Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T12:20:13.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Advances in the analysis of form and pattern: facial growth in African colobines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Paul O'Higgins
Affiliation:
Hull York Medical School and Department of Biology, The University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
Ruliang L. Pan
Affiliation:
School of Anatomy and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009 Australia
Fred Anapol
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Rebecca Z. German
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Nina G. Jablonski
Affiliation:
California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco
Get access

Summary

Introduction

One of Oxnard's enduring contributions to primatology has been the demonstration of the value of multivariate morphometric methods in providing insights into patterns of morphological variation and their ontogenetic, functional, ecological, and phylogenetic correlates. Oxnard's studies have spanned the whole range of primates and a very broad spectrum of anatomy from the skeleton to the soft tissues of muscle and brain. He was one of the first to emphasize the importance of ontogeny in providing an interpretive framework for adult anatomy (Oxnard, 1984, Fig. 2.4). The work and ideas presented in this chapter continue this morphometric tradition. Thus we present a study of ontogenetic and adult variation in the facial skeleton of one group of primates using geometric morphometric methods. While these methods are becoming widely used, they may still be unfamiliar to many readers. The methods section therefore presents an outline summary of some relevant geometric morphometric tools before detailing the specific analyses employed in this chapter.

The study examines patterns of facial variation and ontogeny within and between three African colobine taxa. The ontogenetic origins of diversity in facial skeletal morphology of this group of monkeys have never been studied and yet they are interesting since, unlike the Asian colobines, they form a closely related, possibly monophyletic group (subtribe Colobina: Delson, 1994). This is suggested by the fact that they share quite a number of similarities including a vestigial thumb and shortened midtarsals together with postcranial and dental features (Szalay and Delson, 1979; Strasser and Delson, 1987; Delson, 1994).

Type
Chapter
Information
Shaping Primate Evolution
Form, Function, and Behavior
, pp. 24 - 44
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashton, E. H., Healy, M. J. R., Oxnard, C. E., and Spence, T. F. (1965). The combination of locomotor features of the primate shoulder girdle by canonical analyis. J. Zool. Lond., 163, 319–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookstein, F. L. (1978). The Measurement of Biological Shape and Shape Change. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics. New York, NY: SpringerCrossRef
Bookstein, F. L. (1989). Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 567–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon-Jones, D. (1984). Colobus and leaf monkeys. In: Encyclopaedia of Mammals, ed. I. D. Macdonald. London: George Allen and Unwin. pp. 398–408
Cobb, S. and O'Higgins, P. (2000). Cranial growth in extant large bodied African Hominidae. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 30, Suppl., 126–127Google Scholar
Collard, M. and O'Higgins, P. (2001). Ontogeny and homoplasy in the papionin monkey face, Devel. Evol. 3, 322–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collard, M. and Wood, B. A. 2000. How reliable are human phylogenetic hypotheses? PNAS, 97, 5003–5006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collard, M. and Wood, B. A. 2001. How reliable are current estimates of fossil catarrhine phylogeny? An assessment using extant great apes and Old World monkeys. In: Hominoid Evolution and Climate Change in Europe, vol. 2: Phylogeny of the Neogene Hominoid Primates of Eurasia, ed. L. de Bonis, G. D. Koufous, and P. Andrews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 118–150
Collura, R. V., Auerbach, M. R., and Stewart, C. B. (1996). A quick direct method that can differentiate expressed mitochondrial genes from their unclear pseudogenes. Current Biol., 6, 1337–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corruccini, R. S. (1988). Morphometric replicability using chords and Cartesian co-ordinates of the same landmarks. J. Zool. Lond., 215, 389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creel, N. and Preuschoft, H. (1971). Hominoid taxonomy: a canonical analysis of cranial dimensions. Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Primatology, Zurich 1970, 1, 36–43Google Scholar
Delson, E. (1975). Evolutionary history of the Cercopithecidae. Contrib. Primat., 5, 167–217Google ScholarPubMed
Delson, E. (1993). Theropithecus fossils from Africa and India and the taxonomy of the genus. In: Theropithecus: Rise and Fall of a Primate Genus, ed. N. G. Jablonski. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 157–189CrossRef
Delson, E. (1994). Evolutionary history of the colobine monkeys in paleoenvironmental perspective. In: Colobine Monkeys: Their Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, ed A. G. Davies and J. F. Oates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 11–43
Delson, E. and Dean, D. (1993). Are P. baringensis R. Leakey, 1969, and P. quadratirostris Iwamoto, 1982, species of Papio or Theropithecus? In: Theropithecus: Rise and Fall of a Primate Genus, ed. N. G. Jablonski. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 125–156
Disotell, T. R. (1994). Generic level relationships of the Papionini (Cercopithecoidea). Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 94, 47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disotell, T. R. (1996). The phylogeny of Old World monkeys. Evol. Anthropol. 5, 18–243.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disotell, T. R. (2000). Molecular systematics of the Cercopithecidae. In: Old World Monkeys, ed. P. F. Whitehead and C. J. Jolly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 29–56CrossRef
Dryden, I. L. and Mardia, K. V. (1993). Multivariate shape analysis. Sankhya, 55(A), 460–480Google Scholar
Dryden, I. L. and Mardia, K. V. (1998). Statistical Shape Analysis. London: Wiley
Enlow, D. H. (1975). Handbook of Facial Growth. Toronto: Saunders
Fleagle, J. G. (1988). Primate Adaptation and Evolution. New York, NY: Academic Press
Fleagle, J. G. and McGraw, W. S. (1999). Skeletal and dental morphology supports diphyletic origin of baboons and mandrills. PNAS, 96, 1157–1161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Good, P. (1993). Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses. New York, NY: Springer
Goodall, C. R. (1991). Procrustes methods and the statistical analysis of shape (with discussion). J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 53, 285–340Google Scholar
Groves, C. P. (1989). A Theory of Human and Primate Evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Groves, C. P. (2000). The phylogeny of the Cercopithecoidea. In: Old World Monkeys, ed. P. F. Whitehead and C. J. Jolly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 77–98CrossRef
Groves, C. P. (2001). Primate Taxonomy. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press
Harris, E. E. (2000). Molecular systematics of the Old World monkey tribe Papionini: analysis of the total available genetic sequences. J. Hum. Evol. 38, 235–256CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, E. E. and Disotell, T. R. (1998). Nuclear gene trees and the phylogenetic relationships of the mangabeys (primates: Papionini). Mol. Biol. Evol., 15, 892–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewett-Emmett, D., Cook, C. N., and Barnicot, N. A. (1976). Old World monkey hemoglobins: deciphering phylogeny from complex patterns of molecular evolution. In: Molecular Anthropology: Genes and Proteins in the Evolutionary Ascent of the Primates, ed. M. Goodman, R. E. Tashian and J. H. Tashian. New York, NY: Plenum Press. pp. 257–275CrossRef
Jolly, C. J. (1966). Introduction to the Cercopithecoidea, with notes on their use as laboratory animals. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond., 17, 427–445Google Scholar
Jolly, C. J. (1967). The evolution of baboons. In: The Baboon in Medical Research, vol. II, ed. H. Vagtborg. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. pp. 23–50
Jolly, C. J. (1970). The large African monkeys as an adaptive array. In: Old World Monkeys: Evolution, Systematics, and Behaviour, ed. J. R. Napier and P. H. Napier. New York, NY: Academic Press. pp. 139–174
Kendall, D. G. (1984). Shape manifolds, Procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 16, 81–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, J. T. (1994). The complex Bingham distribution and shape analysis. J. Roy. Stat. Soc, Series B, 56, 285–299Google Scholar
Lele, S. (1993). Euclidean distance matrix analysis: estimation of mean form and form difference. Math. Geol., 25, 573–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, L. F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G. J. P., and Slice, D. (1996). Advances in Morphometrics. New York, NY: Plenum Press
Moss, M. L. and Salentijn, L. (1969). The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Amer. J. of Ortho., 55, 566–577CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss, M. L. and Young, R. W. (1960). A functional approach to craniology. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 18, 281–292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Napier, J. R. and Napier, P. H. (ed) (1967). A Handbook of Living Primates. London: Academic Press
Nowak, R. M. (1991). Walkers Mammals of the World. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
Oates, J. F., Davies, A. G., and Delson, E. (1994). The diversity of living colobines. In: Colobine Monkeys: Their Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, ed. A. G. Davies and J. F. Oates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 45–73
O'Higgins, P. (2000). Quantitative approaches to the study of craniofacial growth and evolution: advances in morphometric techniques. In: Vertebrate Ontogeny and Phylogeny: Implications for the Study of Hominid Skeletal Evolution, ed. P. O'Higgins and P. Cohn. London: Academic Press. pp. 163–185
O'Higgins, P. and Collard, M. (2002). Sexual Dimorphism and Facial Growth in Papionin Monkeys. J. of Zool. 257: 255–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Higgins, P. and Dryden, I. (1992). Studies of craniofacial growth and development. Persp. Hum. Biol., 2 / Arch. Oceania, 27, 95–104Google Scholar
O'Higgins, P. and Dryden, I. (1993). Sexual dimorphism in hominoids: further studies of cranial “shape change” in Pan, Gorilla and Pongo. J. Hum. Evol., 24, 183–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Higgins, P. and Jones, N. (1998). Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation. J. Anat., 193, 251–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Higgins, P. and Strand Vidarsdottir, U. (1999). New approaches to the quantitative analysis of craniofacial growth and variation. In: Human Growth in the Past, ed. R. Hoppa and C. Fitzgerald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 128– 160
O'Higgins, P., Chadfield, P., and Jones, N. (2001). Facial growth and the ontogeny of morphological variation within and between Cebus apella and Cercocebus torquatus. J. Zool., 254, 337–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxnard, C. E. (1972). Some African fossil foot bones: a note on the interpolation of fossils into a matrix of extant species. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 37, 3–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oxnard, C. E. (1973). Form and Pattern in Human Evolution: Some Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Approaches. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Oxnard, C. E. (1984). The Order of Man. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Rohlf, F. J. (1999). Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J. Classification, 16, 197–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. (2000a). On the use of shape spaces to compare morphometric methods. Hystrix, Italian J. Mamm., n.s., 11, 9–25Google Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. (2000b). Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 111, 463–4783.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, C. B. and Disotell, T. R. (1998). Primate evolution in and out of Africa. Current Biology, 8, R582–588CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strasser, E. and Delson, E. (1987). Cladistic analysis of cercopithecid relationship. J. Hum. Evol., 16, 81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalay, F. S. and Delson, E. (eds.) (1979). Evolutionary History of the Primates. New York, NY: Academic Press
Thompson, D'A. W. (1917). On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kuyl, A. C., Kuiken, C. L., Dekker, J. T., and Goudsmit, J. (1994). Phylogeny of African monkeys based upon mitochondrial 12S r RNA sequences. J. Mol. Evol., 40, 173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Z. (1998). Likelihood ratio test for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 568–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×