Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:14:42.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Examining the challenge of communication in diffusing innovative education programmes

An analysis drawing on public choice, social choice and capability framings

from Part I - Social Choice and Capabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2024

Flavio Comim
Affiliation:
Universitat Ramon Llull
P. B. Anand
Affiliation:
University of Bradford
Shailaja Fennell
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

This chapter addresses the questions of how policy choices to improve education might be addressed by looking across social choice theory, public choice theory and capability approaches. The intention is to try and understand how to evaluate innovative programmes that are set up to improve the chances of the most disadvantaged children, and why these well-intentioned programmes continue to face challenges in terms of ensuring a scaling-up procedure. The chapter draws on an evaluative study undertaken in 2014 and 2015 to examine the dissemination and scaling up of the educationally innovative Activity Based Learning (ABL) programme in Tamil Nadu, India, to improve the retention rates and learning outcomes of children from challenging socio-economic backgrounds. The studys aim was to compare the manner and rolling out of the programme in Tamil Nadu with ABL programmes elsewhere, and to ascertain the extent to which they had been successful.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldred, J. (2004) Theory and deliberative democracy: a comment. British Journal of Political Science, 34 (4): 1747–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Aslam, N., Rawal, S., Vignoles, A., Duraisamy, M., and Shanmugam, M. (2016) The trajectory of learning: the ABL story in Tamil Nadu, India. London: DFID.Google Scholar
Beattie, N. (1978) Formalized parent participation in education: a comparative perspective (France, German Federal Republic, England and Wales). Comparative Education, 14 (1): 41–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedi, J., and Kingdon, G. (2016) The political economy of the scale-up of the ABL programme in Tamil Nadu. London: DFID.Google Scholar
Binswanger, H. P., and Aiyar, S. S. (2003) Scaling up community-driven development: theoretical underpinnings and program design implications, Policy Research Working Paper 3039. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, D. K., and Ball, D. L. (2007) Educational innovation and the problem of scale up. In Scale-Up in Education, vol. 1, Ideas in Principle, Schneider, B., and MacDonald, S.-K. (eds.): 1936. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Comim, F. (2018) Sen’s capability approach, social choice theory and the use of rankings. In New Frontiers of the Capability Approach, Comim, F., Fennell, S., and Anand, P. B. (eds.): 179–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1993) Some unresolved problems in the theory of rational choice. Acta Sociologica, 36 (3): 179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennell, S. (2007) Tilting at windmills: public–private partnerships in Indian education today. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 4 (2): 193216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennell, S., Duraisamy, M., and Shanmugam, M. (2016) Dissemination and scaling up of the Activity Based Learning programme. London: DFID.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F. H. G., and Peragine, V. (2016) Individual responsibility and equality of opportunity. In The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy, Adler, M. D., and Fleurbaey, M. (eds.): 746–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geetha Rani, P., and Kannappan, S. (2011) Provision of quality elementary education for all under Sarva Shikha Abhiyan at an affordable cost in Tamil Nadu. In Millennium Development Goals and India: Cases Assessing Performance, Prospects and Challenges, Mishra, R. K., and Raveendran, J. (eds.): 95104. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Geetha Rani, D. S., and Tideman, N. (2013) Varieties of failure of monotonicity and participation under five voting methods. Theory and Decision, 75 (1): 5977.Google Scholar
Gopalan, P. (2013) PPP Paradox: Promise and Perils of Public–Private Partnership in Education. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Hart, C. S., and Brando, N. (2018) A capability approach to children’s well-being, agency and participatory rights in education. European Journal of Education, 53 (3): 293309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. (2018) Education, inequality and social justice: a critical analysis applying the Sen–Bourdieu analytical framework. Policy Futures in Education, 17 (5): 582–98.Google Scholar
Kaminski, J. (2011) Diffusion of innovation theory. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 6 (2): http://cjni.net/journal/?p=1444.Google Scholar
List, C. (2018) Democratic deliberation and social choice: a review. In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J., and Warren, M. (eds.): 463–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mohapatra, A., Baker, K. L., and Sahoo, R. N. (2008) Activity Based Learning: Effectiveness of ABL under SSA. Chennai: SchoolScape.Google Scholar
Mueller, D. (2015) Public choice, social choice, and political economy. Public Choice, 163 (3): 379–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C., and Sen, A. K. (eds.) (1993) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patty, J., and Penn, E. (2014) Social Choice and Legitimacy: The Possibilities of Impossibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patty, J., and Penn, E. (2015) Aggregation, evaluation, and social choice theory. The Good Society, 24 (1): 4972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2001) Capability and freedom: a defence of Sen. Economics and Philosophy, 17 (1): 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillay, M., and Ramaswamy, R. (2009) Qualitative studies of selected educational initiatives in south Indian states (Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh): revisiting education for all. 158143834.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roemer, J. (1993) A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 22 (2): 146–66.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1962) Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sarangapani, P. M., Jain, M, Mukhopadhyay, R., and Winch, C. (2013) Baseline Survey of the School Scenario in Some States in the Context of RTE: Study of Educational Quality, School Management, and Teachers: Andhra Pradesh, Delhi and West Bengal. Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1970) The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. Journal of Political Economy, 78 (1): 152–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1999) The possibility of social choice. American Economic Review, 89 (3): 349–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (2005) Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6 (2): 151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, C., and Volden, C. (2008) The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52 (4): 840–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singal, N., Pedder, D., Duraisamy, M., Manickavasagam, S., Shanmugam, M., and Govdinrajan, M. (2016) ABL pedagogy in schools and classrooms in two districts in Tamil Nadu. London: DFID.Google Scholar
Streeck, W., and Thelen, K. (2005) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, R., and Sunstein, C. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
UNICEF (2011) Evaluation of UNICEF’s Position in India: Final Evaluation Report. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
Uvin, P. (1995) Fighting hunger at the grassroots: paths to scaling up. World Development, 23 (6): 927–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unterhalter, E. (2017) A review of public private partnerships around girls’ education in developing countries: flicking gender equality on and off. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 33 (2): 181–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, M. (2005) Amartya Sen’s capability approach and education. Educational Action Research, 13 (1): 103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westbrook, J., Durrani, N., Brown, R., Orr, D., Pryor, J., Boddy, J., and Salvi, F. (2013) Pedagogy, Curriculum, Teaching Practices and Teacher Education in Developing Countries. Brighton: Centre for International Education, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
World Bank (2008) Field visit to Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×