Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T14:48:32.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Methane Mitigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Methane (CH4) is a major anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG), second only to carbon dioxide (CO2) in its impact on climate change. CH4 has a high global warming potential that is twenty-five times as large as that of CO2 on a 100-year time horizon according to the 2007 IPCC report (IPCC 2007a). Thus, CH4 contributes significantly to anthropogenic radiative forcing, although it has a relatively short atmospheric perturbation lifetime of twelve years. CH4 has a variety of sources that can be small, geographically dispersed, and not related to energy sectors.

In this chapter, we analyze CH4 emission abatement options in five different sectors and identify economic mitigation potentials for different CO2 prices. While mitigation potentials are generally large, there are substantial potentials at low marginal abatement costs (MACs). Drawing on different assumptions on the social costs of carbon (SCC), we calculate benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) for different sectors and mitigation levels.

We recommend an economically efficient global CH4 mitigation portfolio for 2020 that includes the sectors of livestock and manure, rice management, solid waste, coal mine methane, and natural gas. Depending on SCC assumptions, this portfolio leads to global CH4 mitigation levels of 1.5 or 1.9 GtCO2-eq at overall costs of around $14 billion or $30 billion and BCRs of 1.4 and 3.0, respectively. We also develop an economically less efficient alternative portfolio that excludes cost-effective agricultural mitigation options. It leads to comparable abatement levels, but has higher costs and lower BCRs.

Type
Chapter
Information
Smart Solutions to Climate Change
Comparing Costs and Benefits
, pp. 172 - 221
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaheim, A.et al., 2006: Costs savings of a flexible multi-gas climate policy, The Energy Journal, Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy, Special Issue 3, 485–502Google Scholar
Bousquet, P.et al., 2006: Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability, Nature 443, 439–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeAngelo, B.J.et al., 2006: Methane and nitrous oxide mitigation in agriculture, The Energy Journal, Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy, Special Issue 3, 89–108Google Scholar
Chesnaye, F.C.et al., 2001: Cost-effective reductions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases, Energy Policy 29, 1325–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesnaye, F.C. and Weyant, J.P., 2006: Multi-greenhouse gas mitigation and climate policy, The Energy Journal, Special Issue 3, 1–520
Delhotal, K.C.et al., 2006: Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from waste, energy and industry, The Energy Journal, Special Issue 3, 45–62Google Scholar
Gallaher, M.et al., 2005: Region-specific marginal abatement costs for methane from coal, natural gas, and landfills through 2030, in Rubin, E.S., Keith, D.W., and Gilboy, C.F. (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, vol. I, Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Golub, A., T. Hertel, H.L. Lee et al., 2009: The opportunity cost of land use and the global potential for greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture and forestry, Resource and Energy Economics31(4), 299–319
Hope, C. 2005: The climate change benefits of reducing methane emissions, Climatic Change 86, 21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2009: Joint Research Centre (JRC)/Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), release version 4.0. http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu
,international environmental agreement, 2003: Building the cost curves for the industrial sources on non-CO2-greenhouse gases, Report PH4/25, International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, October
,international environmental agreement, 2008: CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion (2008 edn.), International Energy Agency, Paris
,IPPC, 1995: Climate change 1995. The science of climate change, Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, J.T. Houghton, L.G. Meira Filho, B.A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, and K. Maskell (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
,IPPC, 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., Linden, P.J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C.A. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
,IPPC, 2007a: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report – Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K. and Reisinger, A. (eds.), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, GenevaGoogle Scholar
,IPPC, 2007b: Technical summary, in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis – Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H.L. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
,IPPC, 2007c: Summary for policymakers, in Climate Change 2007: Mitigation – Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., and Meyer, L.A. (eds), Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
,IPPC, 2007d: Agriculture, in Climate Change 2007: Mitigation – Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., and Meyer, L.A. (eds), Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
,IPPC, 2007e: Waste management, in Climate Change 2007: Mitigation – Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., Meyer, L.A. (eds), Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Jakeman, G. and Fisher, B.S., 2006: Benefits of multi-gas mitigation: an application of the global trade and environment model (GTEM), The Energy Journal, Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy, Special Issue 3, 323–42Google Scholar
Johnson, J.M.-F.et al., 2007: Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, Environmental Pollution 150, 107–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemfert, C.et al., 2006: Economic impact assessment of climate change – a multi-gas investigation with WIAGEM-GTAPEL-ICM, The Energy Journal, Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy, Special Issue 3, 441–60Google Scholar
Keppler, F.et al., 2006: Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions, Nature 439, 187–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lechtenbömer, S.et al., 2007: Tapping the leakages: methane losses, mitigation options and policy issues for Russian long distance gas transmission pipelines, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 1, 387–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelieveld, J.et al., 2005: Low methane leakage from gas pipelines, Nature, 434(7035), 841–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, P.L.et al., 2007: Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases, Environmental Science & Policy 10, 85–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinsey & Co., 2007: Reducing US greenhouse gas emissions: how much at what cost? US Greenhouse Gas Abatement Mapping Initiative, Executive Report, Jon Creyts et al., December, www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/ccsi/pdf/US_ghg_final_report.pdf
Methane to Markets, 2008: Global methane emissions and mitigation opportunities. Fact Sheet, www.methanetomarkets.org
Milich, L. 1999: The role of methane in global warming: where might mitigation strategies be focused?, Global Environmental Change 9, 179–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monni, S., R.P. Patti, A. Letilä, I. Savolainen, and S. Syri, 2006: Global climate change mitigation scenarios for solid waste management, VTT Publications 603, VTT Technical Research Center of Finland, www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications2006/P603.pdf, accessed September 1, 2009
Nisbet, R.E.R.et al., 2009: Emission of methane from plants, Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276(1660), 1347–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordhaus, W. 2007: The Challenge of Global Warming: Economic Models and Environmental Policy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2008: Costs of Inaction on Key Environmental Challenges, OECD, Paris
Povellato, A.et al., 2007: Cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gases mitigation measures in the European agro-forestry sector: a literature survey, Environmental Science & Policy 10, 474–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P.et al., 2009: Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363, 789–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, N. 2007, The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tol, R.S.J. 2002a: Estimates of the damage costs of climate change, part 1: benchmark estimates, Environmental and Resource Economics 21, 47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tol, R.S.J., 2002b: Estimates of the damage costs of climate change, part 2: dynamic estimates, Environmental and Resource Economics 21, 135–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tol, R.S.J.,2008: The social cost of carbon: trends, outliers and catastrophes, Economics 2, 2008–25Google Scholar
,USEPA, 2006a: Global Mitigation of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Atmospheric Programs EPA 430-R-06-005, Washington, DC
,USEPA, 2006b: Global Anthropogenic Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990–2020, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Climate Change Division, Washington, DC
Vuuren, D.et al., 2006: Long-term multi-gas scenarios to stabilise radiative forcing – exploring costs and benefits within an integrated assessment framework, The Energy Journal, Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy, Special Issue 3, 201–34Google Scholar
Wassmann, R. and Pathak, H., 2007: Introducing greenhouse gas mitigation as a development objective in rice-based agriculture: II. Cost-benefit assessment for different technologies, regions and scales, Agricultural Systems 94, 826–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiske, A.et al., 2006: Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in European conventional and organic dairy farming, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112, 221–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M. 2007: A review of The Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change, Journal of Economic Literature 45(3), 703–24
Witzke, H. and Noleppa, S., 2007: Methan und Lachgas: die vergessenen Klimagase, Berlin, WWFGoogle Scholar
Yang, M., 2009: Climate change and energy policies, coal and coalmine methane in China, Energy Policy 37, 2858–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, S.et al., 2009: Feasibility of atmospheric methane removal using methanotrophic biotrickling filters, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 83, 949–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anthoff, D.et al., 2009a: Discounting for climate change, Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 3, 2009–24Google Scholar
Anthoff, D., 2009b: Risk aversion, time preference, and the social cost of carbon, Environmental Research Letters 4(2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batjes, J.J. and Goldewijk, C.G.M., 1994: The IMAGE 2 Hundred Year (1890–1990) Database of the Global Environment (HYDE), RIVM, Bilthoven, 410100082
Cline, W.R., 1992: The Economics of Global Warming, Institute for International Economics, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Fankhauser, S., 1994: Protection vs. retreat – the economic costs of sea level rise, Environment and Planning A 27, 299–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollier, C., 2004: Maximizing the expected net future value as an alternative strategy to gamma discounting, Finance Research Letters 1, 85–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollier, C. and Zeckhauser, R., 2005: Aggregation of heterogeneous time preferences, Journal of Political Economy 113(4), 878–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, J.et al., 2006: Discounting and the social cost of carbon: a closer look at uncertainty, Environmental Science & Policy 9(3), 205–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammitt, J.K.et al., 1992: A sequential-decision strategy for abating climate change, Nature 357, 315–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, C. and Newbery, D. 2007: Calculating the social cost of carbon, in Delivering a Low Carbon Electricity System: Technologies, Economics and Policy, Grubb, M., Jamasb, T. and Pollitt, M.G. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kattenberg, A.et al., 1996: Climate models – projections of future climate, in Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change – Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Houghton, J.T., Filho, L.G. Meiro, Callander, B.A.et al. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 285–357Google Scholar
Kemfert, C. and Schill, W.-P., 2009: Methane mitigation, chapter 5 in this volume
Leggett, J.et al., 1992: Emissions scenarios for the IPCC: an update in Climate Change 1992 – The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Houghton, J.T., Callander, B.A. and Varney, S.K. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 71–95Google Scholar
Link, P.M. and Tol, R.S.J., 2004: Possible economic impacts of a shutdown of the thermohaline circulation: an application of FUND, Portuguese Economic Journal 3(2), 99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier-Reimer, E. and Hasselmann, K., 1987: Transport and storage of carbon dioxide in the ocean: an inorganic ocean circulation carbon cycle model, Climate Dynamics 2, 63–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manne, A.S. and Richels, R.G., 2001: An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases, Nature 410, 675–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendelsohn, R.O.et al., 2000: Comparing impacts across climate models, Integrated Assessment 1, 37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W., 2008: A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies, Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W. and Boyer, J., 2000: Warming the World: Economics Models of Global Warming, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Shine, K.P.et al., 1990: Radiative forcing of climate, in climate change – The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.J. and Ephraums, J.J. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 41–68Google Scholar
Stern, N., 2007: The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, CambridgeUniversity Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tol, R.S.J., 1995: The damage costs of climate change – towards more comprehensive calculations, Environmental and Resource Economics 5, 353–74Google Scholar
Tol, R.S.J., 1996: The damage costs of climate change: towards a dynamic representation, Ecological Economics 19, 67–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tol, R.S.J., 2002a: Estimates of the damage costs of climate change. part 1: benchmark estimates, Environmental and Resource Economics 21(2), 47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tol, R.S.J., 2002b: Estimates of the damage costs of climate change. part 2: dynamic estimates, Environmental and Resource Economics 21(2), 135–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tol, R.S.J., 2005: An emission intensity protocol for climate change: an application of FUND, Climate Policy 4, 269–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tol, R.S.J., 2006: Multi-gas emission reduction for climate change policy: an application of FUND, The Energy Journal:Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy (Special Issue 3), 235–50Google Scholar
Weitzman, M.L., 1998: Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 201–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M.L., 2001: Gamma discounting, American Economic Review 91(1), 260–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M.L., 2008: On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change, Review of Economics and Statistics91(1), 1–19Google Scholar
Allais, O. and Nichele, V., 2007: Capturing structural changes in french meat and fish demand over the period 1991–2002, European Review of Agricultural Economics 34(4), 517–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, R. et al., 2007: Bali Climate Declaration by Scientists, Climate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, www.ccrc.unsw.edu.au/news/2007/Bali.html
Archer, D., Eby, M., Brovkin, V., Ridgwell, A., Cao, L., Mikolajewicz, U., Caldeira, K., Matsumoto, K., Munhoven, G., Montenegro, A., and Tokos, K., 2009: Atmospheric lifetime of fossil fuel carbon dioxide, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 37, 117–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azar, C., 1998: Are optimal CO2 emissions really optimal? – Four critical issues for economists in the greenhouse, Environmental and Resource Economics 11(3–4), 301–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banse, M., Grethe, H., and Nolte, S., 2005: Documentation of ESIM Model Structure, Base Data and Parameters, in GAMS, User Handbook, Berlin and GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Burton, M. and Young, T., 1992: The structure of changing tastes for meat and fish in Great Britain, European Review of Agricultural Economics 19(2), 165–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson-Kanyama, A. and González, A.D., 2009: Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 89(5), 1704–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., Henriksson, M., Sund, V., and Davis, J., 2009: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Production of Meat, Milk and Eggs in Sweden 1990 and 2005, SIK Report 793, Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology (SIK), Gothenburg
Dasgupta, P., 2008: Discounting climate change, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 37, 141–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO, 2009: FAO statistical database, http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx
Fiore, A.M., West, J.J., Horowitz, L.W., Naik, V., and Schwarzkopf, M.D., 2008: Characterizing the tropospheric ozone response to methane emission control and the benefits to climate and air quality, Journal of Geophysical Research 113(D8), D08307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D.W., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D.C., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R., Raga, G., Schulz, M., and Dorland, R., 2007: Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis – Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Solomon, , Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H.L. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Fuglestvedt, J.S., Berntsen, T.K., Godal, O., Sausen, R., Shine, K.P., and Skodvin, T., 2003: Metrics of climate change: assessing radiative forcing and emission indices, Climatic Change 58, 267–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2009: GGI Scenario Database, www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/GGI/DB/
,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007: Summary for Policymakers, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis – Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H.L. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Jansen, E., Overpeck, J., Briffa, K.R., Duplessy, J.-C., Joos, F., Masson-Delmotte, V., Olago, D., Otto-Bliesner, B., Peltier, W.R., Rahmstorf, S., Ramesh, R., Raynaud, D., Rind, D., Solomina, O., Villalba, R., and Zhang, D., 2007: Palaeoclimate, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis – Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H.L. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Johansson, D.J.A., 2009: Temperature stabilization, ocean heat uptake and radiative forcing profiles, submitted to Climate Change
Johansson, D.J.A., Persson, U.M., and Azar, C., 2006: The cost of using global warming potentials: analysing the trade off between CO2, CH4, and N2O, Climatic Change 77, 291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, D.J.A., Persson, U.M., and Azar, C., 2008: Uncertainty and learning: implications for the trade-off between short-lived and long-lived greenhouse gases, Climatic Change 88, 293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joos, F., Bruno, M., Fink, R., Siegenthaler, U., Stocker, T.F., Quéré, C., and Sarmiento, J.L., 1996: An efficient and accurate representation of complex oceanic and biospheric models of anthropogenic carbon uptake, Tellus B 48(3), 397–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandlikar, M., 1996: Indices for comparing greenhouse gas emissions: Integrating science and economics, Energy Economics 18, 265–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemfert, C. and Schill, W.-P. 2009: Methane mitigation, chapter 5 in this volume
Kriegler, E., Hall, J.W., Held, H., Dawson, R., and Schellnhuber, H.J., 2009: Imprecise probability assessment of tipping points in the climate system, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(13), 5041–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manne, A.S. and Richels, R.G., 2001: An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases, Nature 410(6829), 675–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, H.D. and Caldeira, K., 2008: Stabilizing climate requires near-zero emissions, Geophysical Research Letters 35, L04705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D., 2008: A Question of Balance: Economic Modeling of Global Warming, Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., Linden, P.J., and Hanson, C.E. (eds), 2007: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability – Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Prather, M., Ehhalt, D.H., Dentener, F., Derwent, R., Dlugokencky, E., Holland, E., Isaksen, I., Katima, J., Kirchhoff, V., Matson, P., Midgley, P., and Wang, M., 2001: Atmospheric chemistry and greenhouse gases, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis – Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., Linden, P.J., and Xiaosu, D. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Ramaswamy, V., Boucher, O., Haigh, J., Hauglustaine, D., Haywood, J., Myhre, G., Nakajima, T., Shi, G.Y., and Solomon, S., 2001: Radiative forcing of climate change, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis – Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., Linden, P.J., and Xiaosu, D. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Reilly, J.M. and Richards, K.R., 1993: Climate change damage and the trace gas index issue, Environmental and Resource Economics 3, 41–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Schellnhuber, H.J., Alcamo, J., Barker, T., Kammen, D., Leemans, R., Liverman, D., Munasinghe, M., Osman-Elasha, B., Stern, N., and Waever, O., 2009: Synthesis Report: Climate Change – Global Risks, Challenges and Decisions, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, www.climatecongress.ku.dk
Schmutzler, A. and Goulder, L.H., 1997: The choice between emission taxes and output taxes under imperfect monitoring, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32(1), 51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shindell, D.T., Faluvegi, G., Bell, W., and Schmidt, G.A., 2005: An emissions-based view of climate forcing by methane and tropospheric ozone, Geophysical Research Letters 32(4), L048031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stehfest, E., Bouwman, L., Vuuren, D.P., Elzen, M.G.J., Eickhout, B., and Kabat, P., 2009: Climate benefits of changing diet, Climatic Change 95(1–2), 83–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.B., Schneider, S.H., Oppenheimer, M., Yohe, G.W., Hare, W., Mastrandrea, M.D., Patwardhan, A., Burton, I., Corfee-Morlot, J., Magadza, C.H.D., Füssel, H.M., Pittock, A.B., Rahman, A., Suarez, A., and Ypersele, J.P., 2009: Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “reasons for concern,”Proceedings of National Academy Science 106, 4133–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, S., Plattner, G.K., Knutti, R., and Friedlingstein, P., 2009: Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions, Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 106(6), 1704–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, N.H., 2007: The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterner, T., 2003: Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management, RFF Press; Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Stitch, S., Cox, P.M., Collins, and W.J.Huntingford, C., 2007: Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through effects on the land-carbon sink, Nature 448, 791–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, K., 2008: Inverse Estimation for the Simple Earth System Model ACC2 and Applications, PhD thesis, International Max Planck Research School on Earth System Modelling, Hamburg
The Royal Society, 2008: Ground-Level Ozone in the 21st Century: Future Trends, Impacts and Policy Implications, Science Policy Report 15/08, royalsociety.org
Tol, R.S.J., 2008: The social cost of carbon: trends, outliers, and catastrophes, Economics 2, 2005–25Google Scholar
Tol, R.S.J., 2009: The economic effects of climate change, Journal of Economic Perspectives 23(2), 29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USEPA, 2006: Global Mitigation of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Atmospheric Programs (6207J), Washington, DC
Vuuren, D.P., Weyant, J., and Chesnaye, F., 2006: Multi-gas scenarios to stabilize radiative forcing, Energy Economics 28, 102–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, R., 2006: Impacts of global climate change at different annual mean global temperature increases, in Schellnhuber, H.J., Cramer, W., Nakicenovic, N., Wigley, T., and Yohe, G. (eds.), Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Warren, R., Hope, C., Mastrandrea, M., Tol, P.S.J., Adger, N., and Lorenzoni, I., 2006: Spotlighting Impact Functions in Integrated Assessment: Research Report Prepared for the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Working Paper 91
Watkiss, P. and Downing, T. 2008: The social cost of carbon: valuation estimates and their use in UK policy, Integrated Assessment 8(1), 85–105Google Scholar
Weitzman, M.L., 2009: On Modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change, The Review of Economics and Statistics 91(1), 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, J.J. and Fiore, A.M., 2005: Management of tropospheric ozone by reducing methane, Enviornmental Science & Technology 39(13), 4685–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, J.J., Fiore, A.M., Horowitz, L.W., and Mauzerall, D.L., 2006: Global health benefits of mitigating ozone pollution with methane emissions control, Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 103(11), 3988–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, J.J, Szopa, S., and Hauglustaine, D.A., 2007: Human mortality effects of future concentrations of tropospheric ozone, Comptes Rendus Geosciences 339, 775–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A.G., Audsley, E., and Sandars, D.L., 2006: Determining the Environmental Burdens and Resource Use in the Production of Agricultural and Horticultural Commodities, Silsoe Research Institute, Cranfield University, Bedford
Wigley, T.M.L., Smith, S.J., and Prather, M.J., 2002: Radiative forcing due to reactive gas emissions, Journal of Climate 15, 2690–62.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirsenius, S., Hedeus, F., and Mohlin, K., 2009: Greenhouse gas taxes on animal food products: rationale, tax scheme and climate mitigation effects, submitted to Climatic Change

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×