan: The Civil War. Loeb Classical Library 220. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Duff, J. W. 1936. Roman Satire: Its Outlook on Social Life. Sather Classical Lectures 12. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. 2001. ‘How to Make (and Break) a Cicero: Epideixis, Textuality, and Self-Fashioning in the Pro Archia and In Pisonem’, ClAnt 20: 2377.Google Scholar
Dunkle, J. R. 1967. ‘The Greek Tyrant and Roman Political Invective of the Late Republic’, TAPhA 98: 151–71.Google Scholar
DuQuesnay, I. M. Le, M. 1984. ‘Horace and Maecenas: The Propaganda Value of Sermones 1’, in Woodman, T. and West, D. (eds.), Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. Cambridge: 1958.Google Scholar
Dworkin, A. and MacKinnon, C. A. 1988. Pornography and Civil Rights: A New Day for Women’s Equality. Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De officiis. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. 2003. Sweet Violence: The Idea of the Tragic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. 2005. Holy Terror. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ebel, H. 1970. ‘Apuleius and the Present Time’, Arethusa 3: 155–76.Google Scholar
Edmondson, J. C. 1996. ‘Dynamic Arenas: Gladiatorial Presentations in the City of Rome and the Construction of Roman Society during the Early Empire’, in Slater, W. J. (ed.), Roman Theater and Society: E. Togo Salmon Papers I. Ann Arbor, MI: 69112.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1997. ‘Unspeakable Professions: Public Performance and Prostitution in Ancient Rome’, in Hallett and Skinner 1997: 66–95.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 2007. Death in Ancient Rome. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1987. Homer: Poet of the Iliad. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Eidinow, J. S. C. 1993. ‘A Note on Ovid’s Ars amatoria 1.117–19’, AJPh 114: 413–17.Google Scholar
Eisenhut, W. and Mayer-Maly, T. 1961. ‘Vis’, RE IXA.1.310–47.Google Scholar
Eldred, K. O. 2002. ‘This Ship of Fools: Epic Vision in Lucan’s Vulteius Episode’, in Fredrick 2002a: 57–85.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. 1951. Selected Essays. London.Google Scholar
Enterline, L. 2000. The Rhetoric of the Body from Ovid to Shakespeare. Cambridge Studies in Renaissance Literature and Culture 35. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Erdkamp, P. (ed.). 2007. A Companion to the Roman Army. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Estévez Sola, J. A. 2011. ‘Milicia de amor’, in Moreno Soldevila 2011: 275–86.Google Scholar
Evans, S. 1971. ‘Odyssean Echoes in Propertius IV.8’, G&R 18: 51–3.Google Scholar
Evans Grubbs, J. 1995. Law and Family in Late Antiquity: The Emperor Constantine’s Marriage Legislation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Eyl, J. 2012. ‘Why Thekla Does Not See Paul: Visual Perception and the Displacement of erōs in the Acts of Paul and Thekla’, in Futre Pinheiro, Perkins, and Pervo 2012: 3–19.Google Scholar
Fagan, G. G. 2011a. The Lure of the Arena: Social Psychology and the Crowd at the Roman Games. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fagan, G. G. 2011b. ‘Violence in Roman Social Relations’, in Peachin, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World. New York: 467–95.Google Scholar
Fairweather, J. 1981. Seneca the Elder. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1972. Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery. Phoenix Supplementary Volume 10. Toronto.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (ed.). 1982. Seneca’s Troades. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1986. ‘Ovid, Germanicus, and the Composition of the Fasti, in Cairns, F. (ed.), Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar: Fifth Volume, 1985. ARCA Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers and Monographs 19. Liverpool: 243–81.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 2004. Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Oxford.Google Scholar
Farrar, L. 1998. Ancient Roman Gardens. Stroud.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 1999. ‘The Ovidian corpus: Poetic Body and Poetic Text’, in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds 1999: 127–41.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2007. ‘Horace’s Body, Horace’s Books’, in Heyworth, S. J. (ed.), Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean. Oxford: 174–93.Google Scholar
Fear, T. 2000. ‘The Poet as Pimp: Elegiac Seduction in the Time of Augustus’, Arethusa 23: 217–40.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (ed.). 1980. Sesto Properzio: Il primo libro delle elegie. Accademia toscana di scienze e lettere ‘La Colombaria’, Studi 53. Florence.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 1978. ‘Wild Beasts in the De rerum natura’, Prudentia 10: 1522.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 1992. ‘Si licet et fas est: Ovid’s Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech under the Principate’, in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London: 125.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 1999. ‘Epic Violence, Epic Order: Killing, Catalogues, and the Role of the Reader in Aeneid 10’, in Perkell, C. (ed.), Reading Vergil: An Interpretive Guide. Oklahoma Series in Classical Culture 23. Norman, OK: 178–94.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1997. ‘Metamorphosis and Sacrifice in Ovid’s Theban Narrative’, MD 38: 2555.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 2010. Playing Gods: Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Politics of Fiction. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. and James, P. 2004. ‘Making the Most of Marsyas’, Arethusa 37: 75103.Google Scholar
Felson, R. B. 2000. ‘Mass Media Effects on Violent Behavior’, in Prince 2000a: 237–66.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. 1989. ‘Plato and Poetry’, in Kennedy, G. A. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. I. Classical Criticism. Cambridge: 92148.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. J. (ed.). 2011. Sophocles: Ajax. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 48. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. D. (ed.). 1906. Cornelii Taciti Annalium ab excessu divi Augusti libri. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. D. (ed.). 1911. Cornelii Taciti Historiarum libri. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fiske, G. C. 1920. Lucilius and Horace: A Study in the Classical Theory of Imitation. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 1988. ‘Power and Impotence in Horace’s Epodes’, Ramus 17: 176–91, reprinted in M. Lowrie (ed.), Horace: Odes and Epodes (Oxford, 2009), 141–59.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 2000. Slavery and the Roman Literary Imagination. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Forbes Irving, P. M. C. 1990. Metamorphosis in Greek Myths. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 2002. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Fordyce, C. J. 1938. ‘The Whole Truth’, CR 52: 59.Google Scholar
Fordyce, C. J. 1952. ‘Mittatur senex in scholas’, PCA 49: 28.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1966. Les mots et les choses. Paris.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1975. Surveiller et punir. Paris.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1976. Histoire de la sexualité. I. La volonté de savoir. Paris.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1984a. Histoire de la sexualité. II. L’usage des plaisirs. Paris.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1984b. Histoire de la sexualité. III. Le souci de soi. Paris.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2008. Le gouvernement de soi et des autres: cours au Collège de France 1982–1983. Edited by Gros, F.. Paris.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. 1987. ‘Vergil on Killing Virgins’, in Whitby, Michael, Hardie, P., and Whitby, Mary (eds.), Homo viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. Bristol: 185–98.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. 2002. Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De rerum natura Book Two, Lines 1–332. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, P. G. 1997. ‘Lucretian Conclusions’, in Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ: 112–38, reprinted in Gale 2007: 199–233.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1957. Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1960. Elementi plautini in Plauto. Translated by Munari, F.. Pensiero storico 41. Florence.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. F. 1945. Ovid: A Poet between Two Worlds. Sather Classical Lectures 18. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, D. 2009. ‘Martyrology and the Prurient Gaze’, JECS 17: 215–45.Google Scholar
Fredrick, D. 1997. ‘Reading Broken Skin: Violence in Roman Elegy’, in Hallett and Skinner 1997: 172–93.Google Scholar
Fredrick, D. (ed.). 2002a. The Roman Gaze: Vision, Power, and the Body. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Fredrick, D. 2002b. ‘Introduction: Invisible Rome’, in Fredrick 2002a: 1–30.Google Scholar
Fredrick, D. 2012. ‘The Gaze and the Elegiac Imaginary’, in Gold 2012: 426–39.Google Scholar
French, K. 1996. Screen Violence. London.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 1993. The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2001. Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (ed.). 2005a. The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2005b. ‘Introduction: Roman Satire’, in Freudenburg 2005a: 1–30.Google Scholar
Friedrich, W.-H. 2003. Wounding and Death in the Iliad: Homeric Techniques of Description. Translated by Wright, G. and Jones, P.. Appendix by Saunders, K. B.. London.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, C. J. 2012. Policing the Roman Empire: Soldiers, Administration, and Public Order. New York.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. 2013. ‘Servitium amoris: The Interplay of Dominance, Gender and Poetry’, in Thorsen 2013: 180–93.Google Scholar
Furneaux, H. 1896–1907. The Annals of Tacitus, 2nd edn. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Futrell, A. 1997. Blood in the Arena: The Spectacle of Roman Power. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Futre Pinheiro, M. P., Perkins, J., and Pervo, R. (eds.). 2012. The Ancient Novel and Early Christian and Jewish Narrative: Fictional Intersections. Ancient Narrative Supplementum 16. Groningen.Google Scholar
Fyfe, W. H. and Levene, D. S. 1997. Tacitus: The Histories. Translated by Fyfe, W. H.. Revised and edited by Levene, D. S.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gahan, J. J. 1987. ‘Imitatio and aemulatio in Seneca’s Phaedra’, Latomus 46: 380–7.Google Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. 1983. ‘Amor, rura and militia in Three Elegies of Tibullus: 1.1, 1.5, and 1.10’, Latomus 42: 5872.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. 1994. Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. 1997. ‘Propertius 2.7: Militia amoris and the Ironies of Elegy’, JRS 87: 7791.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. 2000. Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (ed.). 2007. Lucretius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (ed.). 2009. Lucretius: De rerum natura V. Oxford.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1975. Ovid’s Metamorphoses: An Introduction to the Basic Aspects. Oxford.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1988. ‘The Anger of Aeneas’, AJPh 109: 321–48.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1994. ‘How to Be Philosophical about the End of the Aeneid’, ICS 19: 191201.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Gamel, M.-K. 1989. ‘Non sine caede: Abortion Politics and Poetics in Ovid’s Amores’, Helios 16: 183206.Google Scholar
García-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A. F. M., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., and Watts, C. 2005. WHO Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence against Women: Initial Results on Prevalence, Health Outcomes and Women’s Responses. Geneva.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. F. 1986. Women in Roman Law and Society. London.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. F. 1993. Being a Roman Citizen. London.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. 1970. Social Status and Legal Privilege in the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. 1967. Note al Rudens di Plauto. Quaderni di ‘Le parole e le idee’ 7. Naples.Google Scholar
Gershenson, D. E. 1992. ‘Καὶ σὺ τέκνον: Caesar’s Last Words’, Shakespeare Quarterly 43: 218–19.Google Scholar
Gervais, K. 2013. ‘Viewing Violence in Statius’ Thebaid and the Films of Quentin Tarantino’, in Lovatt, H. and Vout, C. (eds.), Epic Visions: Visuality in Greek and Latin Epic and Its Reception. Cambridge: 139–67.Google Scholar
Giardina, G. (ed.). 2010. Properzio: Elegie. Testi e commenti 25. Pisa.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. 1999. Postmodernity, Ethics and the Novel: From Leavis to Levinas. London.Google Scholar
Gibson, B. J. 2008. ‘Battle Narrative in Statius, Thebaid’, in Smolenaars, J. J. L., van Dam, H.-J., and Nauta, R. R. (eds.), The Poetry of Statius. Mnemosyne Supplementum 306. Leiden: 85109.Google Scholar
Gibson, B. J. 2014. ‘The Representation of Greek Diplomacy in Tacitus’, in Madsen, J. M. and Rees, R. D. (eds.), Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing. Impact of Empire 18. Leiden: 124–43.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (ed.). 2003. Ovid: Ars amatoria, Book 3. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 40. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. 2007. Excess and Restraint: Propertius, Horace, and Ovid’s Ars amatoria. BICS Supplement 89. London.Google Scholar
Gilliver, K. 2007. ‘The Augustan Reform and the Structure of the Imperial Army’, in Erdkamp 2007: 183–200.Google Scholar
Girard, R. 1977. Violence and the Sacred. Translated by Gregory, P.. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Girard, R. 1996. ‘Mimesis and Violence’, in Williams, J. G. (ed.), The Girard Reader. New York: 919.Google Scholar
Giroux, H. A. 2006. America on the Edge: Henry Giroux on Politics, Culture, and Education. New York.Google Scholar
Glancy, J. A. 2010. Corporal Knowledge: Early Christian Bodies. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. (ed.). 2012. A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. 1996. ‘The Fall and Rise of Roman Tragedy’, TAPhA 126: 265–86.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. 2000. ‘Going for Baroque: Seneca and the English’, in G. W. M. Harrison 2000: 209–31.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. 2005. Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. (ed.). 1998a. Why We Watch: The Attractions of Violent Entertainment. New York.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. 1998b. ‘Why We Watch’, in Goldstein 1998a: 212–26.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W. and Sandbach, F. H. (eds.). 1973. Menander: A Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. (ed.). 1972. The Annals of Tacitus, Books 1–6. Volume I: Annals 1.1–54. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 15. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. (ed.). 1981. The Annals of Tacitus, Books 1–6. Volume II: Annals 1.55–81 and Annals 2. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 23. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. 2002. ‘Some Unseen Monster: Rereading Lucretius on Sex’, in Fredrick 2002a: 86–109.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 1993. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Satire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. 2005. Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. 1982. ‘Drama’, in Kenney and Clausen 1982: 77–134.Google Scholar
Green, P. (tr.). 1982. Ovid: The Erotic Poems. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Greene, E. 1998. The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Greene, E. 1999. ‘Travesties of Love: Violence and Voyeurism in Ovid Amores 1.7’, CW 92: 409–18.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1977. ‘Propertius and Antony’, JRS 67: 87105, reprinted in Griffin, Latin Poets and Roman Life (London, 1985), 32–47.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1980. Homer on Life and Death. Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. 1972. ‘The Elder Seneca and Spain’, JRS 62: 119.Google Scholar
Griffith, J. G. 1970. ‘The Ending of Juvenal’s First Satire and Lucilius, Book XXX’, Hermes 98: 5672.Google Scholar
Grig, L. 2004. Making Martyrs in Late Antiquity. London.Google Scholar
Grig, L. 2005. ‘The Paradoxical Body of Saint Agnes’, in Hopkins, A. and Wyke, M. (eds.), Roman Bodies: Antiquity to the Eighteenth Century. London: 111–22.Google Scholar
Gros, F. 2003. ‘Introduction’, in Gros, F. and Lévy, C. (eds.), Foucault et la philosophie antique. Paris: 713.Google Scholar
Grünewald, T. 2004. Bandits in the Roman Empire: Myth and Reality. Translated by Drinkwater, J.. London.Google Scholar
Grützmacher, G. 1901–8. Hieronymus: eine biographische Studie zur alten Kirchengeschichte. 3 vols. Studien zur Geschichte der Theologie und der Kirche 6.3, 10.1–2. Leipzig/Berlin.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. 1996. ‘The Ideology of the Arena’, ClAnt 15: 113–51.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. 1997. ‘Catullus, Pliny and Love-Letters’, TAPhA 127: 201–29.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. 2003. Declamation, Paternity, and Roman Identity: Authority and the Rhetorical Self. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. 2005. ‘The Libidinal Rhetoric of Satire’, in Freudenburg 2005a: 224–40.Google Scholar
Gurval, R. A. 1995. Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1997. ‘The Invention of Sexuality in the World-City of Rome’, in Habinek and Schiesaro 1997: 23–43.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 2005. The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.). 1997. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1995. Qu’est-ce que la philosophie antique? Collection Folio/essais 280. Paris.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. 1973. ‘The Role of Women in Roman Elegy: Counter-Cultural Feminism’, Arethusa 6: 103–24.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. 1977. ‘Perusinae glandes and the Changing Image of Augustus’, AJAH 2: 151–71.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. 2002. ‘The Eleven Elegies of the Augustan Poet Sulpicia’, in Churchill, L. J., Brown, P. R., and Jeffrey, J. E. (eds.), Women Writing Latin: From Roman Antiquity to Early Modern Europe. I. Women Writing Latin in Roman Antiquity, Late Antiquity, and the Early Christian Era. New York: 4565.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. 2009. ‘Sulpicia and Her Resistant Intertextuality’, in van Mal-Maeder, D., Burnier, A., and Núñez, L. (eds.), Jeux de voix: enonciation, intertextualité et intentionnalité dans la littérature antique. Echo 8. Berne: 141–55.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.). 1997. Roman Sexualities. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Hands, A. R. 1968. Charities and Social Aid in Greece and Rome. London.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. A. (ed., tr.). 1989. Apuleius: Metamorphoses. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library 44, 453. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1986. Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1990. ‘Ovid’s Theban History: The First “Anti-Aeneid”?’, CQ 40: 224–35.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2002. Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S. (eds.). 1999. Ovidian Transformations: Essays on the Metamorphoses and Its Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harries, J. 1999. ‘Constructing the Judge: Judicial Accountability and the Culture of Criticism in Late Antiquity’, in Miles, R. (ed.), Constructing Identities in Late Antiquity. London: 214–33.Google Scholar
Harries, J. 2007. Law and Crime in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. 1979. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 B.C. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. 1994. ‘Child-Exposure in the Roman Empire’, JRS 84: 122.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. 2001. Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. W. M. (ed.). 2000. Seneca in Performance. London.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (ed.). 1991. Vergil: Aeneid 10. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (ed.). 1995. Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hattaway, M. 1982. Elizabethan Popular Theatre: Plays in Performance. London.Google Scholar
Hauthal, F. (ed.). 1864–6. Acronis et Porphyrionis Commentarii in Q. Horatium Flaccum. 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Heffernan, T. J. 2012. The Passion of Perpetua and Felicity. New York.Google Scholar
Helm, R. (ed.). 1931. Apuleius: Metamorphoseon libri XI. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hemker, J. 1985. ‘Rape and the Foundation of Rome’, Helios 12: 41–7.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. 1987. ‘Lucan: The Word at War’, Ramus 16: 122–64.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. 1998. Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. 1999a. Writing down Rome: Satire, Comedy, and Other Offences in Latin Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. 1999b. ‘Suck It and See: Horace, Epode 8’, in Henderson 1999a: 93–113.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. 1999c. ‘Be Alert (Your Country Needs Lerts): Horace, Satires 1.9’, in Henderson 1999a: 202–27.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. 2002. Pliny’s Statue: The Letters, Self-Portraiture and Classical Art. Exeter.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. 2003. Morals and Villas in Seneca’s Letters: Places to Dwell. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. 2004. Hortus: The Roman Book of Gardening. London.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. 2010. Review of Migliario 2007, BMCRev 2010.01.20.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. 2011. ‘The Nature of Man: Pliny, Historia naturalis as Cosmogram’, MD 66: 139–71.Google Scholar
Henderson Administration. 1994–6. The Henderson Top 2000 Charities. Continues The Henderson Top 1000 Charities. London.Google Scholar
Hengel, M. 1977. Crucifixion in the Ancient World and the Folly of the Message of the Cross. Translated by Bowden, J.. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Henry, M. M. 1992. ‘The Edible Woman: Athenaeus’s Concept of the Pornographic’, in Richlin 1992b: 250–68.Google Scholar
Herbert, Z. 1968. Selected Poems. Translated by Miłosz, C. and Scott, P. D.. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Herbert-Brown, G. 1994. Ovid and the Fasti: An Historical Study. Oxford.Google Scholar
Herington, C. J. 1966. ‘Senecan Tragedy’, Arion 5: 422–71.Google Scholar
Herington, C. J. 1982. ‘The Younger Seneca’, in Kenney and Clausen 1982: 511–32.Google Scholar
Hershkowitz, D. 1998. The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Herz, P. 2007. ‘Finances and Costs of the Roman Army’, in Erdkamp 2007: 306–22.Google Scholar
Heubner, H. 1963–82. P. Cornelius Tacitus: Die Historien. Kommentar. 5 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Heuzé, P. 1985. L’image du corps dans l’oeuvre de Virgile. Collection de l’École française de Rome 86. Rome.Google Scholar
Heyman, R. E. and Neidig, P. H. 1999. ‘A Comparison of Spousal Aggression Prevalence Rates in U.S. Army and Civilian Representative Samples’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67: 239–42.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. 1992. ‘Ars moratoria (Ovid, A. A. 1.681–704)’, LCM 17: 5961.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (ed.). 2007a. Sexti Properti Elegi. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. 2007b. Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hilberg, I. (ed.). 1996. Sancti Eusebii Hieronymi Epistulae, 2nd edn. 4 vols. Corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum Latinorum 54–56/2. Vienna.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1985. The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1988. ‘Generalising about Ovid’, in Boyle, A. J. (ed.), The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire. Berwick, Victoria: 431.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 2002. ‘Landscape with Figures: Aesthetics of Place in the Metamorphoses and Its Tradition’, in Hardie, P. R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ovid. Cambridge: 122–49.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 2005. ‘Dislocations of Roman Time’, in Schwindt, J. P. (ed.), La représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne. Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften, neue Folge, 2. Reihe, 116. Heidelberg: 203–30.Google Scholar
Hite, S. 1981. The Hite Report on Male Sexuality. London.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (ed.). 1977. Ovid: Ars amatoria, Book I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (ed.). 2007. Fragments of Roman Poetry, c. 60 BC–AD 20. Oxford.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1997. Ovid: Dichter und Werk. Munich.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 2002. Ovid: The Poet and His Work. Translated by Goshgarian, G. M.. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1978. Conquerors and Slaves. Sociological Studies in Roman History 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1983. Death and Renewal. Sociological Studies in Roman History 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. 2002. ‘Rome, Taxes, Rents and Trade’, in Scheidel, W. and von Reden, S. (eds.), The Ancient Economy. Edinburgh: 190230.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1979. ‘Epic and Burlesque in Ovid, Met. viii. 260ff.’, CJ 74: 319–32.Google Scholar
Hubbard, M. 1974. Propertius. London.Google Scholar
Huber-Rebenich, G. 1999. ‘Hagiographic Fiction as Entertainment’, in Hofmann, H. (ed.), Latin Fiction: The Latin Novel in Context. London: 187212.Google Scholar
Hugh, G. R. 2004. ‘The Professional Soldier in Menander and Plautus’, American Philological Association 135th Annual Meeting Abstracts 320.Google Scholar
Hulse, S. C. 1979. ‘Wresting the Alphabet: Oratory and Action in “Titus Andronicus”’, Criticism 21: 106–18.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2001. ‘The Date of De rerum natura’, CQ 51: 150–62.Google Scholar
Jakobi, R. 1988. Der Einfluss Ovids auf den Tragiker Seneca. Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte 28. Berlin.Google Scholar
Jal, P. 1963. La guerre civile à Rome: étude littéraire et morale. Publications de la Faculté des lettres et sciences humaines de Paris, série ‘Recherches’, 6. Paris.Google Scholar
James, S. L. 1997. ‘Slave-Rape and Female Silence in Ovid’s Love Poetry’, Helios 24: 6076.Google Scholar
James, S. L. 2003a. Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
James, S. L. 2003b. ‘Her Turn to Cry: The Politics of Weeping in Roman Love Elegy’, TAPhA 133: 99122.Google Scholar
Janan, M. 2001. The Politics of Desire: Propertius IV. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Jantzen, G. M. 2004. Death and the Displacement of Beauty. I. Foundations of Violence. London.Google Scholar
Jenisson, G. 1937. Animals for Show and Pleasure in Ancient Rome. Publications of the University of Manchester 258. Manchester.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. 1982. Romano-British Mosaics. Aylesbury.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. J. 2008. Ovid before Exile: Art and Punishment in the Metamorphoses. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. 1987. Momentary Monsters: Lucan and his Heroes. Cornell Studies in Classical Philology 47. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. 1996. ‘The Rapes of Callisto’, CJ 92: 924.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. 2000. Lucretius and the Modern World. London.Google Scholar
Jones, C. 1993. ‘Women, Death, and the Law during the Christian Persecutions’, in Wood, D. (ed.), Martyrs and Martyrologies: Papers Read at the 1992 Summer Meeting and the 1993 Winter Meeting of the Ecclesiastical History Society. Studies in Church History 30. Oxford: 2334.Google Scholar
Joplin, P. 1984. ‘The Voice of the Shuttle Is Ours’, Stanford Literary Review 1: 2553.Google Scholar
Joshel, S. R. 1992. Work, Identity, and Legal Status at Rome: A Study of the Occupational Inscriptions. Oklahoma Series in Classical Culture 11. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Joshel, S. R. and Murnaghan, S. (eds.). 1998. Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture: Differential Equations. London.Google Scholar
Kajanto, I. 1981. ‘Fortuna’, ANRW II.17.1: 502–58.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1913. Kants gesammelte Schriften, vol. V, 2nd edn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1987. Critique of Judgment. Translated by Pluhar, W. S.. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Kany-Turpin, J. 1997. ‘Cosmos ouvert et épidémies mortelles dans le De rerum natura’, in Algra, K. A., Koenen, M. H., and Schrijvers, P. H. (eds.), Lucretius and His Intellectual Background. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afd. Letterkunde 172. Amsterdam: 179–85.Google Scholar
Kapparis, K. 2002. Abortion in the Ancient World. London.Google Scholar
Kappeler, S. 1986. The Pornography of Representation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. 1998. ‘Becoming “CICERO”’, in Knox, P. E. and Foss, C. (eds.), Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 92. Stuttgart: 248–63.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. 2005. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. New York.Google Scholar
Keane, C. 2006. Figuring Genre in Roman Satire. American Classical Studies 50. New York.Google Scholar
Keitel, E. 1984. ‘Principate and Civil War in the Annals of Tacitus’, AJPh 105: 306–25.Google Scholar
Keith, A. 1992. ‘Amores 1.1: Propertius and the Ovidian Programme’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VI. Collection Latomus 217. Brussels: 327–44.Google Scholar
Keith, A. 1994. ‘Corpus eroticum: Elegiac Poetics and Elegiac puellae in Ovid’s Amores’, CW 88: 2740.Google Scholar
Keith, A. 1997. ‘Tandem venit amor: A Roman Woman Speaks of Love’, in Hallett and Skinner 1997: 285–310.Google Scholar
Keith, A. 1999. ‘Epic Masculinity in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds 1999: 214–39.Google Scholar
Keith, A. 2000. Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keith, A. 2008. Propertius: Poet of Love and Leisure. London.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. 2012. ‘The Cretan Slinger at War – a Weighty Exchange’, ABSA 107: 273311.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. N. D. 1975. Jerome: His Life, Writings, and Controversies. London.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. 1993. The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. 2002. Rethinking Reality: Lucretius and the Textualization of Nature. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. 2008. ‘Elegy and the Erotics of Narratology’, in Liveley and Salzman-Mitchell 2008: 19–33.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. 2012. ‘Love’s Tropes and Figures’, in Gold 2012: 189–203.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (ed.). 1961. P. Ovidi Nasonis Amores, Medicamina faciei femineae, Ars amatoria, Remedia amoris. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. 1972. ‘The Historical Imagination of Lucretius’, G&R 19: 1224.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.). 1982. The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. II. Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keppie, L. J. F. 1983. Colonisation and Veteran Settlement in Italy, 47–14 B.C. London.Google Scholar
Keppie, L. J. F. 1984. The Making of the Roman Army: From Republic to Empire. London.Google Scholar
Kermode, M. 2004. Review of The Passion of the Christ, Sight & Sound 14.4: 63.Google Scholar
Khan, H. A. 1966. ‘Ovidius furens: A Revaluation of Amores 1, 7’, Latomus 25: 880–94.Google Scholar
Kiessling, A. and Heinze, R. (eds.). 1921. Q. Horatius Flaccus: Satiren, 5th edn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kinder, M. 2001. ‘Violence American Style: The Narrative Orchestration of Violent Attractions’, in Slocum 2001a: 63–100.Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. 2010. A Comedy of Storytelling: Theatricality and Narrative in Apuleius’ Golden Ass. Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften, neue Folge, 2. Reihe, 127. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Knoche, U. 1975. Roman Satire. Translated by Ramage, E. S.. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Koestermann, E. (ed.). 1963–8. Cornelius Tacitus: Annalen. 4 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1983. Roman Comedy. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1994. ‘Foreword: To the Reader’, in Schiesaro, Mitsis, and Clay 1994: 11–22.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1995. Greek Comedy and Ideology. New York.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1997. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2001. Pity Transformed. London.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2008. A Life Worthy of the Gods: The Materialist Psychology of Epicurus. Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2013. ‘Menander’s Slaves: The Banality of Violence’, in Akrigg, B. and Tordoff, R. (eds.), Slaves and Slavery in Ancient Greek Comic Drama. Cambridge: 144–58.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2014. ‘Turns and Returns in Plautus’ Casina’, in Perysinakis, I. N. and Karakasis, E. (eds.), Plautine Trends: Studies in Plautine Comedy and Its Reception. Trends in Classics Supplementary Volume 29. Berlin: 312.Google Scholar
Kray, K. 2002. The Twins: Men of Violence. London.Google Scholar
Kremer-Marietti, A. 1985. Michel Foucault: archéologie et généalogie, revised edn. Paris.Google Scholar
Krenkel, W. (ed.). 1970. Lucilius: Satiren. 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay in Abjection. Translated by Roudiez, L. S.. New York.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. 1924. Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kyle, D. G. 1998. Spectacles of Death in Ancient Rome. London.Google Scholar
Labate, M. 2006. ‘Erotic Aetiology: Romulus, Augustus, and the Rape of the Sabine Women’, in Gibson, R. K., Green, S., and Sharrock, A. (eds.), The Art of Love: Bimillennial Essays on Ovid’s Ars amatoria and Remedia amoris. Oxford: 193215.Google Scholar
Laigneau, S. 1999. La femme et l’amour chez Catulle et les élégiaques augustéens. Collection Latomus 249. Brussels.Google Scholar
Lambert, B. 1969–72. Bibliotheca Hieronymiana manuscripta: la tradition manuscrite des oeuvres de saint Jérôme. 4 vols. Instrumenta patristica 4. Steenbrugge.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. 2006. Sexual Morality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lape, S. 2004. Reproducing Athens: Menander’s Comedy, Democratic Culture, and the Hellenistic City. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Laqueur, T. 1990. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. H. J., Miller, P. A., and Platter, C. (eds.). 1998a. Rethinking Sexuality: Foucault and Classical Antiquity. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. H. J., Miller, P. A., and Platter, C. 1998b. ‘Introduction: Situating the History of Sexuality’, in Larmour, Miller, and Platter 1998a: 3–41.Google Scholar
Larosa, M. Forthcoming. ‘The Mythical Exempla of Faithful Heroines in Seneca the Elder’s Work: Literary Occurrences of a Declamatory Device’, in Dinter, Guérin, and Martinho forthcoming.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. 1998. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Translated by Bliss, M. T., Jansen, A., and Orton, D. E.. Edited by Orton, D. E. and Anderson, R. D.. Leiden.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1969. ‘De exemplo meo ipse aedificato: An Organizing Idea in the Mostellaria’, Hermes 97: 318–32.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1971. ‘Horace’s pater optimus and Terence’s Demea: Autobiographical Fiction and Comedy in Sermo, I, 4’, AJPh 92: 616–32.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1974. ‘Ekphrasis and the Theme of Artistic Failure in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Ramus 3: 102–42.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1980. ‘The Soldier and Society: Plautus’ Miles gloriosus as Popular Drama’, Rivista di studi classici 28: 185209.Google Scholar
Leatherman, J. L. 2011. Sexual Violence and Armed Conflict. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lee-Stecum, P. 1998. Powerplay in Tibullus: Reading Elegies Book One. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1984. Diphilos und Plautus: der Rudens und sein Original. Mainz.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 1995. ‘Wounding and Popular Rhetoric at Rome’, BICS 40: 195212.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 1997. Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Oxford.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 2004. Comedy and the Rise of Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 2007. ‘Epic and Historiography at Rome’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. 2 vols. Malden, MA: 483–92.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (ed.). 1878. Seneca: Tragoediae. I. De Senecae tragoediis observationes criticae. Berlin.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (ed.). 1895–6. Plauti Comoediae. 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Levin, D. N. 1983. ‘Reflections of the Epic Tradition in the Elegies of Tibullus’, ANRW II.30.3: 2000–127.Google Scholar
Lilja, S. 1965. The Roman Elegists’ Attitude to Women. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Series B, 135. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Lindheim, S. H. 1998. ‘Hercules Cross-Dressed, Hercules Undressed: Unmasking the Construction of the Propertian amator in Elegy 4.9’, AJPh 119: 4366.Google Scholar
Linklater, B. 2001. ‘Philomela’s Revenge: Challenges to Rape in Recent Writing in German’, German Life and Letters 54: 253–71.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. 1993. Imperium Romanum: Politics and Administration. London.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. 1999. Violence in Republican Rome, 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lipsius, R. A. (ed.). 1891. Acta apostolorum apocrypha, vol. I. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Littlewood, C. A. J. 2004. Self-Representation and Illusion in Senecan Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Liveley, G. 1999. ‘Reading Resistance in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds 1999: 197–213.Google Scholar
Liveley, G. and Salzman-Mitchell, P. (eds.). 2008. Latin Elegy and Narratology: Fragments of Story. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Lloyd, T. 1993. The Charity Business: The New Philanthropists. London.Google Scholar
Logre, B. J. 1946. L’anxiété de Lucrèce. Paris.Google Scholar
Lorenz, S. 2002. Erotik und Panegyrik: Martials epigrammatische Kaiser. Classica Monacensia 23. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Louth, A. 2004. ‘Eusebius and the Birth of Church History’, in Young, F., Ayres, L., and Louth, A. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Early Christian Literature. Cambridge: 266–74.Google Scholar
Lovatt, H. 2013. The Epic Gaze: Vision, Gender and Narrative in Ancient Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lucas, D. W. (ed.). 1968. Aristotle: Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Luck, G. 1959. The Latin Love Elegy. London.Google Scholar
Lussky, E. A. 1953. ‘Misapplications of the Term Zeugma’, CJ 48: 285–90.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1979. ‘Servitium amoris’, CQ 29: 117–30.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1980. The Latin Love Poets: From Catullus to Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1998. ‘Propertius and Tibullus: Early Exchanges’, CQ 48: 519–44.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. 1991. ‘The Sublime and the Avant-Garde’, in Lyotard, , The Inhuman: Reflections on Time. Translated by Bennington, G. and Bowlby, R.. Stanford, CA: 89107.Google Scholar
Macey, D. 1993. The Lives of Michel Foucault. New York.Google Scholar
MacManus, D., Dean, K., Al Bakir, M., Iversen, A. C., Hull, L., Fahy, T., Wessely, S., and Fear, N. T. 2012. ‘Violent Behaviour in UK Military Personnel Returning Home after Deployment’, Psychological Medicine 42: 1663–73.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. 1986. ‘Judicial Savagery in the Roman Empire’, Chiron 16: 147–66.Google Scholar
Malamud, M. A. 1989. A Poetics of Transformation: Prudentius and Classical Mythology. Cornell Studies in Classical Philology 49. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Malamud, M. A. 1990. ‘Making a Virtue of Perversity: The Poetry of Prudentius’, Ramus 19: 6488.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. 1991. A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. ARCA Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers and Monographs 25. Leeds.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (ed.). 2002. Tibullus: Elegies. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mannering, J. Forthcoming. ‘Objection! Contesting Taste and Space in Seneca’s Declamatory Arena’, in Dinter, Guérin, and Martinho forthcoming.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I. 2005. ‘In Memory of Simonides: Poetry and Mnemotechnics chez Nasidienus’, TAPhA 135: 393402.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 2013. ‘Polybius, Phylarchus and “Tragic History”: A Reconsideration’, in Gibson, B. J. and Harrison, T. E. H. (eds.), Polybius and His World: Essays in Memory of F. W. Walbank. Oxford: 7390.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 2000. ‘Location! Location! Location! Choral Absence and Theatrical Space in the Troades’, in G. W. M. Harrison 2000: 27–51.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 2006. The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Martin, R. H. 1955. ‘Tacitus and the Death of Augustus’, CQ 5: 123–8.Google Scholar
Martin, R. H. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.). 1989. Tacitus: Annals, Book IV. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marx, F. (ed.). 1904–5. C. Lucilii Carminum reliquiae. 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Maslen, R. W. (ed.). 2002. Sir Philip Sidney: An Apology for Poetry (or The Defence of Poesy), 3rd edn. Manchester.Google Scholar
Massaro, A. 2010. ‘Ifigenia, la giovenca e le “guerre improbabili”: aspetti del rapporto uomo-animale in Lucrezio’, Maia 62: 261–82.Google Scholar
Masters, J. 1992. Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s Bellum civile. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mattern, S. P. 1999. Rome and the Enemy: Imperial Strategy in the Principate. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Matthews, J. 1975. Western Aristocracies and Imperial Court A.D. 364–425. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. 2002. Seneca: Phaedra. London.Google Scholar
Mayne, J. 1993. Cinema and Spectatorship. London.Google Scholar
McCarroll, J. E., Ursano, R. J., Liu, X., Thayer, L. E., Newby, J. H., Norwood, A. E., and Fullerton, C. S. 2000. ‘Deployment and the Probability of Spousal Violence by U.S. Army Soldiers’, Military Medicine 165: 41–4.Google Scholar
McCarroll, J. E., Ursano, R. J., Newby, J. H., Liu, X., Fullerton, C. S., Norwood, A. E., and Osuch, E. A. 2003. ‘Domestic Violence and Deployment in US Army Soldiers’, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 191: 39.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. 1998. ‘Servitium amoris: amor servitii’, in Joshel and Murnaghan 1998: 174–92.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. 2000. Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
McCauley, C. 1998. ‘When Screen Violence Is Not Attractive’, in Goldstein 1998a: 144–62.Google Scholar
McGinn, T. A. J. 1998. Prostitution, Sexuality, and the Law in Ancient Rome. New York.Google Scholar
McKay, K. L. 1964. ‘Animals in War and isonomia’, AJPh 85: 124–35.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. (ed.). 1989. Ovid: Amores. Text, Prolegomena and Commentary. II. A Commentary on Book One. ARCA Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers and Monographs 22. Leeds.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. 1995. ‘Militat omnis amans’, CJ 90: 295304.Google Scholar
McKinney, D. 2000. ‘Violence: The Strong and the Weak’, in Prince 2000a: 99–109.Google Scholar
McLynn, N. B. 1994. Ambrose of Milan: Church and Court in a Christian Capital. The Transformation of the Classical Heritage 22. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Melville, A. D. (tr.). 1990. Ovid: The Love Poems. Oxford.Google Scholar
Michie, J. (tr.). 1993. Ovid: The Art of Love. London.Google Scholar
Migliario, E. 2007. Retorica e storia: una lettura delle Suasoriae di Seneca padre. Quaderni di ‘Invigilata lucernis’ 32. Bari.Google Scholar
Miller, J. 1993. The Passion of Michel Foucault. New York.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1983. ‘Ovid’s Divine Interlocutors in the Fasti’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History III. Collection Latomus 180. Brussels: 156–92.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1991. Ovid’s Elegiac Festivals: Studies in the Fasti. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 55. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 1994. Lyric Texts and Lyric Consciousness: The Birth of a Genre from Archaic Greece to Augustan Rome. London.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 1998a. ‘The Bodily Grotesque in Roman Satire: Images of Sterility’, Arethusa 31: 257–83, reprinted in M. Plaza (ed.), Persius and Juvenal (Oxford, 2009), 327–48.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 1998b. ‘Catullan Consciousness, the “Care of the Self”, and the Force of the Negative in History’, in Larmour, Miller, and Platter 1998a: 171–203.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2001. ‘Why Propertius Is a Woman: French Feminism and Augustan Elegy’, CPh 96: 127–46.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (ed.). 2002. Latin Erotic Elegy: An Anthology and Reader. London.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2004. Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Elegy and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (ed.). 2005. Latin Verse Satire: An Anthology and Critical Reader. London.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2006. ‘Truth-Telling in Foucault’s “Le gouvernement de soi et des autres” and Persius 1: The Subject, Rhetoric, and Power’, Parrhesia 1: 2761.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2007. ‘“I Get Around”: Sadism, Desire, and Metonymy on the Streets of Rome with Horace, Ovid, and Juvenal’, in Larmour, D. H. J. and Spencer, D. (eds.), The Sites of Rome: Time, Space, Memory. Oxford: 138–67.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2009. ‘Ethics and Irony’, Substance 38: 5171.Google Scholar
Miller, P. C. 1993. ‘The Blazing Body: Ascetic Desire in Jerome’s Letter to Eustochium’, JECS 1: 2145.Google Scholar
Mistry, R. 1997. A Fine Balance. London.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. 1994. ‘Committing Philosophy on the Reader: Didactic Coercion and Reader Autonomy in De rerum natura’, in Schiesaro, Mitsis, and Clay 1994: 111–28.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T., Krueger, P., and Watson, A. (eds.). 1985. The Digest of Justinian. 4 vols. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Morales, H. 1996. ‘The Torturer’s Apprentice: Parrhasius and the Limits of Art’, in Elsner, J. (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge: 182209.Google Scholar
Morales, H. 2004. Vision and Narrative in Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Clitophon. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moreno Soldevila, R. (ed.). 2011. Diccionario de motivos amatorios en la literatura latina (siglos III a. C.–II d. C.). Exemplaria classica, Anejo 2. Huelva.Google Scholar
Morley, N. 2006. ‘The Poor in the City of Rome’, in Atkins, M. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Poverty in the Roman World. Cambridge: 2139.Google Scholar
Morris, E. P. (ed.). 1968. Horace: The Satires. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Moses, D. C. 1993. ‘Livy’s Lucretia and the Validity of Coerced Consent’, in Laiou, A. E. (ed.), Consent and Coercion to Sex and Marriage in Ancient and Medieval Societies. Washington, DC: 3981.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1992. ‘Disiecti membra poetae: The Rhetoric of Dismemberment in Neronian Poetry’, in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity. New York: 391419.Google Scholar
Mozley, J. H. (ed., tr.). 1979. Ovid: The Art of Love and Other Poems. Revised by G. P. Goold. Loeb Classical Library 232. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Muecke, F. 2005. ‘Rome’s First “Satirists”: Themes and Genre in Ennius and Lucilius’, in Freudenburg 2005a: 33–47.Google Scholar
Mueller, M. 2009. The Iliad, 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Müller, H. 1998. ‘Der älteste Brief des heiligen Hieronymus: zu einem aktuellen Datierungsvorschlag’, WS 111: 191210.Google Scholar
Mulvey, L. 1975. ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’, Screen 16: 6–18, reprinted in Mulvey 2009: 14–27.Google Scholar
Mulvey, L. 1981. ‘Afterthoughts on “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” Inspired by “Duel in the Sun” (King Vidor, 1946)’, Framework 15–17: 12–15, reprinted in Mulvey 2009: 31–40.Google Scholar
Mulvey, L. 2009. Visual and Other Pleasures, 2nd edn. Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Murgatroyd, P. 1975. ‘Militia amoris and the Roman Elegists’, Latomus 34: 5979.Google Scholar
Murgatroyd, P. 1980. Tibullus I: A Commentary on the First Book of the Elegies of Albius Tibullus. Pietermaritzburg.Google Scholar
Murgatroyd, P. 1981. ‘Servitium amoris and the Roman Elegists’, Latomus 40: 589606.Google Scholar
Musurillo, H. 1972. The Acts of the Christian Martyrs. Oxford.Google Scholar
Naiden, F. S. 2006. Ancient Supplication. Oxford.Google Scholar
Neumann, J. 1962. Titian: The Flaying of Marsyas. London.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. 2012. ‘The Aesthetics of Violence: Myth and Danger in Roman Domestic Landscapes’, ClAnt 31: 349–89.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. 1995. Playing with Time: Ovid and the Fasti. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. 1998 .The Role of the Book in Tristia 3.1’, Ramus 26: 5779.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. 2004. ‘Ovid and Statius: Transforming the Landscape’, TAPhA 134: 133–55.Google Scholar
Nippel, W. 1995. Public Order in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nipperdey, K. and Andresen, G. (eds.). 1915. P. Cornelius Tacitus, Erster Band: Ab excessu divi Augusti I–VI, 11th edn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. (ed.). 1961. M. Tulli Ciceronis In L. Calpurnium Pisonem oratio. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. 1970. A Commentary on Horace: Odes, Book I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. 1978. A Commentary on Horace: Odes, Book II. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Rudd, N. 2004. A Commentary on Horace: Odes, Book III. Oxford.Google Scholar
Niżyńska, J. 2001. ‘Marsyas’ Howl: The Myth of Marsyas in Ovid’s Metamorphoses and Zbigniew Herbert’s “Apollo and Marsyas”’, Comparative Literature 53: 151–69.Google Scholar
Nolder, M. J. 2001. ‘The Domestic Violence Dilemma: Private Action in Ancient Rome and America’, Boston University Law Review 81: 1119–47.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1986. ‘Therapeutic Arguments: Epicurus and Aristotle’, in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.), The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge: 3174.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. 1996. Greek Bastardy in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. 1997. ‘Rape, Adultery and Protection of Bloodlines in Classical Athens’, in Deacy and Pierce 1997: 25–41.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. 2000. Irony and Misreading in the Annals of Tacitus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. 2007. Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 2009. Freud’s Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Olsen, M. 2003. ‘Turning on a Dime’, Sight & Sound 13.10: 1215.Google Scholar
O’Mathúna, D. P. 2008. ‘The Ethics of Torture in 24: Shockingly Banal’, in Weed, Davis, and Weed 2008: 91–104.Google Scholar
Omitowoju, R. 2002. Rape and the Politics of Consent in Classical Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Opelt, I. 1967. ‘Der Christenverfolger bei Prudentius’, Philologus 111: 242–57.Google Scholar
Orr, C. 2006. ‘Kiefer Madness’, The New Republic 234.19 (22 May): 1618.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (ed.). 2004. Studies in Ancient Greek and Roman Society. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Otis, B. 1964. Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Otto, A. 1890. Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Pagán, V. E. 2007–8. ‘Teaching Torture in Seneca Controversiae 2.5’, CJ 103: 165–82.Google Scholar
Palmer, A.-M. 1989. Prudentius on the Martyrs. Oxford.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, S. 2002. ‘The Temple and the Brothel: Mothers and Daughters in Apollonius of Tyre’, in Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Space in the Ancient Novel. Ancient Narrative Supplementum 1. Groningen: 98117.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. 1969. Problems in Titian, Mostly Iconographic. The Wrightsman Lectures 2. London.Google Scholar
Pansiéri, C. 1997. Plaute et Rome, ou les ambiguïtés d’un marginal. Collection Latomus 236. Brussels.Google Scholar
Paoli, U. E. 1976. Altri studi di diritto greco e romano. Milan.Google Scholar
Paratore, E. (ed.). 1947. Virgilio: Eneide, libro quarto. Convivium: collana di autori greci e latini 4. Rome.Google Scholar
Parker, D. 1969. ‘The Ovidian Coda’, Arion 8: 8097.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. 1989. ‘Crucially Funny or Tranio on the Couch: The servus callidus and Jokes about Torture’, TAPhA 119: 233–46.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. 1992. ‘Love’s Body Anatomized: The Ancient Erotic Handbooks and the Rhetoric of Sexuality’, in Richlin 1992b: 90–111.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. 1999. ‘The Observed of All Observers: Spectacle, Applause, and Cultural Poetics in the Roman Audience’, in Bergmann, B. and Kondoleon, C. (eds.), The Art of Ancient Spectacle. Studies in the History of Art, Symposium Papers 34. Washington, DC: 163–79.Google Scholar
Parry, H. 1964. ‘Ovid’s Metamorphoses: Violence in a Pastoral Setting’, TAPhA 95: 268–82.Google Scholar
Patterson, O. 1982. Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Perelli, L. 1969. Lucrezio, poeta dell’angoscia. Biblioteca di cultura 85. Florence.Google Scholar
Perkins, J. 1995. The Suffering Self: Pain and Narrative Representation in the Early Christian Era. London.Google Scholar
Pianezzola, E. (ed.). 1991. Ovidio: L’arte di amare. Milan.Google Scholar
Pierce, K. F. 1997. ‘The Portrayal of Rape in New Comedy’, in Deacy and Pierce 1997: 163–84.Google Scholar
Plantinga, C. 1997. ‘Notes on Spectator Emotion and Ideological Film Criticism’, in Allen, R. and Smith, M. (eds.), Film Theory and Philosophy. Oxford: 372–93.Google Scholar
Plass, P. 1995. The Game of Death in Ancient Rome: Arena Sport and Political Suicide. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Plaza, M. 2006. The Function of Humour in Roman Verse Satire: Laughing and Lying. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pociña, A. 1997. ‘Épica y teatro’, in Codoñer, C. (ed.), Historia de la literatura latina. Madrid: 1370.Google Scholar
Poe, E. A. 1846. ‘The Philosophy of Composition’, Graham’s Magazine 28: 163–7, reprinted in Poe, Essays and Reviews (New York, 1984), 13–25.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. 2007. The Murder of Regilla: A Case of Domestic Violence in Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Prince, S. (ed.). 2000a. Screening Violence. London.Google Scholar
Prince, S. 2000b. ‘Graphic Violence in the Cinema: Origins, Aesthetic Design, and Social Effects’, in Prince 2000a: 1–44.Google Scholar
Prince, S. 2000c. ‘The Aesthetic of Slow-Motion Violence in the Films of Sam Peckinpah’, in Prince 2000a: 175–201.Google Scholar
Projansky, S. 2001. Watching Rape: Film and Television in Postfeminist Culture. New York.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1973. Tibullus: A Commentary. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1990. ‘Anger, Blindness and Insight in Virgil’s Aeneid’, in Nussbaum, M. C. (ed.), The Poetics of Therapy: Hellenistic Ethics in its Rhetorical and Literary Context (= Apeiron 23.4). Edmonton: 740, reprinted in Putnam, Virgil’s Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence (Chapel Hill, NC, 1995), 172–200.Google Scholar
Puttfarken, T. 2005. Titian and Tragic Painting: Aristotle’s Poetics and the Rise of the Modern Artist. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Ramage, E. S. 1974a. ‘Ennius and the Origins of Roman Satire’, in Ramage, Sigsbee, and Fredericks 1974a: 8–26.Google Scholar
Ramage, E. S. 1974b. ‘Lucilius, the Discoverer of the Genre’, in Ramage, Sigsbee, and Fredericks 1974a: 27–52.Google Scholar
Ramage, E. S., Sigsbee, D. L., and Fredericks, S. C. (eds.). 1974a. Roman Satirists and Their Satire: The Fine Art of Criticism in Ancient Rome. Park Ridge, NJ.Google Scholar
Ramage, E. S., Sigsbee, D. L., and Fredericks, S. C. 1974b. ‘Introduction’, in Ramage, Sigsbee, and Fredericks 1974a: 1–7.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. 2001. I romanzi antichi e il Cristianesimo: contesto e contatti. Graeco-Romanae religionis electa collectio 6. Madrid.Google Scholar
Rawson, B. (ed.). 1991. Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rawson, B. 2003. Children and Childhood in Roman Italy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Raymond, E. 2013. ‘Caius Cornelius Gallus: “The Inventor of Latin Love Elegy”’, in Thorsen 2013: 59–67.Google Scholar
Rebenich, S. 1992. Hieronymus und sein Kreis: prosopographische und sozialgeschichtliche Untersuchungen. Historia Einzelschriften 72. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rebenich, S. 2002. Jerome. London.Google Scholar
Redfield, J. M. 1994. Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector, 2nd edn. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Regenbogen, O. 1932. Lukrez: seine Gestalt in seinem Gedicht. Neue Wege zur Antike, 2. Reihe: Interpretationen, 1. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Reward Group. 1994–5. Charity R£wards. Continues Charities Salary Survey. Stone.Google Scholar
Rich, J. and Shipley, G. (eds.). 1993. War and Society in the Roman World. Leicester–Nottingham Studies in Ancient Society 5. London.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. Jr. (ed.). 1977. Propertius: Elegies I–IV. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 1981. ‘Approaches to the Sources on Adultery at Rome’, in Foley, H. P. (ed.), Reflections of Women in Antiquity. New York: 379404.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 1992a. The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor, revised edn. New York.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (ed.). 1992b. Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 1992c. ‘Reading Ovid’s Rapes’, in Richlin 1992b: 158–79.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 1999. ‘Cicero’s Head’, in Porter, J. I. (ed.), Constructions of the Classical Body. Ann Arbor, MI: 190211.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2002. Petronius and the Anatomy of Fiction. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2006. Ovid’s Lovers: Desire, Difference, and the Poetic Imagination. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rives, J. B. 1999. ‘The Decree of Decius and the Religion of Empire’, JRS 89: 135–54.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. 1993. Poetry and the Cult of the Martyrs: The Liber peristephanon of Prudentius. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Robinson, L. 1953. ‘The Personal Abuse in Lucilius’ Satires’, CJ 49: 31–5, 47.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. 1997. ‘Color-Blindness: Cicero’s Death, Declamation, and the Production of History’, CPh 92: 109–30.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. 2004. ‘Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia’, CPh 99: 156.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 1983. Narciso e Pigmalione: illusione e spettacolo nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio. Florence.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 1999. ‘Form in Motion: Weaving the Text in the Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds 1999: 240–53.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (ed.). 2009. Ovidio: Metamorfosi, vol. III. Milan.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. 2004. Rome at War: Farms, Families, and Death in the Middle Republic. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Ross, J. 1995. ‘Dynamic Writing and Martyrs’ Bodies in Prudentius’ Peristephanon’, JECS 3: 325–55.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. 2000. ‘The Aeneid Revisited: The Journey of Pompey in Lucan’s Pharsalia’, AJPh 121: 571–91.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. 2004. Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Rouse, J. 1994. ‘Power/Knowledge’, in Gutting, G. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. Cambridge: 92114.Google Scholar
Rowe, K. 1999. Dead Hands: Fictions of Agency, Renaissance to Modern. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Rozelaar, M. 1941. Lukrez: Versuch einer Deutung. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. 1982. The Satires of Horace. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Salisbury, J. E. 1997. Perpetua’s Passion: The Death and Memory of a Young Roman Woman. New York.Google Scholar
Saller, R. P. 1991. ‘Corporal Punishment, Authority, and Obedience in the Roman Household’, in Rawson 1991: 144–65.Google Scholar
Saller, R. P. 1994. Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family. Cambridge Studies in Population, Economy and Society in Past Time 25. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Saller, R. P. 1998. ‘Symbols of Gender and Status Hierarchies in the Roman Household’, in Joshel and Murnaghan 1998: 85–91.Google Scholar
Salzman-Mitchell, P. B. 2005. A Web of Fantasies: Gaze, Image, and Gender in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Salzman-Mitchell, P. B. 2008. ‘Snapshots of a Love Affair: Amores 1.5 and the Program of Elegiac Narrative’, in Liveley and Salzman-Mitchell 2008: 34–47.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (ed.). 1990. Menandri Reliquiae selectae, revised edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sanders, P., Oyewole, A., and Mboup, A. 1998. ‘Save Our Children’, on Sanders, P., Save Our Children. Verve Records.Google Scholar
Sapolsky, B. S., Molitor, F., and Luque, S. 2003. ‘Sex and Violence in Slasher Films: Reexamining the Assumptions’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 80: 2838.Google Scholar
Saunders, C. 1997. ‘Classical Paradigms of Rape in the Middle Ages’, in Deacy and Pierce 1997: 243–66.Google Scholar
Saylor, C. F. 1972. ‘Man, Animal, and the Bestial in Lucretius’, CJ 67: 306–16.Google Scholar
Scafuro, A. C. 1994. The Forensic Stage: Settling Disputes in Graeco-Roman New Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Scarry, E. 1985. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York.Google Scholar
Schäublin, C. 1973. ‘Textkritisches zu den Briefen des Hieronymus’, MH 30: 5562.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. and Svenbro, J. 1996. The Craft of Zeus: Myths of Weaving and Fabric. Translated by C. Volk. Revealing Antiquity 9. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 1996. Measuring Sex, Age and Death in the Roman Empire: Explorations in Ancient Demography. JRA Supplement 21. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, N. and Bourgois, P. (eds.). 2004. Violence in War and Peace: An Anthology. Blackwell Readers in Anthropology 5. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 1990. Simulacrum et imago: gli argomenti analogici nel De rerum natura. Biblioteca di ‘Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici’ 8. Pisa.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2003. The Passions in Play: Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A., Mitsis, P., and Clay, J. S. (eds.). 1994. Mega nepios: il destinatario nell’epos didascalico (= MD 31). Pisa.Google Scholar
Schlam, C. 1992. The Metamorphoses of Apuleius: On Making an Ass of Oneself. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Schlegel, C. M. 2005. Satire and the Threat of Speech: Horace’s Satires, Book 1. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Schneemelcher, W. (ed.). 1991–2. New Testament Apocrypha, revised edn. English translation edited by Wilson, R. M.. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schneider, C. Forthcoming. ‘Laughing Is No Laughing Matter: Laughs and Laughter in Seneca the Elder’s oeuvre’, in Dinter, Guérin, and Martinho forthcoming.Google Scholar
Schneider, S. J. (ed.). 2004. New Hollywood Violence. Manchester.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. 1970. Horror ac divina voluptas: études sur la poétique et la poésie de Lucrèce. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. 1978. ‘Le regard sur l’invisible: étude sur l’emploi de l’analogie dans l’oeuvre de Lucrèce’, in Gigon, O. (ed.), Lucrèce: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique 24. Geneva: 77114, published in English as ‘Seeing the Invisible: A Study of Lucretius’ Use of Analogy in De rerum natura’, in Gale 2007: 255–88.Google Scholar
Schroeder, F. M. 2004. ‘Philodemus: avocatio and the Pathos of Distance in Lucretius and Vergil’, in Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A., and Skinner, M. B. (eds.), Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin, TX: 139–56.Google Scholar
Schroeder, J. A. 2004. ‘John Chrysostom’s Critique of Spousal Violence’, JECS 12: 413–42.Google Scholar
Schwind, J. 1997. ‘Hieronymus’ Epistula ad Innocentium (Epist. 1) – ein Jugendwerk?’, WS 110: 171–86.Google Scholar
Scourfield, J. H. D. 1986. ‘Jerome, Antioch, and the Desert: A Note on Chronology’, JThS 37: 117–21.Google Scholar
Scourfield, J. H. D. 1987. ‘Notes on the Text of Jerome, Letters 1 and 107’, CQ 37: 487–97.Google Scholar
Scourfield, J. H. D. 1993. Consoling Heliodorus: A Commentary on Jerome, Letter 60. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E. K. 1990. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1969. Landscape in Ovid’s Metamorphoses: A Study in the Transformations of a Literary Symbol. Hermes Einzelschriften 23. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1971. The Theme of the Mutilation of the Corpse in the Iliad. Mnemosyne Supplementum 17. Leiden.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1983. ‘Boundary Violation and the Landscape of the Self in Senecan Tragedy’, A&A 29: 172–87, reprinted in J. G. Fitch (ed.), Seneca (Oxford, 2008), 136–56.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1984. ‘Senecan Baroque: The Death of Hippolytus in Seneca, Ovid, and Euripides’, TAPhA 114: 311–25.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1986. Language and Desire in Seneca’s Phaedra. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1990. Lucretius on Death and Anxiety: Poetry and Philosophy in De rerum natura. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1994. ‘Philomela’s Web and the Pleasures of the Text: Reader and Violence in the Metamorphoses of Ovid’, in de Jong, I. J. F. and Sullivan, J. P. (eds.), Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. Mnemosyne Supplementum 130. Leiden: 257–80.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1997. Dionysiac Poetics and Euripides’ Bacchae, expanded edn. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1998. ‘Ovid’s Metamorphic Bodies: Art, Gender, and Violence in the Metamorphoses’, Arion 5.3: 941.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 2005. ‘Il corpo e l’io nelle “Metamorfosi” di Ovidio’, in Barchiesi 2005: xv–ci.Google Scholar
Segal, E. 1987. Roman Laughter: The Comedy of Plautus, 2nd edn. New York.Google Scholar
Seifert, A. 2011. ‘Strafbar oder nicht? Sexualdelikte und häusliche Gewalt’, in Reuter, M. and Schiavone, R. (eds.), Gefährliches Pflaster: Kriminalität im römischen Reich. Xantener Berichte 21. Mainz: 147–60.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. 1994. ‘Ovid and the Politics of Reading’, MD 33: 97122.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. 2002. ‘Looking at Looking: Can You Resist a Reading?’, in Fredrick 2002a: 265–95.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D. 1984. ‘Bandits in the Roman Empire’, P&P 105: 352, reprinted (slightly revised, and with a postscript) in Osborne 2004: 326–74.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D. 1987. ‘The Family in Late Antiquity: The Experience of Augustine’, P&P 115: 351.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D. 1993. ‘The Passion of Perpetua’, P&P 139: 345, reprinted (slightly revised, and with a postscript) in Osborne 2004: 286–325.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D. 1996. ‘Body/Power/Identity: Passions of the Martyrs’, JECS 4: 269312.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D. 2001. ‘Raising and Killing Children: Two Roman Myths’, Mnemosyne 54: 3177.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D. 2011. Sacred Violence: African Christians and Sectarian Hatred in the Age of Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shelton, J. A. 1996. ‘Lucretius on the Use and Abuse of Animals’, Eranos 94: 4864.Google Scholar
Sherman, M. D., Sautter, F., Hope Jackson, M., Lyons, J. A., and Han, X. 2006. ‘Domestic Violence in Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Who Seek Couples Therapy’, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 32: 479–90.Google Scholar
Sigismund-Nielsen, H. 2012. ‘Vibia Perpetua – an Indecent Woman’, in Bremmer and Formisano 2012: 103–17.Google Scholar
Sigsbee, D. L. 1974. ‘The Disciplined Satire of Horace’, in Ramage, Sigsbee, and Fredericks 1974a: 64–88.Google Scholar
Silk, M. 1987. Homer: The Iliad. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sivan, H. 1998. ‘Le corps d’une pécheresse, le prix de la piété: la politique de l’adultère dans l’Antiquité tardive’, Annales (HSS) 53: 231–53.Google Scholar
Six-Hohenbalken, M. and Weiss, N. (eds.). 2011. Violence Expressed: An Anthropological Approach. Farnham.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 1997. ‘Ego mulier: The Construction of Male Sexuality in Catullus’, in Hallett and Skinner 1997: 129–50.Google Scholar
Skjelsbæk, I. 2001. ‘Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship’, European Journal of International Relations 7: 211–37.Google Scholar
Sklenář, R. J. 2003. The Taste for Nothingness: A Study of Virtus and Related Themes in Lucan’s Bellum civile. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Skoie, M. 2002. Reading Sulpicia: Commentaries 1475–1990. Oxford.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (ed.). 1985. The Annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Slocum, J. D. (ed.). 2001a. Violence and American Cinema. New York.Google Scholar
Slocum, J. D. 2001b. ‘Introduction: Violence and American Cinema: Notes for an Investigation’, in Slocum 2001a: 1–34.Google Scholar
Small, J. P. 1982. Cacus and Marsyas in Etrusco-Roman Legend. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Smith, R. A. 1997. Poetic Allusion and Poetic Embrace in Ovid and Virgil. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1961. ‘Propertius in His Literary Relations with Tibullus and Vergil’, Philologus 105: 273–89.Google Scholar
Solodow, J. B. 1988. The World of Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Sontag, S. 2003. Regarding the Pain of Others. London.Google Scholar
Spies, A. 1930. Militat omnis amans: ein Beitrag zur Bildersprache der antiken Erotik. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Stacey, J. 1994. Star Gazing: Hollywood Cinema and Female Spectatorship. London.Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. 1985. Propertius: ‘Love’ and ‘War’. Individual and State under Augustus. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. 1990. ‘The Death of Turnus: Augustan Vergil and the Political Rival’, in Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate. Berkeley, CA: 174211.Google Scholar
Stålenheim, P., Kelly, N., Perdomo, C., Perlo-Freema, S., and Sköns, E. 2009. ‘Appendix 5A: Military Expenditure Data 1999–2008’, in Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, SIPRI Yearbook 2009: Armaments, Disarmaments and International Security. Oxford: 212–46.Google Scholar
Staley, G. A. 2010. Seneca and the Idea of Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stampacchia, G. 1982. ‘Schiavitù e libertà nelle “Satire” di Orazio’, Index 11: 193219.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. 2005. Women Latin Poets: Language, Gender, and Authority, from Antiquity to the Eighteenth Century. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. 2012. Plautus and Roman Slavery. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Stirrup, B. E. 1973. ‘Irony in Ovid Amores I, 7’, Latomus 32: 824–31.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. 2003. ‘Declamatio’, in Schröder, B.-J. and Schröder, J.-P. (eds.), Studium declamatorium: Untersuchungen zu Schulübungen und Prunkreden von der Antike bis zur Neuzeit. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 176. Munich: 534.Google Scholar
Studlar, G. 1988. In the Realm of Pleasure: Von Sternberg, Dietrich, and the Masochistic Aesthetic. New York.Google Scholar
Sturken, M. and Cartwright, L. 2009. Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture, 2nd edn. New York.Google Scholar
Sussman, L. A. 1977. ‘Arellius Fuscus and the Unity of the Elder Seneca’s Suasoriae’, RhM 120: 303–23.Google Scholar
Sussman, L. A. 1978. The Elder Seneca. Mnemosyne Supplementum 51. Leiden.Google Scholar
Sutherland, S. and Swan, S. 2007. ‘“Tell Me Where the Bomb Is, or I Will Kill Your Son”: Situational Morality on 24’, in Peacock, S. (ed.), Reading 24: TV against the Clock. London: 119–32.Google Scholar
Sutton, D. F. 1986. Seneca on the Stage. Mnemosyne Supplementum 96. Leiden.Google Scholar
Sykes Davies, H. 1932. ‘Notes on Lucretius’, The Criterion 11: 2542, reprinted in C. J. Classen (ed.), Probleme der Lukrezforschung (Hildesheim, 1986), 273–90.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1958. Tacitus. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1978. History in Ovid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tabacco, R. 1978. ‘Povertà e ricchezza: l’unità tematica della declamazione XIII dello pseudo-Quintiliano’, Materiali e contributi per la storia della narrativa greco-latina 2: 3770.Google Scholar
Tabacco, R. 1985. ‘Il tiranno nelle declamazioni di scuola in lingua latina’, MAT 9: 1141.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 1978. ‘Senecan Drama and Its Antecedents’, HSCPh 82: 2363.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (ed.). 2004. P. Ovidi Nasonis Metamorphoses. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (ed.). 2012. Virgil: Aeneid Book XII. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Theodorakopoulos, E. 1999. ‘Closure and Transformation in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds 1999: 142–61.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. 1964. ‘Variations on a Military Theme in Ovid’s Amores’, G&R 11: 151–65.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (ed.). 1988. Virgil: Georgics. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomson, H. J. (tr.). 1949–53. Prudentius. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library 387, 398. London.Google Scholar
Thorsen, T. S. (ed.). 2013. The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tissol, G. 1997. The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Tovey, D. F. 1935. Essays in Musical Analysis: Symphonies (II), Variations and Orchestral Polyphony. London.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1991a. Roman Marriage: Iusti coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1991b. ‘Divorce Roman Style: How Easy and How Frequent Was It?’, in Rawson 1991: 31–46.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. 2003. ‘“Portare davanti agli occhi”: una tecnica retorica nelle opere “morali” di Filodemo’, CErc 33: 243–7.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. 2007. The Ethics of Philodemus. Oxford.Google Scholar
van den Berg, C. Forthcoming. ‘The Rhetoric of Decline and the Rhetoric for declamatio’, in Dinter, Guérin, and Martinho forthcoming.Google Scholar
van Wees, H. 1992. Status Warriors: War, Violence and Society in Homer and History. Dutch Monographs on Ancient History and Archaeology 9. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1991. ‘A “Beautiful Death” and the Disfigured Corpse in Homeric Epic’, translated by Szegedy-Maszak, A., in Vernant, Mortals and Immortals: Collected Essays. Edited by Zeitlin, F. I.. Princeton, NJ: 5074.Google Scholar
Viljamaa, T., Timonen, A., and Krötzl, C. (eds.). 1992. Crudelitas: The Politics of Cruelty in the Ancient and Medieval World. Proceedings of the International Conference, Turku (Finland), May 1991. Medium aevum quotidianum Sonderband 2. Krems.Google Scholar
Ville, G. 1981. La gladiature en occident des origines à la mort de Domitien. Bibliothèque des Écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 245. Rome.Google Scholar
Vizier, A. 1998. ‘Incipit philosophia’, in Larmour, Miller, and Platter 1998a: 61–84.Google Scholar
Volk, K. 2010. ‘Lucretius’ Prayer for Peace and the Date of De rerum natura’, CQ 60: 127–31.Google Scholar
von Albrecht, M. 1997. A History of Roman Literature from Livius Andronicus to Boethius with Special Regard to Its Influence on World Literature. 2 vols. Revised by Schmeling, G. and von Albrecht, M.. Translated by M. von Albrecht and G. Schmeling with the assistance of R. R. Caston, F. and K. Newman, and F. Schwartz. Leiden.Google Scholar
von Schlegel, A. W. 1972. ‘Senecas Tragödien’, in Lefèvre, E. (ed.), Senecas Tragödien. Wege der Forschung 310. Darmstadt: 1314.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1960. ‘History and Tragedy’, Historia 9: 216–34, reprinted in Walbank, Selected Papers: Studies in Greek and Roman History and Historiography (Cambridge, 1985), 224–41.Google Scholar
Walker, B. 1969. Review of Zwierlein 1966, CPh 64: 183–7.Google Scholar
Walker, L. E. 2009. The Battered Woman Syndrome, 3rd edn. New York.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1997. ‘Mutatio morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution’, in Habinek and Schiesaro 1997: 3–22.Google Scholar
Walters, J. 1997. ‘Invading the Roman Body: Manliness and Impenetrability in Roman Thought’, in Hallett and Skinner 1997: 29–43.Google Scholar
Walters, J. 1998. ‘Making a Spectacle: Deviant Men, Invective, and Pleasure’, Arethusa 31: 355–67.Google Scholar
Wardman, A. E. 1965. ‘The Rape of the Sabines (Ovid, Ars amatoria 1. 89 ff.)’, CQ 15: 101–3.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. 1988. ‘Lucretius on What Atoms Are Not’, CPh 83: 112–28.Google Scholar
Warmington, E. H. (ed., tr.). 1979. Remains of Old Latin, vol. III, revised. Loeb Classical Library 329. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2004. Facing Death: Epicurus and His Critics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Watson, L. C. 1995. ‘Horace’s Epodes: The Impotence of iambos?’, in S. J. Harrison 1995: 188–202.Google Scholar
Watson, L. C. 2003. A Commentary on Horace’s Epodes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 1997. ‘Imagination and the Arousal of the Emotions in Greco-Roman Rhetoric’, in Braund and Gill 1997: 112–27.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2009. Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham.Google Scholar
Weed, J. H., Davis, R., and Weed, R. (eds.). 2008. 24 and Philosophy: The World according to Jack. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
West, D. A. 1969. The Imagery and Poetry of Lucretius. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
West, D. A. 2002. Horace, Odes III: Dulce periculum. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, T. 1992. Emperors and Gladiators. London.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von (tr.). 1919. Griechische Tragödien. 4 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. 1955. Ovid Recalled. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Williams, C. 2012. ‘Perpetua’s Gender: A Latinist Reads the Passio Perpetuae et Felicitatis’, in Bremmer and Formisano 2012: 54–77.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 1995. ‘Libertino patre natus: True or False?’, in S. J. Harrison 1995: 296–313.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. 1996. The Curse of Exile: A Study of Ovid’s Ibis. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Supplementary Volume 19. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1973. The Country and the City. London.Google Scholar
Williams, R. D. (ed.). 1962. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber tertius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Williams, R. D. 1967. ‘The Purpose of the Aeneid’, Antichthon 1: 2941, reprinted in S. J. Harrison (ed.), Oxford Readings in Vergil’s Aeneid (Oxford, 1990), 21–36.Google Scholar
Williamson, E. 2012. ‘Domestic Abuse and Military Families: The Problem of Reintegration and Control’, British Journal of Social Work 42: 1371–87.Google Scholar
Willink, C. W. 1966. ‘Some Problems of Text and Interpretation in the Bacchae: I’, CQ 16: 2750.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. 2008. ‘Your Writings or Your Life: Cicero’s Philippics and Declamation’, in Stevenson, T. and Wilson, M. (eds.), Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric, Ideology (= Prudentia 37–8 (2005–6)). Auckland: 305–34.Google Scholar
Windrum, K. 2004. ‘Fight Club and the Political (Im)potence of Consumer Era Revolt’, in S. J. Schneider 2004: 304–17.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. 1985. Auctor & Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius’s Golden Ass. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Winkler, M. M. 1991. ‘Satire and the Grotesque in Juvenal, Arcimboldo, and Goya’, A&A 37: 2242.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (ed., tr.). 1974. Seneca the Elder: Declamations. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library 463, 464. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (ed.). 1984. The Minor Declamations Ascribed to Quintilian. Texte und Kommentare 13. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. 1950. Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1979. Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. Leicester.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1994. Historiography and Imagination: Eight Essays on Roman Culture. Exeter Studies in History 33. Exeter.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1995. Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2000. ‘Liber: Myth, Drama and Ideology in Republican Rome’, in Bruun, C. (ed.), The Roman Middle Republic: Politics, Religion, and Historiography c. 400–133 B.C. Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 23. Rome: 265–99.Google Scholar
Wistrand, M. 1992. Entertainment and Violence in Ancient Rome: The Attitudes of Roman Writers of the First Century A.D. Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia 56. Göteborg.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1985. Tacitus and Tiberius: The Alternative Annals. Durham.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1988. Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. London.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1993. ‘Amateur Dramatics at the Court of Nero: Annals 15.48–74’, in Luce, T. J. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition. Princeton, NJ: 104–28.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1995. ‘A Death in the First Act: Tacitus, Annals 1.6’, in Brock, R. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Papers of the Leeds Latin Seminar: Eighth Volume, 1995. ARCA Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers and Monographs 33. Leeds: 257–73, reprinted in Woodman, Tacitus Reviewed (Oxford, 1998), 23–39.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (tr.). 2004. Tacitus: The Annals. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 2005. ‘Textual Notes on Tacitus’ Annals’, in Cairns, F. (ed.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar: Twelfth Volume, 2005. ARCA Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers and Monographs 44. Cambridge: 321–9.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 2006. ‘Mutiny and Madness: Tacitus Annals 1.16–49’, Arethusa 39: 303–29.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. and Martin, R. H. (eds.). 1996. The Annals of Tacitus, Book 3. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 32. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 1993. ‘Roman Peace’, in Rich and Shipley 1993: 171–94.Google Scholar
Wright, F. A. (tr.). 1933. Select Letters of St Jerome. Loeb Classical Library 262. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1974. Dancing in Chains: The Stylistic Unity of the Comoedia palliata. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 25. Rome.Google Scholar
Wright, M. R. 1997. ‘Ferox virtus: Anger in Virgil’s Aeneid’, in Braund and Gill 1997: 169–84.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. 1989. ‘Mistress and Metaphor in Augustan Elegy’, Helios 16: 2547.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. 2002. The Roman Mistress: Ancient and Modern Representations. New York.Google Scholar
Wyss, E. 1996. The Myth of Apollo and Marsyas in the Art of the Italian Renaissance: An Inquiry into the Meaning of Images. Newark, DE.Google Scholar
Zillmann, D. 1998. ‘The Psychology of the Appeal of Portrayals of Violence’, in Goldstein 1998a: 179–211.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. 2006. ‘The Depraved Heroes of 24 Are the Himmlers of Hollywood’, The Guardian, 10 January, online at www.theguardian.com/media/2006/jan/10/usnews.comment.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. 1966. Die Rezitationsdramen Senecas. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 20. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O (ed.). 1986. L. Annaei Senecae Tragoediae. Oxford.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Edited by Monica R. Gale, Trinity College Dublin, J. H. D. Scourfield, Maynooth University, Ireland
  • Book: Texts and Violence in the Roman World
  • Online publication: 29 March 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139225304.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Edited by Monica R. Gale, Trinity College Dublin, J. H. D. Scourfield, Maynooth University, Ireland
  • Book: Texts and Violence in the Roman World
  • Online publication: 29 March 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139225304.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Edited by Monica R. Gale, Trinity College Dublin, J. H. D. Scourfield, Maynooth University, Ireland
  • Book: Texts and Violence in the Roman World
  • Online publication: 29 March 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139225304.014
Available formats
×