Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-nxk7g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-14T05:13:33.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Private Speech and Theory of Mind: Evidence for Developing Interfunctional Relations

from Part II - Language, Communication, Social Cognition, and Awareness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Adam Winsler
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Charles Fernyhough
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Ignacio Montero
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Get access

Summary

As the chapters in this volume testify, Vygotsky's (1930–1935/1978,Vygotsky 1934/1987) ideas about the social origin of higher mental processes are proving influential in a variety of developmental research domains. Our focus in this chapter is on two areas of cognition for which social influences have been claimed, but which have not been linked to any great extent by empirical research: theory of mind (ToM) and private speech (PS). Our contribution to this volume is in three sections. In the first, we examine some possible reasons why ToM and PS might be developmentally related. In the second, we report on three studies that have investigated concurrent relations between self-regulatory PS and ToM in preschoolers and young schoolchildren. In the final section, we attempt to make sense of our findings in terms of different possible theoretical positions on the relation between these variables. We give particular attention to the idea that engaging in self-regulatory PS may provide children with a mechanism for building on their existing social-cognitive understanding, specifically through the opportunities it provides for the internalization of dialogic exchanges with others.

DEVELOPMENTAL LINKAGES BETWEEN PRIVATE SPEECH AND THEORY OF MIND

The focus of ToM research has recently shifted away from questions about the timetabling of acquisition of this fundamental social-cognitive capacity, toward an attempt to understand individual differences in ToM development in terms of the social and environmental influences that children are exposed to in the preschool years (see Carpendale & Lewis, 2004; Symons, 2004, for recent reviews).

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Namlah, A. S., Fernyhough, C., & Meins, E. (2006). Sociocultural influences on the development of verbal mediation: Private speech and phonological recoding in Saudi Arabian and British samples. Developmental Psychology, 42, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astington, J. W. (1996). What is theoretical about the child's theory of mind? A Vygotskian view of its development. In Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. K. (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind (pp. 184–199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astington, J. W., & Baird, J. A. (2005). Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (Emerson, C. & Holquist, M., Eds., McGee, V. W., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Berk, L. E. (1986). Relationship of elementary school children's private speech to behavioral accompaniment to task, attention, and task performance. Developmental Psychology, 22, 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M., & Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 79–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villiers, J. G., & Villiers, P. A. (2000). Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs. In Mitchell, P. & Riggs, K. J. (Eds.), Children's reasoning and the mind (pp. 191–228). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, J., Brown, J., Slomkowski, C., Tesla, C., & Youngblade, L. M. (1991). Young children's understanding of other people's feelings and beliefs: Individual differences and their antecedents. Child Development, 62, 1352–1366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). British picture vocabulary scale (2nd ed.). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Fernyhough, C. (1996). The dialogic mind: A dialogic approach to the higher mental functions. New Ideas in Psychology, 14, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernyhough, C. (2004). More than a context for learning? The epistemic triangle and the dialogic mind (Commentary on Carpendale & Lewis). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 104–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernyhough, C. (2006). Private speech, executive functioning and theory of mind: A Vygotskian-Lurian synthesis. In Montero, I. (Ed.), Current research trends in private speech: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on self-regulatory functions of language. Madrid: University Press of Universidad Autónoma of Madrid.Google Scholar
Fernyhough, C. (2008). Getting Vygotskian about theory of mind: Mediation, dialogue, and the development of social understanding. Developmental Review, 28, 225–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernyhough, C., & Fradley, E. (2005). Private speech on an executive task: Relations with task difficulty and task performance. Cognitive Development, 20, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernyhough, C., & Russell, J. (1997). Distinguishing one's own voice from those of others: A function for private speech?International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 651–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., & Flavell, E. R. (1993). Children's understanding of the stream of consciousness. Child Development, 64, 387–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frauenglass, M. H., & Díaz, R. M. (1985). Self-regulatory functions of children's private speech: A critical analysis of recent challenges to Vygotsky's theory. Developmental Psychology, 21, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudena, P. P. (1992). The problem of abbreviation and internalization of private speech. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. E. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 215–224). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (1996). Desires, beliefs, and language. In Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. K. (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind (pp. 200–220). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. L. (1999). Acquiring the art of conversation. In Bennett, M. (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Achievements and prospects (pp. 89–105). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L., Johnson, C. L., Hutton, D., Andrews, G., & Cooke, T. (1989). Young children's theory of mind and emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogrefe, G. J., Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1986). Ignorance versus false belief: A developmental lag in attribution of epistemic states. Child Development, 57, 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. W. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 32, 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L., Yaeger, J., & Hjertholm, E. (1968). Private speech: Four studies and a review of theories. Child Development, 39, 691–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Fradley, E., & Tuckey, M. (2001). Rethinking maternal sensitivity: Mothers' comments on infants' mental processes predict security of attachment at 12 months. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42, 637–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Russell, J., & Clark-Carter, D. (1998). Security of attachment as a predictor of symbolic and mentalising abilities: A longitudinal study. Social Development, 7, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Wainwright, R., Clark-Carter, D., Das Gupta, M., Fradley, E., et al. (2003). Pathways to understanding mind: Construct validity and predictive validity of maternal mind-mindedness. Child Development, 74, 1194–1211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Wainwright, R., Das Gupta, M., Fradley, E., & Tuckey, M. (2002). Maternal mind-mindedness and attachment security as predictors of theory of mind understanding. Child Development, 73, 1715–1726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perner, J., Lang, B., & Kloo, D. (2002). Theory of mind and self-control: More than a common problem of inhibition. Child Development, 73, 752–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, C. C., & Siegal, M. (2000). Insights into theory of mind from deafness and autism. Mind and Language, 15, 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1959). The language and thought of the child. New York: Meridian Books. (Original work published 1923)Google Scholar
Symons, D. (2004). Mental state discourse, theory of mind, and the internalization of self-other understanding. Developmental Review, 24, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C., & Ratner, H. H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 495–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D'Onofrio, B., & Gottesman, I. I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14, 623–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E., Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1930, 1933, and 1935)Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winsler, A., León, J. R., Wallace, B. A., Carlton, M. P., & Willson-Quayle, A. (2003). Private speech in preschool children: Developmental stability and change, across-task consistency, and relations with classroom behavior. Journal of Child Language, 30, 583–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsler, A., Fernyhough, C., McClaren, E. M., & Way, E. (2005). Private speech coding manual. Unpublished manuscript, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. Available at http://classweb.gmu.edu/awinsler/resources/pscodingmanual.pdf.Google Scholar
Winsler, A., & Naglieri, J. (2003). Overt and covert verbal problem-solving strategies: Developmental trends in use, awareness, and relations with task performance in children age 5 to 17. Child Development, 74, 659–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×