Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T09:10:40.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Private Speech beyond Childhood: Testing the Developmental Hypothesis

from Part III - Symbols and Tools throughout the Life Span

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

By
José A. Sánchez Medina ,
David Alarcón Rubio  and
Manuel L. De la Mata Benítez
Edited by
Adam Winsler ,
Charles Fernyhough  and
Ignacio Montero
Adam Winsler
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Charles Fernyhough
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Ignacio Montero
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Get access

Summary

Western study of private speech has been mostly directed at looking for empirical data to test L. S. Vygotsky's hypotheses (Vygotsky, 1934/1987). The great majority of empirical studies have been focused on three main aspects of private speech: (a) its origin and evolution; (b) its cognitive function and relations with task performance; and (c) the structure of private speech productions (Berk, 1992; Díaz, 1992; Fuson, 1979; Krafft & Berk, 1998; Montero, de Dios, & Huertas, 2006; Winsler, 2006; Winsler, de León, Carlton, & Willson-Quayle, 2003; Winsler, Díaz, & Montero, 1997; Zivin, 1979).

The studies carried out on the origin, development, and function of private speech reflect the polemic maintained by J. Piaget and L. S. Vygotsky on its nature in the 1930s. For Piaget, egocentric speech is a subproduct of the general cognitive egocentrism that governs children's mental life during early childhood (3–4 years to 6–7 years). Egocentric speech lacks specific cognitive functionality and, therefore, is indicative of child cognitive immaturity. From the Piagetian perspective, it has to be expected that as the child is socialized and egocentrism decreases, the number of private speech productions will be reduced, until they disappear. On the contrary, Vygotsky's hypothesis on the internalization of language clearly contrasts with the ideas of Piaget, at the same time that it predicts a distinct relationship between private speech and age. According to Vygotsky, private speech has its origins in social speech, which regulates the child's first social interactions (Vygotsky, 1934/1987).

Type
Chapter
Information
Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-Regulation , pp. 188 - 198
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F. J. (1999). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. Modern Language Journal, 83, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, G., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Speaking as mediation: A study of L1 and L2 text recall tasks. Modern Language Journal, 78, 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azevedo, M., Sánchez, J. A., Alarcón, D., & Mata, M. (2002, June). Structure and function of egocentric speech in illiterate adults: A challenge to Vygotsky's notion of functional undifferentiation of speech. Paper presented at the fifth Congress of the International Society for Cultural Research and Activity Theory: Dealing with Diversity. Vrije Universiteit Ámsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Beaudichon, J. (1973). Nature and instrumental function of private speech in problem solving situations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 19, 117–135.Google Scholar
Behrend, D. A., Rosengren, K. S., & Perlmutter, M. (1989). A new look at children's private speech: The effects of age, task difficulty and parent presence. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 12, 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, L. E. (1986). Relationship of elementary school children's private speech to behavioral accompaniment to task, attention, and task performance. Developmental Psychology, 2, 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, L. E. (1992). Children's private speech: An overview of theory and the status of research. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. E. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 17–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berk, L. E. (2006). Foreword. In Montero, I. (Ed.), Current research trends in private speech: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Self-Regulatory Functions of Language. Madrid, Spain: Publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma.Google Scholar
Berk, L. E., & Garvin, R. A. (1984). Development of private speech among low-income Appalachian children. Developmental Psychology, 20, 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and the early childhood education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
Bivens, J. A., & Berk, L. E. (1990). A longitudinal study of the development of elementary school children's private speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 19, 443–463.Google Scholar
Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought. A psychological introduction. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mata, M. L., & Sánchez, J. A. (1991). Educación formal y acciones de agrupación y memoria en adultos: Un estudio microgenético. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 53, 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz, R. M. (1992). Methodological concerns in the study of private speech. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. E. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 55–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
DiCamilla, F. J., & Antón, M. (2004). Private speech: A study of language for thought in the collaborative interaction of language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 36–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, R. M., & Cheyne, J. A. (1999). Incidence and function of self-reported private speech in young adults: A self-verbalization questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 31, 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, R. M., & Cheyne, J. A. (2002). Private speech in young adults. Task difficulty, self-regulation, and psychological predication. Cognitive Development, 16, 889–906.Google Scholar
Duncan, R. M., & Pratt, M. W. (1997). Microgenetic changes in the quantity and quality of preschoolers' private speech. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frauenglass, M. H., & Díaz, R. M. (1985). Self-regulatory functions of children's private speech: A critical analysis of recent challenges to Vygotsky's theory. Developmental Psychology, 21, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, P. S. (1992). Assessment of private and inner speech of older adults in relation to depression. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. E. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 267–284). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Furrow, D. (1984). Social and private speech at two years. Child Development, 55, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furrow, D. (1992). Developmental trends in the differentiation of social and private speech. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. E. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 143–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fuson, K. C. (1979). The development of self-regulating aspects of speech: A review. In Zivin, G. (Ed.), The development of self-regulation through private speech (pp. 135–217). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gaskill, M. N., & Díaz, R. M. (1991). The relation between private speech and cognitive performance. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 53, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudena, P. P. (1987). The social nature of private speech of preschoolers during problem solving. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 10, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John-Steiner, V. (1992). Private speech among adults. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. E. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 285–296). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L., Yaeger, J., & Hjertholm, E. (1968). Private speech: Four studies and a review of theories. Child Development, 39, 691–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krafft, K. C., & Berk, L. E. (1998). Private speech in two preschools: Significance of open-ended activities and make-believe play for verbal self-regulation. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 637–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronk, C. M. (1994). Private speech in adolescents. Adolescence, 29, 781–804.Google ScholarPubMed
Lantolf, J. P. (1997). The function of language play in the acquisition of L2 Spanish. In Glass, W. R. & Perez-Leroux, A. T. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish: Vol. 2. Production, processing, and comprehension (pp. 3–24). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (2003). Intrapersonal communication and internalization in the second language classroom. In Kozulin, A. & Gindis, B. (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. Learning in doing (pp. 349–370). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, G. S. (2003). Student and instructor beliefs and attitudes about target language use, first language use, and anxiety. Report of a questionnaire survey. Modern Language Journal, 87, 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebscher, G., & Dailey-O'Cain, J. (2005). Learner code-switching in the content-based foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 89, 234–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, B. H., White, C. S., & Daugherty, M. (1994). Young children's private speech as a precursor to metacognitive strategy use during task engagement. Discourse Processes, 17, 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matuga, J. M. (2003). Children's private speech during algorithmic and heuristic drawing tasks. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 552–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, S. G. (1992). The use of private speech by adult second language learners: A cross-cultural study. Modern Language Journal, 76, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, S. G. (1994). Adult second language learners' use of private speech: A review of studies. Modern Language Journal, 78, 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, I., & Dios, M. J. (2006). Vygotsky was right. An experimental approach to the relationship between private speech and task performance. Estudios de Psicología, 27, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, I., Dios, M. J., & Huertas, J. A. (2006). The study of private speech as a window to analysing internal processes. The case of motivation. In Montero, I. (Ed.), Current research trends in private speech. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Self-Regulatory Functions of Language (pp. 223–234). Madrid, Spain: Publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma.Google Scholar
Murray, J. D. (1979). Spontaneous private speech and performance on a delayed match-to-sample task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2, 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D. (1981). The social orientation of private speech. Child Study Journal, 11, 25–32.Google Scholar
Ramírez, J. D. (1992). Texto y diálogo en el aprendizaje lecto-escritor. Nuevas perspectivas en el estudio de la alfabetización de adultos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 59/60, 73–86.Google Scholar
Ramírez, J. D., & Cubero, M. (1995). Modes of discourse-ways for thinking. Actual debates in socio-cultural studies. Philosophica, 55, 69–87.Google Scholar
Ramírez, J. D., Sánchez, J. A., & Cala, M. J. (1999). Speech genres and rhetoric. The development of ways of argumentation in a program of adult literacy. In Hedegaard, M. & Lompscher, J. (Eds.), Learning activity and development (pp. 51–70). Aarhus, The Netherlands: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. N., & Tharp, R. G. (1980). A naturalistic study of school children's private speech in an academic problem-solving task. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roebuck, R. F., & Wagner, L. C. (2004). Teaching repetition as a communicative and cognitive tool: Evidence from a Spanish conversation class. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1981). Schooling and the development of cognitive skills. In Triandis, H. C. & Heron, A. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 233–294). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sánchez, J. A., & Alarcón, D. (2005, September). Structure and function of private speech in illiterate adults. Paper presented at the First International Conference of the International Society for Cultural Activity Research. Sevilla, Spain.Google Scholar
Sánchez, J. A., & Alarcón, D. (2006). Self-regulation and mastering: Patterns in the development of egocentric speech in illiterate adults. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Self-Regulatory Functions of Language (pp. 197–212). Madrid, Spain: Publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma.Google Scholar
Sánchez, E. S., & Mata, M. L. (2006). School experience, memory actions and private speech in adults. In Montero, I. (Ed.), Current trends in private speech research. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Self-Regulatory Functions of Language (pp. 175–195). Madrid, Spain: Publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma.Google Scholar
Sturn, A., & Johnston, J. (1999). Thinking out loud: An exploration of problem-solving language in preschoolers with and without language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. (Minick, N., Ed. & Trans.). New York: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1990). The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind. In Moll, L. C. (Ed.), Vygotsky and education. Instructional implications (pp. 111–126). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In Wertsch, J., Rio, P. del & Álvarez, A. (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56–74). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, C. S., & Manning, B. H. (1994). The effects of verbal scaffolding instruction on young children's private speech and problem-solving capabilities. Instructional Science, 22, 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsler, A. (2006). Still talking to ourselves after all these years: Vygotsky, private speech, and self regulation. In Montero, I. (Ed.), Current trends in private speech research. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Self-Regulatory Functions of Language (pp. 17–72). Madrid, Spain: Publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma.Google Scholar
Winsler, A., León, J. R., Carlton, M. P., & Willson-Quayle, A. (2003). Private speech in preschool children: Developmental stability and change, across-task consistency and relations with classroom behaviour. Journal of Child Language, 30, 583–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winsler, A., & Díaz, R. M. (1995). Private speech in the classroom: The effects of activity type, presence of others, classroom context, and mixed-age grouping. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18, 463–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsler, A., Díaz, R. M., & Montero, I. (1997). The role of private speech in the transition from collaborative to independent task performance in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsler, A., & Naglieri, J. (2003). Overt and covert verbal problem-solving strategies: Developmental trends in use, awareness, and relations with task performance in children age 5 to 17. Child Development, 74, 659–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zivin, G. (1979). Removing common confusions about egocentric speech, private speech, and self-regulation. In Zivin, G. (Ed.), The development of self-regulation through private speech (pp. 13–49). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×