References
Baker-Hytch, M. (2018). Testimony amidst diversity. In Benton, M. A., Hawthorne, J., and Rabinowitz, D., eds., Knowledge, Belief, and God New Insights in Religious Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–202.
Baldwin, E., & McNabb, T. D. (2015). An epistemic defeater for Islamic belief? International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 76(4), 352–67.
Baldwin, E., & McNabb, T. D. (Forthcoming). Plantingian Religious Epistemology: Problems and Prospects, Lanham: Lexington Press.
Barrett, J. L. (2011). Cognitive Science, Religion, and Theology: From Human Minds to Divine Minds, PA: Templeton Press.
Barrett, J. L. (2017). Religion is kid stuff: Minimally counterintuitive concepts are better remembered by young people. In Hombeck, R. G., Barrett, J. L., & Kang, M., eds., Religious Cognition in China: “Homo Religiosus” and the Dragon. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 125–37.
Bergmann, M. (2002). Common sense naturalism. In Beilby, J., ed., Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 61–90.
Bergmann, M. (2004). What’s NOT wrong with foundationalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXVIII(1), 164–5.
BonJour, L. (1985). The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Boyce, K., & Moon, A. (2016). In defense of proper functionalism: cognitive science takes on Swampman. Synthese, 123(9), 2987–3001.
Boyce, K., & Plantinga, A. (2012). Proper functionalism. In Cullison, A., ed., Companion to Epistemology. Continuum Press, pp. 124–40.
Casler, K., & Kelemen, D. (2008). Developmental continuity in teleo-functional explanation: Reasoning about nature among Romanian Romani adults. Journal of Cognition and Development, 9(3), 340–62.
Clark, K. J., & Barrett, J. L. (2011). Reidian religious epistemology and the cognitive science of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 79(3), pp. 639–75.
Craig, W. L., and Sinclair, James. (2009). The kalam cosmological argument. In Craig, W. L. and Moreland, J. P., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Malden, UK: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 101–201.
Davidson, D. (1987). Knowing one’s own mind. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 60(3), 441–58.
DePoe, J. (2013). In defense of classical foundationalism: A critical evaluation of Plantinga’s argument that classical foundationalism is self-refuting. South African Journal of Philosophy, 245–51.
DePoe, J. (Forthcoming). Classical evidentialism. In DePoe, J. and Dalton, T., eds., Debating Religious Epistemology: An Introduction to Five Views on the Knowledge of God. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
Feldman, R. (1985). Reliability and justification. The Monist, 68:2, 159–74.
Gage, L., & McAllister, B. (Forthcoming). The phenomenal conservative approach to religious epistemology. In DePoe, J. and Dalton, T., eds., Debating Religious Epistemology: An Introduction to Five Views on the Knowledge of God. NY: Bloomsbury Press.
Goldman, A. (1992). Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gettier, E. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23 (6), 121–3.
Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harrison, V. (2012). Eastern Philosophy: The Basics. London: Routledge.
Järnefelt, E., Canfield, C. F., & Kelemen, D. (2015). The divided mind of a disbeliever: intuitive beliefs about nature as purposefully created among different groups of non-religious adults. Cognition, 140, 72–88.
Kane, R. (2005). A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kelemen, D. (1999). Why are rocks pointy? Children’s preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology, 35(6), 1440–52.
Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction: teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111(1), 138–43.
Kelly, T. (2005). The epistemic significance of disagreement. In Hawthorne, J., ed., Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 167–96.
Kelly, T. (2010). Peer disagreement and higher order evidence. In Feldman, R. and Warfield, T., eds., Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–74.
Kim, J. (2011). Reformed Epistemology and the Problem of Religious Diversity: Proper Function, Epistemic Disagreement, and Christian Exclusivism. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.
Klein, P. (1999). Human knowledge and the infinite regress of reasons. Philosophical Perspectives, 13(s13), 297–325.
Kundert, C., & Edman, L. R. O. (2017). Testing naturalness theory hypothesis in China. In Hombeck, R. G., Barrett, J. L., and Kang, M., eds., Religious Cognition in China: “Homo Religiosus” and the Dragon. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 77–97.
Kwan, K. (2006). Can religious belief provide justification for belief in God? The debate in contemporary philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 1(6), 640–61.
Law, S. (2016). The X-claim argument against religious belief. Religious Studies, 54(1), 15–35.
Lehrer, K. (1965). Knowledge, truth, and evidence. Analysis, 25(5), 168–75.
McGrew, T. & McGrew, L. (2006). Internalism and Epistemology: The Architecture of Reason. London: Routledge Press.
McNabb, T. D. (2015). Warranted religion: answering objections to Alvin Plantinga’s epistemology. Religious Studies, 51(4), 477–95.
McNabb, T. D., & Baldwin, E. (2016). Reformed epistemology and the Pandora’s box objection: the Vaisesika and Mormon traditions. Philosophia Christi, 18(2), 451–65.
McNabb, T. D., & Baldwin, E. (2017). Divine methodology: a lawful deflection of Kantian and Kantian-esque defeaters. Open Theology, 3(1), 293–304.
Millikan, R. (1989). In defense of proper functions. Philosophy of Science, 56(2), 288–9.
Moon, A. (2016). Recent work in reformed epistemology. Philosophy Compass, 11(12), 879–91.
Moon, A. (2018). How to use cognitive faculties you never knew you had. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 99(s1), 251–75.
Nāgārjuna, , & Garfield, J. (1996). Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna’s ‘mulamadhymakakarika’ with a Philosophical Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norenzayan, A. (2015). Big Gods – How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. New York: Oxford University Press.
Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.
Plantinga, A., & Tooley, M. (2008). Knowledge of God. MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Pritchard, D. (2012). Epistemological Disjunctivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (2005). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reid, T. (1983). Essay on the intellectual powers of man. In Beanblossom, R. and Lehrer, K., eds., Thomas Reid’s Inquiry and Essays. IN: Hackett, pp. 281–2.
Rottman, J., Zhu, L., Wang, W., Schillaci, R. S., Clark, K. J., and Kelemen, D. (2017) Cultural Influences on the teleological stance: Evidence from China. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 7(1) 17–26. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2015.1118402.
Shaw, K. (2016). Religious disjunctivism. International Journal of Philosophy of Religion, 79(3), 261–79.
Smith, M. (2014). The epistemology of religion. Analysis, 74(1), 135–47.
Sosa, E. (2015). Judgement and Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sosa, E. (1991). Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sosa, E... (1996). Proper functionalism and virtue epistemology. In Kvanvig, J. L., ed., Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga’s Theory of Knowledge. MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 258–59.
Swinburne, R. (2014). The Existence of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taber, T., & McNabb, T. (2015). Is the problem of divine hiddenness a problem for the reformed epistemologist? The Heythrop Journal, 57(6).
Tolly, J. (Forthcoming). Swampman: A dilemma for proper functionalists. Synthesis.
Wilkins, J. S., & Griffiths, P. E. (2013). Evolutionary debunking arguments in three domains: fact, value, and religion. In Maclaurin, J. and Dawes, G., eds., A New Science of Religion. London: Routledge, pp. 133–46.
Wright, S. (2013). Does Klein’s infinitism offer a response to Agrippa’s Trilemma? Synthese, 190(6), 1113–30.
