Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T03:09:10.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Rousseau plays the beggar: the last words of citizen subject

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Celeste Langan
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

Of the features of Rousseau's corpus that compel a resurgent recognition of his critical and philosophical importance, none is as crucial nor as problematic as the imaginary fault line that separates his “political” or “public” writing from the autobiographical or ostensibly “private” documents. On the one hand, Rousseau's “literary” reputation appears to rest on the Confessions, regarded by many as marking the emergence of the modern (liberal) subject. On the other, the Social Contract is a crucial text for political theorists now engaged in rethinking the relation between the political subject of democracy and the private subject of liberalism. But the very nature of Rousseau's texts complicates any attempt so to “discipline” or separate into private and public spheres the question of the subject and the question of the citizen, the confession and the contract. Both the subject and the citizen owe their preeminence as essential units of thought in the regime of liberalism to a metaphorical logic by which one derives its justification from the other. If we are now at a point where we wish to ask, with Jean-Luc Nancy, Who Comes After the Subject?, we may wish, with Etienne Balibar, to use Rousseau to ground our response: “After the subject comes the citizen” (38).

What does it mean to “return” to Rousseau, and the citizen, in this manner? How does such a return promise to escape or at least to criticize the metaphorical interchangeability of citizen and subject? At first, such a return to Rousseau might seem to identify a postmodern critical agenda with the logic of infinite circulation. If we recognize certain ideological limitations in the category of the (epistemological) subject, nonetheless the subject of liberalism has been regarded as an improvement upon the citizen.

Type
Chapter
Information
Romantic Vagrancy
Wordsworth and the Simulation of Freedom
, pp. 31 - 58
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×