Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T23:20:35.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Population and community dynamics in variable environments: the desert annual system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2013

D. Lawrence Venable
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Sarah Kimball
Affiliation:
University of California
Colleen K. Kelly
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Michael G. Bowler
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Gordon A. Fox
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Desert annual plants are frequently used to illustrate the principles of adaptation to variable environments, the population dynamic functions of dispersal and dormancy, and how temporal variation may promote species coexistence (Cohen 1966, Venable and Lawlor 1980, Shmida and Ellner 1984, Chesson and Huntly 1988, 1989, Philippi and Seger 1989, Venable et al. 1993, Chesson 2000). All of these topics involve ecological and evolutionary responses to environmental variability. High levels of environmental variation driven by rainfall are a signature characteristic of hot deserts (Frank and Inouye 1994, Davidowitz 2002). Desert annuals have provided useful conceptual models because they have very simple life cycles and respond on a rapid time scale to such environmental variation (Patten 1975, Venable and Pake 1999, Venable 2007). ‘Good wildflower years’, when showy-flowered annuals blanket the desert, often occur in association with abrupt desert annual population increases. Such years are correlated with greater than average germination season rainfall and global climatic cycles, such as El Niño and Pacific Decadal Oscillations, in the case of US southwestern deserts (Cayan et al. 1999, Venable and Pake 1999, Bowers 2005). Desert annuals spend most of their lives as seeds and may even go unnoticed during their normal flowering season in years of little germination or high mortality. Persistent seedbanks play an important role in population and community dynamics, and it is not uncommon for species to reappear following years of absence.

While desert annuals are small and short lived, they occur as members of mature, persistent communities. This means that it is relatively easy to monitor multiple generations during the course of a single long-term project. Thus, in addition to being good conceptual models, desert annuals make good empirical models for exploring ecological and evolutionary dynamics in variable environments. Here, we present the results of our work combining the collection of long-term population dynamic data with several short-term focused approaches to understanding the ecology of Sonoran Desert winter annuals. We begin by introducing our study system and long-term data set, demonstrating how our data provide evidence for bet hedging and coexistence via the storage effect. Next, we describe a fundamental functional tradeoff that structures the dominant members of our community and determines the degree of interannual variation in fecundity. Finally, we explain long-term trends in response to climate change.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P. B., HilleRisLambers, J., Kyriakidis, P. C., Guan, Q. F. and Levine, J. M. (2006). Climate variability has a stabilizing effect on the coexistence of prairie grasses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103, 12793–12798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adondakis, S. and Venable, D. L. (2004). Dormancy and germination in a guild of Sonoran Desert annuals. Ecology 85, 2582–2590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreadis, T. G. (1990). Observations on installment egg hatching in the brown salt-marsh mosquito, Aedes cantator. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 6, 727–729.Google Scholar
Angert, A. L., Horst, J. L., Huxman, T. E. and Venable, D. L. (2010). Phenotypic plasticity and precipitation response in Sonoran Desert winter annuals. American Journal of Botany 94, 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angert, A. L., Huxman, T. E., Barron-Gafford, G. A., Gerst, K. L. and Venable, D. L. (2007). Linking growth strategies to long-term population dynamics in a guild of desert annuals. Journal of Ecology 95, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angert, A. L., Huxman, T. E., Chesson, P. and Venable, D. L. (2009). Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106, 11641–11645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, R. A. and McGehee, R. (1980). Competitive exclusion. American Naturalist 115, 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, H. J. E., Gallie, J., Kost, C., Ferguson, G. C. and Rainey, P. B. (2009). Experimental evolution of bet hedging. Nature 462, 90–U97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, J. R., Bohan, D. A., Shaw, E. M. and Weyman, G. S. (2005). Ballooning dispersal using silk: world fauna, phylogenies, genetics and models. Bulletin of Entomological Research 95, 69–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowers, J. E. (2005). El Niño and displays of spring-flowering annuals in the Mojave and Sonoran deserts. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 132, 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, J. E. and Turner, R. M. (1985). A revised flora of Tumamoc Hill, Tucson, Arizona. Madroño 32, 225–252.Google Scholar
Brown, J. H., Reichman, O. J. and Davidson, D. W. (1979). Granivory in desert ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10, 201–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cáceres, C. E. (1997). Temporal variation, dormancy, and coexistence: A field test of the storage effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94, 9171–9175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cayan, D. R., Redmond, K. T. and Riddle, L. G. (1999). ENSO and hydrologic extremes in the western United States. Journal of Climate 12, 2881–2893.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesson, P. (1994). Multispecies competition in variable environments. Theoretical Population Biology 45, 227–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesson, P. (2000). Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31, 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesson, P. L. and Huntly, N. (1988). Community consequences of life-history traits in a variable environment. Annales Zoologici Fennici 25, 5–16.Google Scholar
Chesson, P. and Huntly, N. (1989). Short-term instabilities and long-term community dynamics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4, 293–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chesson, P. L. and Warner, R. R. (1981). Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive systems. American Naturalist 117, 923–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauss, M. J. and Venable, D. L. (2000). Seed germination in desert annuals: an empirical test of adaptive bet hedging. American Naturalist 155, 168–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, D. (1966). Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology 12, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comstock, J. P. and Ehleringer, J. R. (1992). Plant adaptation in the Great Basin and Colorado Plateau. Great Basin Naturalist 52, 195–215.Google Scholar
Crump, M. L. (1981). Variation in propagule size as a function of environmental uncertainty for tree frogs. American Naturalist 117, 724–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidowitz, G. (2002). Does precipitation variability increase from mesic to xeric biomes?Global Ecology and Biogeography 11, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, T. E., Mambelli, S., Plamboeck, A. H., Templer, P. H. and Tu, K. P. (2002). Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33, 507–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehleringer, J. R. (1993). Gas-exchange implications of isotopic variation in arid-land plants. In Smith, J. A. C. and Griffiths, H. (eds), Water Deficits: Plant Responses from Cell to Community. Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishers, pp. 265–284.Google Scholar
Ellner, S. (1985). ESS germination strategies in randomly varying environments. 1. Logistic-type models. Theoretical Population Biology 28, 50–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, M. E. K. and Dennehy, J. J. (2005). Germ banking: bet-hedging and variable release from egg and seed dormancy. Quarterly Review of Biology 80, 431–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, M. E. K., Ferrière, R., Kane, M. J. and Venable, D. L. (2007). Bet hedging via seed banking in desert evening primroses (Oenothera, Onagraceae): demographic evidence from natural populations. American Naturalist 169, 184–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felger, R. S. (1980). Vegetation and flora of the Gran Desierto, Sonora, Mexico. Desert Plants 2, 87–114.Google Scholar
Fell, P. E. (1995). Deep diapause and the influence of low-temperature on the hatching of the gemmules of Spongilla lacustris (L) and Eunapius fragilis (Leidy). Invertebrate Biology 114, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. A. and Inouye, R. S. (1994). Temporal variation in actual evapotranspiration of terrestrial ecosystems: patterns and ecological implications. Journal of Biogeography 21, 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendron, R. P. (1987). Models and mechanisms of frequency-dependent predation. American Naturalist 130, 603–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennon, V., Chisholm, L. A. and Whittington, I. D. (2006). Three unrelated species, 3 sites, same host monogenean parasites of the southern fiddler ray, Trygonorrhina fasciata, in South Australia: egg hatching strategies and larval behaviour. Parasitology 133, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hairston, N. G. and Munns, W. R. (1984). The timing of copepod diapause as an evolutionarily stable strategy. American Naturalist 123, 733–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, P. C., Thomas, R. B., Reynolds, J. F. and Strain, B. R. (1992). Modeling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant Cell and Environment 15, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, A. (1980). Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theoretical Population Biology 18, 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, I. R., Owen, P. and Nataro, J. P. (1999). Molecular switches: the ON and OFF of bacterial phase variation. Molecular Microbiology 33, 919–932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxman, T. E., Barron-Gafford, G., Gerst, K. L. et al. (2008). Photosynthetic resource-use efficiency and demographic variability in desert winter annual plants. Ecology 89, 1554–1563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxman, T. E., Kimball, S., Angert, A. L., Gremer, J. R., Barron-Gafford, G. A. and Venable, D. L. (2013). Understanding past, contemporary, future dynamics of plants, populations, and communities using Sonoran Desert winter annuals. American Journal of Botany 100, 1369–1380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, C. K. and Bowler, M. G. (2002). Coexistence and relative abundance in forest trees. Nature 417, 437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, S., Angert, A. L., Huxman, T. E. and Venable, D. L. (2010). Contemporary climate change in the Sonoran Desert favors cold-adapted species. Global Change Biology 16, 1555–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, S., Gremer, J. R., Angert, A. L., Huxman, T. E. and Venable, D. L. (2011). Differences in the timing of germination and reproduction relate to growth physiology and population dynamics of Sonoran Desert winter annuals. American Journal of Botany 98, 1773–1781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levins, R. and Culver, D. (1971). Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 68, 1246–1248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, K. L. M. (1999). Ready and waiting: delayed hatching and extended incubation of anamniotic vertebrate terrestrial eggs. American Zoologist 39, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuo, Y. (2006). Cost of prolonged diapause and its relationship to body size in a seed predator. Functional Ecology 20, 300–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, S. A. and Russell, J. L. (2008). Northern annular mode impact on spring climate in the western United States. Geophysical Research Letters 35, L17701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriuchi, K. S., Venable, D. L., Pake, C. E. and Lange, T. (2000). Direct measurement of the seed bank age structure of a Sonoran Desert annual plant. Ecology 81, 1133–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pake, C. E. and Venable, D. L. (1995). Is coexistence of Sonoran Desert annuals mediated by temporal variability in reproductive success?Ecology 76, 246–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pake, C. E. and Venable, D. L. (1996). Seed banks in desert annuals: Implications for persistence and coexistence in variable environments. Ecology 77, 1427–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, D. T. (1975). Phenology and function of Sonoran Desert annuals in relation to environmental changes. In USABP Desert Biome Research Memorandum 75010. Logan, UT: Utah State University, pp. 109–116.Google Scholar
Philippi, T. (1993). Bet-hedging germination of desert annuals: Variation among populations and maternal effects in Lepidium lasiocarpum. American Naturalist 142, 488–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philippi, T. and Seger, J. (1989). Hedging ones evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4, 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippi, T. E., Simovich, M. A., Bauder, E. T. and Moorad, J. A. (2001). Habitat ephemerality and hatching fractions of a diapausing anostracan (Crustacea : Branchiopoda). Israel Journal of Zoology 47, 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, M., Condit, R., Crawley, M., Pacala, S. and Tilman, D. (2001). Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics. Science 293, 650–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, H. A. and Feast, P. M. (1972). Fate of seeds of some annual weeds in different depths of cultivated and undisturbed soil. Weed Research 12, 316–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondeau, R. J. (1996). Flora and vegetation of the Tucson Mountains. Desert Plants 12, 1–47.Google Scholar
Runkle, J. R. (1989). Synchrony of regeneration, gaps, and latitudinal differences in tree species diversity. Ecology 70, 546–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T. W. (1974). Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwinning, S., Sala, O. E., Loik, M. E. and Ehleringer, J. R. (2004). Thresholds, memory, and seasonality: understanding pulse dynamics in arid/semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141, 191–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seger, J. and Brockmann, H. J. (1987). What is bet-hedging?Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 4, 182–211.Google Scholar
Shmida, A. and Ellner, S. P. (1984). Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio 58, 29–55.Google Scholar
Stumpf, M. P. H., Laidlaw, Z. and Jansen, V. A. A. (2002). Herpes viruses hedge their bets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99, 15234–15237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. (1991). Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technology 5, 657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. (1988). Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilman, D. and Pacala, S. (1993). The maintenance of species richness in plant communities. In Ricklefs, R. E. and Schluter, D. (eds), Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 13–25.Google Scholar
Tuljapurkar, S. (1990). Delayed reproduction and fitness in variable environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 87, 1139–1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venable, D. L. (2007). Bet hedging in a guild of desert annuals. Ecology 88, 1086–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venable, D. L. and Lawlor, L. (1980). Delayed germination and dispersal in desert annuals: escape in space and time. Oecologia 46, 272–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venable, D. L. and Pake, C. E. (1999). Population ecology of Sonoran Desert annual plants. In Robichaux, R. H. (ed.), Ecology of Sonoran Desert Plants and Plant Communities. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, pp. 115–142.Google Scholar
Venable, D. L., Pake, C. E. and Caprio, A. C. (1993). Diversity and coexistence of Sonoran Desert winter annuals. Plant Species Biology 8, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, J. L. and Overpeck, J. T. (2005). Is the Sonoran Desert losing its cool?Global Change Biology 11, 2065–2077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wullschleger, S. D. (1993). Biochemical limitations to carbon assimilation in C3 plants: A retrospective analysis of the A/Ci curves from 109 species. Journal of Experimental Botany 44, 907–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×