Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-2s2w2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-18T23:05:31.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

2 - Analysis Part Two

Get access

Summary

The previous chapter examined the style of analysis:synthesis and touched on its relationship with compound individuality. This chapter looks more closely at the neurosciences between 1830 and 1845, in which analysis progressively disintegrated the nervous system. One example was the emergence of the reflex arc. Fields to be examined include orthodox topics such as neuroanatomy and neurophysiology, and heterodox ones like phrenology. Neuroscientists saw animals as disunified when trying to answer certain analytic questions: what were the nervous elements that made up volition? Was there a central ‘seat’ in which these nervous elements were combined? If so, where was it; and if it was removed, what happened to the rest of the body? Lower animals seemed to lack the same mental characteristics as higher ones, such as volition – so how did their body parts move? Why did these parts often display an independent agency? If one denied a central coordinating location for nervous elements in lower animals, then how did these quasi-independent body parts act harmoniously?

Analytically-minded neuroscientists were therefore faced with the problematic of collective action. How could they reconcile the seeming independence of body parts with their harmonious contribution to the good of the entire individual? To answer such a question, different images were used. Body parts were seen as parts of a musical instrument, or they were depicted as linked by the ‘telegraph wires’ of the nerves. But the most common tactic was to see body parts as members of a social system, cooperating with (or being forced to cooperate with) other parts. Victorian life researchers were using similar tactics to those used by contemporary economists and political philosophers. Just as a society could be disintegrated into myriad individuals – each with their own interests – so too could an individual organism be seen as though it was a group of parts.

Neurophysiology as Analysis: Vivisections

Historian William Randall Albury portrays Bichat and François Magendie as analysts, French researchers who saw an organism's life as the sum of its independent parts.

Type
Chapter
Information
Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences
Shared Assumptions, 1820–58
, pp. 43 - 64
Publisher: Pickering & Chatto
First published in: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×