Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2003; 5: 137–46..
The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1531–9., , , et al.
Implications of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms on surgical workload. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 171–6., , , et al.
Suitability of ruptured AAA for endovascular repair. J Endovasc Ther 2004; 11: 635–40., , , .
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is less invasive: now we must prove its efficacy. J Endovasc Ther 2003; 10: 16–9., .
Endovascular AAA repair attenuates the inflammatory and renal responses associated with conventional surgery. J Endovasc Ther 2000; 7: 359–71., , , , .
Improved respiratory function and analgesia control after endovascular AAA repair. J Endovasc Surg 1997; 4: 62–5., , , et al.
In-hospital mortality from abdominal aortic surgery in Great Britain and Ireland: Vascular Anaesthesia Society audit. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 687–92., , , , .
Glasgow Aneurysm Score predicts survival after endovascular stenting of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients from the EUROSTAR registry. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 191–4., , .
Outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with conditions considered unfit for an open procedure: a report on the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 211–21., , , et al.
Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. European collaborators on stent/graft techniques for aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2000; 32: 739–49., , , et al.
EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 2187–92.
EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 2179–86.
Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 843–8., , , , .
Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2398–405., , , et al.
A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1607–18., , , et al.
Anesthesia for endovascular repair of abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms: a review article. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2003; 44: 443–51., , , , .
Anesthesia technique and outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2005; 19: 123–9., , , et al.
Local anesthesia for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42: 402–9., , , et al.
Treatment of ruptured abdominal aneurysms with stent grafts: a new gold standard?Semin Vasc Surg 2003; 16: 171–5., , , , .
Correlations of cerebrospinal fluid pressure with hemodynamic parameters during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2005; 19: 619–24., , , et al.
Distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage for thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aortic repair: ten years of organ protection. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 372–80., , , et al.
Thirty-day mortality statistics underestimate the risk of repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: a statewide experience. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43: 217–22., , , et al.
Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic diseases: combined experience from the EUROSTAR and United Kingdom Thoracic Endograft registries. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 670–9., , , et al.
Endovascular repair of the descending thoracic aorta: evidence for the change in clinical practice. Vascular 2005; 13: 148–57., .
US multicenter trials of endoprostheses for the endovascular treatment of descending thoracic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43(Suppl. A): 12A–19A., , .
Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms: results of the phase II multicenter trial of the GORE TAG thoracic endoprosthesis. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41: 1–9., , , et al.
Prospective analysis of fenestrated endovascular grafting: intermediate-term outcomes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 32: 115–23., , , et al.
Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003; 361: 107–16., , , et al.
An analysis of perioperative surgical mortality and morbidity in the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. ACAS Investigators: Asymptomatic Carotid Artherosclerosis Study. Stroke 1996; 27: 2216–24., , , et al.
Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1491–502., , , et al.
Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004: CD000126; http://www.wchrane.org/reviews/en/ab000126.html., , .
Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1493–501., , , et al.
et al. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 1729–37., , ,
Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a randomized trial in a community hospital. Neurosurgery 2004; 54: 318–24., , , , .
Randomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a stopped trial. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28: 326–34., , , et al.
Efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy using polidocanol foam: a controlled clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 31: 101–7., , , et al.
Foam-sclerotherapy, surgery, sclerotherapy, and combined treatment for varicose veins: a 10-year, prospective, randomized, controlled, trial (VEDICO trial). Angiology 2003; 54: 307–15., , , et al.
Immediate and mid-term complications of sclerotherapy: report of a prospective multicenter registry of 12,173 sclerotherapy sessions. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31: 123–8., , , .
Systematic review of endovenous laser treatment for varicose veins. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 1189–94., , , .
Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 6: 125–31., .
Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 991–6., , .