Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: September 2014

Part II - Intuition in Psychology and Cognitive Science

References

Alexander, J., & Weinberg, J. M. (2007). Analytic epistemology and experimental philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 2(1), 56–80.
Baron, J. (1978). Intelligence and general strategies. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 403–450). New York: Academic Press.
Barton, A., Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Koehler, A., & Haas, M. (2009). Comparing risk reductions: On the dynamic interplay of cognitive strategies, numeracy, complexity, and format. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2347–2352). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Bealer, G. (1998). Intuition and the autonomy of philosophy. In M. R. DePaul & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry (pp. 201–239). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bloom, B. L. (1985). A factor analysis of self-report measures of family functioning. Family Process, 24 (2), 225–239.
Bonjour, L. (1998). In defense of pure reason: A rationalist account of a priori justification. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Buckwalter, W., & Stich, S. (2013). Gender and philosophical intuition. In J. Knobe & S. Nichols (Eds.), Experimental Philosophy Volume 2, (pp. 307–346). New York: Oxford University Press.
Chase, W G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.
Claxton, G. (1998). Investigating human intuition: Knowing without knowing why. The Psychologist, 11, 217–220.
Cohen, L. J. (1981). Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 317–331.
Cokely, E. T. (2009). Beyond generic dual processes: How should we evaluate scientific progress?PsycCritiques, 54, doi:10.1037/a0017643
Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2009). Adaptive variation in judgment and philosophical intuition. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 355–357.
Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2009). Individual differences, judgment biases, and theory-of-mind: Deconstructing the intentional action side effect asymmetry. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 18–24.
Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. . (2010). Adaptive diversity and misbelief. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 516.
Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2011). Virtue in business: Morally better, praiseworthy, trustworthy, and more satisfying. Journal of Organizational Moral Psychology, 2, 13–26.
Cokely, E. T., & Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(1), 20–33.
Cokely, E. T., Kelley, C. M., & Gilchrist, A. L. (2006). Sources of individual differences in working memory: Contributions of strategy to capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 991–997.
Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Schulz, E., Ghazal, S., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin numeracy test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(1), 25–47.
Cokely, E. T., Ghazal, S., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (in press). Measuring numeracy. In B. L. Anderson & J. Schulkin (Eds.), Numerical reasoning in judgments and decision making about health. (pp. 11–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cokely, E. T., Ghazal, S., Galesic, M., Garcia-Retamero, R., & Schulz, E. (2013). How to measure risk comprehension in educated samples. In R. Garcia-Retamero & M. Galesic (Eds.), Transparent communication of health risks: Overcoming cultural differences (pp. 29–52). New York: Springer.
Cokely, E. T., Parpart, P., & Schooler, L. J. (2009). On the link between cognitive control and heuristic processes. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2926–2931). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Cokely, E. T., Schooler, L. J., & Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Information use for decision making. In M. N. Maack & M. J. Bates (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (3rd. ed.). (pp. 2727–2734). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684.
Devitt, M. (2006). Intuitions in linguistics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 481–513.
Dhami, M. K., Hertwig, R., & Hoffrage, U. (2004). The role of representative design in an ecological approach to cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 959–988.
Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working-memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.
Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 273–305.
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review, 85, 114–121.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007). Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgment. New York: Psychology Press.
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Frankish, K. (2009). In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press.
Feltz, A., & Bishop, M. (2010). The proper role of intuitions in epistemology. In M. Milkowski & K. Talmont-Kaminski (Eds.), Beyond description: Normativity in naturalized philosophy (pp. 101–122). London: College Publication.
Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2008). The fragmented folk: More evidence of stable individual differences in moral judgments and folk intuitions. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1771–1776). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2009). Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 342–350.
Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2011). Individual differences in theory-of-mind judgments: Order effects and side effects. Philosophical Psychology, 24, 343–355.
Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T.(2012a). The philosophical personality argument. Philosophical Studies, 161, 227–246.
Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2012b). The virtues of ignorance. The Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3, 335–350.
Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2012c). Virtue or consequences: The folk against pure evaluational internalism. Philosophical Psychology,
Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2013). Predicting philosophical disagreement. Philosophy Compass, 8(10), 978–989.
Feltz, A., Cokely, E. T., & Nadelhoffer, T. (2009). Natural compatibilism versus natural incompatibilism: Back to the drawing board. Mind and Language, 24, 1–23.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Garcia-Retamero, R, & Cokely, E. T. (2011). Effective communication of risks to young adults: Using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 270–287.
Garcia-Retamero, R, & Cokely, E. T. (2012). Advances in efficient health communication: Promoting prevention and detection of STDs. Current HIV Research, 10, 262–270.
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2013). Communicating health risks with visual aids. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 392–399.
Ghazal, S., Cokely, E. T., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2014). Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(1), 15–34.
Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky. Psychological Review, 103(3), 592–596.
Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality. In D. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 62–88). Oxford: Blackwell.
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 20–29.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650.
Gigerenzer, G., & Regier, T. (1996). How do we tell an association from a rule? Comment on Sloman. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 23–26.
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldman, A., & Pust, J. (1998). Philosophical theory and intuitional evidence. In M. R. DePaul & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry (pp. 179–197). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613–628.
Hales, S. (2000). The problem of intuition. American Philosophical Quarterly, 37, 125–147.
Hammond, K. R. (2000). Coherence and correspondence theories in judgment and decision making. In T. Connolly & H. R. Arkes (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (2nd ed., pp. 53–65). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hastie, R. (2001). Problems for judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 653–853.
Hertzog, C., & Robinson, A. E. (2005). Metacognition and intelligence. In O. Wilhelm & R. W. Engle (Eds.), Understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 101–123). London: Sage.
Horvath, J. (2010). How (not) to react to experimental philosophy. Philosophical Psychology, 23(4), 447–480.
Huebner, B., Bruno, M., & Sarkissian, H. (2010). What does the nation of China think about phenomenal states?Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(2), 225–243.
Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & McElree, B. D. (1999). The role of cognitive control: Early selection versus late correction. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope, (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 383–402). New York: The Gilford Press.
Jacoby, L. L., Shimizu, Y., Daniels, K. A., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: Depth of retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 852–857.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2007). Frames and brains: Elicitation and control of response tendencies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 45–46.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the study of statistical intuitions. Cognition, 11(2), 123–141.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kauppinen, A. (2007). The rise and fall of experimental philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 10(2), 95–118.
Kornblith, H. (2002). Knowledge and its place in nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kruglanski, A. W., Chen, X., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Erb, H. P., & Spiegel, S. (2006). Persuasion according to the unimodel: Implications for cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), S105–S122.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10(2), 83–109.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. (1983). Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). New York: Oxford University Press.
Livengood, J., Sytsma, J., Feltz, A., Scheines, R., & Machery, E. (2010). Philosophical temperament. Philosophical Psychology, 23(3), 313–330.
Ludwig, K. (2007). The epistemology of thought experiments: First person versus third person approaches. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31(1), 128–159.
Ludwig, K. (2010). Intuitions and relativity. Philosophical Psychology, 23(4), 427–445.
Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. P. (2004). Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition, 92(3), B1–B12.
McKenzie, C. R. (2003). Rational models as theories – not standards – of behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(9), 403–406.
Mitchum, A. L., & Kelley, C. M. (2010). Solve the problem first: Constructive solution strategy can influence the accuracy of retrospective confidence judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 699–710.
Moshman, D. (2000). Diversity in reasoning and rationality: Metacognitive and developmental considerations. Educational Psychology Papers and Publications, 46, 689–690.
Moxley, J. H., Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., & Krampe, R. T. (2012). The role of intuition and deliberative thinking in experts’ superior tactical decision-making. Cognition, 124(1), 72–78.
Nadelhoffer, T., & Feltz, A. (2008). The actor-observer bias and moral intuitions: Adding fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong’s fire. Neuroethics, 1(2), 133–144.
Nahmias, E., & Murray, D. (2010). Experimental philosophy on free will: An error theory for incompatibilist intuitions. In J. Aguilar, K. Frankish, & A. Buckareff (Eds.), New waves in philosophy of action (pp. 189–215). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Nahmias, E., Coates, D., & Kvaran, T. (2007). Free will, moral responsibility, and mechanism: Experiments on folk intuitions. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31, 214–242.
Newell, A. (1973). You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press.
Osbeck, L. (2001). Direct apprehension and social construction: Revisiting the concept of intuition. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 21, 118–131.
Osman, M. (2004). An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 988–1010.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87–131.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17, 407–413.
Prinz, J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schulz, E., Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2011). Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: A test of the expertise defense. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1722–1731.
Schwitzgebel, E. (2009). Do ethicists steal more books?Philosophical Psychology, 22(6), 711–725.
Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2009). The moral behaviour of ethicists: Peer opinion. Mind, 118(472), 1043–1059.
Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2010). Do ethicists and political philosophers vote more often than other professors?Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(2), 189–199.
Shafir, E., & Tversky, A. (1995). Decision making. In E. E. Smith & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Thinking: An invitation to cognitive science (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 77–100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190.
Simon, H. A. (1956). Reply: Surrogates for Uncertain Decision Problems. Models of Bounded Rationality, 1, 235–244.
Simon, H. A. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice. In Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. New York: Wiley.
Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 1–20.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2008). Framing moral intuitions. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (Vol. 2, pp. 47–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3–22.
Sommers, T. (2012). Relative justice: Cultural diversity, free will, and moral responsibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sosa, E. (2007). Intuitions: Their nature and epistemic efficacy. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 74, 51–67.
Sosa, E. (2010). The epistemology of disagreement. In A. Haddock, A. Millar, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Social Epistemology (pp. 278–297). New York: Oxford University Press.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672–695.
Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84, 353–378.
Stich, S. (1998). Deconstructing the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stich, S. (2010). Philosophy and WEIRD intuition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 110–111.
Swain, S., Alexander, J., & Weinberg, J. M. (2008). The instability of philosophical intuitions: Running hot and cold on Truetemp. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76(1), 138–155.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
van Inwagen, P. (1997). Materialism and the psychological continuity account of personal identity. Nous, 31, 305–319.
Vigneau, F., Caissie, A. F., & Bors, D. A. (2005). Eye-movement analysis demonstrates strategic influence on intelligence. Intelligence, 34, 261–272.
Weinberg, J., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2001). Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics, 29(1–2), 429–459.
Weinberg, J. M. (2007). How to challenge intuitions empirically without risking skepticism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31(1), 318–343.
Weinberg, J. M., Gonnerman, C., Buckner, C., & Alexander, J. (2010). Are philosophers expert intuiters?Philosophical Psychology, 23(3), 331–355.
Woller-Carter, M. M., Okan, Y., Cokely, E. T., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Communicating and distorting risks with graphs: An eye-tracking study. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56 (1), 1723–1727.

References

Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. London: HarperCollins.
Ash, M. G. (2001). Egon Brunswik before and after emigration. In K. R. Hammond & T. S. Stewart (Eds.), The essential Brunswik (pp. 453–464). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bealer, G. (1999). A theory of the a priori. Philosophical Perspectives, 13, Epistemology, 29–55.
Becker, G. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1967). Value: Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 18, 239–286.
Betsch, T. (2008). The nature of intuition and its neglect in judgment and decision research. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuitions in judgment and decision making (pp. 3–22). New York: Erlbaum.
Bishop, M., & Trout, J. D. (2005). Epistemology and the psychology of human judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brunswik, E. (2001a). Psychology as a science of objective relations. In K. R. Hammond & T. S. Stewart (Eds.), The essential Brunswik (pp. 38–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1943 in Philosophy of Science, 4, 227–260.)
Brunswik, E. (2001b). Distal focussing of perception: Size constancy in a representative sample of situations. In K. R. Hammond & T. S. Stewart (Eds.), The essential Brunswik (pp. 68–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1944 in Psychological Monographs, 56 (254), 1–49.)
Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicao: University of Chicago Press.
Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217.
Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cappelen, H. (2012) Philosophy without intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Charness, G., Karni, E. & Levin, D. (2010). On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: New experimental evidence regarding Linda. Games & Economic Behavior, 68, 551–556.
Cohen, L. J. (1970). The implications of induction. London: Methuen.
Cohen, L. J. (1979). On the psychology of prediction: Whose is the fallacy?Cognition, 7, 385–407.
Cohen, L. J. (1980a). Whose is the fallacy? A rejoinder to Kahneman and Tversky. Cognition, 8, 89–92.
Cohen, L. J. (1980b). Some historical remarks on the Baconian concept of probability. Journal of the History of Ideas, 41, 219–31.
Cohen, L. J. (1981). Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 317–331 (comments and responses, 331–359).
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all?Cognition, 58, 1–73.
DePaul, M., & Ramsey, W. (Eds.). (1998). Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Dennett, D. (1984). Elbow room. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
Dennett, D. (2013). Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. New York: W.W. Norton.
Edwards, W. (1954).The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380–417.
Edwards, W. (1961). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 12, 473–498.
Erickson, P., Klein, J., Daston, L., Lemov, R., Sturm, T., & Gordin, M. (2013). How reason almost lost its mind: The strange career of cold war rationality. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1991). Theories of human reasoning: The fragmented state of the art. Theory & Psychology, 1, 83–105.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2012). Questions and challenges for the new psychology of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 18, 5–31.
Evans, J. St. B., & Pollard, P. (1981). On defining rationality unreasonably. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 335–336.
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond heuristics and biases. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 83–115.
Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A rebuttal to Kahneman and Tversky. Psychological Review, 103, 592–96.
Gigerenzer, G. (2007a). Gut feelings. London: Penguin.
Gigerenzer, G. (2007b). Rationality for mortals: How people cope with uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684–704.
Gigerenzer, G., & Murray, D. (1987). Cognition as intuitive statistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gigerenzer, G., & Sturm, T. (2012). How (far) can rationality be naturalized?Synthese, 187, 243–268.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goodman, N. (1965). Fact, fiction, and forecast. London: Athlone.
Grier, M. (2001). Kant’s doctrine of transcendental illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hammond, K. R., & Stewart, T. S. (2001). Introduction. In K. R. Hammond & T. S. Stewart (Eds.), The essential Brunswik (pp. 3–11). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The “conjunction fallacy” revisited: How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 275–305.
Jungermann, H. (1983). The two camps on rationality. In R. W. Scholz (Ed.), Decision making under uncertainty (pp. 63–86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kahneman, D. (1981). Who shall be the arbiter of intuitions?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 339–340.
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93, 1449–1475.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–83). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.), (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454. (Reprinted in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky [1982]. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–47).
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–25l. (Reprinted in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky [1982]. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–68).
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1977) Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. APRA Advances in Decision Technology, 1042-77-6, June 1977. Eugene, OR/Arlington, VA.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometria, 47, 263–292.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1980). On the interpretation of intuitive probability: A reply to Jonathan Cohen. Cognition, 7, 409–11.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982a). On the study of statistical intuitions. Cognition, 11, 123–141. (Reprinted in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky [1982]. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 493–508).
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982b). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201–208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions: A reply to Gigerenzer’s critique. Psychological Review, 103, 582–591.
Kast, B. (2007). Wie der Bauch dem Kopf beim Denken hilft: Die Kraft der Intuition. Stuttgart: Fischer.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118, 97–109.
Leary, D. E. (1987). From act psychology to probabilistic functionalism: The place of Egon Brunswik in the history of psychology. In M. G. Ash & W. R. Woodward (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth-century thought and society (pp. 115–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lopes, L. L. (1991). The rhetoric of irrationality. Theory & Psychology, 1, 65–82.
Lopes, L. L. (1992). Three misleading assumptions in the customary rhetoric of the bias literature. Theory & Psychology, 2, 231–236.
Myers, D. G. (2002). Intuition: Its powers and perils. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
Nagel, J. (2012). Intuitions and experiments: A defense of the case method in epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85, 495–527.
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Osbeck, L. (1999). Conceptual problems in the development of a psychological notion of ‘intuition’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 229–249.
Peterson, C. R., & Beach, L. R. (1967). Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 29–46.
Pust, J. (2000). Intuitions as evidence. New York: Garland Publishing.
Rakoczy, H., Clüver, A., Saucke, L., Stoffregen, N., Gräbner, A., Migura, J., & Call, J. (2014). Apes are intuitive statisticians. Cognition, 131, 60–68.
Rips, L. J., & Marcus, S. L. (1977). Supposition and the analysis of conditional sentences. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 185–220). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Robinson, D. (2014). Kant on intuition. In L. M. Osbeck & B. S. Held (Eds.), Rational intuition: Philosophical roots, scientific investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, B. (2010). The philosophy of logical atomism. London and New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1918.)
Samuels, R., Stich, S., & Bishop, M. (2002). Ending the rationality wars: How to make disputes about human rationality disappear. In R. Elio (Ed.), Common Sense, reasoning and rationality (pp. 236–68). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sedlmaier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1997). Intuitions about sample size: The empirical law of large numbers. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 33–51.
Stanovich, K. E., (1999). Who is rational?Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K E., & West, R F. (2000). Individual difference in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726.
Stanovich, K E., & West, R F. (2010). Rationality and the reflective mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stein, E. (1996). Without good reason: The rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stich, S. (1985). Could man be an irrational animal? Some notes on the epistemology of rationality. Synthese, 64, 115–135.
Stich, S. (1990). The fragmentation of reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stich, S., & Nisbett, R. (1980). Justification and the psychology of human reasoning. Philosophy of Science, 47, 188–202.
Stenning, K., & Van Lambalgen, M. (2008). Human reasoning and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sturm, T. (2012). The “rationality wars” in psychology: Where they are and where they could go. Inquiry, 55, 66–81.
Sutherland, S. (1992). Irrationality. London: Pinker & Martin.
Teigen, K. H. (1983). Studies in subjective probability IV: Probabilities, confidence, and luck. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 175–191.
Tetlock, P. E., & Mellers, B. (2002). The great rationality debate: The impact of the Kahneman and Tversky research program. Psychological Science, 13, 94–99.
Thagard, P. 2012. Eleven dogmas of analytic philosophy. Psychology Today, Dec 4. Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/hot-thought/201212/eleven-dogmas-analytic-philosophy.
Thagard, P. (2014). Creative intuition: How Eureka results from three neural mechanisms. In L. M. Osbeck & B. S. Held (Eds.), Rational intuition: Philosophical roots, scientific investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 105–110.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: Conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59 (4–2), S251–S278.
Wason, P. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology (pp. 135–151). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Weinberg, J., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2001). Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics, 29, 429–460.
Whitehead, A. N. (1911). An introduction to mathematics. New York: H. Holt & Co.

References

Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms:Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. New York: Routledge.
Bennett, M., Dennett, D., Hacker, P., & Searle, J. (2007). Neuroscience and philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Blouw, P., Solodkin, E., Thagard, & P.Eliasmith, C., (2012). Concepts as semantic pointers: A theory and computational model. (Unpublished manuscript). University of Waterloo, ON.
Boden, M. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Braun, J. (2009). Attention and awareness. In T. Bayne, A. Cleeremans & P. Wilken (Eds.), The Oxford companion to consciousness (pp. 72–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, J. R. (1991). The laboratory of the mind. London: Routledge.
Bunge, M. (2003). Emergence and convergence: Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Carruthers, P. (2011). Higher-order theories of consciousness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consciousness-higher/
Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Darwin, C. (1987). Charles Darwin’s notebooks, 1836–1844. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Dehaene, S. (2009). Neuronal global workspace. In T. Bayne, A. Cleeremans & P. Wilken (Eds.), The Oxford companion to consciousness (pp. 466–470). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Descartes, R. (1980). Discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy (D. Cress, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
Driver, J., & Noesselt, T. (2008). Multisensor interplay reveals crossmodal influences on ‘sensory-specific’ brain regions, neural responses, and judgments. Neuron, 57, 11–23.
Eliasmith, C. (2005). Cognition with neurons: A large-scale, biologically realistic model of the Wason task. In B. Bara, L. Barasalou & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 624–629). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eliasmith, C. (2013). How to build a brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eliasmith, C., & Anderson, C. H. (2003). Neural engineering: Computation, representation and dynamics in neurobiological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Eliasmith, C., & Thagard, P. (2001). Integrating structure and meaning: A distributed model of analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 25, 245–286.
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., König, P., Brecht, M., & Singer, W. (1999). Temporal binding, binocular rivalry, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 128–151.
Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. (2002). Spiking neuron models: Single neurons, populations, plasticity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Glymour, C., & Danks, D. (2007). Reasons as causes in Bayesian epistemology. Journal of Philosophy, 104, 464–474.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295–355.
Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K., J. (2003). A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychological Review, 110, 220–264.
Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koestler, A. (1967). The act of creation. New York: Dell.
Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2003). Mental imagery: Against the nihilistic hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 109–111.
Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). The Aha! moment: The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 210–216.
Maass, W., & Bishop, C. M. (Eds.). (1999). Pulsed neural networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maia, T. V., & Cleeremans, A. (2005). Consciousness: Converging insights from connectionism modeling and neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 397–404.
Markus, H., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 858–866.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
Parisien, C., & Thagard, P. (2008). Robosemantics: How Stanley the Volkswagen represents the world. Minds and Machines, 18, 169–178.
Plate, T. (2003). Holographic reduced representations. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Revonsuo, A. (2009). Binding problem. In T. Bayne, A. Cleeremans & P. Wilken (Eds.), The Oxford companion to consciousness (pp. 101–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rolls, E. R. (2005). Emotion explained. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Schröder, T., Stewart, T. C., & Thagard, P. (in press). Intention, emotion, and action in the brain: A neurocomputational model. Cognitive Science.
Schröder, T., & Thagard, P. (2013). The affective meanings of automatic social behaviors: Three mechanisms that explain priming. Psychological Review, 120, 255–280.
Smith, E. E., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2007). Cognitive psychology: Mind and brain. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Smolensky, P. (1990). Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 159–217.
Stewart, D. (1792). Elements of the philosophy of the human mind. London: Strahan, Cadell, and Creech.
Stewart, T. C., & Eliasmith, C. (2012). Compositionality and biologically plausible models. In W. Hinzen, E. Machery & M. Werning (Eds.), Oxford handbook of compositionality (pp. 596–615). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435–467.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Thagard, P. (2010). The brain and the meaning of life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Thagard, P. (2012). The cognitive science of science: Explanation, discovery, and conceptual change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thagard, P. (2014a). The self as a system of multilevel interacting mechanisms. Philosophical Psychology, 27, 145–163.
Thagard, P. (2014b). Thought experiments considered harmful. Perspectives on Science, 22, 288–305.
Thagard, P., & Aubie, B. (2008). Emotional consciousness: A neural model of how cognitive appraisal and somatic perception interact to produce qualitative experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 811–834.
Thagard, P., & Finn, T. (2011). Conscience: What is moral intuition? In C. Bagnoli (Ed.), Morality and the emotions (pp. 150–159). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thagard, P., & Nussbaum, A. D. (in press). Fear-driven inference: Emotions in model-based reasoning. In L. Magnani (Ed.), Model-based reasoning in science and technology. Berlin: Springer.
Thagard, P., & Schröder, T. (in press). Emotions as semantic pointers: Constructive neural mechanisms. In L. F. Barrett & J. A. Russell (Eds.), The psychological construction of emotions. New York: Guilford.
Thagard, P., & Stewart, T. C. (2011). The Aha! experience: Creativity through emergent binding in neural networks. Cognitive Science, 35, 1–33.
Thagard, P., & Stewart, T. C. (forthcoming). Two theories of consciousness: Semantic pointer competition vs. information integration. (Unpublished manuscript). University of Waterloo, ON.
Thrun, S., Burgard, W., & Fox, D. (2005). Probabilistic robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

References

Archibald, S. J., Mateer, C. A., & Kerns, K. A. (2001). Utilization behavior: Clinical manifestations and neurological mechanisms. Neuropsychology Review, 11(3), 117–130.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
Beauchamp, M., & Martin, A. (2007) Grounding object concepts in perception and action: evidence from fMRI studies of tools. Cortex, 43, 461–468.
Bengtsson, S. L., Ullén, F., Ehrsson, H. H., Hashimoto, T., Kito, T., Naito, E., Forssberg, H., & Sadato, N. (2009). Listening to rhythms activates motor and premotor cortices. Cortex, 45, 62–71.
Bergen, B., Chang, N., & Narayan, S. (2004). Simulated action in an embodied construction grammar. In K. D. Forbus, D. Gentner & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 108–113.
Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain & Language, 112, 150–158.
Bohannon, J. (2009, April). Gamers unravel the secret life of protein. Wired, May 17. Available at http://www.wired.com/medtech/genetics/magazine/17-05/ff_protein?currentPage=all
Bosbach, S., Cole, J., Prinz, W., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Understanding another’s expectation from action: The role of peripheral sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1295–1297.
Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
Brass, M., & Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 489–495.
Brass, M., Bekkering, H., & Prinz, W. (2002). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106, 3–22
Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. J. (2012). On the dynamics of action representations evoked by names of manipulable objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 502–517.
Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Non-visual motor learning influences the recognition of biological motion. Current Biology, 16, 69–74.
Chandrasekharan, S., & Stewart, T. C. (2007). The origin of epistemic structures and proto-representations. Adaptive Behavior, 15, 329–353.
Chandrasekharan, S. (2009). Building to discover: A common coding model. Cognitive Science, 33(6), 1059–1086.
Chandrasekharan, S., & Nersessian, N. J. (2011). Building cognition: The construction of external representations for discovery. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Conference 2011, Boston, MA.
Chandrasekharan, S., Binsted, G., Ayers, F., Higgins, L., & Welsh, T. (2012). Factors that affect action possibility judgments: Recent experience with action and current body state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 976–993.
Chandrasekharan, S. (2013). The cognitive science of Feynmen. Metascience, 22, 647–652.
Chandrasekharan, S., & Nersessian, N. J. (in press). Beyond correspondence: How the process of constructing models leads to discoveries and transfer in the bioengineering sciences. Erkenntnis.
Chen, J. L., Penhune, V. B., & Zatorre, R. J. (2008) Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2844–2854.
Cooper, S., Khatib, F., Treuille, A., Barbero, J., Lee, J., Beenen, M., Leaver-Fay, A., Baker, D., & Popović, Z. (2010). Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature, 466(7307), 756–760.
Cree, G. S., McRae, K., & McNorgan, C. (1999). An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming, Cognitive Science, 23, 371–414.
Decety, J. (2002). Is there such a thing as a functional equivalence between imagined, observed and executed actions? In A. N. Meltzoff and W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: development, evolution and brain bases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 291–310.
Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827–37.
Ehrsson, H. H. (2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences, Science, 317, 1048.
Engela, A., Burkea, M., Fiehlera, K., Biena, S., & Röslera, F. (2008). How moving objects become animated: The human mirror neuron system assimilates non-biological movement patterns. Social Neuroscience, 3(3–4), 368–387.
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 399–402.
Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2000). Visuomotor neurons: Ambiguity of the discharge or ‘motor’ perception?International Journal of Psychophysiology, 35, 165–177.
Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study, Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608–2611.
Farne, A., Iriki, A., & Ladavas, E. (2005). Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: Evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia, 43, 238–248.
Ferguson, E. S. (1992). Engineering and the mind’s eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fiorio, M., Tinazzi, M., & Agiloti, S. M. (2006). Selective impairment of hand mental rotation in patients with focal hand dystonia, Brain, 129, 47–54.
Gallese, V., Ferrari, P. F., Kohler, E., & Fogassi, L. (2002). The eyes, the hand and the mind: Behavioral and neurophysiological aspects of social cognition. In M. Bekoff, C. Allen, & M. Burghardt (Eds.), The cognitive animal (pp. 451–462). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing (pp. 67–82). New York: Wiley.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 558–565.
Gowen, E., Bradshaw, C., Galpin, A., Lawrence, A., & Poliakoff, E. (2010). Exploring visuomotor priming following biological and non-biological stimuli. Brain and Cognition, 74, 288–297.
Guterstam, A., Gentile, G., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2013). The invisible hand illusion: Multisensory integration leads to the embodiment of a discrete volume of empty space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1078–99.
Guterstam, A., Petkova, V. I., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). The illusion of owning a third arm. PLoS One, 6(2), e1720.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hadamard, J. W. (1945). Essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hegarty, M. (2004). Mechanical reasoning as mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 280–285.
Helsen, W. F., Elliot, D., Starkes, J. L., & Ricker, K. L. (1998). Temporal and spatial coupling of point of gaze and hand movements in aiming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 249–59.
Helsen, W. F., Elliot, D., Starkes, J. L., & Ricker, K. L. (2000). Coupling of eye, finger, elbow, and shoulder movements during manual aiming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 241–8.
Heyes, C. M. (2005). Imitation by association. In S. Hurley and N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From cognitive neuroscience to social science (157–174). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hirschfeld, G., & Zwitserlood, P. (2012). Effector-specific motor activation modulates verb production. Neuroscience Letters, 523(1), 15–18.
Holt, L. E. & Beilock, S. L. (2006). Expertise and its embodiment: Examining the impact of sensorimotor skill expertise on the representation of action-related text. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 694–701.
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.
Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. Neuroreport, 7, 2325–2330.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford: Blackwell.
Jeannerod, M. (2006). From volition to agency: The mechanism of action recognition and its failures. In N. Sebanz & W. Prinz (Eds.), Disorders of volition (pp. 175–192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kandel, S., Orliaguet, J.-P., and Viviani, P. (2000). Perceptual anticipation in handwriting: The role of implicit motor competence, Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 706–716.
Khatib, F., DiMaio, F., Foldit Contenders Group, Foldit Void Crushers Group, Cooper, S., Kazmierczyk, M., Gilski, M., Krzywda, S., Zabranska, H., Pichova, I., Thompson, J., Popović, Z., Jaskolski, M., & Baker, D. (2011). Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 18, 1175–1177.
Knoblich, G. & Sebanz, N. (2006). The social nature of perception and action. Psychological Science, 15, 99–104.
Koerner, B. I. (2012). New videogame lets amateur researchers mess with RNA. Wired, July 5, 2012.
Konkle, T., & Oliva, A. (2012). A real-world size organization of object responses in occipitotemporal cortex. Neuron, 74, 1114–1124.
Kornysheva, K., von Cramon, D. Y., Jacobsen, T., & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Tuning-in to the beat: Aesthetic appreciation of musical rhythms correlates with a premotor activity boost. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 48–64.
Kosslyn, S. M. 1994. Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lenggenhager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., & Blanke, O. (2007). Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciouness. Science, 317, 1096–1099.
Lindemann, O., & Bekkering, H. (2009). Object manipulation and motion perception: Evidence of an influence of action planning on visual processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1062–1071.
Maravita, A., & Iriki, A. (2004). Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 79–86.
Martin, T., & Schwartz, D. L. (2005). Physically distributed learning: Adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of fraction concepts. Cognitive Science, 29, 587–625.
Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1389–1400.
Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ocklenburg, S., Peterburs, J., Rüther, N., & Güntürkün, O. (2012). The rubber hand illusion modulates pseudoneglect. Neuroscience Letters, 523(2), 158–61.
Oztop, E., Kawato, M., & Arbib, M. (2006). Mirror neurons and imitation: A computationally guided review. Neural Networks, 19, 254–271.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge.
Polanyi, M. (1970). Transcendence and self-transcendence. Soundings, 53(1), 88–94.
Prinz, W. (1992). Why don’t we perceive our brain states?European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1–20.
Prinz, W. (2005). An ideomotor approach to imitation. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 1, pp. 141–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pulvermüller, F. (2001). Brain reflections of words and their meaning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 517–525.
Ramenzoni, V. C., Riley, M. A., Davis, T., Shockley, K., & Armstrong, R. (2008). Carrying the height of the world on your ankles. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1487–1495.
Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, J., & Umilta, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31–40.
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., & Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umiltà and M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV (pp. 231–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schubotz, R., & von Cramon, D. (2004). Sequences of abstract non-biological stimuli share ventral premotor cortex with action observation and imagery. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(24), 5467–5474.
Schubotz, R. (2007). Prediction of external events with our motor system: Towards a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 211–218.
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1234–1246.
Sievers, B., Polansky, L., Casey, M., & Wheatley, T. (2013). Music and movement share a dynamic structure that supports universal expressions of emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (1), 70–75.
Taylor, J. E., Witt, J. K., & Grimaldi, P. J. (2012). Uncovering the connection between artist and audience: Viewing painted brushstrokes evokes corresponding action representations in the observer. Cognition, 125, 26–36.
Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Houghton, G. (1999). Behavioral consequences of selection form neural population codes. In S. Monsell and J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII (pp. 223–45). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116, 185–2003.
van der Hoort, B., Guterstam, A., & Ehrsson, H. (2011). Being Barbie: The size of one’s own body determines the perceived size of the world. PLoS ONE, 6 (5), e20195.
Vingerhoets, G., de Lange, F. P, Vandemaele, P, Deblaere, K., & Achten, E. (2002). Motor imagery in mental rotation: An FMRI study. Neuroimage, 17, 1623–1633.
Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1989). The effect of movement velocity on form perception: geometric illusions in dynamic displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 266–274.
Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1992). Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motorperceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 603–623.
Viviani, P. (2002). Motor competence in the perception of dynamic events: A tutorial. In W. PrinzB. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: attention and performance XIX (pp. 406–442). New York: Oxford University Press.
Walter, S., Quigley, C., Andersen, S. K., & Mueller, M. M. (2012). Effects of overt and covert attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential. Neuroscience Letters, 519, 37–41.
Welsh, T. N., & Elliott, D. (2004). Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: Evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology – Section A, 57, 1031–1057.
Welsh, T. N., Lyons, J., Weeks, D. J., Anson, G. J., Chua, R., Mendoza, J., & Elliott, D. (2007). Within-and between-nervous system inhibition of return: Observation is as good as performance. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 950–6.
Wexler, M., Kosslyn, S. M., & Berthoz, A. (1998). Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition, 68(1), 77–94.
Wilson, N. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 721–731.
Wohlschlager, A. (2001). Mental object rotation and the planning of hand movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 709–718.
Wykowska, A., Schubö, A., & Hommel, B. (2009). How you move is what you see: Action planning biases selection in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1755–69.

References

Amodio, D. M., Devine, P. G., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2007). A dynamic model of guilt. Psychological Science, 18(6), 524–530.
Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & Srull, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes (Vol. 1, pp. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 361–382). New York: The Guilford Press.
Bargh, J. A., & Chartland, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.
Barrett, L. F., Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2007). On the automaticity of emotion. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 173–217). New York: Psychology Press.
Batson, C. D., Oquin, K., Fultz, J., Vanderplas, M., & Isen, A. M. (1983). Influence of self-reported distress and empathy on egoistic versus altruistic motivation to help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 706–718.
Björklund, F., Haidt, J., & Murphy, S. (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason. Lund Psychological Reports, 1, 1–15.
Bloom, A. H. (1986). Psychological ingredients of high-level moral thinking: A critique of the Kohlberg-Gilligan paradigm. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 16(1), 89–103.
Bornemann, B., Winkielman, P., & der Meer, E. (2011). Can you feel what you do not see? Using internal feedback to detect briefly presented emotional stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 85, 116–124.
Broeders, R., van den Bos, K., Müller, P. A., & Ham, J. (2011). Should I save or should I not kill? How people solve moral dilemmas depends on which rule is most accessible. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 923–934.
Brown, L. M., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2006). Affective reactions to pictures of ingroup and outgroup members. Biological Psychology, 71(3), 303–311.
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: The Guilford Press.
Craigie, J. (2011). Thinking and feeling: moral deliberation in a dual-process framework. Philosophical Psychology, 24(1), 52–71.
Curtis, V., Aunger, R., & Rabie, T. (2004). Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271(Suppl. 4), S131.
Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.
De Dreu, C. K. W. (2011). Oxytocin modulates cooperation within and competition between groups: an integrative review and research agenda. Hormones and Behavior, 61(3), 419–428.
De Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., Handgraaf, M. J. J., Shalvi, S., Van Kleef, G. A., Baas, M., Ten Velden, F. S., et al. (2010). The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science, 328(5984), 1408–1411.
Decety, J., & Chaminade, T. (2003). Neural correlates of feeling sympathy. Neuropsychologia, 41(2), 127–138.
Dennett, D. C. (1996). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 95–109.
Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 11, 86–89.
Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion regulation and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 665–697.
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2), 131–149.
Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Di Giunta, L. (2010). Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4(1), 143–180.
Epstein, S. (1991). Cognitive-experiential self-theory: An integrative theory of personality. In R. C. Curtis (Ed.), The relational self: Theoretical convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology (pp. 111–137). New York: Guilford Press.
Fine, C. (2006). Is the emotional dog wagging its rational tail, or chasing it? Reason in moral judgment. Philosophical Explorations, 9(1), 83–98.
Geraci, A., & Surian, L. (2011). The developmental roots of fairness: Infants’ reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources. Developmental Science, 14(5), 1012–1020.
Gibbs, J. C., Basinger, K. S., Grime, R. L., & Snarey, J. R. (2007). Moral judgment development across cultures: Revisiting Kohlberg’s universality claims. Developmental Review, 27(4), 443–500.
Giner-Sorolla, R., & Russell, P. S. (2009). Anger, disgust and sexual crimes. In Horvath, M. A. H. & Brown, J. M. (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp.46–73). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
Giner-Sorolla, R. (1999) Affect in attitude: Immediate and deliberative perspectives. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 441–461. New York: The Guilford Press.
Giner-Sorolla, R. (2012). Judging passions: Moral emotions in persons and groups. London: Psychology Press.
Giner-Sorolla, R., Bosson, J. K., Caswell, T. A., & Hettinger, V. E. (2012). Emotions in sexual morality: Testing the separate elicitors of anger and disgust. Cognition & Emotion, 26(7), 1208–1222.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.
Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 101–124.
Greene, J. D. (2009). Dual-process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 581–584.
Greene, J. D., Cushman, F. A., Stewart, L. E., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2009). Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition, 111, 364–371.
Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144–1154.
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., and Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.
Grossman, D. (1995). On killing: The psychological cost of learning to kill in war and society. New York: Back Bay Books.
Guerra, V. M., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2010). Community, autonomy, and divinity scale (CADS): Development of a theory-based moral codes scale. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 35–50.
Gutierrez, R., & Giner-Sorolla, R. S. (2007) Anger, disgust, and presumption of harm as reactions to taboo-breaking behaviors. Emotion, 7, 853–868.
Gutierrez, R., Giner-Sorolla, R., & Vasiljevic, M. (2012). Just an anger synonym? Moral context influences predictors of disgust word use. Cognition & Emotion, 26(1), 53–64.
Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). Empathy constrained: Prejudice predicts reduced mental simulation of actions during observation of outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 841–845.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
Haidt, J. (2003). The emotional dog does learn new tricks: A reply to Pizarro and Bloom, Psychological Review, 110(1), 197–198.
Haidt, J. (2004). The emotional dog gets mistaken for a possum. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 283–290.
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.
Haidt, J. & Björklund, F. (2008). Social intuitionists reason, in conversation. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (Vol. 2, pp. 241–254). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Haidt, J., & Hersh, M. A. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 191–221.
Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613–628.
Ham, J., & van den Bos, K. (2010). On unconscious morality: The effects of unconscious thinking on moral decision making. Social Cognition, 28(1), 74–83.
Hamlin, J. K., & Wynn, K. (2011). Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive development, 26(1), 30–39.
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557–559.
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., Bloom, P., & Mahajan, N. (2011). How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 19931–19936.
Harrison, N. A., Wilson, C. E., & Critchley, H. D. (2007). Processing of observed pupil size modulates perception of sadness and predicts empathy. Emotion; Emotion, 7(4), 724.
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 96–99.
Hauser, M. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. New York: Harper Collins.
Hauser, M. D., Cushman, F. A., Young, L., Jin, R., & Mikhail, J. M. (2007). A dissociation between moral judgment and justification. Mind and Language, 22(1), 1–21.
Heath, C., Bell, C., Sternberg, E. (2001). Emotional selection in memes: The case of urban legends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1028–1041.
Hibben, J. G. (1895). Automatism in morality. International Journal of Ethics, 5, 462–471.
Hodges, S. D., & Wegner, D. M. (1997). Automatic and controlled empathy. Empathic Accuracy, 311–339.
Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Moral internalization: Current theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 85–133.
Hoffman, M. L. (1982). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt. In N. Eisenberg-Berg, (Ed.), Development of prosocial behavior (pp. 281–313). New York: Academic Press.
Hoffman, M. L. (2008). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (Vol. 3, pp. 440–455). New York: The Guilford Press.
Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., Keltner, D., Cohen, A. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 963–976.
Huebner, B. (2011). Critiquing empirical moral psychology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 41(1), 50–83.
Huebner, B., Dwyer, S., & Hauser, M. (2009). The role of emotion in moral psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(1), 1–6.
Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 719–737.
Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653–670.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 513–541.
Jensen, L. A. (1997). Culture wars: American moral divisions across the adult lifespan. Journal of Adult Development, 4(2), 107–121.
Jensen, L. A. (1998). Moral divisions within countries between orthodoxy and progressivism: India and the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 90–107.
Kappas, A. (2011). Emotion and regulation are one!Emotion Review, 3(1), 17–25.
Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2010). The identifiable victim effect: Causes and boundary conditions. In D. M. Oppenheimer & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The Science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 133–148). New York: Psychology Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Koole, S. L., & Rothermund, K. (2011). “I feel better but I don’t know why”: The psychology of implicit emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 389–399.
Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(1), 42–58.
Loewenstein, G., & Small, D. A. (2007). The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 112.
MacDonald, K., & MacDonald, T. M. (2010). The peptide that binds: A systematic review of oxytocin and its prosocial effects in humans. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(1), 1–21.
Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (1998). Values as truisms: Evidence and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 294–311.
McGuire, J., Langdon, R., Coltheart, M., & Mackenzie, C. (2009). A reanalysis of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 577–580.
McIntosh, D. N., Reichmann-Decker, A., Winkielman, P., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2006). When the social mirror breaks: Deficits in automatic, but not voluntary, mimicry of emotional facial expressions in autism. Developmental Science, 9(3), 295–302.
Moll, J., & de Oliveira-Souza, R. (2007). Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 319–321.
Moors, A. (2010). Automatic constructive appraisal as a candidate cause of emotion. Emotion Review, 2, 139–156.
Morelli, S. A., Rameson, L. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012). The neural components of empathy: Predicting daily prosocial behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
Moskowitz, G. B., Gollwitzer, P. M., Wasel, W., & Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 167–184.
Oaten, M., Stevenson, R. J., & Case, T. I. (2009). Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 303–321.
Öhman, A. (2002). Automaticity and the amygdala: Nonconscious responses to emotional faces. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 62–66.
Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2003). The intelligence of the moral intuitions: A reply to Haidt (2001). Psychological Review, 110, 193–196.
Prinz, J. J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rameson, L. T., Morelli, S. A., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012). The neural correlates of empathy: Experience, automaticity, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(1), 235–245.
Richerson, P. J., and Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rozin, P. (1999). The process of moralization. Psychological Science, 10(3), 218–221.
Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574–586.
Rozin, P., Millman, L., & Nemeroff, C. (1986). Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 703–712.
Russell, P. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2011a). Social justifications for moral emotions: When reasons for disgust are less elaborated than for anger. Emotion, 11, 637–646.
Russell, P. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2011b). Moral anger, but not moral disgust, responds to intentionality. Emotion, 11, 233–240.
Russell, P. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2011c). Moral anger is more flexible than moral disgust. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 360–364.
Russell, P. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2013). Bodily moral disgust: What it is, how it is different from anger, and why it is an unreasoned emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 328.
Saltzstein, H. D., & Kasachkoff, T. (2004). Haidt’s moral intuitionist theory: A psychological and philosophical critique. Review of General Psychology, 8, 273–282.
Sarlo, M., Lotto, L., Manfrinati, A., Rumiati, R., Gallicchio, G., & Palomba, D. (2012). Temporal dynamics of cognitive–emotional interplay in moral decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 1018–1029.
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096–1109.
Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(35), 15073–15078.
Shweder, R. A. (1990). Ethical relativism: Is there a defensible version?Ethos, 18(2), 205–218.
Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). New York: Routledge.
Skitka, L. J., Mullen, E., Griffin, T., Hutchinson, S., & Chamberlin, B. (2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction?: Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 470–487.
Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), 5–16.
Sloane, S., Baillargeon, R., & Premack, D. (2012). Do infants have a sense of fairness?Psychological Science, 23, 196–204.
Sneddon, A. (2007). A social model of moral dumbfounding: Implications for studying moral reasoning and moral judgment. Philosophical Psychology, 20(6), 731–748.
Sonnby–Borgström, M. (2002). Automatic mimicry reactions as related to differences in emotional empathy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43(5), 433–443.
Stürmer, S., Snyder, M., Kropp, A., & Siem, B. (2006). Empathy-motivated helping: The moderating role of group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 943–956.
Suter, R. S., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Time and moral judgment. Cognition, 119(3), 454–458.
Tarrant, M., Dazeley, S., & Cottom, T. (2009). Social categorization and empathy for outgroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 427–446.
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Usoof-Thowfeek, R., Janoff-Bulman, R., & Tavernini, J. (2011). Moral judgments and the role of social harm: Differences in automatic versus controlled processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 1–6.
Vauclair, C. M., & Fischer, R. (2011). Do cultural values predict individuals’ moral attitudes? A cross-cultural multilevel approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 645–657.
Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotically induced disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780–784.
Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2011). The role of intent for distinct moral domains. Cognition, 120, 202–214.

References

Aarons, D. (2012). Jokes and the linguistic mind. New York: Routledge.
Almog, J. (2004). The proper form of semantics. In M. Reimer & A. Bezuidenhout (Eds.), Descriptions and beyond (pp. 390–419). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bach, K. (1987). Thought and reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Barker, S. (2006). Wettstein’s prism. Philosophical Books, 47(1), 15–24.
Bealer, G. (1998). Intuition and the autonomy of philosophy. In M. R. DePaul & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry (pp. 201–240). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bianchi, A. (2011). Reference and descriptions. In M. Sbisà, J. Östman, & J. Vershueren (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives for pragmatics (pp. 253–279). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bianchi, A. (2012). Two ways of being a (direct) referentialist. In J. Almog & P. Leonardi (Eds.), Having in mind: The philosophy of Keith Donnellan (pp. 79–92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boghossian, P. (1998). What the externalist can know a priori. In C. Wright, B. C. Smith & C. Macdonald (Eds.), Knowing our own minds (pp. 271–284). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Braun, D. (1993). Empty names. Nous, 27, 449–69.
Bromberger, S. (1992). On what we know we don’t know: Explanation, theory, linguistics, and how questions shape them. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Burge, T. (1988). Individualism and self-knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, 85(11), 649–663.
Burgess, J. P. (2013). Kripke. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cappelen, H. (2012). Philosophy without intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D. J. (2002). Does conceivability entail possibility. In T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Conceivability and possibility (pp. 145–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Skinner’s verbal behavior. Language, 35,(1), 26–58. (Reprinted in L. A. Jakobovits & M. S. Miron (Eds.). (1967). Readings in the Psychology of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Chomsky, N. (1962). Explanatory models in linguistics. In E. Nagel, P. Suppes & A. Tarski (Eds.), Logic, methodology and philosophy of science (pp. 528–550). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. In J. A. Fodor and J. J. Katz (Eds.), Structure of language (pp. 50–118). New York: Prentice-Hall.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1969). Linguistics and philosophy. In S. Hook (Ed.), Language and philosophy. New York: New York University Press. (Reprinted in Chomsky (2006). Language and mind (3rd ed., pp. 143–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations, Oxford: Blackwell.
Chomsky, N. (1982). The generative enterprise: A discussion with Riny Huybregts and Hekn van Riemsdijk. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, N. (1992). Language and interpretation: Philosophical reflections and empirical inquiry. In J. Earman (Ed.), Inference, explanation, and other frustrations (pp. 99–128). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995). Language and nature. Mind: New Series, 104,(413), 1–61.
Chomsky, N. (2000a). The architecture of language. N. Mukherji, B. N. Patnaik & R. K. Agnihotri (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2000b). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2002). On nature and language. A. Belletti & L. Rizzi (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2012). The science of language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crane, T. 1991. All the difference in the world. The Philosophical Quarterly, 41, 1–25. Reprinted in A. Pessin & S. Goldberg (Eds.). (1996). The twin earth chronicles (pp. 284–304). New York: M.E Sharpe).
Culbertson, J., & Gross, S. (2009). Are linguists better subjects?British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 721–36.
Cummins, R. (2000). “How does it work?” versus “what are the laws?”: Two conceptions of psychological explanation. F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and Cognition (pp. 117–144). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Curley, E. M. (1986). Analysis in the meditations: The quest for clear and distinct ideas. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Descartes’ meditations (pp. 153–176). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Davidson, D. (1977/2001). The method of truth in metaphysics. In Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 199–214). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DePaul, M. R., & Ramsey, W. (Eds.) (1998). Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Descartes, R. (1985). The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vols. I and II). (J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, Trans.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Devitt, M. (1981). Designation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Devitt, M. (1984). Thoughts and their ascription. P. A. French, T. E. Uehling & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Midwest studies in philosophy (Vol. IX, pp. 385–420). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Devitt, M. (1989). Against direct reference. In P. A. French, T. E. Uehling & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Midwest studies in philosophy 14 (pp. 206–240). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Devitt, M. (2006a), Intuitions in linguistics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 481–513.
Devitt, M. (2006b), Ignorance of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Devitt, M. (2006c), Defending ignorance of language: Responses to the Dubrovnik papers. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 6,(18), 571–606.
Devitt, M. (2009). ‘Psychological conception, psychological reality: A response to Longworth and Slezak.’ Croatian Journal of Philosophy, IX, 35–44.
Devitt, M. (2010). What “intuitions” are linguistic evidence?Erkenntnis, 73, 251–264.
Devitt, M. (2011). Whither experimental semantics?Theoria, 72, 5–36.
Devitt, M. (2012a). Still against direct reference. In R. Schantz (Ed.), Prospects for Meaning (pp. 61–84). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Devitt, M. (2012b). The role of intuitions in the philosophy of language. In G. Russell & D. G. Fara (Eds.), Routledge companion to the philosophy of language (pp. 554–65). New York: Routledge.
Devitt, M. (2013). Linguistic intuitions are not “the voice of competence.” In M. Haug (Ed.). Philosophical methodology: The armchair or the laboratory? (pp. 268–293). London: Routledge.
Devitt, M. (forthcoming). Should proper names still seem so problematic. In A. Bianchi (Ed.), New Essays on Reference.
Devitt, M., & Sterelny, K. (1999). Language and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Donnellan, K. S. (1974). Speaking of nothing. The Philosophical Review, 83,(1), 3–31.
Dummett, M. (1973). Frege: Philosophy of language. New York: Harper & Row.
Egan, F. (1999). In defence of narrow mindedness. Mind & Language, 14,(2), 177–194.
Farkas, K. (2003a). What is externalism?Philosophical Studies, 112, 187–208.
Farkas, K. (2003b). Does twin earth rest on a mistake?Croatian Journal of Philosophy, III(8), 155–69.
Fitzgerald, G. (2010). Linguistic intuitions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61, 123–160.
Fodor, J. A. (1968). Psychological explanation. New York: Random House.
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1987). Individualism and supervenience. In A. Pessin & S. Goldberg (Eds.), The twin earth chronicles (pp. 192–216). New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford: Clarendon.
Fodor, J. A. (October 2004). Water’s water everywhere. London Review of Books, 21.
Fodor, J., Bever, T., & Garrett, M. (1974). The psychology of language. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Freud, S. (1905/1960). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. (J. Strachey, Trans.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Freud, S. (1899/1913). The interpretation of dreams (3rd ed.). (A. A. Brill, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
GibsonE., & FedorenkoE. (2013). The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28,(1–2), 88–124.
Gil, D. (1983). Intuitionism, transformational generative grammar and mental acts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 14(3), 231–254.
Glymour, C. (2001). The mind’s arrows: Bayes nets and graphical causal models in psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gödel, K. (1944). Russell’s mathematical logic. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Bertrand Russell (pp. 125–153). Evanston: Northwestern University Press. (Reprinted in P. Benacerraf & H. Putnam [Eds.]. [1983]. Philosophy of mathematics (2nd ed., pp. 447–469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gopnik, A., & Schulz, L. (Eds.), (2007). Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy and computation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gross, S., & Culbertson, J. (2011). Revisited linguistic intuitions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62, 639–656.
Hales, S. D. (2012). The faculty of intuition. Analytic Philosophy, 53(2), 180–207.
Harris, R. A. (1993). The linguistic wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hempel, C. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Free Press.
Hetherington, S. (2012). The Gettier illusion. Synthese, 188(2), 217–230.
Hinitkka, J. (1999). The emperor’s new intuitions. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 127–147.
Hintikka, J., & Remes, (1974). The method of analysis, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Hoffman, D. D. (1998). Visual intelligence: How we create what we see, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Hughes, C. (2004). Kripke: Names, necessity and identity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Isaacson, W. (2007). Einstein: His life and universe. London: Simon & Schuster.
Jackson, F. (1998). From metaphysics to ethics: A defence of conceptual analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jeshion, R. (2006). Reference and intentionality. Philosophical Books, 47(1), 25–33.
Julesz, B. (1971). The foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kaplan, D. (2012). An idea of Donnellan. In J. Almog & P. Leonardi (Eds.), Having in mind: The philosophy of Keith Donnellan (pp. 122–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Katz, J. J. (1981). Language and other abstract objects. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kenny, A. (1968). Descartes: A study of his philosophy. New York: Random House.
Kripke, S. (1972/1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kripke, S. (1979). A puzzle about belief. In A. Margalit (Ed.), Meaning and use (pp. 239–283). Dordrecht, NL: Reidel. (Reprinted in P. Ludlow (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy of language (pp. 875–920). (1997). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted in S. Kripke (2011). Philosophical troubles: Collected papers (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kripke, S. (2011). Philosophical troubles: Collected papers (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1977). The method of analysis – synthesis. In J. Worrall and G. Currie (Eds.), Mathematics, science & epistemology: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2, pp. 70–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambrozo, T. (2010), Causal-explanatory pluralism: How intentions, functions and mechanisms influence causal ascriptions. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 303–332.
Lepore, E., & Ludwig, K. (2005). Donald Davidson: Meaning, truth, language and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ludlow, P. (2011). The philosophy of generative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. P. (2004). Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition, 92, B1–B12.
Mackie, J. L. (1980). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford: Clarendon.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
Matthews, R. J. (forthcoming). Linguistic intuition: An exercise of linguistic competence.
Maudlin, T. (2007). The metaphysics within physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maynes, J., & Gross, S. (2013). Linguistic intuitions. Philosophy Compass, 8(8), 714–730.
Mendola, J. (2008). Anti-externalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Millikan, R. (1991. Speaking up for Darwin. In B. Loewer and Georges Rey (Eds.), Meaning in mind: Fodor and his critics (pp. 151–164). Oxford: Blackwell.
Moore, G. E. (1925). A defence of common sense. In J. H. Muirhead (Ed.), Contemporary British Philosophy (2nd series) (pp. 193–223). London: George Allen & Unwin (Reprinted in Ammerman, R. [1965]. Classics of analytic philosophy [pp. 47–67]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company).
Moravcsik, J. M. (1981). Frege and Chomsky on thought and language. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 6(1), 105–124.
Nagel, J. (2012). Intuitions and experiments: A defense of the case method in epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85(3), 495–527.
Nelson, R. J. (1978). The competence-performance distinction in mental philosophy. Synthese, 39, 337–381.
Pais, A. (1982). Subtle is the lord: The science and the life of Albert Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parsons, C. (1995). Platonism and mathematical intuition in Kurt Gödel’s thought. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 1, 44–74.
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pietroski, P. M. (2003). The character of natural language semantics. In A. Barber (Ed.), Epistemology of Language (pp. 217–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Putnam, H. (1975). The Meaning of “Meaning.” In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind and knowledge: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 7), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Reprinted in H. Putnam, Mind, language, and reality: Philosophical papers (pp. 215–271, Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1972). Competence and psychological reality. American Psychologist, 546–552.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1973). The role of competence theories in cognitive psychology. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(1), 21–50.
Quine, W. V. (1966). The ways of paradox. New York: Random House.
Reimer, M. (2001). The problem of empty names. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79(4), 491–506
Riemer, N. (2009). Grammaticality as evidence and as prediction in a Galilean linguistics. Language Sciences, 31, 612–633.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.
Salmon, N. (2011). A note on Kripke’s puzzle about belief. In A. Berger (Ed.), Saul Kripke (pp. 235–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schantz, R. (Ed.) (2004). The externalist challenge. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Schütze, C., & Sprouse, J. (2013). Judgment data. D. Sharma & R. Podesva (Eds.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 27–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schütze, C. T. (1996). The empirical basis of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Scriven, M. (1959). Truisms as the grounds of historical explanations. In P. Gardiner (Ed.), Theories of history: Readings from classical and contemporary sources, (pp. 443–475). New York: Free Press.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, G. M. A. (2004). Reference, causal powers, externalist intuitions and unicorns. In R. Schantz (Ed.), The externalist challenge (pp. 329–346). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Slezak, P. (2009). Linguistic explanation and psychological reality. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 9(25), 2–21.
Slezak, P. (2010). Doubts about Descartes’ indubitability: The cogito as intuition and inference. Philosophical Forum, 41(4), 389–412.
Sloman, S. (2005). Causal models: How people think about the world and its alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, B. C. (2006). Why we still need knowledge of language. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 6(18), 431–456.
Soames, S. (2005). Reference and description: The case against two-dimensionalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Soames, S. (2009). Truth and meaning in perspective. In P. French (Ed.), Truth and its Deformities: Midwest studies in philosophy (Vol. 23). (Reprinted in Philosophical essays (Vol. 1, pp. 225–247). (2009). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sosa, E. (2007). Experimental philosophy and philosophical intuition. Philosophical Studies, 132, 9–107.
Sprouse, J., & Almeida, D. (2013). The empirical status of data in syntax: A reply to Gibson and Fedorenko. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(3), 222–228.
Sprouse, J., Schütze, C. T., & Almeida, D. (2013). Assessing the reliability of journal data in syntax: Linguistic inquiry 2001–2010. Retrieved from http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001352
Stalnaker, R. (2003). Ways a world might be. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stich, S. (1996). Deconstructing the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stich, S. (2009). Replies. In D. Murphy & M. Bishop (Eds.), Stich and his critics (pp. 190–252). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Stich, S. (2012). Do different groups have different epistemic intuitions? A reply to Jennifer Nagel. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 87(1), 151–178.
Textor, M. (2009). Devitt on the epistemic authority of linguistic intuitions. Erkenntis, 71, 395–405.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130.
Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1977). The pragmatics of explanation. American Philosophical Quarterly, 14(2), 143–149.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Vargas Llosa, M. (1975). La orgia perpetua. (H. Lane, Trans.). New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.
Wasow, T., & Arnold, J. (2005). Intuitions in linguistic argumentation. Lingua, 115, 1481–1496.
Weinberg, J., Gonerman, C., Buckner, C., & Alexander, J., (2010). Are philosophers expert intuiters?Philosophical Psychology, 23(3), 331–355.
Weinberg, J. M., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2001). Normativity and epistemic Iintuitions. Philosophical Topics, 29(1&2), 429–460.
Weinberg, S. (1976). The forces of nature. Bulletin of the American Society of Arts and Sciences, 29(4), 13–29.
Wettstein, H. (1986). Has semantics rested on a mistake?The Journal of Philosophy, 83(4), 185–209.
Wettstein, H. (2004). The magic prism: An essay in the philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wikforss, A. (2008). Semantic externalism and psychological Externalism. Philosophy Compass, 3(1), 158–181.
Williamson, T. (2011). Philosophical expertise and the burden of proof. Metaphilosophy, 42(3), 215–229.
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.
Winer, G. A., Cottrell, J. E., Gregg, V., Fournier, J. S., & Bica, L. A. (2002). Fundamentally misunderstanding visual perception: Adults’ belief in visual emissions. American Psychologist, 57(6/7), 417–424.
Wolf-Devine, C. (1993). Descartes on seeing: Epistemology and visual perception. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Wolf-Devine, C. (2000a). Descartes’ theory of visual spatial perception. In S. Gaukroger, J. Schuster & J. Sutton (Eds.), (2000). Descartes’ natural philosophy (pp. 506–523). London: Routledge.
Wolf-Devine, C. (2000b). The role of inner objects in perception. In S. Gaukroger, J. Schuster & J. Sutton (Eds.), (2000), Descartes’ natural philosophy (pp. 557–568). London: Routledge.
Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woodward, J. (2012). Causation: Interactions between philosophical theories and psychological research. Philosophy of Science, 79, 961–972.

References

Beebe, J. (2004). Understanding consciousness through the theory of psychological types. In J. Cambray & L. Carter (Eds.), (2004). Contemporary perspectives in Jungian analysis (pp. 83–116). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
Beebe, J., & Falzeder, E. (2013). The question of psychological types: The correspondence of C. G. Jung and Hans Schmid-Guisan, 1915–1916. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bar-Cohen, Y. (2005). Biomimetics: Biologically inspired technologies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Bohr, N. (1958). Atomic physics and human knowledge. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Eastman, T. E. (2008). Our cosmos, from substance to process. World Futures, 64, 84–93.
Jung, C. G. (1921/1971). Psychological types, CW6. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G. (1954/1966). The practice of psychotherapy: Essays on the psychology of the transference and other subjects. CW16. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G. (1956). Symbols of transformation, CW5. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G. (1959/1969). The archetypes and the collective unconscious, CW 9(1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G. (1960/1969). The structure and dynamics of the psyche, CW 8. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G. (1961). Memories, dreams, and reflections. A. Jaffe (Ed.). (R. & C. Winston, Trans.). New York, NY: Random House.
Jung, C. G. (1968). Analytical psychology: Its theory and practice (The Tavistock lectures). New York, NY: Random House.
Jung, C. G. (2009). The red book. (S. Shamdasani, Ed., Trans.). (M. Kyburz & J. Peck, Trans.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
Krause, E. (1997). The metaphysics of experience: A companion to Whitehead’s process and reality. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
Maier, M. (1989). Atalanta fugiens. Grand Rapids, MI: Phanes Press.
von Franz, M. F. (1964). The process of individuation. In C. G. Jung (Ed.), Man and his symbols (pp. 185–229). New York, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc.
von Franz, M. F. (1975). C.G. Jung: His myth in our time. New York, NY : Little, Brown & Company/G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Whitehead, A. N. (1925/1967). Science and the modern world. New York, NY: McMillan Free Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1927/1959). Symbolism: Its meaning and effect. New York, NY: Capricorn Books.
Whitehead, A. N. (1929/1976). Process and reality: Corrected edition. D. R. Griffin & D. W. Sherburne(Eds.). New York, NY: McMillan Free Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1933/1967). Adventures of ideas. New York, NY: McMillan Free Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1938). Modes of thought. New York, NY: Macmillan Free Press.
Quenk, N. (2000). Essentials of Myers-Briggs type indicator assessment. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Wilde, D. J. (2011). Jung’s personality theory quantified. New York, NY: Springer.
Wilhelm, R. (1931/1962) The secret of the golden flower: A Chinese book of Life. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.