Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: June 2015

3 - Measuring Corporate Accountability through Global Indicators




During the past two decades, there has been a drive to reduce complicated concepts to simple numbers. Corruption, rule of law, human rights, and more have all been reduced to quantitative “indicators.” Based on the theory that what gets measured gets done, government agencies have incorporated quantitative indicators into performance-based rules, information disclosure regimes, and self-regulation (see, e.g., Sunstein 1999; Sugarman and Sandman 2007; Carrigan and Coglianese 2011). These statistical tools have recently been used in international law to operationalize global norms and thereby improve compliance.

As a second-order abstraction of statistical information, indicators rely on numbers to represent social phenomena and evaluate performance. Backed by technical expertise and designed to produce comparability, these tools are shaping decision making by domestic and global regulatory bodies. For instance, the World Bank's Doing Business indicators produce a ranking of developing countries based on the quality of their business laws and legal institutions. The Bank's classification then influences its allocation of foreign aid as well as that of the US government through the Millennium Challenge Corporation. Domestic law has also incorporated indicators, as in the 2008 reauthorization of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. This law relies on performance indicators to assess foreign governments' compliance with minimum antitrafficking standards and then categorize countries into three tiers. Given their propensity to simplify complex concepts and translate them into quantifiable measures, indicators are often used to regulate more intangible, value-laden issues such as the rule of law (as in the Freedom House indicators), corruption (as in Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index), and human rights (as in the indicators developed by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to monitor treaty compliance).

Indicators are playing an increasingly important role in regulatory governance (Davis, Kingsbury, and Engle Merry 2012). If used effectively, they can offer a number of apparent benefits: they can measure accountability to standards and norms; assess compliance with policies and specific targets; and evaluate performance with respect to stated objectives.

Abbott, Kenneth, and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Legal Governance.” International Organization 54: 421–456.
Bamberger, Kenneth A. 2010. “Technologies of Compliance: Risk and Regulation in a Digital Age.” Texas Law Review 88: 669–740.
Benvenisti, Eyal, and Downs, George W.. 2011. “National Courts Review of Transnational Private Regulation.” Tel Aviv University of Law Faculty Papers, Working Papers 125.
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2006. “Seeing Beyond the Limits of International Law.” Texas Law Review 84: 1265–1316.
Blair, Margaret M., Williams, Cynthia A. and Lin, Li-Wen. 2008. “The New Role for Assurance Services in Global Commerce.” Journal of Corporation Law 33: 325–360.
Bodansky, Daniel. 1999. “The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law.” American Journal of Internal Law 93: 596–624.
Braithwaite, John, and Drahos, Peter. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Halina Szejnwald, de Jong, Martin and Lessidrenska, Teodorina. 2009. “The Rise of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) as a Case of Institutional Entrepreneurship.” Environmental Politics 18: 182–200.
Brown, Halina Szejnwald, de Jong, Martin and Levy, David L.. 2009. “Building Institutions Based on Information Disclosure: Lessons from GRI's Sustainability Reporting.” Journal of Cleaner Productions 17: 571–580.
Caron, David D. 1993. “The Legitimacy of the Collective Authority of the Security Council.” American Journal of Internal Law 87: 552–588.
Carrigan, Christopher, and Coglianese, Cary. 2011. “The Politics of Regulation: From Institutionalism to New Governance.” Annual Review of Political Science 14: 107–129.
Case, David W. 2005. “Corporate Environmental Reporting as Informational Regulation: A Law and Economics Perspective.” University of Colorado Law Review 76: 379–442.
Clapham, Andrew. 2006. Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clapham, Andrew, and Jerbi, Scott. 2001. “Categories of Corporate Complicity in Human Rights Abuses.” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 24: 339–350.
Croley, Steven P. 2008. Regulation and Public Interests: the Possibility of Good Regulatory Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Davis, Kevin E., Kingsbury, Benedict and Merry, Sally Engle. 2012. “Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance.” Law and Society Review 46: 71–104.
Deloitte. 2010. “Sustainability Reporting: The Emerging Challenge.”
Eccles, Robert G., and Krzus, Michael P.. 2010. One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Edelman, Lauren B. Fuller, Riggs, Sally and Mara-Drita, Iona. 2001. “Diversity Rhetoric and the Managerialization of Law.” American Journal of Sociology 106: 1589–1641.
Entine, Jon. 2010. “UN Global Compact: Ten Years of Greenwashing?” Ethical Corporation.
Esty, Daniel C. 2004. “Environmental Protection in the Information Age.” New York Law Review 79: 115–211.
Esty, Daniel C. 2006. “Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law.” Yale Law Journal 115: 1490–1562.
Franck, Thomas M. 1988. “Legitimacy in the International System.” American Journal of Internal Law 82: 705–759.
Franck, Thomas M. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, Jody. 2000. “The Private Role in Public Governance.” New York University Law Review 75: 543–675.
Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek. 2004. “How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law.” Duke Law Journal 54: 621–704.
Green, Maria. 2001. “What We Talk About When We Talk About Indicators: Current Approaches to Human Rights Measurement.” Human Rights Quarterly 23: 1062–1097.
Gunther, Marc. 2010. “Investors Urge More Tech Firms to Follow Intel's Lead and Embrace Green.” GREENBIZ Blog, June 1.
Guzman, Andrew T. 2010. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Guzman, Andrew T., and Meyer, Timothy L.. 2010. “International Soft Law.” Journal of Legal Analysis 2: 171–225.
Hathaway, Oona A. 2005. “Between Power and Principle: An Integrated Theory of International Law.” University of Chicago Law Review 72: 469–536.
Hess, David. 2008. “The Three Pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance Regulation: Disclosure, Dialogue, and Development.” Business Ethics Quarterly 18: 447–482.
Ioannou, Ioannis, and Serafeim, George. 2012. “The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting.” Harvard Business School Research Working Paper No. 11–100.
Karkkainen, Bradley C. 2001. “Information as Environmental Regulation: TRI and Performance Benchmarking, Precursor to a New Paradigm?Georgetown Law Journal 89: 257–370.
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Stewart, Richard B.. 2005. “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems 68; 15–62.
Kinley, David, and Tadaki, Junko. 2004. “From Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law.” Virginia Journal of International Law 44: 931–1024.
Kleindorfer, Paul R., and Orts, Eric W.. 1998. “Informational Regulation of Environmental Risks.” Risk Analysis 18: 155–170.
Koops, Bert-Jaap. 2008. “Criteria for Normative Technology: The Acceptability of ‘Code as Law’ in Light of Democratic and Constitutional Values.” In Brownsword, Roger and Yeung, Karen, eds., Regulatory Technologies: Legal Futures, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes, 157–174. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
KPMG International. 2008. “KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting.”
KPMG International. 2010. Carrots and Sticks: Promoting Transparency and Sustainability.
Kysar, Douglas A. 2010. Regulating from Nowhere: Environmental Law and the Search for Objectivity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kysar, Douglas A., and Salzman, James. 2008. “Foreword: Making Sense of Information for Environmental Protection.” Texas Law Review 86: 1347–1364.
Landis, James M. 1938. The Administrative Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Leavoy, Paul. 2010. “Does CSR Reporting Help the Planet, or Just Help Reporting?” Greenbiz Blog, September 30.
Levy, David L., Brown, Halina Szejnwald and de Jong, Martin. 2010. “The Contested Politics of Corporate Governance: The Case of the Global Reporting Initiative.” Business and Society 49: 88–115.
Lobel, Orly. 2004. “The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought.” Minnesota Law Review 89: 342–470.
MacLean, Richard, and Rebernak, Kathee. 2007. “Closing the Credibility Gap: The Challenges of Corporate Responsibility Reporting.” Environmental Quality Management 16: 1–6.
Manetti, Giacomo, and Becatti, Lucia. 2009. “Assurance Services for Sustainability Reports: Standards and Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Business Ethics 87: 289–298.
Mattli, Walter, and Büthe, Tim. 2005. “Global Private Governance: Lessons from a National Model of Setting Standards in Accounting.” Law and Contemporary Problems 68: 225–262.
Meidinger, Errol. 2006. “The Administrative Law of Global Private-Public Regulation: The Case of Forestry.” European Journal of International Law 17: 47–87.
Nazari, Mehrdad. 2011. “GRI Reporting Grows by 30% in USA and 50% in Canada.” PRIZMA Blog, March 9.
O'Dwyer, Brendan, and Owen, David L.. 2005. “Assurance Statement Practice in Environmental, Social and Sustainability Reporting: A Critical Evaluation.” British Accounting Review 37: 205–229.
Pizzani, Lori. 2010. “Disclosing Environmental Risks.” CFA Magazine, September–October.
Power, Michael. 2007. Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Power, Michael. 2004. The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty. London: Demos.
Ratner, Steven R. 2001. “Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility.” Yale Law Journal 111: 443–546.
Ruggie, John Gerard. 2007. “Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda.” American Journal of International Law 101: 819–840.
Sarfaty, Galit A. 2012. Values in Translation: Human Rights and the Culture of the World Bank. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Sarfaty, Galit A. 2009. “Why Culture Matters in International Institutions: the Marginality of Human Rights at the World Bank.” American Journal of International Law 103: 647–683.
Shaffer, Gregory C., and Pollack, Mark A.. 2010. “Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists in International Governance.” Minnesota Law Review 94: 706–799.
Spence, David B., and Cross, Frank. 2000. “A Public Choice Case for the Administrative State.” Georgetown Law Journal 89: 97–142.
Stephan, Paul B. 2011. “Privatizing International Law.” Virginia Law Review 97: 1573–1664.
Sugarman, Stephen D., and Sandman, Nirit. 2007. “Fighting Childhood Obesity Through Performance-Based Regulation of the Food Industry.” Duke Law Journal 56: 1403–1490.
Sunstein, Cass R. 1999. “Informational Regulation and Informational Standing: Akins and Beyond.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 147: 613–675.
Tilt, Carol A. 2009. “Corporate Responsibility, Accounting and Accountants.” In Idowu, Samuel O. and Filho, Walter Leal, eds., Professionals’ Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility, 11–32. London and Hamburg: Springer.
United Nations Environment Programme, KPMG, Global Reporting Initiative and Unit of Corporate Governance in Africa, University in Stellenbosch Business School. 2010. “Carrots and Sticks – Promoting Transparency and Sustainability: an Update on Trends in Voluntary and Mandatory Approaches to Sustainability Reporting.”
Vandenbergh, Michael P. 2007. “The New Wal-Mart Effect: The Role of Private Contracting in Global Governance.” UCLA Law Review 54: 913–970.