Given the current state of awareness of the world’s scriptures, anyone serious about scriptural guidance will be interested in evaluating the possibility of following multiple scriptures without deceptively separating the divine goal from the “many paths.” “Global theology” proposals have tended to avoid the question of scripture. Multiscripturalism is already weakly in force in an ordinary East Asian religious pattern of multiple religious belonging and in Abrahamic acknowledgements of “rays of Truth” in all the world’s traditions (Nostra Aetate), but a strong commitment to multiple scriptures like that of Raimon Panikkar is hard to reconcile with the usual understanding of the authority of scriptures and traditions. Yet it seems that supposed incompatibilities of belief, cultural intelligibility, and community membership can be overcome by individual learning and spiritual adjustments; in fact, such adjustments are not infrequently made (I give examples from my own multiscriptural experience). Multiscripturalism arguably lies on the main path of development of literate guidance, supporting a more robustly cosmopolitan sensitivity to diverse identifications of ultimate appeal and right attitude.