Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T15:12:47.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Measurement Errors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

A. Colin Cameron
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Pravin K. Trivedi
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The benchmark measurement error model is the bivariate linear errors-invariables (EIV) regression model with additive measurement errors in both the dependent variable and the regressor variable. The measurement errors are assumed to be classical, meaning that they are uncorrelated with the true value and have mean zero. Then the OLS estimator is inconsistent, with a bias toward zero. The measurement error is often large enough for this bias to be substantial; see, for example, Bound, Brown, and Mathiowetz (2001).

For nonlinear models the attenuation result does not necessarily hold, but measurement error still leads to inconsistency because the identified parameter is not the parameter of interest in the model free of measurement error. The essential problem lies in the correlation between the observed regressor variable and the measurement error. This leads to loss of identification and distorted inferences about the role of the covariate. A key objective of analysis is to establish an identification strategy for the parameter of interest.

There are important differences between nonlinear and linear measurement errors models. It is more difficult in nonlinear models to correct for classical measurement error in the regressors. Furthermore, in nonlinear models it may be more natural to allow measurement errors to be nonclassical and nonadditive. And although in linear models classical measurement error in the dependent variable is innocuous because it just contributes to the equation error as additive noise, in nonlinear models the presence of even classical measurement error in the dependent variable leads to loss of identification of model parameters.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×