Part II - Diverse Public Reason
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 October 2022
Edited by
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Public Reason and DiversityReinterpretations of Liberalism, pp. 177 - 265Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
References
Arthur, WB (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, I (1990) The apotheosis of the romantic will. In: Henry, Hardy (ed.) The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 207–37.Google Scholar
Ewin, EW (1991) Virtues and Rights: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Gaus, G (2015) Public reason liberalism. In: Steven, Wall (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–40.Google Scholar
Gaus, G (2016a) The Tyranny of the Ideal: Justice in a Diverse Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, G (2016b) The Commonwealth of Bees: on the impossibility of justice-through-ethos. Social Philosophy & Policy 96–121.Google Scholar
Gaus, G (2016c) Social morality and the primacy of individual perspectives. Review of Austrian Economics. DOI 10.1007/s11138–016-0358-8.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D (1998) Public reason. In: D’Agostino, F and Gaus, GF (eds) Public Reason. Brookeville: Ashgate, pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
Habermas, J (1995) Reconciliation through the public use of reason: remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy 92: 109–131.Google Scholar
Kalai, E (1977) Proportional solutions to bargaining situations. Econometrica 45: 1623–1630.Google Scholar
Kalai, E and Smorodinsky, M (1975) Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43: 513–518.Google Scholar
Kant, I (1999 [1797]) The Metaphysical Elements of Justice. Ladd, John (transl., 2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Rawls, J (1999a) A Theory of Justice, rev ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J (1999b) An outline of a decision procedure for ethics. In: Samuel, Freeman (ed.) John Rawls: Collected Papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Rawls, J (2005) Political Liberalism. expanded ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schotter, A and Sopher, B (2003) Social learning and coordination conventions in intergenerational games. Journal of Political Economy 111: 498–529.Google Scholar
Thrasher, J (2014) Uniqueness and symmetry in bargaining theories of justice. Philosophical Studies 167: 683–699.Google Scholar
Williams, B (1981) Conflict of values. In: Williams, B (ed.) Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Bicchieri, C. (2016). Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. (2005). Group-Beneficial Norms Can Spread Rapidly in a Structured Population. In: The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 227–40.Google Scholar
Colander, D. and Kupers, R. (2014). Complexity and the Art of Public Policy: Solving Society’s Problems from the Bottom Up. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, F. (2010). Naturalizing Epistemology: Thomas Kuhn and the ‘Essential Tension.’ London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, F. (2013). The Orders of Public Reason. Analytic Philosophy, vol. 54 (March): 129–155.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. (2016). The Tyranny of the Ideal: Justice in a Diverse Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. (2017a). The Open Society and Its Friends: With Friends Like These, Who Needs Enemies? The Critique, January 15, 2017, www.thecritique.com/articles/open-society-and-its-friends. Accessed May 23, 2017.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. (2017b). Social Morality and the Primacy of Individual Perspectives. Review of Austrian Economics, vol. 30: 377–396.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. (2017c). Self-Organizing Moral Systems: Beyond Social Contract Theory. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, vol. 17: 119–147, https://doi.org.10.1177/1470594X17719425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, G. (2018). The Priority of Social Morality. In Morality, Governance, and Social Institutions: Reflections on Russell Hardin, edited by Christiano, Thomas, Creppell, Ingrid and Knight, Jack. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. and Van Schoelandt, C. (2017). Consensus on What? Convergence for What? Four Models of Political Liberalism. Ethics, vol. 128: 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1964 [2014]). The Theory of Complex Phenomena. In: The Market and Other Orders, edited by Caldwell, Bruce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 257–266.Google Scholar
Hesse, M. B. (1966). Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, James (2014). Models Among the Political Theorists. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 58 (July): 547–560.Google Scholar
Kogelmann, B. (2017). Agreement, All the Way Up: An Essay on Public Reason and Theory Choice. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, second edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lane, R. (2017). The Complexity of Self Government: Politics from the Bottom Up. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, D. M. and Peart, S. J. (2017). Escape from Democracy: The Role of Experts and the Public in Economic Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1986 [2014]). An Agenda for the Study of Institutions. In: Choice, Rules and Collective Action. Ed. Sabetti, Fillippo and Aligica, Paul Dragos. Essex: ECPR Press, pp. 97–119.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1972 [1999]). Polycentricity (Part 2). In: Polycentricity and Local Public Economies. Ed. McGinnis, Michael D.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 119–38.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. and Ostrom, E. (1977 [1999]). Public Goods and Public Choices. In: Polycentricity and Local Public Economies. Ed. McGinnis, Michael D.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 75–103.Google Scholar
Page, S. E. (2016). Not Half Bad: A Modest Criterion for Inclusion. In: Complexity and Evolution: Toward a New Synthesis for Economics. E. Wilson, David S. and Kirman, Alan. Cambridge, ma: MIT Press, pp. 319–26.Google Scholar
Poundstone, W. (1992). Prisoner’s Dilemma: John von Neumann, Game Theory, and the Puzzle of the Bomb. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2005). Political Liberalism. Expanded edn. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2007) Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. Ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Third edn. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2017). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Expanded edn. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Vallier, K. (forthcoming). Must Politics Be War? Restoring Our Trust in the Open Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, M. (2013). Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar