Alder, J. ‘The Sublime and the Beautiful: Incommensurability and Human Rights’ [2006] PL697
Alexander, L.Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge University Press, 1998)
Alexy, R.Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as a Theory of Legal Justification (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989)
Alexy, R. ‘Rights, Legal Reasoning and Rational Discourse’ (1992) 5 Ratio Juris143
Alexy, R. ‘Discourse Theory and Human Rights’ (1996) 9 Ratio Juris209
Alexy, R. ‘Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Legal Discourse’ (1996) 17 Cardozo LR1027
Alexy, R. ‘On The Structure of Legal Principles’ (2000) 13 Ratio Juris294
Alexy, R.A Theory of Constitutional Rights, tr. J. Rivers (Oxford University Press, 2002)
Alexy, R. ‘Constitutional Rights, Balancing and Rationality’ (2003) 16 Ratio Juris131
Alexy, R. ‘On Balancing and Subsumption. A Structural Comparison’ (2003) 16 Ratio Juris433
Alexy, R. ‘On Two Juxtapositions: Concept and Nature, Law and Philosophy. Some Comments on Joseph Raz’s “Can There Be a Theory of Law?”’ (2007) 20 Ratio Juris162
Alexy, R. ‘Thirteen Replies’ in G. Pavlakos (ed.), Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007)
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Legislative Supremacy and the Rule of Law: Democracy and Constitutionalism’ (1985) 44 CLJ111
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Dworkin and Dicey: The Rule of Law as Integrity’ (1988) 8 OJLS266
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Constitutional Rights and Common Law’ (1991) 11 OJLS453
Allan, T. R. S. ‘The Rule of Law as the Rule of Reason: Consent and Constitutionalism’ (1999) 115 LQR221
Allan, T. R. S.Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 2001)
Allan, T. R. S. ‘The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review: Conceptual Conundrum or Interpretive Inquiry?’ (2002) 61 CLJ87
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Constitutional Dialogue and the Justification of Judicial Review’ (2003) 23 OJLS563
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Doctrine and Theory in Administrative Law: An Elusive Quest for the Limits of Jurisdiction’ [2003] PL429
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Common Law Reason and the Limits of Judicial Deference’ in D. Dyzenhaus (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004)
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Legislative Supremacy and Legislative Intention: Interpretation, Meaning and Authority’ (2004) 63 CLJ685
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Legislative Supremacy and Legislative Intent: A Reply to Professor Craig’ (2004) 24 OJLS563
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of “Due Deference”’ (2006) 65 CLJ671
Allison, J. ‘The Procedural Reason for Judicial Restraint’ [1994] PL452
Andenas, M.English Public Law and the Common Law of Europe (London: Key Haven, 1998)
Andenas, M. and S. Zleptnig. ‘Proportionality and Balancing in WTO Law: A Comparative Perspective’ (2007) 20 Cambridge Review of International Affairs71
Arai-Takahashi, Y.The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Oxford: Intersentia, 2002)
Arden, A. ‘Doherty: How Far Did the Pendulum Swing?’ (2008) 11 HLR93
Arden, A. ‘Doherty: The Facts of the Matter’ (2008) 11 HLR96
Arden, M. ‘Human Rights in the Age of Terrorism’ (2005) 121 LQR604
Arthurs, H. W. ‘Rethinking Administrative Law: A Slightly Dicey Business’ (1979) 17 Osgoode Hall LJ1
Atrill, S. ‘Keeping the Executive in the Picture: A Reply to Professor Leigh’ [2003] PL41
Baker, A. ‘Proportionality and Employment Discrimination in the UK’ (2008) 37 ILJ305
Baker, A. ‘Proportional, Not Strict, Scrutiny: Against a U.S. “Suspect Classifications” under Article 14 ECHR in the UK’ (2008) 56 Am J Comp L847
Baldwin, R.Rules and Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995)
Bamforth, N. and P. Leyland (eds.). Public Law in a Multi-layered Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003)
Barber, N. W. and A. L. Young. ‘The Rise of Prospective Henry VIII Clauses and their Implications for Sovereignty’ [2003] PL112
Barendt, E. ‘Separation of Powers and Constitutional Government’ [1995] PL599
Beatson, J., M. Matthews and M. Elliott. Administrative Law: Text and Materials, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2005)
Beatson, J.et al. Human Rights: Judicial Protection in the United Kingdom (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2008)
Beatty, D. M.Constitutional Law in Theory and Practice (Toronto University Press, 1995)
Beatty, D. M.Ultimate Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 2004)
Beatty, D. M. (ed.). Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994)
Beaudoin, G. A. and E. P. Mendes. (eds.). The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 3rd edn (Toronto: Carswell, 1996)
Beloff, M. J. ‘The Concept of “Deference in Public Law”’ [2006] JR213
Berlin, I.Liberty (Oxford University Press, 2002)
Bilder, M. S. ‘The Corporate Origins of Judicial Review’ (2006) 116 Yale LJ502
Black-Branch, J. L. ‘Powers of Detention of Suspected International Terrorists under the United Kingdom Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001: Dismantling the Cornerstones of a Civil Society’ (2002) 27 EL Rev19
Blake, N. ‘Judicial Review of Discretion in Human Rights Cases’ [1997] EHRLR391
Blake, N. ‘Importing Proportionality: Clarification or Confusion’ [2002] EHRLR19
Bonner, D., H. Fenwick and S. Harris-Short. ‘Judicial Approaches to the Human Rights Act’ (2003) 52 ICLQ549
Boyron, S. ‘Proportionality in English Administrative Law: A Faulty Tranlsation?’ (1992) 12 OJLS237
Bradley, A. ‘Judicial Independence under Attack’ [2003] PL397
Búrca, G. de. ‘The Principle of Proportionality and its Application in EC Law’ (1993) Yearbook of European Law105
Búrca, G. de. ‘Proportionality & Wednesbury Unreasonableness: The Influence of European Legal Concepts on UK Law’ in M. Andenas (ed.), English Public Law and the Common Law of Europe (London: Key Haven, 1998)
Busch, L. ‘Standards of Review of Administrative Decision-making and the Role of Deference in Australian Public Law’ [2006] JR363
Cane, P.Administrative law, 4th edn (Oxford University Press, 2004)
Carnwath, R. ‘The Reasonable Limits of Local Authority Powers’ [1996] PL244
Carnwath, R. ‘Tribunal Justice – A New Start’ [2009] PL48
Choudhry, S. ‘So What is the Real Legacy of Oakes? Two Decades of Proportionality Analysis under the Canadian Charter’s Section 1’ (2006) 34 Supreme Court Law Review501
Claus, L. ‘Montesquieu’s Mistakes and the True Meaning of Separation’ (2005) 25 OJLS419
Clayton, G. ‘Prediction or Precondition? The House of Lords Judgment in Huang & Kashmiri’ (2007) 21 JIANL311
Clayton, R. ‘Regaining a Sense of Proportion: The Human Rights Act And the Proportionality Principle’ [2001] EHRLR504
Clayton, R. ‘Developing Principles for Human Rights’ [2002] EHRLR175
Clayton, R. ‘The Limits of What’s “Possible”: Statutory Construction under the Human Rights Act’ [2002] EHRLR559
Clayton, R. ‘Proportionality and the HRA 1998: Implications for Substantive Review’ [2002] JR124
Clayton, R. ‘Judicial Deference and “Democratic Dialogue”: The Legitimacy of Judicial Intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2004] PL33
Clayton, R. ‘Principles for Judicial Deference’ [2006] JR109
Clayton, R. ‘The Human Rights Act Six Years On: Where Are We Now?’ [2007] EHRLR11
Clayton, R., A. Ruck Keene and R. Dunlop. ‘Key Human Rights Act Cases in the Last 12 Months’ [2004] EHRLR614
Clayton, R. and K. Ghaly. ‘Shifting Standards of Review’ [2007] JR210
Cohn, M. ‘Judicial Activism in the House of Lords: A Composite Constitutionalist Approach’ [2007] PL95
Cooke of Thorndon, Lord. ‘The Discretionary Heart of Administrative Law’ in C. Forsythand I. Hare, The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Administrative Law Essays in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997)
Coppel, J. and M. Supperstone. ‘Judicial Review after the Human Rights Act’ [1999] EHRLR301
Costello, C. ‘The Bosphorus Ruling of the European Court of Human Rights: Fundamental Rights and Blurred Boundaries in Europe’ (2006) 6 (1) HRLR87
Craig, P.Public Law and Democracy in the United Kingdom and the United States of America (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990)
Craig, P. ‘Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review’ (1998) 57 CLJ63
Craig, P. ‘Competing Models of Judicial Review’ [1999] PL428
Craig, P. ‘Unreasonableness and Proportionality in UK Law’ in E. Ellis (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999)
Craig, P. ‘Public Law, Political Theory and Legal Theory’ [2000] PL211
Craig, P. ‘The Courts, the Human Rights Act and Judicial Review’ (2001) 117 LQR589
Craig, P. ‘Constitutional Foundations, The Rule of Law and Supremacy’ [2003] PL92
Craig, P. ‘The Common Law, Shared Power and Judicial Review’ (2004) 24 OJLS237
Craig, P. ‘Fundamental Principles of Administrative Law’ in D. Feldman (ed.), English Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2004).
Craig, P.Administrative Law, 6th edn (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2008)
Craig, P. and R. Rawlings (eds.). Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow (Oxford University Press, 2003)
Craig, P. and A. Tomkins (eds.). Executive and Public Law: Power and Accountability in Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press, 2006)
Dennis, I. ‘Reverse Onuses and the Presumption of Innocence: In Search of Principle’ [2005] Crim LR901
Dicey, A. V.Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, ed. E. C. S. Wade, 10th edn (London: MacMillan, 1959)
Dickson, B. ‘Safe in their Hands? Britain’s Law Lords and Human Rights’ (2006) 26 LS329
Dijk, P. vanet al. (eds.). Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, 4th edn (Oxford: Intersentia, 2006)
Dworkin, R.Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977)
Dworkin, R. ‘Rights as Trumps’ in J. Waldron (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press, 1984)
Dyson, Lord Justice. ‘Some Thoughts on Judicial Deference’ [2006] JR103
Dyzenhaus, D. ‘The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy’ in M. Taggart (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997)
Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.). The Unity of Public Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004)
Dyzenhaus, D., M. Hunt and M. Taggart. ‘The Principle of Legality in Administrative Law: Internationalisation as Constitutionalisation’ (2001) 1 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal5
Edwards, R. A. ‘Reading Down Legislation under the Human Rights Act’ (2000) 20 LS353
Edwards, R. A. ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act’ (2002) 65 MLR859
Ekins, R. ‘Judicial Supremacy and the Rule of Law’ (2003) 119 LQR127
Elliott, M. ‘The Demise of Parliamentary Sovereignty? The Implications for Justifying Judicial Review’ (1999) 115 LQR119
Elliott, M.The Constitution and the Foundations of Judicial Review (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)
Elliott, M. ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Standard of Substantive Review’ (2001) 60 CLJ301
Elliott, M. ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Standard of Substantive Review’ [2002] JR97
Elliott, M. ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and the New Constitutional Order: Legislative Freedom, Political Reality and Convention’ (2002) 22 Legal Studies340
Ellis, E. (ed.). The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart, 1999)
Emiliou, N.The Principle of Proportionality in European Law: A Comparative Study (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996)
Evans, C. and S. Evans. ‘Legislative Scrutiny Committees and Parliamentary Conceptions of Human Rights’ [2006] PL785
Ewing, K. D. ‘The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy’ (1999) 62 MLR79
Ewing, K. D. ‘The Futility of the Human Rights Act’ [2004] PL829
Ewing, K. D. and J. C. Tham. ‘The Continuing Futility of the Human Rights Act’ [2008] PL668
Feldman, D. ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and Constitutional Principles’ (1999) 19 LS165
Feldman, D. ‘Proportionality and the Human Rights Act 1998’ in E. Ellis (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999)
Feldman, D. ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny of Legislation and Human Rights’ [2002] PL323–48
Feldman, D. ‘Can and Should Parliament Protect Human Rights?’ (2004) 10 European Public Law635
Feldman, D. ‘The Impact of Human Rights on the Legislative Process’ (2004) 25 Statute Law Review91
Feldman, D. ‘None, One or Several? Perspectives on the UK’s Constitution(s)’ (2005) 64 CLJ329
Feldman, D. ‘Proportionality and Discrimination under Anti-Terrorism Legislation’ (2005) 64 CLJ271
Feldman, D. ‘Human Rights, Terrorism and Risk: The Roles of Politicians and Judges’ [2006] PL364
Feldman, D. ‘Constitutionalism, Deliberative Democracy and Human Rights’ in J. Morison, K. McEvoy and G. Anthony (eds.), Judges, Transition and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007)
Feldman, D. ‘Institutional Roles and Meanings of “Compatibility” under the Human Rights Act 1998’ in H. Fenwick, G. Phillipson and R. Masterman (eds.), Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2007)
Feldman, D. (ed.). English Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2004)
Fenwick, H., G. Phillipson and R. Masterman (eds.). Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2007)
Foley, B. ‘Diceyan Ghosts: Deference Rights, Policy and Spatial Distinctions’ (2006) 13 Dublin University Law Journal77
Fordham, M. ‘Common Law Proportionality’ [2002] JR110
Fordham, M.Judicial Review Handbook, 5th edn (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008)
Fordham, M., and T. de la Mare. ‘Identifying the Principles of Proportionality’ in J. Jowell and J. Cooper (eds.), Understanding Human Rights Principles (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)
Forsyth, C. ‘Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review’ (1996) 55 CLJ122
Forsyth, C. (ed.). Judicial Review and the Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000)
Forsyth, C. and M. Elliott. ‘The Legitimacy of Judicial Review’ [2003] PL286
Forsyth, C. and E. Kong. ‘The Constitution and Prospective Henry VIII Clauses’ [2003] JR17
Fredman, S.‘Judging Democracy: The Role of the Judiciary under the HRA 1998’ (2000) 53 Current Legal Problems99
Friedman, D. ‘Defending the Essence of the Right: Judicial Discretion and the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2001] Arch News6
Friedman, D. ‘From Due Deference to Due Process: Human Rights Litigation in the Criminal Law’ [2002] EHRLR216
Fuller, L. L. ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’ (1978) 92 Harv LR353
Galligan, D. J. ‘The Nature and Function of Policies within Discretionary Power’ [1976] PL332
Galligan, D. J.Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986)
Galligan, D. J.Due Process and Fair Procedures: A Study of Administrative Procedures (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)
Galligan, D. J. ‘Judicial Review and Democratic Principles: Two Theories’ in M. Tushnet (ed.), Bills of Rights (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007)
Galligan, D. J.Law in Modern Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007)
Ganz, G. ‘Delegated Legislation: A Necessary Evil or a Constitutional Outrage’ in P. Leyland and T. Woods (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future: Old Constraints and New Horizons (London: Blackstone, 1997)
Gearty, C. ‘Reconciling Parliamentary Democracy and Human Rights’ (2002) 118 LQR248
Gearty, C.Principles of Human Rights Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2004)
Gearty, C. ‘Rethinking Civil Liberties in a Counter-Terrorism World’ [2007] EHRLR111
Geddis, A. ‘You Can’t Say “God” on the Radio: Freedom of Expression, Religious Advertising and the Broadcast Media after Murphy v. Ireland’ [2004] EHRLR181
Geenens, R. ‘The Deliberative Model of Democracy: Two Critical Remarks’ (2007) 20 Ratio Juris355
Genn, H. and G. Richardson (eds.). Administrative Law and Government Action: The Courts and Alternative Mechanisms of Review (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)
Gordon, R. ‘Structures or Mantras? Some New Puzzles in HRA Decision Making’ [2006] JR136
Green, N. ‘Proportionality and the Supremacy of Parliament in the UK’ in E. Ellis (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999)
Greer, S. ‘Constitutionalising Adjudication under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2003) 23 OJLS405
Greer, S. ‘“Balancing” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas–Alexy Debate’ (2004) 63 CLJ412
Griffiths, J. A. G. ‘The Constitutional Significance of Delegated Legislation in England’ (1950) 48 Mich LR1079
Griffiths, J. A. G. ‘The Political Constitution’ (1979) 42 MLR1
Habermas, J.Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, tr. W. Rehg (Oxford: Polity Press, 1996)
Hamer, D. ‘The Presumption of Innocence and Reverse Burdens: A Balancing Act’ (2007) 66 CLJ142
Harlow, C. ‘Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values’ (2006) 17 EJIL187
Harlow, C. and R. Rawlings. Law and Administration, 2nd edn (London: Butterworths, 1997)
Harris, B. V. ‘The “Third Source” of Authority for Government Action Revisited’ (2007) 123 LQR255
Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)
Hayek, F. A.Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy (London: Routledge, 1982)
Hickman, T. ‘The Reasonableness Principle: Reassessing its Place in the Public Sphere’ (2004) 63 CLJ166
Hickman, T. ‘Constitutional Dialogue, Constitutional Theories and the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2005] PL306
Hickman, T. ‘Proportionality: Comparative Law Lessons’ [2007] JR31
Hickman, T. ‘The Courts and Politics after the Human Rights Act: A Comment’ [2008] 84
Hickman, T. ‘The Substance and Structure of Proportionality’ [2008] PL694
Hickman, T.Public Law after the Human Rights Act (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010)
Hiebert, J. L. ‘Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR Help Facilitate a Culture of Rights?’ (2006) 4 IJCL1
Hiebert, J. L. ‘Parliamentary Bills of Rights: An Alternative Model?’ (2006) 69 MLR7
Hoffman, Lord. ‘A Sense of Proportion’ (1997) 32 Irish Jurist49
Hoffman, Lord. ‘The Influence of the European Principle of Proportionality upon UK Law’ in E. Ellis (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999)
Hogan, G. and G. Whyte. JM Kelly: The Irish Constitution, 4th edn (Dublin: Tottel, 2003).
Hogg, P. W.Constitutional Law of Canada, 4th edn (Toronto: Carswell, 1997)
Hogg, P. W. and A. A. Bushell. ‘The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn’t Such a Bad Thing After All)’ (1997) 35 Osgoode Hall LJ75
Hohfeld, W. N. ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ (1913) 23 Yale LJ16
Hohfeld, W. N. ‘Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ (1917) 26 Yale LJ710
Hunt, M. ‘Sovereignty’s Blight: Why Contemporary Public Law Needs the Concept of ‘Due Deference’ in N. Bamforth and P. Leyland (eds.), Public Law in a Multi-layered Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003)
Huscroft, G.Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2008)
Hutton, Lord. ‘Reasonableness and the Common Law’ (2004) 55 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly242
Idriss, M. M. ‘The House of Lords, Shabina Begum and Proportionality’ [2006] JR239
Irvine of Lairg, Lord. ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act: Parliament, the Courts and the Executive’ [2003] PL308
Irvine of Lairg, Lord (ed.). Human Rights, Constitutional Law and the Development of the English Legal System: Selected Essays (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003)
Jowell, J. ‘Beyond The Rule Of Law: Towards Constitutional Judicial Review’ [2000] PL671
Jowell, J. ‘Judicial Deference: Servility, Civility or Institutional Capacity’ (2003) PL592
Jowell, J. ‘Judicial Deference and Human Rights: A Question of Competence’ in P. Craig and R. Rawlings (eds.), Law and Administration in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2003)
Jowell, J. ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty under the New Constitutional Hypothesis’ [2006] PL562
Jowell, J. and J. Cooper (eds.). Understanding Human Rights Principles (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)
Jowell, J. and A. Lester. ‘Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law’ [1987] PL368
Jowell, J. and A. Lester‘Proportionality: Neither Novel Nor Dangerous’ in J. Jowell and D. Oliver (eds.), New Directions in Judicial Review Administration (London: Stevens, 1988)
JowellJ. and D. Oliver (eds.). New Directions in Judicial Review Administration (London: Stevens, 1988)
Jowell, J. and A. LesterThe Changing Constitution, 5th edn (OxfordUnivesity Press, 2004)
Kavanagh, A. ‘Comparative Perspectives on Constitutional Law: Implications for the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2004) 10 European Public Law161
Kavanagh, A. ‘The Elusive Divide between Interpretation and Legislation under the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2004) 24 OJLS259
Kavanagh, A. ‘Statutory Interpretation and Human Rights after Anderson: A More Contextual Approach’ [2004] PL539
Kavanagh, A. ‘Unlocking the Human Rights Act: The “Radical” Approach to Section 3(1) Revisited’ [2005] EHRLR259
Kavanagh, A. ‘The Role of Parliamentary Intention in Adjudication under the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2006) 26 OJLS179
Kavanagh, A. ‘Choosing Between Sections 3 and 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Reasoning after Ghaidan v. Mendoza’ in H. Fenwick, G. Phillipson and R. Masterman (eds.), Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007)
Kavanagh, A. ‘Deference or Defiance? The Limits of the Judicial Role in Constitutional Adjudication’ in G. Huscroft (ed.), Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2008)
Kavanagh, A.Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2009)
Kavanagh, A. ‘Defending Deference in Public Law and Constitutional Theory’ (2010) 126 LQR222
Keene, Sir D. ‘Principles of Deference under the Human Rights Act 1998’ in H. Fenwick, G. Phillipson and R. Masterman (eds.), Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2007)
Kentridge, S. ‘The Incorporation of the European Convention’ in J. Beatson, C. Forsyth and I. Hare (eds.), Constitutional Reform in the United Kingdom (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998)
King, J. ‘Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint’ (2008) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies409
Kirchhof, P. and D. P. Kommers (eds.). Germany and its Basic Law: Past, Present and Future – A German-American Symposium (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1993)
Klatt, M. ‘Taking Rights Less Seriously. A Structural Analysis of Judicial Discretion’ (2007) 20 Ratio Juris506
Klug, F. ‘The Human Rights Act – A “Third Way” or “Third Wave” Bill of Rights’ [2001] EHRLR361
Klug, F. ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2003] EHRLR125
Knight, C. ‘Proportionality, the Decision-maker and the House of Lords’ (2007) 12 JR221
Knight, C. ‘The Test that Dare Not Speak its Name: Proportionality Comes Out of the Closet?’ [2007] JR117
Kommers, D. P.The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2nd edn (Durham NC: Duke University Press, 1997)
Kumm, M. ‘Political Liberalism and the Structure of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement’ in G. Pavlakos (ed.), Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007)
Kyritsis, D. ‘Representation and Waldron’s Objection to Judicial Review’ (2006) 26 OJLS733
Lajoie, A. and H. Quillinan. ‘Emerging Constitutional Norms: Continuous Judicial Amendment of the Constitution: The Proportionality Test as a Moving Target’ (1992) 55 Law & Contemporary Problems285
Laws, Sir J. ‘Judicial Remedies and the Constitution’ (1994) 57 MLR213
Laws, Sir J. ‘Law and Democracy’ [1995] PL72
Laws, Sir J. ‘The Constitution: Morals and Rights’ [1996] PL622
Lazarus, L. ‘Conceptions of Liberty Deprivation’ (2006) 69 MLR738
Leigh, I.Law, Politics and Local Democracy (OxfordUniversity Press, 2000)
Leigh, I. ‘Taking Rights Proportionately: Judicial Review, The Human Rights Act and Strasbourg’ [2002] PL265
Leigh, I. ‘The Standard of Judicial Review after the Human Rights Act’ in H. Fenwick, G. Phillipson and R. Masterman (eds.), Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007)
Leigh, I. and R. Masterman. Making Rights Real: The Human Rights Act in its First Decade (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008)
LesterA. ‘The Art of the Possible: Interpreting Statutes under the Human Rights Act’ [1998] EHRLR665
LesterA. ‘Developing Constitutional Principles of Public Law’ [2001] PL684
LesterA. ‘The Human Rights Act 1998: Five Years On’ (2004) 3 EHRLR258
LesterA. ‘The Utility of the Human Rights Act: A Reply to Keith Ewing’ [2005] PL249
LesterA. and D. Pannick (eds.). Human Rights Law and Practice, 2nd edn (London: LexisNexis UK, 2004)
Letsas, G. ‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’ (2006) 26 OJLS705
Leyland, P.The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007)
Leyland, P. and T. Woods. ‘Public Law History and Theory: Some Notes towards a New Foundationalism: Part 1’ in P. Leyland and T. Woods (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future: Old Constraints and New Horizons (London: Blackstone, 1997)
Leyland, P. and T. Woods‘Public Law History and Theory: Some Notes towards a New Foundationalism: Part 2: Some Contemporary Developments and a Sketch for the Future’ in P. Leyland and T. Woods (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future: Old Constraints and New Horizons (London: Blackstone, 1997)
Leyland, P. and T. Woods (eds.). Administrative Law Facing the Future: Old Constraints and New Horizons (London: Blackstone, 1997)
Lijphart, A.Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999)
Loughlin, M.Public Law and Political Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992)
Loughlin, M.Sword and Scales: An Examination of the Relationship between Law and Politics (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000)
Loughlin, M.The Idea of Public Law (OxfordUniversity Press, 2003)
Loughlin, M. ‘Constitutional Theory: A 25th Anniversary Essay’ (2005) 25 OJLS183
Loughlin, M. ‘Theory and Values in Public Law: An Interpretation’ [2005] PL48
Loughlin, M. ‘Towards a Republican Revival?’ (2006) 26 OJLS425
Loveland, I. ‘Does Homelessness Decision Making Engage Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights?’ [2003] EHRLR176
Loveland, I. ‘The Shifting Sands of Article 8 Jurisprudence in English Housing Law’ [2011] EHRLR151
McBride, J. ‘Proportionality and the European Convention on Human Rights’ in E. Ellis (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart, 1999)
McBride, J. ‘Imperfect Limits to Unacceptable Treatment’ (2000) 25 EL Rev31
McConnell, M. W. ‘The Importance of Humility in Judicial Review: A Comment on Ronald Dworkin’s “Moral Reading” of the Constitution’ (1997) 65 Fordham L Rev1269
MacCormick, N.Institutions of Law (OxfordUniversity Press, 2007)
McCracken, R. and G. Jones. ‘Article 8 ECHR, Gypsies, and Some Remaining Problems after South Buckinghamshire’ [2003] JPL382
McCrudden, C. and G. Chambers (eds.). Individual Rights and the Law in Britain (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)
MacDonald, I. ‘ECHR Article 8: Bringing the UK Courts Back in Step with Strasbourg’ [2008] JIANL293
Macdonald, R. St. J., F. Matscher and H. Petzold (eds.). European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993)
McGoldrick, D. ‘The United Kingdom’s Human Rights Act 1998 in Theory and Practice’ (2001) 50 ICLQ901
McHarg, A. ‘What Is Delegated Legislation?’ [2006] PL539
Mare, T. de la and D. Pievsky. ‘Impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on Judicial Review’ (2003) 8 JR221
Martin, M. and A. Horne. ‘Proportionality: Principles and Pitfalls – Some Lessons from Germany’ [2008] JR169
Masterman, R. ‘Taking the Strasbourg Jurisprudence into Account: Developing a “Municipal Law of Human Rights” under the Human Rights Act’ (2005) 54 ICLQ907
Masterman, R. ‘Aspiration or Foundation? The Status of the Strasbourg Jurisprudence and the “Convention Rights” in Domestic Law’ in H. Fenwick, G. Phillipson and R. Masterman (eds.), Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007)
Mead, D. ‘Swallowing the Camel, Straining at the Gnat: The Implications of Mendoza v Ghaidan’ [2003] EHRLR501
Melissaris, E. ‘Is Common Law Irrational? The Weberian “England Problem” Revisited’ (2004) 55 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly378
Menéndez, A. J. and Eriksen, E. O. (eds.). Arguing Fundamental Rights (Dordrecht: Springer, 2006)
Merieux, M. de. ‘Establishing the Democratic Credentials of Legislation: “R. v. Oakes” and Section 4 of the Human Rights Act (1998) UK’ (2001) 30 Comm L World Rev193
Merris, A. ‘Can We Speak Freely Now? Freedom Of Expression Under The Human Rights Act’ [2002] EHRLR750
Merryman, J. H.Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America, 2nd edn (Stanford University Press, 1985)
Morison, J., K. McEvoy and G. Anthony (eds.). Judges, Transition and Human Rights (OxfordUniversity Press, 2007)
Mountfield, H. ‘The Concept of Lawful Interference with Fundamental Rights’ in J. Jowell and J. Cooper (eds.), Understanding Human Rights Principles (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)
Mullender, R. ‘Privacy, Paedophilia and the European Convention on Human Rights: A Deontological Approach’ [1998] PL384
Nicol, D. ‘The Human Rights Act and the Politicians’ (2004) 24 LS451
Nicol, D. ‘Statutory Interpretation and Human Rights after Anderson’ [2004] PL274
Nicol, D. ‘Law and Politics after the Human Rights Act’ [2006] PL722
O’Brien, C. and J. Arkinstall. ‘Table of Cases under the Human Rights Act: Commentary’ [2002] EHRLR631
O’Brien, C. and J. Arkinstall‘Table of Cases under the Human Rights Act: Commentary’ [2002] EHRLR493
O’Brien, C. and J. Arkinstall‘Table of Cases under the Human Rights Act: Commentary’ [2002] EHRLR239
O’Brien, D. ‘Judicial Review under the Human Rights Act 1998: Legislative or Applied Review?’ [2007] EHRLR550
Oliver, D. ‘The Courts and the Policy Making Process’ in J. Jowell and D. Oliver (eds.), New Directions in Judicial Review Administration (London: Stevens, 1988)
O’Neill, A. ‘Fundamental Rights and the Constitutional Supremacy of Community Law in the United Kingdom after Devolution and the Human Rights Act’ [2002] PL742
Page, E. C.Governing By Numbers: Delegated Legislation and Everyday Policy-making (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)
Palmer, S. ‘A Wrong Turning: Article 3 ECHR and Proportionality’ (2006) 65 CLJ438
Pavlakos, G. (ed.). Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007)
Phillipson, G. ‘Deference, Discretion, and Democracy in the Human Rights Act Era’ (2007) 60 CLP40
Poole, T. ‘Dogmatic Liberalism? TRS Allan and the Common Law Constitution’ (2002) 65 MLR463
Poole, T. ‘Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism’ (2003) 23 OJLS435
Poole, T. ‘Harnessing the Power of the Past? Lord Hoffmann and the Belmarsh Detainees Case’ (2005) 32 Journal of Law & Society534
Poole, T. ‘Legitimacy, Rights and Judicial Review’ (2005) 25(2) OJLS697
Poole, T. ‘Of Headscarves and Heresies: The Denbigh High School Case and Public Authority’ [2005] PL685
Poole, T. ‘Questioning Common Law Constitutionalism’ (2005) 25 LS142
Poole, T. ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law’, LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 12/2007 (London: London School of Economics, 2007)
Poole, T. ‘The Return of Grand Theory in the Juridical Sciences?’ (2007) 70 MLR484
Poole, T. ‘Tilting at Windmills? Truth and Illusion in “The Political Constitution”’ (2007) 70 MLR250
Poole, T. ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law’ (2009) 68 CLJ142
Postema, G. J. ‘Classical Common Law Jurisprudence (Part I)’ (2002) Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal155
Postema, G. J. ‘Classical Common Law Jurisprudence (Part II)’ (2003) Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal1
Radford, M. ‘Mitigating the Democratic Deficit? Judicial Review and Ministerial Accountability’ in P. Leyland and T. Woods, Administrative Law Facing The Future: Old Constraints and New Horizons (Oxford: Blackstone, 1997)
Rawlings, R. ‘Review, Revenge and Retreat’ (2005) 68 MLR378
Rawlings, R. (ed.). Law, Society and Economy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997)
Rivers, J. ‘Fundamental Rights in the UK Human Rights Act’ in A. J. Menéndez and E. O. Eriksen (eds.), Arguing Fundamental Rights (Dordrecht: Springer, 2006)
Rivers, J. ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’ (2006) 65 CLJ174
Rivers, J. ‘Proportionality and Discretion in International and European Law’ in N. Tsagourias (ed.), Transnational Constitutionalism (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007)
Rivers, J. ‘Proportionality, Discretion and the Second Law of Balancing’ in G. Pavlakos (ed.), Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007)
Roberts, P. ‘Criminal Procedure, the Presumption of Innocence and Judicial Reasoning under the Human Rights Act’ in H. Fenwick, G. Phillipson and R. Masterman (eds.), Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007)
Rogers, N. ‘Immigration and the European Convention on Human Rights: Are New Principles Emerging?’ (2003) EHRLR53
Rubenfeld, J. ‘Legitimacy and Interpretation’ in L. Alexander, Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (CambridgeUniversity Press, 1998)
Rummens, S. ‘Democratic Deliberation as the Open-ended Construction of Justice’ (2007) 20 Ratio Juris335
Sales, P. and B. Hooper. ‘Proportionality and the Form of Law’ (2003) 119 LQR426.
Sandell, A. ‘Liberty, Fairness and the UK Control Order Cases: Two Steps Forward, Two Steps Back’ [2008] EHRLR 120
Saunders, C. ‘Separation of Powers and the Judicial Branch’ [2006] JR337
Sayeed, S. ‘Beyond the Language of “Deference”’ [2005] JR111
Schaeffer, A. ‘Linking Marleasing and s. 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2005] JR72
Schwarze, J.European Administrative Law (London: Sweet and Maxwell,1992)
Schwarze, J. (ed.). Administrative Law under European Influence: On the Convergence of the Administrative Laws of the EU Member States (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1996)
Shah, S. and T. Poole. ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lords’, LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 8/2009 (London: London School of Economics, 2009)
Singh, R. ‘Is there a Role for the “Margin of Appreciation” in National Law after the Human Rights Act?’ [1999] EHRLR15
Smith, S.A. deet al. De Smith’s Judicial Review, 6th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007)
Starmer, K. ‘Setting the Record Straight: Human Rights in an Era of International Terrorism’ [2007] EHRLR123
Stephens, R.The Independence of the Judiciary: The View from the Lord Chancellor’s Office (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)
Steyn, J. ‘The Weakest and Least Dangerous Department of Government’ [1997] PL84
Steyn, Lord. ‘Democracy through Law’ [2002] EHRLR723
Steyn, Lord. ‘Deference: A Tangled Story’ [2005] PL346
Sunkin, M. ‘Trends in Judicial Review and the Human Rights Act’ (2001) 21 Public Money and Management9
Sunstein, C. R. ‘Incommensurability and Valuation in Law’ (1994) 92 Mich LR779.
Supperstone, M., J. Goudie and P. Walker. Judicial Review, 4th edn (London: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2010)
Taggart, M.The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997)
Thomas, R.Legitimate Expectations and Proportionality in Administrative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000)
Tomkins, A. ‘Inventing Human Rights Law and Scholarship’ (1996) 16 OJLS153
Tomkins, A.The Constitution after Scott: Government Unwrapped (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998)
Tomkins, A. ‘In Defence of the Political Constitution’ (2002) 22 OJLS157
Tomkins, A.Public law (Oxford University Press, 2003)
Tomkins, A. ‘Readings of A v. Secretary Of State For The Home Department’ [2005] PL259
Tomkins, A.Our Republican Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005)
Tomkins, A. ‘The Struggle to Delimit Executive Power in Britain’ in P. Craig and A. Tomkins (eds.), Executive and Public Law: Power and Accountability in Comparative Perspective (OxfordUniversity Press, 2006)
Tremblay, L. ‘General Legitimacy of Judicial Review and the Fundamental Basis of Constitutional Law’ (2003) 23 OJLS525
Tsagourias, N. (ed.). Transnational Constitutionalism (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007)
Tsakyrakis, S. ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?’ (2009) 7 IJCL468
Turner, S. P.Liberal Democracy 3.0 (London: Sage, 2003)
Turpin, C. and A. Tomkins. British Government and the Constitution, 6th edn (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007)
Tushnet, M. ‘New Forms of Judicial Review and the Persistence of Rights and Democracy-based Worries’ (2003) 38 Wake Forest Law Review813
Tushnet, M. (ed.). Bills of Rights (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007)
Wade, H. W. R. and C. Forsyth. Administrative Law, 10th edn (OxfordUniversity Press, 2009)
Waldron, J. ‘Precommitment and Disagreement’ in L. Alexander (ed.), Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (CambridgeUniversity Press, 1998)
Waldron, J.Law and Disagreement (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999)
Waldron, J. ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’ (2006) 115 Yale LJ1346
Waldron, J. (ed.). Theories of Rights (OxfordUniversity Press, 1984)
Wicks, E. ‘The Greater Good? Issues of Proportionality and Democracy in the Doctrine of Necessity as Applied in Re A’ (2003) 32 Comm L World Rev15
Wong, G. ‘Towards the Nutcracker Principle: Reconsidering the Objections to Proportionality’ [2000] PL92
Woolf, Lord. ‘Droit Public: English Style’ [1995] PL57
Young, A. L. ‘Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza: Avoiding the Deference Trap’ [2005] PL23
Young, A. L.Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008)
Young, A. L. ‘In Defence of Due Deference’ (2009) 72 MLR554
Youngs, R.Sourcebook on German Law (London: Cavendish, 1994)
