Abrams, M. H. and Greenblatt, Stephen, eds., The Norton Anthology of English Literature, Vol. i, 9th edn (New York: W. W. Norton, 2012).Google Scholar

Airey, Jennifer L., The Politics of Rape: Sexual Atrocity, Propaganda Wars, and the Restoration Stage (Lanham: University of Delaware Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Alvarez-Recio, Leticia, ‘Nahum Tate’s The History of Richard the Second (1681): Politics and Censorship during the Exclusion Crisis’, Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Theatre Research 24 (2009), 17–30.Google Scholar

Amussen, Susan D., An Ordered Society: Gender and Class in Early Modern England (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998).Google Scholar

Anon, ., The Character of a Trimmer Neither Whig nor Tory (London: printed for T. S., 1682).Google Scholar

Anon, . A Just and Modest Vincation of His Royal Highness the Duke of York (London: printed for Thomas Benskin, 1680).Google Scholar

Anon, . Versatile Ingenium: The Wittie Companion; or, Jests of All Sorts (London: printed by Stephen Swart, 1679).Google Scholar

Arber, Edward, ed., The Term Catalogues, 1668–1709, 3 vols. (London: privately printed, 1903–6).Google Scholar

Arber, Edward, A Transcript of the Registers of the Company of Stationers 1554–1640 ad, 5 vols. (London: privately printed, 1875–94).Google Scholar

Armistead, J. M., Nathaniel Lee (Boston: Twayne, 1979).Google Scholar

Astington, John H., ‘Dramatic Extracts in the Interregnum’, RES 54 (2003), 601–14.Google Scholar

Atkins, G. Douglas, ‘The Function and Significance of the Priest in Dryden’s Troilus and Cressida’, Texas Studies in Language and Literature 13 (1971), 29–37.Google Scholar

Auberlen, Edward, ‘The Tempest and the Concerns of the Restoration Court: A Study of The Enchanted Island and the Operatic Tempest’, Restoration 15 (1991), 71–88.Google Scholar

Avery, Emmet L., ‘The Restoration Audience’, PQ 45 (1966), 54–61.Google Scholar

Ayloffe, John, Poems on Affairs of State (London: s. n., 1697).Google Scholar

Baldick, Chris, The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms, 4th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Banks, John, The Destruction of Troy (London: printed by A. G. and J. P., 1679).Google Scholar

Bartholomeusz, Dennis, Macbeth and the Players (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Barton, Anne, ‘Parks and Ardens’, Proceedings of the British Academy 80 (1991), 49–71.Google Scholar

Bartlett, Henrietta C., ‘Quarto Editions of Julius Caesar’, Library, 3rd series, 4 (1913), 122–32.Google Scholar

Bate, Jonathan, Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730–1830 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Bawcutt, N. W., Control and Censorship of Caroline Drama: The Records of Sir Henry Herbert, Master of the Revels 1623–73 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Bear, A. S., ‘Criticism and Social Change: The Case for Restoration Drama’, Komos 2 (1969–70), 23–31.Google Scholar

Beaumont, Francis and Fletcher, John, Fifty Comedies and Tragedies. Written by Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher, Gentlemen (London: printed for John Martyn, Henry Herringman, Richard Marriot, 1679).Google Scholar

Belanger, Terry, ‘Tonson, Wellington and the Shakespeare Copyrights’, in R. W. Hunt, I. G. Philip and R. J. Roberts, eds., Studies in the Book Trade in Honour of Graham Pollard (Oxford: Oxford Bibliographical Society, 1975), 195–209.Google Scholar

Bentley, Gerald E., ‘John Cotgrave’s English Treasury of Wit and Language and the Elizabethan Drama’, Studies in Philology 40 (1943), 186–203.Google Scholar

Bentley, Gerald E., Shakespeare and Jonson: Their Reputations in the Seventeenth Century Compared (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1945).Google Scholar

Bernhardt, W. W., ‘Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida and Dryden’s Truth Found Too Late’, SQ 20 (1969), 129–41.Google Scholar

Bishop, John, ‘“The Ordinary Course of Nature”: Authority in the Restoration Tempest’, Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Research 13 (1998), 54–69.Google Scholar

Black, James, ‘The Influence of Hobbes on Nahum Tate’s King Lear’, Studies in English Literature 7 (1967), 377–85.Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter, ‘The Alleged Popularity of Playbooks’, SQ 56 (2005), 33–50.Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter, ‘The Publication of Playbooks’, in Cox, John D. and Kastan, David Scott, eds., A New History of Early English Drama (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997), 383–422.Google Scholar

Blount, Charles, An Appeal from the Country to the City for the Preservation of His Majesties Person, Liberty, Property, and the Protestant Religion (London: s.n., 1679).Google Scholar

Bohun, Edmund, Reflections on a Pamphlet Stiled, A Just and Modest Vindication of the Proceedings of the Last Two Parliaments (London: printed for George Wells, 1683).Google Scholar

Borgman, Albert S., Thomas Shadwell: His Life and Comedies (New York: New York University Press, 1928).Google Scholar

Boswell, Eleonore, The Restoration Court Stage, 1660–1702 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1932).Google Scholar

Bourne, Claire M. L., ‘Dramatic Typography and the Restoration Quartos of Hamlet’, in Emma Depledge and Peter Kirwan, eds., Canonising Shakespeare: Stationers and the Book Trade, 1640–1740 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 153–70.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson, A Supplement to the Woodward and McManaway Check List of English Plays, 1641–1700 (Charlottesville: Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia, 1949).Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson, ‘Variants in Early Editions of Dryden’s Plays’, HLB 3 (1949), 278–88.Google Scholar

Bowers, Rick, ‘Players, Puritans, and “Theatrical” Propaganda, 1642–1660’, Dalhousie Review 67 (1988), 463–79.Google Scholar

Bradley, Lynne, Adapting ‘King Lear’ for the Stage (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010).Google Scholar

Brady, Jennifer, ‘Dryden and Negotiations of Literary Succession and Precession’, in Miner, Earl and Brady, Jennifer, eds., Literary Transmission and Authority: Dryden and Other Writers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 27–54.Google Scholar

Brady, Robert, A True and Exact History of the Succession of the Crown of England (London: printed for Cave Pulleyn, 1681).Google Scholar

Bristol, Michael D., Big-Time Shakespeare (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

Brome, Richard, Five New Playes (London: printed for Humphrey Moseley, Richard Marriot, and Thomas Dring, 1653).Google Scholar

Brooks, Douglas A., Playhouse to Printing House: Drama and Authorship in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Brooks, Douglas A., ed., The Shakespeare Apocrypha (Lampeter: Edwin Mellen, 2007).Google Scholar

Brown, Laura, English Dramatic Form, 1660–1700: An Essay in Generic History (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Brown, Laura, ‘Nathaniel Lee’s Political Dramas, 1679–83’, Restoration 10 (1986), 41–52.Google Scholar

Brown, Richard E., ‘The Dryden–Lee Collaboration: Oedipus and The Duke of Guise’, Restoration 9 (1985), 12–25.Google Scholar

Burke, Helen M., ‘The Cavalier Myth in The Rover’, in Hughes, Derek and Todd, Janet M., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Aphra Behn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 118–34.Google Scholar

Caines, Michael, Shakespeare and the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Callow, John, James II: The Triumph and the Tragedy (Kew: The National Archives, 2005).Google Scholar

Canfield, J. Douglas, ‘Royalism’s Last Dramatic Stand: English Political Tragedy, 1679–89’, Studies in Philology 82 (1985), 234–63.Google Scholar

Cannan, Paul D., ‘The 1709/11 Editions of Shakespeare’s Poems’, in Emma Depledge and Peter Kirwan, eds., Canonising Shakespeare: Stationers and the Book Trade, 1640–1740 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 171–86.Google Scholar

Cannan, Paul D., ‘Shakespeare Criticism, Charles Gildon, and the Making of Shakespeare the Playwright-Poet’, Modern Philology 102 (2004), 35–55.Google Scholar

Carlell, Lodowick, Arviragus and Philicia (London: printed for John Crooke and Richard Sergier, 1639).Google Scholar

Carlton, Charles, Charles I: The Personal Monarch (London: Routledge, 1982).Google Scholar

Catty, Jocelyn, Writing Rape, Writing Women in Early Modern England: Unbridled Speech (London: Palgrave, 1999).Google Scholar

Chamberlayne, William, Wits Led by the Nose; or, A Poets Revenge (London: printed for Langly Curtis, 1678).Google Scholar

Chan, Mary, ‘Drolls, Drolleries and Mid-Seventeenth-Century Dramatic Music in England’, Royal Musical Association Research Chronicle 15 (1979), 117–73.Google Scholar

Chandaman, C. D., The English Public Revenue 1660–1688 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Chess, Simone, ‘Shakespeare Plays and Broadside Ballads’, Literature Compass 7/9 (2010), 773–785.Google Scholar

Clare, Janet, ‘“All Run Now into Politicks”: Dramatic Censorship during the Exclusion Crisis, 1678–82’, in Neil Sammells and Paul Hyland, eds., Writing and Censorship in Britain (London: Routledge, 1992), 46–59.Google Scholar

Clare, Janet, ‘The Censorship of the Deposition Scene in Richard II’, RES 41 (1990), 89–94.Google Scholar

Clare, Janet, ed., Drama of the English Republic, 1649–1660: Plays and Entertainments (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Clark, Sandra, ‘Shakespeare in the Restoration’, Literature Compass 2 (2005): 1–13.Google Scholar

Clark, Sandra, ed., Shakespeare Made Fit: Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare (London: Everyman, 1997).Google Scholar

Cohn, Ruby, Modern Shakespeare Offshoots (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Connaway, Charles, ‘“Ye sid ha taken my counsel sir”: Restoration Satire and Theatrical Authority’, in Wootton, David and Holderness, Graham, eds., Gender and Power in Shrew Taming Narratives (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2010), 145–68.Google Scholar

Connor, Francis X., Literary Folios and Ideas of the Book in Early Modern England (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar

Connor, Francis X., ‘Richard Bentley, Henry Herringman and the Fourth Folio (1685)’, in Emma Depledge and Peter Kirwan, eds., Canonising Shakespeare: Stationers and the Book Trade, 1640–1740 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 38–54.Google Scholar

Corman, Brian, ‘Thomas Shadwell and the Jonsonian Comedy of the Restoration’, in Robert Markley and Laura Finke, eds., From Renaissance to Restoration: Metamorphoses of the Drama (Cleveland: Bellflower Press, 1984), 127–52.Google Scholar

Cotgrave, John, The English Treasury of Wit and Language (London: printed for Henry Moseley, 1655).Google Scholar

Cox, Robert, Actaeon and Diana: With a Pastoral Storie of the Nimph Oenone (London: printed for Edward Archer, 1656).Google Scholar

Cressey, David, England on Edge: Crisis and Revolution, 1640–1642 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Crist, Timothy, ‘Government Control of the Press after the Expiration of the Printing Act in 1679’, Publishing History 5 (1979), 49–78.Google Scholar

Crouch, John, ed., Mercurius Democritus (London: s. n., 1652–4).Google Scholar

Crowne, John, The Ambitious Statesman; or, The Loyal Favourite (London: printed for William Abington, 1679).Google Scholar

Crowne, John, City Politiques, ed. Wilson, John Harold (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Crowne, John, The English Frier (London: printed for James Knapton, 1690).Google Scholar

Crowne, John, Henry the Sixth: The First Part, with the Murder of Humphrey, Duke of Glocester, as It Was Acted at the Dukes Theatre (London: printed for R. Bentley and M. Magnes, 1681).Google Scholar

Crowne, John, The Misery of Civil-War: A Tragedy (London: printed for R. Bentley and M. Magnes, 1680).Google Scholar

Crowne, John, Thyestes: A Tragedy (London: printed for R. Bentl[e]y and M. Magnes, 1681).Google Scholar

Danchin, Pierre, The Prologues and Epilogues of the Restoration, 1660–1700, 4 vols. in 7 parts (Nancy: Publications Université Nancy ii, 1980–1).Google Scholar

Davenant, William, Davenant’s ‘Macbeth’ from the Yale Manuscript, ed. Christopher Spencer (New Haven : Yale University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Davenant, William, Poem on His Sacred Majesties Happy Return to his Dominions (London: printed for Henry Herringman, 1660).Google Scholar

Davenant, William, The Works of Sr. William Davenant, Kt (London: printed for Henry Herringman, 1673).Google Scholar

Dawson, Giles E., ‘The Copyright of Shakespeare’s Dramatic Works’, in Prouty, Charles T., ed. Studies in Honor of A. H. R. Fairchild (Columbia: University of Missouri Studies, 1946), 11–35.Google Scholar

Dawson, Giles E., ‘Some Bibliographical Irregularities in the Shakespeare Fourth Folio’, Studies in Bibliography 4 (1951), 93–103.Google Scholar

Dawson, Janet, ‘Searching for Peace: John Dryden’s Troilus and Cressida or Truth Found too Late’, in Usandizaga, Aránzazu and Monnickendam, Andrew, eds., Back to Peace: Reconciliation and Retribution in the Postwar Period (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007), 119–45.Google Scholar

De Grazia, Margreta, ‘Shakespeare in Quotation Marks’, in Jean I. Marsden, ed., The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Works and the Myth (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), 57–71.Google Scholar

De Grazia, Margreta, Shakespeare Verbatim: The Reproduction of Authenticity and the 1790 Apparatus (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Depledge, Emma, ‘The Politics of Rape in Shakespeare Alterations of the Exclusion Crisis: Nahum Tate’s The History of King Lear, 1681’, in Dobson, Michael, Höfele, Andreas, Procházka, Martin and Scolnicov, Hanna, eds., Renaissance Shakespeare: Shakespeare Renaissances, Proceedings of the 9th World Shakespeare Conference (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2014), 317–24.Google Scholar

Depledge, Emma, ‘False Dating: The Case of the ‘1676’ Hamlet Quartos’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Depledge, Emma, ‘Shakespeare for Sale, 1640–1740’, in Depledge, Emma and Kirwan, Peter eds., Canonising Shakespeare: Stationers and the Book Trade, 1640–1740 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 17–25.Google Scholar

Depledge, Emma and Peter Kirwan, eds., Canonising Shakespeare: Stationers and the Book Trade, 1640–1740 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Desmet, Christy and Sawyer, Robert, eds., Shakespeare and Appropriation (London: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar

Dessen, Alan C., Rescripting Shakespeare: The Text, the Director, and Modern Productions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Dobson, Michael, ‘Accents Yet Unknown: Canonisation and the Claiming of Julius Caesar’, in Jean I. Marsden, ed., The Re-Imagined Text: Shakespeare, Adaptations, and Eighteenth-Century Literary Theory (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1995), 11–28.Google Scholar

Dobson, Michael, ‘Adaptations and Revivals’, in Deborah Payne Fisk, ed., The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 40–51.Google Scholar

Dobson, Michael, The Making of the National Poet: Shakespeare, Adaptation and Authorship, 1660–1769 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Dobson, Michael, ‘“Remember / First to Possess His Books”: The Appropriation of The Tempest, 1700–1800’, Shakespeare Survey 43 (1991), 99–108.Google Scholar

Dominik, Mark, William Shakespeare and ‘The Birth of Merlin’ (Beaverton: Alioth Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Donaldson, Ian, The Rapes of Lucretia: A Myth and Its Transformations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Downes, John, Roscius Anglicanus, eds. Milhous, Judith and Hume, Robert D. (London: Society for Theatre Research, 1987).Google Scholar

Dryden, John, Don Sebastian, King of Portugal (London: printed for Jo. Hindmarsh, 1690).Google Scholar

Dryden, John, Troilus and Cressida; or, Truth Found Too Late (London: printed for Abel Swall and Jacob Tonson, 1679).Google Scholar

Dryden, John, The Vindication; or, The Parallel (London: printed for Jacob Tonson, 1683).Google Scholar

Dryden, John, The Works of John Dryden, eds. Hooker, E. N and Swedenberg, H. T, 20 vols. (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1956–89).Google Scholar

Dryden, John and Davenant, William, The Tempest; or The Enchanted Island (London: printed for Henry Herringman, 1670).Google Scholar

Dryden, John and Lee, Nathaniel, Oedipus (London: printed for R. Bentley and R. Magnes, 1679).Google Scholar

Dugas, Don-John, ‘Elkannah Settle, John Crowne and Nahum Tate’, in Susan J. Owen, ed., A Companion to Restoration Drama (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001), 378–95.Google Scholar

Dugas, Don-John, Marketing the Bard: Shakespeare in Performance and Print, 1660–1740 (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Dugaw, Dianne, Warrior Women and Popular Balladry, 1650–1850 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Durfey, Thomas, The Injured Princess; or, The Fatal Wager (London: printed for R. Bentley and M. Magnes, 1682).Google Scholar

Edmonds, John, ‘Timon of Athens Blended with Le Misanthrope: Shadwell’s Recipe for Satirical Tragedy’, MLR 64 (1969), 500–7.Google Scholar

Elson, John James, The Wits; or, Sport upon Sport: A Collections of Drolls and Farces Originally Published in 1662, 1672, and 1673 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1930).Google Scholar

English Broadside Ballad Archive (EBBA), http://ebba.english.ucsb.edu/ballad/20063/xml.Google Scholar

Erne, Lukas, ‘Cupids Cabinet Unlock’t (1662), Ostensibly “By W. Shakespeare”, in Fact Partly by John Milton’, in Emma Depledge and Peter Kirwan, eds., Canonising Shakespeare: Stationers and the Book Trade, 1640–1740 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 107–29.Google Scholar

Erne, Lukas, Shakespeare and the Book Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Erne, Lukas, Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Erne, Lukas and Kidnie, M. J., Textual Performances: The Modern Reproductions of Shakespeare’s Drama (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Estill, Laura, Dramatic Extracts in Seventeenth-Century English Manuscripts (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Eyre, G., E. B. and Rivington, C. R., A Transcript of the Registers of the Worshipful Company of Stationers of London: From 1640–1708 ad, 3 vols. (London: privately printed, 1913–14).Google Scholar

Ezell, Margaret J. M., The Patriarch’s Wife: Literary Evidence and the History of the Family (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Farmer, Alan and Lesser, Zachary, ‘Canons and Classics: Publishing Drama in Caroline England’, in Localizing Caroline Drama: Politics and Economics of the Early Modern Stage, 1625–1642 (New York: Palgrave, 2006), 17–41.Google Scholar

Farmer, Alan and Lesser, Zachary, ‘The Popularity of Playbooks Revisited’, SQ 56 (2005), 1–32.Google Scholar

Farmer, Alan and Lesser, Zachary, ‘Structures of Popularity in the Early Modern Book Trade’, SQ 56 (2005), 206–13.Google Scholar

Farr, Henry, ‘Philip Chetwind and the Allot Copyrights’, Library, 4th series, 15 (1934), 129–36.Google Scholar

Filmer, Robert, The Freeholders Grand Inquest (London: s. n., 1679).Google Scholar

Filmer, Robert, Observations upon Aristotles Politiques Touching Forms of Government (London: printed for R. Royston, 1652).Google Scholar

Filmer, Robert, Patriarcha; or, The Natural Power of Kings (London: printed for Ric. Chiswell, Matthew Gillyflower and William Henchman, 1680).Google Scholar

Filmer, Robert, Sir Robert Filmer: ‘Patriarcha’ and other Writings, ed. Johann P. Sommerville (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Firth, C. H. and Rait, R. S, eds., Acts and Ordinances of the Interregnum 1642–1660 (London: HMSO, 1911).Google Scholar

Fischlin, Daniel and Fortier, Mark, eds., Adaptations of Shakespeare: A Critical Anthology of Plays from the Seventeenth Century to the Present (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar

Fisher, Alan S. ‘The Significance of Thomas Shadwell’, Studies in Philology 71 (1974), 225–46.Google Scholar

Fisk, Deborah Payne, ‘“Betwixt two Ages cast”: Theatrical Dryden’, in Novak, Maximillian E. and Lewis, Jayne Elizabeth, eds., Enchanted Ground: Reimagining John Dryden (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004), 226–43.Google Scholar

Fleissner, Robert F., ‘The Misattribution of The Birth of Merlin to Shakespeare’, PBSA 73 (1979), 248–52.Google Scholar

Freehafer, John, ‘The Formation of the London Patent Companies in 1660’, Theatre Notebook 20 (1965), 6–30.Google Scholar

Frost, David, ‘Shakespeare in the Seventeenth Century’, SQ 16 (1965), 81–9.Google Scholar

Gaskell, Philip, A New Introduction to Bibliography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Gellert, James, ‘Davenant’s The Law against Lovers: A “Lost” Herringman Quarto’, Library 5 (1983), 57–60.Google Scholar

Gellert, James, ‘Sir William Davenant’s The Law against Lovers: Shakespeare’s Problem Comedy and the Restoration Heroic Tradition’, Cahiers Elisabéthains 16 (1679), 27–43.Google Scholar

Gellert, James, ‘The Sources of Davenant’s The Law against Lovers’, Library 8 (1986), 351–7.Google Scholar

Genest, John, An Account of the English Stage from 1660 to 1830, 10 vols. (Bath: H. E. Carrington, 1832).Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard, Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree, trans. Channa Newman and Claude Doubinsky (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Gibney, John, Ireland and the Popish Plot (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2009).Google Scholar

Gildon, Charles, Measure for Measure; or, Beauty’s Best Advocate (London: printed for D. Brown and R. Parker, 1700).Google Scholar

Granville, George, The Jew of Venice (London: printed for Ber. Lintott, 1701).Google Scholar

Greaves, Richard L., Secrets of the Kingdom: British Radicals from the Popish Plot to the Revolution of 1688–1689 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Greene, Robert, ‘Perymedes the Blacksmith’ and ‘Pandosto’ by Robert Greene: A Critical Edition, ed. Stanley Wells (New York: Garland, 1961).Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., A Bibliography of the English Printed Drama to the Restoration (London: Bibliographical Society, 1939–59).Google Scholar

Gross, John, After Shakespeare: An Anthology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Gurr, Andrew, The Shakespearean Stage, 1574–1642, 4th edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Haley, Kenneth H. D., The First Earl of Shaftesbury (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Hammond, Brean S., Professional Imaginative Writing in England, 1670–1740: ‘Hackney for Bread’ (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Hammond, Paul, Figuring Sex between Men from Shakespeare to Rochester (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Hammond, Paul, ‘The Janus Poet: Dryden’s Critique of Shakespeare’, in Rawson, Claude Julien and Santesso, Aaron, eds., John Dryden (1631–1700): His Politics, His Plays, and His Poets (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2004), 158–79.Google Scholar

Hammond, Paul, ‘The King’s Two Bodies: Representations of Charles II’, in Black, Jeremy and Gregory, Jeremy, eds., Culture, Politics and Society in Britain, 1660–1800 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991), 13–48.Google Scholar

Hansen, Lara and Rasmussen, Eric, ‘Shakespeare without Rules: The Fifth Shakespeare Folio and Market Demand in the Early 1700s’, in Emma Depledge and Peter Kirwan, eds., Canonising Shakespeare: Stationers and the Book Trade, 1640–1740 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 55–62.Google Scholar

Harbage, Alfred, Sir William Davenant, Poet Venturer, 1606–1668 (Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press, 1935).Google Scholar

Hardman, C. B., ‘“Our Drooping Country Now Erects Her Head”: Nahum Tate’s The History of King Lear’, MLR 95 (2000), 913–23.Google Scholar

Harris, Tim, ‘Cooper, Anthony Ashley, First Earl of Shaftesbury (1621–1683)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Online, www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/6208.Google Scholar

Harris, Tim, London Crowds in the Reign of Charles II: Propaganda and Politics from the Restoration until the Exclusion Crisis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Harris, Tim, Restoration: Charles II and His Kingdoms (London: Penguin, 2005).Google Scholar

Harris, Tim, Revolution: The Great Crisis of the British Monarchy, 1685–1720 (London: Penguin, 2006).Google Scholar

Harvey, A. D., ‘Virginity and Honour in Measure for Measure and Davenant’s The Law against Lovers’, English Studies 75 (1994), 123–32.Google Scholar

Havens, Earle, ed., ‘Of Common Places, or Memorial Books’: A Seventeenth-Century Manuscript from the James Marshall and Marie-Louise Osborn Collection (New Haven: Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, 2001).Google Scholar

Hinds, Peter, ‘The Horrid Popish Plot’: Roger L’Estrange and the Circulation of Political Discourse in Late Seventeenth-Century London (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Holland, Peter, The Ornament of Action: Text and Performance in Restoration Comedy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Holland, Peter, ‘Theatre Editions’, in Massai, Sonia and Kidnie, M. J, eds., Shakespeare and Textual Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 233–48.Google Scholar

Holmer, Joan Ozark, ‘Jewish Daughters: The Question of Philo-Semitism in Elizabethan Drama’, in Mahon, John W. and Mahon, Ellen Macleod, eds., ‘The Merchant of Venice’: New Critical Essays (New York: Routledge, 2002), 107–44.Google Scholar

Hook, Lucyle, ‘Shakespeare Improv’d; or, A Case for the Affirmative’, SQ 4 (1953), 289–99.Google Scholar

Hooks, Adam, ‘Royalist Shakespeare: Publishers, Politics, and the Appropriation of The Rape of Lucrece (1655)’, in Emma Depledge and Peter Kirwan, eds., Canonising Shakespeare: Stationers and the Book Trade, 1640–1740 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 26–37.Google Scholar

Hooks, Adam, Selling Shakespeare: Biography, Bibliography, and the Book Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Hope, Jonathan, The Authorship of Shakespeare’s Plays: A Socio-Linguistic Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Horace, , Satires, Epistles, ‘Ars poetica’, trans. H. Rushton Fairclough (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1929).Google Scholar

Hotson, Leslie, The Commonwealth and Restoration Stage (New York: Russell and Russell, 1962).Google Scholar

Howard, Edward, The Womens Conquest (London: printed for H. Herringman, 1671).Google Scholar

Howe, Elizabeth, The First English Actresses: Women and Drama, 1660–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Hughes, Derek, English Drama, 1660–1700 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Hughes, Derek, ‘Rape on the Restoration Stage’, The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 46 (2005), 29–40.Google Scholar

Hughes, Leo and Scouten, Arthur H., ‘Some Theatrical Adaptations of a Picaresque Tale’, University of Texas Studies in English (1946), 98–114.Google Scholar

Hume, Robert D., ‘Before the Bard: “Shakespeare” in Early Eighteenth-Century London’, ELH 64 (1997), 41–75.Google Scholar

Hume, Robert D., The Development of English Drama in the Late Seventeenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Hume, Robert D., ‘The Economics of Culture in London, 1660–1740’, HLQ 69 (2006), 487–533.Google Scholar

Hume, Robert D., ‘Securing a Repertory: Plays on the London Stage, 1660–65’, in Coleman, Anthony and Hammond, Anthony, eds., Essays in Honour of Harold Brooks (London: Methuen, 1981), 156–72.Google Scholar

Hume, Robert D., ‘Theatre Performance Records in London, 1660–1705’, RES 67 (2016), 468–95.Google Scholar

Hume, Robert D. and Scouten, Arthur H., ‘“Restoration Comedy” and Its Audiences, 1660–1776’, Yearbook of English Studies 10 (1980), 45–69.Google Scholar

Hutcheon, Linda, A Theory of Adaptation (New York: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Hutton, Ronald, Charles the Second, King of England, Scotland, and Ireland (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Hutton, Ronald, The Restoration: A Political and Religious History of England and Wales, 1658–1667 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Isherwood, Anne, ‘Cut Out “into little stars”: Shakespeare in Anthologies’, Ph.D. thesis (King’s College London, 2014).Google Scholar

Jardine, Lisa and Grafton, Anthony, ‘“Studied for Action”: How Gabriel Harvey Read His Livy’, Past and Present 129 (1990), 30–78.Google Scholar

Johanson, Kristine, ed., Shakespeare Adaptations from the Early Eighteenth Century: Five Plays (Lanham: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Johnson, Odai, ‘Empty Houses: The Suppression of Tate’s Richard II’, Theatre Journal 47 (1995), 503–16.Google Scholar

Johnson, Odai, Rehearsing the Revolution: Radical Performance, Radical Politics in the English Restoration (Cranbury: Associated University Presses, 2000).Google Scholar

Johnson, Richard, The Golden Garland of Princely Pleasures (London: printed for Thomas Longley, 1620).Google Scholar

Jones, James Rees, The First Whigs: The Politics of the Exclusion Crisis, 1678–1683 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Jordan, Thomas, A Royal Arbor of Loyal Poesie (London : printed for Eliz. Andrew[s], 1664).Google Scholar

Jose, Nicholas, Ideas of the Restoration in English Literature, 1660–71 (London: Macmillan, 1984).Google Scholar

Jowett, John, ‘Shakespeare Supplemented’, in Douglas A. Brooks, ed., The Shakespeare Apocrypha (Lampeter: Edwin Mellen, 2007), 39–73.Google Scholar

Kastan, David Scott, Shakespeare and the Book (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Kaufman, Anthony, ‘Civil Politics–Sexual Politics in John Crowne’s City Politiques’, Restoration 6 (1982), 72–80.Google Scholar

Keeble, N. H., The Restoration: England in the 1660s (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002).Google Scholar

Kenyon, John Phillips, The Popish Plot (London: Heinemann, 1972).Google Scholar

Kewes, Paulina, Authorship and Appropriation: Writing for the Stage in England, 1660–1710 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Kewes, Paulina, ‘Dryden and the Staging of Popular Politics’, in Hammond, Paul and Hopkins, David, eds., John Dryden: Tercentenary Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 57–91.Google Scholar

Kewes, Paulina, ‘Gerard Langbaine’s “View of Plagiaries”: The Rhetoric of Dramatic Appropriation in the Restoration’, RES 48 (1997), 2–18.Google Scholar

Kewes, Paulina, ‘Otway, Lee and the Restoration History Play’, in Susan J. Owen, A Companion to Restoration Drama (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001), 355–77.Google Scholar

Kidnie, Margaret Jane, Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation (London: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar

Kilbourne, Frederick W., Alterations and Adaptations of Shakespeare (Boston: The Poet Lore Company, 1906).Google Scholar

Kinservik, Matthew, ‘Theatrical Regulation during the Restoration Period’, in Susan J. Owen, ed., A Companion to Restoration Drama (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001), 36–52.Google Scholar

Kirwan, Peter, ‘The First Collected “Shakespeare Apocrypha”’, SQ 62 (2011), 266–75.Google Scholar

Kirwan, Peter, Shakespeare and the Idea of Apocrypha: Negotiating the Boundaries of the Dramatic Canon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Knights, Mark, Politics and Opinion in Crisis, 1678–81 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Knutson, Roslyn, L., Playing Companies and Commerce in Shakespeare’s Time (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Knutson, Roslyn, L., ‘The Repertory’, in Kastan, David Scott and Cox, John D., eds., A New History of English Drama (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997), 461–80.Google Scholar

Knutson, Roslyn, L., The Repertory of Shakespeare’s Company 1594–1613 (Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Kroll, Richard, ‘Emblem and Empiricism in Davenant’s Macbeth’, ELH 57 (1990), 835–64.Google Scholar

Krutch, Joseph Wood, Comedy and Conscience after the Restoration (New York: Russell and Russell, 1967).Google Scholar

Lamb, Mary Ellen and Bamford, Karen, eds., Oral Traditions and Gender in Early Modern Literary Texts (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar

Langbaine, Gerard, An Account of the English Dramatick Poets (Oxford: printed for George West and Henry Clements, 1691).Google Scholar

Langbaine, Gerard, Momus Triumphans; or, The Plagiaries of the English Stage; Expos’d in a Catalogue (London: printed for Nicholas Cox to be sold in Oxford, 1687).Google Scholar

Langhams, Edward, ‘The Theatre’, in Deborah Payne Fisk, ed., The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 1–18.Google Scholar

Laslett, Peter, ‘Sir Robert Filmer: The Man versus the Whig Myth’, William and Mary Quarterly 5 (1948), 523–46.Google Scholar

Lawrence, W. J., The Elizabethan Playhouse and Other Studies, 2 vols. (Stratford-upon-Avon: Shakespeare Head Press, 1912).Google Scholar

Lawrence, W. J., ‘Review of The Wits; or, Sport upon Sport, ed. by John James Elson (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1932)’, MLR 28 (1933), 256–7.Google Scholar

Lee, Nathaniel, Lucius Junius Brutus (London: printed for Richard Tonson and Jacob Tonson, 1681).Google Scholar

Lee, Nathaniel, Lucius Junius Brutus, ed. Loftis, John (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Leigh, Lori, Shakespeare and the Embodied Heroine: Staging Female Characters in the Late Plays and Early Adaptations (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2014).Google Scholar

Lesser, Zachary, ‘Shakespeare’s Flop: John Waterson and The Two Noble Kinsmen’, in Marta Straznicky, ed., Shakespeare’s Stationers: Studies in Cultural Bibliography (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Lesser, Zachary and Stallybrass, Peter, ‘The First Literary Hamlet and the Commonplacing of Professional Plays’, SQ 59 (2008), 371–420.Google Scholar

L’Estrange, Roger, An Account of the Growth of Knavery, under the Pretended Fears of Arbitrary Government and Popery (London: printed for Henry Brome, 1678).Google Scholar

L’Estrange, Roger, An Answer to the Appeal from the Country to the City (London: printed for Henry Brome, 1679).Google Scholar

Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government (London: printed for Awnsham Churchill, 1690).Google Scholar

Loewenstein, Joseph, The Author’s Due: Printing and the Prehistory of Copyright (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Loewenstein, Joseph, Ben Jonson and Possessive Authorship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Loewenstein, Joseph, ‘The Script in the Marketplace’, Representations 12 (1985), 101–14.Google Scholar

Loftis, John, Comedy and Society from Congreve to Fielding (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1959).Google Scholar

Loftis, John, ‘Political and Social Thought in the Drama’, in Robert D. Hume, ed., The London Theatre World, 1660–1800 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1980), 253–85.Google Scholar

Lopez, Jeremy, Constructing the Canon of Early Modern Drama (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Love, Harold, ‘Bear’s Case Laid Open; or, A Timely Warning to Literary Sociologists’, Komos 2 (1969–70), 72–80.Google Scholar

Love, Harold, ‘The Myth of the Restoration Audience’, Komos 1 (1968), 49–56.Google Scholar

Love, Harold, ‘Who Were the Restoration Audience?’, Yearbook of English Studies 10 (1980), 21–44.Google Scholar

Loveman, Kate, Reading Fictions, 1660–1740: Deception in English Literary and Political Culture (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar

Luckett, Richard, ‘Music’, in Samuel Pepys, The Diary of Samuel Pepys, eds. Latham, Robert and Matthews, William, 11 vols. (London: Bell, 1970–83), Vol. x, 258–82.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Hugh, John Dryden: A Bibliography of Early Editions and of Drydeniana (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939).Google Scholar

Maguire, Nancy Klein, ‘Factionary Politics: John Crowne’s Henry VI’, in Gerald MacLean, ed., Culture and Society in the Stuart Restoration: Literature, Drama, History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 70–92.Google Scholar

Maguire, Nancy Klein, ‘Nahum Tate’s King Lear: “The king’s blest restoration”’, in Jean I. Marsden, ed., The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Works and the Myth (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), 29–42.Google Scholar

Maguire, Nancy Klein, Regicide and Restoration: English Tragicomedy, 1660–1671 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Mandelbrote, Giles, ‘Richard Bentley’s Copies: The Ownership of Copyright in the Late 17th Century’, in Hunt, Arnold, Mandelbrote, Giles and Shell, Alison, eds., The Book Trade and Its Customers 1450–1900 (Newcastle: Oak Knoll Press, 1998), 55–94.Google Scholar

Mardock, James and Rasmussen, Eric, ‘What Does Textual Evidence Reveal about the Author’, in Paul Edmondson and Stanley Wells, eds., Shakespeare Beyond Doubt: Evidence, Argument, Controversy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 111–20.Google Scholar

Marsden, Jean I., ed., The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Works and the Myth (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991).Google Scholar

Marsden, Jean I., Fatal Desire: Women, Sexuality, and the English Stage, 1660–1720 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Marsden, Jean I., ‘Pathos and Passivity: D’Urfey’s The Injured Princess and Shakespeare’s Cymbeline’, Restoration 14 (1990), 71–81.Google Scholar

Marsden, Jean I., ‘Rape, Voyeurism and the Restoration Stage’, in Katherine M. Quinsey, ed., Broken Boundaries: Women and Feminism in Restoration Drama (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1996), 185–200.Google Scholar

Marsden, Jean I., The Re-Imagined Text: Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Eighteenth-Century Literary Theory (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1995).Google Scholar

Marsden, Jean I., ‘Rewritten Women: Shakespearean Heroines in the Restoration’, in Jean I. Marsden, ed., The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Works and the Myth (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), 43–56.Google Scholar

Marsden, Jean I., ‘Spectacle, Horror and Pathos’, in Deborah Payne Fisk, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Restoration Drama (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 174–90.Google Scholar

Marshall, Alan, ‘Bennet, Henry, First Earl of Arlington (bap. 1618, d. 1685)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Online, www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/2104.Google Scholar

Marshall, Alan, The Strange Death of Edmund Godfrey: Plots and Politics in Restoration London (Stroud: Sutton, 1999).Google Scholar

Massai, Sonia, ‘The Mixed Fortunes of Shakespeare in Print’, in Sonia Massai and M. J. Kidnie, eds., Shakespeare and Textual Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 57–68.Google Scholar

Massai, Sonia, ‘Nahum Tate’s Critical “Editing” of His Source-Text(s) for The History of King Lear’, Textus 9 (1996), 501–22.Google Scholar

Massai, Sonia, ‘Nahum Tate’s Revision of Shakespeare’s King Lear’, Studies in English Literature 40 (2000), 435–50.Google Scholar

Massai, Sonia, Shakespeare and the Rise of the Editor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Maus, Katherine Eisaman, ‘Arcadia Lost: Politics and Revision in the Restoration Tempest’, Renaissance Drama 13 (1982), 189–209.Google Scholar

Maus, Katherine Eisaman, ‘“Playhouse Flesh and Blood”: Sexual Ideology and the Restoration Actress’, ELH 46 (1979), 595–617.Google Scholar

McEvilla, Joshua, ‘John Cragge’s The Wits Interpreter’, Library, 7th series, 18.3 (2017), 337–44.Google Scholar

McGugan, Ruth, Nahum Tate and the ‘Coriolanus’ Tradition in English Drama, with a Critical Edition of Tate’s ‘The Ingratitude of a Common-Wealth’ (New York: Garland, 1987).Google Scholar

McKenzie, D. F. and Bell, M., A Chronology and Calendar of Documents Relating to the London Book Trade 1641–1700, 3 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

McKeon, Michael, ‘Historicizing Patriarchy: The Emergence of Gender Difference in England, 1660–1760’, Eighteenth-Century Studies 28 (1995), 295–322.Google Scholar

McKeon, Michael, Politics and Poetry in Restoration England: The Case of Dryden’s Annus Mirabilis (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

McKitterick, David, Print, Manuscript, and the Search for Order, 1450–1830 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Merke, Thomas, The Bishop of Carlile’s Speech in Parliament, Concerning Deposing of Princes (London: s. n., 1679).Google Scholar

Milhous, Judith, Thomas Betterton and the Management of Lincoln’s Inn Fields, 1695–1708 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Milhous, Judith and Hume, Robert D., ‘Dating Play Premières from Publication Data, 1660–1700’, HLB 22 (1974), 374–405.Google Scholar

Milhous, Judith and Hume, Robert D., ‘Lost English Plays, 1660–1700’, HLB 25 (1977), 5–33.Google Scholar

Milhous, Judith and Hume, Robert D., ‘The Prologue and Epilogue for Fools Have Fortune; or, Luck’s All (1680)’, HLQ 43 (1980), 313–21.Google Scholar

Milhous, Judith and Hume, Robert D., The Publication of Plays in London 1660–1800: Playwrights, Publishers and the Market (London: British Library, 2015).Google Scholar

Milhous, Judith and Hume, Robert D., eds., A Register of English Theatrical Documents, 1660–1730, 2 vols. (Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Miller, John, Popery and Politics in England, 1660–1688 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Miller, John, Restoration England: The Reign of Charles II (London: Longman, 1985).Google Scholar

Miller, Ted H., ‘The Two Deaths of Lady Macduff: Antimetaphysics, Violence and William Davenant’s Restoration Version of Macbeth’, Political Theory 37 (2009), 817–22.Google Scholar

Milton, William M., ‘Tempest in a Teapot’, ELH 14 (1947), 207–18.Google Scholar

Moore, Lewis D., ‘For King and Country: John Dryden’s Troilus and Cressida’, College Language Association Journal 26 (1982), 98–111.Google Scholar

Mowatt, Barabara, ‘The Form of Hamlet’s Fortunes’, Renaissance Drama 19 (1988), 97–126.Google Scholar

Müller, Robert, ‘Nahum Tate’s Richard II and Censorship during the Exclusion Bill Crisis in England’, in James Hogg, ed., Poetic Drama and Poetic Theory (Salzburg: Institut für Englische Sprache und Literatur, 1975), 40–51.Google Scholar

Munns, Jessica, ‘“The Dark Disorders of a Divided State”: Otway and Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet’, Comparative Drama 19 (1985/6), 347–62.Google Scholar

Munns, Jessica, ‘The Golden Days of Queen Elizabeth: Thomas Shadwell’s The Lancashire-Witches and the Politics of Nostalgia’, in Slagle, Judith Bailey, ed., Thomas Shadwell Reconsider’d: Essays in Criticism, special issue of Restoration: Studies in English Literary Culture, 1660–1700 20 (1996), 195–216.Google Scholar

Munns, Jessica, Restoration Politics and Drama: The Plays of Thomas Otway, 1675–1683 (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew, Shakespeare in Print: A History and Chronology of Shakespeare Publishing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Murray, Barbara, ‘The Butt of Otway’s Political Moral in The History and Fall of Caius Marius (1680)’, Notes and Queries 36 (1989), 48–50.Google Scholar

Murray, Barbara, ‘Lady Elianor Butler and John Crowne’s The Misery of Civil-War (1680)’, The Ricardian 14 (2004), 54–61.Google Scholar

Murray, Barbara, ‘Performance and Publication of Shakespeare, 1660–1682: “Go see them play’d, then read them as before”’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 102 (2001), 435–49.Google Scholar

Murray, Barbara, Restoration Shakespeare: Viewing the Voice (London: Associated University Presses, 2001).Google Scholar

Neman, Beth S., ‘Crowne, John (bap. 1641, d. 1712)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Online, www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/6832.Google Scholar

Newcomb, Lori Humphrey, Reading Popular Romance in Early Modern England (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Newman, Steve, Ballad Collection, Lyric, and the Canon: The Call of the Popular from the Restoration to the New Criticism (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Nicoll, Allardyce, A History of English Drama 1600–1900, 6 vols., Vol. i: Restoration Drama 1660–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1923).Google Scholar

Nicoll, Allardyce, ‘Political Plays of the Restoration’, MLR 16 (1921), 224–42.Google Scholar

Norbrook, David, Writing the English Republic: Poetry, Rhetoric and Politics, 1627–1660 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Oakley-Brown, Liz, ‘Titus Andronicus and the Cultural Politics of Translation in Early Modern England’, Renaissance Studies 19 (2005), 325–47.Google Scholar

Odell, George C. D., Shakespeare from Betterton to Irving, 2 vols. (New York: Scribner’s Sons, 1920–1).Google Scholar

O’Donnell, Mary Ann, ed., Aphra Behn: An Annotated Bibliography of Primary and Secondary Sources, 2nd edn (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004).Google Scholar

Ogg, David, England in the Reign of Charles II, 2 vols., 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Olsen, Thomas G., ‘Apolitical Shakespeare; or, The Restoration Coriolanus’, Studies in English Language and Literature 38 (1998), 411–25.Google Scholar

Osborn, James M., John Dryden: Some Biographical Facts and Problems (New York: Columbia University Press, 1940).Google Scholar

Otway, Thomas, The History and Fall of Caius Marius (London: printed for Tho. Flesher, 1680).Google Scholar

Otway, Thomas, Venice Preserved, ed. Malcolm Kelsall. Regents Restoration Drama Series (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Otway, Thomas, The Works of Thomas Otway, ed. Summers, Montague, 3 vols. (London: Nonesuch Press, 1926).Google Scholar

Owen, Susan, ‘Drama and Political Crisis’, in Deborah Payne Fisk, The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 158–73.Google Scholar

Owen, Susan, ‘“He that should guard my virtue has betrayed it”: The Dramatization of Rape in the Exclusion Crisis’, Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Theatre Research 9 (1994), 59–68.Google Scholar

Owen, Susan, ‘Interpreting the Politics of Restoration Drama’, The Seventeenth Century 8 (1993), 67–97.Google Scholar

Owen, Susan, Perspectives on Restoration Drama (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Owen, Susan, Restoration Theatre and Crisis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Pask, Kevin, ‘Plagiarism and the Originality of National Literature: Gerard Langbaine’, ELH 69 (2002), 727–47.Google Scholar

Paul, Henry, ‘Players’ Quartos and Duodecimos of Hamlet’, Modern Language Notes 49 (1934), 369–75.Google Scholar

Payne, Deborah C., ‘Patronage and the Dramatic Marketplace under Charles I and II’, Yearbook of English Studies 21 (1998), 137–52.Google Scholar

Payne, Deborah C., ‘Reified Object, or Emergent Professional? Retheorizing the Restoration Actress’, in Canfield, J. Douglas and Payne, Deborah C., eds., Cultural Readings of Restoration and Eighteenth-Century English Theater (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1995), 13–38.Google Scholar

Pepys, Samuel, The Diary of Samuel Pepys, eds. Latham, Robert and Matthews, William, 11 vols. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970–83).Google Scholar

Peters, Julie Stone, Theatre of the Book, 1480–1880: Print, Text, and Performance in Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Peterson, Lene B., Shakespeare’s Errant Texts: Textual Form and Linguistic Style in Shakespearean ‘Bad’ Quartos and Co-Authored Plays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Pincus, Steven, ‘Shadwell’s Dramatic Trimming’, in Hamilton, Donna B. and Strier, Richard, eds., Religion, Literature and Politics in Post-Reformation England, 1540–1688 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 253–74.Google Scholar

Pollard, Hazel Bazer, ‘Shakespeare’s Influence on Otway’s Caius Marius’, Revue de l’Université d’Ottawa 39 (1969), 533–61.Google Scholar

Pollock, John, The Popish Plot: A Study in the History of the Reign of Charles II (London: Duckworth, 1903).Google Scholar

Potter, Lois, Secret Rites and Secret Writing: Royalist Literature, 1641–1660 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Raddadi, Mongi, Davenant’s Adaptations of Shakespeare (Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1979).Google Scholar

Randall, Dale, Winter Fruit: English Drama, 1642–1660 (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1995).Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Eric, ‘Anonymity and the Erasure of Shakespeare’s First Eighteenth-Century Editor’, in Joanna Gondris, ed., Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century (Madison and London: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press and Associated University Presses, 1998), 318–23.Google Scholar

Ravenscroft, Edward, Titus Andronicus; or, The Rape of Lavinia (London: printed for J Hindmarsh, 1687).Google Scholar

Raymond, Joad, Pamphlets and Pamphleteering in Early Modern Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Richie, Fiona and Sabor, Peter, eds., Shakespeare in the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Ripley, John, ‘Coriolanus as Tory Propaganda’, in Edward Pechter, ed., Textual and Theatrical Shakespeare: Questions of Evidence (Iowa: Iowa University Press, 1996), 102–23.Google Scholar

Ripley, John, ‘Coriolanus’ on Stage in England and America, 1609–1994 (Madison: Associated University Presses, 1998).Google Scholar

Roberts, David, Restoration Plays and Players: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Robertson, Randy, Censorship and Conflict in Seventeenth-Century England: The Subtle Art of Division (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Rollins, Hyder E., ‘A Contribution to the History of the English Commonwealth Drama’, Studies in Philology 18 (1921), 267–333.Google Scholar

Ronalds, Francis Spring, The Attempted Whig Revolution of 1678–81 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1937).Google Scholar

Rose, Mark, ‘The Author as Proprietor: Donaldson v. Becket and the Genealogy of Modern Authorship’, Representations 23 (1988), 51–85.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Laura J., ‘Masculinity in Restoration Drama’, in Susan J. Owen, ed., A Companion to Restoration Drama (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001), 92–108.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Laura J., Playwrights and Plagiarists in Early Modern England: Gender, Authorship, Literary Property (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Laura J., ‘(Re)Writing Lear: Literary Property and Dramatic Authorship’, in John Brewer and Susan Staves, eds., Early Modern Conceptions of Property (London: Routledge, 1994), 323–38.Google Scholar

Rowe, Katherine, ‘Humoral Knowledge and Liberal Cognition in Davenant’s Macbeth’, in Paster, Gail Kern, Rowe, Katherine and Floyd-Wilson, Mary, eds., Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays in the Cultural History of Emotion (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004), 169–91.Google Scholar

Rudolph, Julia, ‘Rape and Resistance: Women and Consent in Seventeenth-Century English Legal and Political Thought’, Journal of British Studies 39 (2000), 157–84.Google Scholar

Rustici, Craig M., ‘Gender, Disguise, and Usurpation: The Female Prelate and the Popish Successor’, Modern Philology 98 (2000), 271–98.Google Scholar

Sanders, Julie, Adaptation and Appropriation (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Saunders, Charles, Tamerlane the Great: A Tragedy (London: printed for Richard Bentley and M. Magnes, 1681).Google Scholar

Saunders, David and Hunter, Ian, ‘Lessons from the “Literatory”: How to Historicise Authorship’, Critical Inquiry 17 (1991), 479–509.Google Scholar

Savile, George, Marquess of Halifax, The Character of a Trimmer (London: s. n., 1688).Google Scholar

Scaravelli, Enrico, The Rise of Bardolatry: Paratexts of Shakespearean Adaptations and other Texts, 1660–1737 (Bern: Peter Lang, 2016).Google Scholar

Scott, Jonathan, Algernon Sidney and the Restoration Crisis, 1677–1683 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Scott, Jonathan, ‘England’s Troubles: Exhuming the Popish Plot’, in Goldie, Mark, Harris, Tim and Seaward, Paul, eds., The Politics of Religion in Restoration England (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990), 107–31.Google Scholar

Scott, Jonathan, England’s Troubles: Seventeenth-Century English Political Instability in European Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Scouten, Arthur H., ‘Julius Caesar and Restoration Shakespeare’, SQ 29 (1978), 423–7.Google Scholar

Seaton, Ethel, Literary Relations of England and Scandinavia in the Seventeenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1935).Google Scholar

Sengupta, S., ‘Shakespeare Adaptations and Political Consciousness: 1678–82’, Mid-Hudson Language Studies 4 (1981), 58–67.Google Scholar

Scheil, Katherine West, The Taste of the Town: Shakespearian Comedy and the Early Eighteenth-Century Theater (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Schille, Candy B., ‘“Man Hungry”: Reconsidering Threats to Colonial and Patriarchal Order in Dryden and Davenant’s The Tempest’, Texas Studies in Language and Literature 48 (2006), 273–90.Google Scholar

Schille, Candy B., ‘Reappraising “Pathetic” Tragedies: Venice Preserv’d and The Massacre of Paris’, Restoration 12 (1988), 33–45.Google Scholar

Shadwell, Thomas, The Complete Works of Thomas Shadwell, ed. Summers, Montague, 5 vols. (London: The Fortune Press, 1927).Google Scholar

Shadwell, Thomas, The History of Timon of Athens; or, the Man-Hater (London: printed for Henry Herringman, 1678).Google Scholar

Shadwell, Thomas, ‘The Lancashire-Witches’ and ‘Tegue O Divelly, the Irish-Priest’ (London: printed for John Starkey, 1682).Google Scholar

Shadwell, Thomas, A True Widow (London: printed for Benjamin Tooke, 1679).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, Coriolanus, ed. Philip Brockbank. The Arden Shakespeare (London: Methuen, 1976).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, Hamlet, eds. Thompson, Ann and Taylor, Neil. The Arden Shakespeare (London: Thomson Learning, 2006).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, Henry VI, Part 2, ed. Ronald Knowles. The Arden Shakespeare (Walton-on-Thames: Thomas Nelson, 1999).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, Henry VI, Part 3, ed. John D. Cox and Eric Rasmussen. The Arden Shakespeare (London: Cengage Learning, 2001).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, King Lear, ed. Foakes, R. A. The Arden Shakespeare (Walton-on-Thames: Thomas Nelson, 1997).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, King Henry VIII, ed. Gordon McMullan. The Arden Shakespeare (London: Thomas Nelson, 2000).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, King Richard II, ed. Charles R. Forker. The Arden Shakespeare (London: Thomson Learning, 2002).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, King Richard the Second, ed. Stanley Wells. New Penguin Shakespeare, rev. edn (London: Penguin, 1997).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, Macbeth, ed. Nicholas Brooke. The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, M^r. William Shakespear’s Comedies, Histories, and Tragedies. Published According to the True Original Copies (London: printed for H. Herringman, E. Brewster, and R. Bentley, 1685).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, Titus Andronicus, ed. Jonathan Bate. The Arden Shakespeare (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, Troilus and Cressida, ed. David Bevington. The Arden Shakespeare (Walton-on-Thames: Thomas Nelson, 1998).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, The Two Noble Kinsmen, ed. Lois Potter. The Arden Shakespeare (London: Bloomsbury, 2007).Google Scholar

Slagle, Judith Bailey, ‘Thomas Shadwell’s Censored Comedy, The Lancashire Witches: An Attack on Religious Ritual or Divine Right?’, Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Theatre Research 7 (1992), 54–63.Google Scholar

Smith, Bruce, The Acoustic World of Early Modern England: Attending to the O-Factor (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Smith, Bruce R., ‘The Circulation of Ballads in Cultural Memory’, in Gillespie, Stuart and Rhodes, Neil, eds., Shakespeare and Elizabethan Popular Culture. Arden Critical Companions (London: Bloomsbury, 2006), 193–218.Google Scholar

Smith, Nigel, Literature and Revolution in England, 1640–1660 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Smyth, Adam, ‘Profit and Delight’: Printed Miscellanies in England, 1640–1682 (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Sorelius, Gunnar, ‘The Giant Race before the Flood’: Pre-Restoration Drama on the Stage and in the Criticism of the Restoration (Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1966).Google Scholar

Sorelius, Gunnar, ‘Shadwell Deviating into Sense: Timon of Athens and the Duke of Buckingham’, Studia Neophilologica 36 (1964), 232–4.Google Scholar

Sorelius, Gunnar, ‘An Unknown Shakespearian Commonplace Book’, Library 27 (1973), 294–308.Google Scholar

Spencer, Christopher, ‘“Count Paris’ Wife”: Romeo and Juliet on the Early Restoration Stage’, Texas Studies in English Language and Literature 7 (1966), 309–16.Google Scholar

Spencer, Christopher, Five Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1965).Google Scholar

Spencer, Christopher, ‘Macbeth and Davenant’s The Rivals’, SQ 20 (1969), 225–9.Google Scholar

Spencer, Christopher, Nahum Tate (New York: Twayne, 1972).Google Scholar

Spencer, Hazelton,‘A Caveat on Restoration Play Quartos’, RES 23 (1930), 315–16.Google Scholar

Spencer, Hazelton, ‘Hamlet under the Restoration’, PMLA 38 (1923), 770–91.Google Scholar

Spencer, Hazelton, ‘Seventeenth-Century Cuts in Hamlet’s Soliloquies’, RES 60 (1933), 257–65.Google Scholar

Spencer, Hazelton, Shakespeare Improved (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1927).Google Scholar

Sprague, Arthur Colby, Beaumont and Fletcher on the Restoration Stage (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1926).Google Scholar

Staves, Susan, Players’ Scepters: Fictions of Authority in the Restoration (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Stern, Tiffany, Documents of Performance in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Strier, Richard, ‘Impossible Radicalism and Impossible Value: Nahum Tate’s King Lear’, in Richard Strier, ed., Resistant Structures: Particularity, Radicalism, and Renaissance Texts (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1995), 203–32.Google Scholar

Styan, J. L., Restoration Comedy in Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Tate, Nahum, The History of King Lear (London: printed for E. Flesher, 1681).Google Scholar

Tate, Nahum, The History of King Lear, ed. Black, James (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Tate, Nahum, The Ingratitude of a Common-Wealth; or, the Fall of Caius Martius Coriolanus (London: printed for Joseph Hindmarsh, 1682).Google Scholar

Tate, Nahum, The Loyal General: A Tragedy (London: printed for Henry Bonwicke, 1680).Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary, ‘The Canon and Chronology of Shakespeare’s Plays’, in Wells, Stanley, Taylor, Gary, Jowett, John and Montgomery, William, eds., William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary, Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History from the Restoration to the Present (New York: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1989).Google Scholar

Thompson, Ann, ‘“I’ll have grounds More relative than this”: The Puzzle of John Ward’s Hamlet Promptbooks’, Yearbook of English Studies 29 (1999), 138–50.Google Scholar

Tianhu, Hao, ‘Hesperides; or, The Muses’ Garden and Its Manuscript History’, Library 10 (2009), 373–404.Google Scholar

Todd, Janet, ‘Behn, Aphra (1640?–1689)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Online, www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/1961.Google Scholar

Todd, Janet, The Secret Life of Aphra Behn (London: André Deutsch, 1996).Google Scholar

Tuke, Samuel, The Adventures of Five Hours (London: printed for Henry Herringman, 1663).Google Scholar

Vallance, Edward, The Glorious Revolution. 1688: Britain’s Fight for Liberty (London: Hachette, 2006).Google Scholar

Van Lennep, William, ‘The New-Made Nobleman’, Times Literary Supplement, 20 June 1936.Google Scholar

Van Lennep, William, ‘Plays on the English Stage, 1669–1672’, Theatre Notebook 16 (1961), 12–20.Google Scholar

Van Lennep, William, et al., The London Stage, 1660–1800, 5 parts in 11 vols., Part I: 1660–1700 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1965).Google Scholar

Velz, John W., ‘“Pirate Hills” and the Quartos of Julius Caesar’, PBSA 63 (1969), 177–93.Google Scholar

Vernon, P. F., ‘Social Satire in Shadwell’s Timon’, Studia Neophilologica 35 (1963), 221–6.Google Scholar

Viator, Timothy, ‘Nahum Tate’s Richard II’, Theatre Notebook 42 (1988), 109–17.Google Scholar

Vickers, Brian, Shakespeare, Co-Author: A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Vickers, Brian, ed., Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage, 1623–1800, 6 vols., Vol. i (London: Routledge, 1974).Google Scholar

Visconsi, Elliott, ‘Trojan Originalism: Dryden’s Troilus and Cressida’, in Novak, Maximillian E., ed. The Age of Projects (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008), 73–90.Google Scholar

Wager, William(?), Tom Tyler and His Wife (London: s. n., 1661).Google Scholar

Walker, J., ‘The Censorship of the Press during the Reign of Charles II’, Historical Association 35 (1950), 219–38.Google Scholar

Wallace, John M., ‘Dryden and History: A Problem in Allegorical Reading’, ELH 36 (1969), 265–90.Google Scholar

Wallace, John M., ‘Otway’s Caius Marius and the Exclusion Crisis’, Modern Philology 85 (1988), 363–72.Google Scholar

Walsh, Jaquelyn, The Impact of Restoration Critical Theory on Four Shakespeare Comedies (Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Ward, Adolphus W. and Waller, A. R, eds., The Cambridge History of English Literature, 14 vols., Vol. viii: The Age of Dryden (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1912).Google Scholar

Warner, Kerten P., Thomas Otway (Boston: Twayne, 1982).Google Scholar

Watt, Tessa, Cheap Print and Popular Piety, 1550–1640 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Weber, Harold, Paper Bullets: Print and Kingship under Charles II (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1996).Google Scholar

Weil, Rachel, ‘Sometimes a Sceptre Is Only a Sceptre: Politics and Pornography in Restoration England’, in Lynn Hunt, ed., The Invention of Pornography: Obscenity and the Origins of Modernity, 1500–1800 (New York: Zone Books, 1993), 125–56.Google Scholar

West, Anthony James, The Shakespeare First Folio: The History of the Book, Vol, i: An Account of the First Folio Based on Its Sales and Prices, 1623–2000 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Wheatley, Christopher J., Without God or Reason: The Plays of Thomas Shadwell and Secular Ethics in the Restoration (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

White, Arthur, ‘The Office of Revels and Dramatic Censorship during the Restoration Period’, Western Reserve University Bulletin 34 (1931), 5–45.Google Scholar

Whiting, George W., ‘The Condition of the London Theatres, 1679–83: A Reflection of the Political Situation’, Modern Philology 25 (1927), 195–206.Google Scholar

Whiting, George W., ‘Political Satire in London Stage Plays, 1660–83’, Modern Philology 28 (1930), 29–43.Google Scholar

Wikander, Matthew H., ‘“The Spitted Infant”: Scenic Emblem and Exclusionist Politics in Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare’, SQ 37 (1986), 340–58.Google Scholar

Wilcox, J., The Relation of Molière to Restoration Comedy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1938).Google Scholar

Willbern, David, ‘Rape and Revenge in Titus Andronicus’, English Literary Renaissance 8 (1978), 159–82.Google Scholar

Williams, Sarah F., Damnable Practices: Witches, Dangerous Women, and Music in Seventeenth-Century English Broadside Ballads (Farnham: Ashgate, 2015).Google Scholar

Willie, Rachel, Staging the Revolution: Drama, Reinvention and History, 1647–72 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Willie, Rachel, ‘Viewing the Paper Stage: Civil War, Print, Theater and the Public Sphere’, in Vanhaelen, Angela and Ward, Joseph, eds., Making Space Public in Early Modern Europe: Performance, Geography, Privacy (New York: Routledge, 2013), 54–75.Google Scholar

Willman, Robert, ‘The Origins of “Whig” and “Tory” in English Political Language’, Historical Journal 17 (1974), 247–64.Google Scholar

Wilmot, John, earl of Rochester, The Complete Works of John Wilmot Earl of Rochester, ed. Vieth, David M. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Wilson, John Harold, All the King’s Ladies (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958).Google Scholar

Wilson, John Harold, ‘Six Restoration Play Dates’, Notes and Queries 9 (1962), 221–3.Google Scholar

Wiltenburg, Joy, Disorderly Women and Female Power in the Street Literature of Early Modern England and Germany (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Wing, Donald et al., Short-Title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales, and British America and of English Books Printed in Other Countries: 1641–1700, 3 vols. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982–98).Google Scholar

Winton, Calhoun, ‘Dramatic Censorship’, in Robert D. Hume, ed., The London Theatre World, 1660–1800 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1980), 286–308.Google Scholar

Wiseman, Susan, Drama and Politics in the English Civil War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Woodmansee, Martha, ‘The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the “Author”’, Eighteenth-Century Studies 17 (1984), 425–48.Google Scholar

Woodward, Gertrude L. and McMannaway, James G. A Check List of English Plays, 1641–1700 (Chicago: The Newberry Library, 1945).Google Scholar

Woudhuysen, H. R., ‘Early Play Texts: Forms and Formes’, in Thompson, Ann and McMullan, Gordon, eds., In Arden: Editing Shakespeare (London: Thomson Learning, 2003), 48–61.Google Scholar

Wright, Louis B., ‘The Reading of Plays during the Puritan Revolution’, HLB 6 (1934), 73–108.Google Scholar

Würzbach, Natascha, The Rise of the English Street Ballad, 1550–1650 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Yeo, Matthew, The Acquisition of Books by Chetham’s Library, 1655–1700 (Leiden: Brill, 2011).Google Scholar