Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: November 2012

18 - Towards a deeper understanding of the social in resilience: the contributions of cultural landscapes

Summary

Introduction

I am, perhaps, the ‘fish out of water’ in this collection of authors, as I have come to this work primarily as someone who has studied the resilience literature, instead of as an expert (indeed, even a novice) on the subject of cultural landscapes. As such, I have been asked to reflect on what the scholarship on cultural landscapes can contribute to resilience, rather than ask (as have most of the other scholars in this book) what the resilience literature can contribute to an understanding of cultural landscapes. It is, perhaps, an unfortunate balance. As I have learned from hearing the authors in this book speak at our conference in Summer of 2010 and from reading their contributions to this book, the literature on cultural landscapes and on resilience have much in common but with often revealing differences, the study of which would benefit both communities. My single contribution cannot do justice to the breadth of what a more thorough understanding of cultural landscapes might mean for the resilience community.

Nonetheless, I offer four primary ways in which I believe a study of cultural landscapes can contribute to the resilience conceptual framework; these observations find voice in and are informed by many of the other chapters in this book. These are (in no particular order):

that analyses of resilience would benefit from greater consideration of how the natural resource systems of interest are globally embedded;

that the one-way nature of the adaptive cycle is not inevitable;

that a better integration of social and ecological is needed;

that the social analyses in resilience need to be much deeper.

I first offer a brief summary of my own perspective on the resilience conceptual framework before addressing each of these points in turn. I conclude with two additional observations – one warning against a certain romanticism or political correctness that permeates (in their poorer manifestations) both the resilience and cultural landscape literature, and a final warning against the notion that every place is absolutely unique, requiring its own individually tailored analysis of challenges and solutions.

References
Anderies, J. M.Walker, B.Kinzig, A. 2006 Fifteen weddings and a funeral: case studies and resilience-based managementEcology and Society 11 21http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art21/
Carpenter, S.Walker, B.Anderies, J. M.Abel, N. 2001 From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to whatEcosystems 4 765
Diamond, J. 2005 Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or SucceedNew York, NYPenguin Group
Gunderson, L. H.Holling, C. S. 2001 Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural SystemsWashington, DCIsland Press
Holling, C. S. 1973 Resilience and stability of ecological systemsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4 1
Levin, S. 2000 Fragile Dominions: Complexity and the CommonsCambridge, UKPerseus Publishing
Ostrom, E. 2005 Understanding Institutional DiversityPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press
Scheffer, M. 2009 Critical Transitions in Nature and SocietyPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press
Swanstrom, T. 2008 Regional Resilience: a Critical Examination of the Ecological FrameworkBerkeley, CAInstitute for Urban and Regional Development, University of California
Tainter, J. A. 1990 The Collapse of Complex SocietiesCambridge, UKCambridge University Press
Walker, B.Salt, D. 2006 Rethinking Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing WorldWashington, DCIsland Press