Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: January 2010

8 - Assessing local vulnerabilities: methodological approaches and regional contexts

from Part IV



The global change literature has experienced a significant, growing interest in vulnerability since the early 1990s. Although a host of authors have provided overarching conceptual discussions of vulnerability, they have largely ignored methodological issues. Consequently, several papers have recently addressed the topic of operationalizing vulnerability. Despite this growing number of vulnerability studies privileging methodology, we are unaware of published papers tackling the challenge of how to conduct a coordinated vulnerability assessment in multiple places. The HERO project, with this chapter, responds to that gap in the literature.

By addressing the topic of replicable protocols, the HERO project seeks to advance the science of vulnerability. Coupled human–environment systems are dynamic, which means that the vulnerability estimated at one point in time or space may not be a faithful predictor of vulnerability at a later point in time or another point in space. Therefore, as argued elsewhere in similar contexts (e.g., Chapter 5 of this volume; Redman et al. 2004; Gragson and Grove 2006; Haberl et al. 2006; Polsky et al. 2007), replicable protocols must be consistently applied to vulnerability assessments over time and space to develop a database sufficiently sensitive to distinguish trends from anomalies. Thus, HERO is aiming to contribute to a larger discussion on scientific infrastructure development (see Chapters 1, 3, and 5).

In the remainder of this chapter, we first elaborate on methodological issues associated with conducting vulnerability assessments in the context of a multi-site network.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Adger, W. N., 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16: 268–281.
Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Bentham, G., Agnew, M., and Eriksen, S., 2004. New Indicators of Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity, Tyndall Centre Technical Report No. 7. Norwich, UK: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
Barnes, T., and Gregory, D., 1997. Worlding geography: geography as situated knowledge. In Reading Human Geography: Poetics and Politics of Inquiry, eds. Barnes, T. and Gregory, D., pp. 14–26. London: Arnold Publishers.
Baxter, J., and Eyles, J., 1997. Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing “rigour” in interview anaysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 22: 505–525.
Böhle, H.-G., Downing, T. E., and Watts, M., 1994. Climate change and social vulnerability: the sociology and geography of food insecurity. Global Environmental Change 4: 37–48.
Chambers, R., 1983. Rural Development: Putting the Last First. New York: Longman.
Chambers, R., 1993. Challenging the Professions: Frontiers for Rural Development. London: ITDG.
Clark, G. E., Moser, S. C., Ratick, S. J., Dow, K., Meyer, W. B., Emani, S., Jin, W., Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., and Schwarz, H. E., 1998. Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: the case of Revere, MA, USA. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 3: 59–82.
Creswell, J. W., 2002. Research Design. London: Sage Publications.
Cutter, S., 1996. Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography 20: 529–539.
Dow, K., 1992. Exploring differences in our common future(s): the meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change. Geoforum 23: 417–436.
Downing, T. E., Patwardhan, A., Klein, R. J. T., Mukhala, E., Stephen, L., Winograd, M., and Ziervogel, G., 2003. Vulnerability Assessment for Climate Adaptation, Technical Paper No. 3, Adaptation Policy Framework. Nairobi: United Nations Development Programme.
Eakin, H., and Bojorquez-Tapia, L. A., 2008. Insights into the composition of household vulnerability from multicriteria decision analysis. Global Environmental Change 18: 112–127.
Eakin, H. and Luers, A., 2006. Assessing the vulnerability of social–environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment Resources 31: 365–394.
England, K., 1994. Getting personal: reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. Professional Geographer 46: 80–89.
Füssel, H.-M., 2007. Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change 17: 155–167.
Füssel, H.-M., and Klein, R. J. T., 2006. Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Climatic Change 75: 301–329.
Gragson, T. L., and Grove, J. M., 2006. Social science in the context of the Long Term Ecological Research program. Society and Natural Resources 93: 93–100.
Haberl, H., Winiwarter, V., Andersson, K., Ayres, R. U., Boone, C., Castillo, A., Cunfer, G., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Freudenburg, W. R., Furman, E., Kaufmann, R., Krausmann, F., Langthaler, E., Lotze-Campen, H., Mirtl, M., Redman, C. L., Reenberg, A., Wardell, A., Warr, B., and Zechmeister, H., 2006. From LTER to LTSER: conceptualizing the socioeconomic dimension of long-term socioecological research. Ecology and Society 11(2): 13.
,Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía y Informática (INEGI), 2000. XII Censo General de Población y Vivienda 2000. Municipal data. Accessed at
,International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), 2008. Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA): Participatory Research for Sustainable Livelihoods – A Guide for Field Projects on Adaptive Strategies. Accessed at
Kates, R. W., 1985. The interaction of climate and society. In Climate Impact Assessment: Studies of the Interaction of Climate and Society, eds. Kates, R. W., Ausubel, J. H., and Berberian, M., pp. 3–36. New York: John Wiley.
Kelly, P. M., and Adger, W. N., 2000. Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change 47: 325–352.
King, G., Keohane, R. O., and Verba, S., 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Klein, R. J. T., and MacIver, D. C., 1999. Adaptation to climate change and variability: methodological issues. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4(3/4): 189–198.
Leathers, N., and Harrington, L. M. B., 2000. Effectiveness of conservation reserves: ‘slippage’ in southwestern Kansas. Professional Geographer 52(1): 83–93.
Lincoln, Y.S., and Guba, E. G., 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Liverman, D., 2001. Vulnerability to global environmental change. In Global Environmental Risk, eds. Kasperson, J. X. and Kasperson, R. E., pp. 201–216. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
,MASSGIS, 2008. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of Geographic and Environmental Information, Boston, Massachusetts. Accessed at
McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J., and White, K. S. (eds.) 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation & Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDowell, L., 1992. “Doing gender”: feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17: 399–416.
Moss, R. H., Brenkert, A. L., and Malone, E. L., 2001. Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Quantitative Approach. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
,National Research Council (NRC), 1999. Our Common Journey: A Transition Toward Sustainability. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
O'Brien, K., Leichenko, R., Kelkar, U., Venema, H., Nadal, G., Tompkins, H., Javed, A., Bhadwal, S., Barg, S., Nygaard, L., and West, J., 2004. Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Global Environmental Change 14: 1–11.
Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., and Belitz, K., 1994. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the Earth sciences, Science 263(5147): 641–646.
,PA DEP, 2005. Drinking water reporting system: inventory data. Accessed at
Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., Linden, P. J., and Hanson, C. E. (eds.), 2007. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Polsky, C., 2004. Putting space and time in Ricardian climate change impact studies: agriculture in the U.S. Great Plains, 1969–1992. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94: 549–564.
Polsky, C., Neff, R., and Yarnal, B., 2007. Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: the Vulnerability Scoping Diagram. Global Environmental Change 17: 472–485.
Rastetter, E., 1996. Validating models of ecosystem response to global change: how can we best assess models of long-term global change?BioScience 46(3): 190–198.
Redman, C. L., Grove, J. M., and Kuby, L. H., 2004. Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research (LTER) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7: 161–171.
Sayre, R., Roca, E., Sedaghatkish, G., Young, B., Keel, S., Roca, R. L., and Sheppard, S., 2000. Nature in Focus: Rapid Ecological Assessment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Schröter, D., Polsky, C., and Patt, A. G., 2005. Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: an eight step approach. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 10: 573–596.
Singleton, R. A., and Straits, B. C., 2005. Approaches to Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., and Street, R., 1999. The science of adaptation: a framework for assessment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4(3/4): 199–213.
Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., and Wandel, J., 2000. An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Climatic Change 45(11): 223–251.
Smit, B., Pilifosova, O., Burton, I., Challenger, B., Huq, S., Klein, R. J. T., and Yohe, G., 2001. Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. In Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability – Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds. McCarthy, J. al., pp. 877–912. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J., 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Turner, B. L. II, Kasperson, R. E., Matsone, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J. X., Luerse, A., Martello, M. L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., and Schiller, A., 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100: 8074–8079.
,United States Census Bureau, 1997. American FactFinder, 1997 Economic Census. Accessed at
,United States Census Bureau, 2004. 2004 American Community Survey. Accessed at
,United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA ERS), 2006. State Fact Sheets: Kansas. Accessed at
,United States Department of Agriculture, National Agriculture Statistics Service, 2002. Census of Agriculture. Accessed at
Wilbanks, T. L., Kane, S. M., Leiby, P. N., Perlack, R. D., Settle, C., Shogren, J. F., and Smith, J. B.. 2003. Integrating mitigation and adaptation. Environment 45(5): 28–39.
Wu, S.-Y., Yarnal, B., and Fisher, A., 2002. Vulnerability of coastal communities to sea-level rise: a case study of Cape May County, New Jersey. Climate Research 22: 255–270.
Yohe, G., and Tol, R. S. J., 2002. Indicators for social and economic coping capacity: moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change 12: 25–40.