Prioritizing Development A Cost Benefit Analysis of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals
Book contents
- Prioritizing Development
- Prioritizing Development
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Benefits and Costs of Air Pollution Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 2 Targets for Biodiversity and Deforestation
- Chapter 3 Benefits and Costs of the Climate Change Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 4 Beyond Civil War
- Chapter 5 Data Revolution
- Chapter 6 Benefits and Costs of the Education Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 7 Benefits and Costs of the Energy Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 8 Benefits and Costs of the IFF Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 9 Benefits and Costs of the Trade Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 10 Benefits and Costs of the Health Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 11 Benefits and Costs of the Noncommunicable Disease Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 12 Benefits and Costs of the Women’s Health Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 13 Benefits and Costs of TB Control for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 14 Benefits and Costs of the Infant Mortality Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 15 Benefits and Costs of the HIV/AIDS Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 16 Benefits and Costs of the Malaria Targets for the Post-2015 Consensus Project
- Chapter 17 Benefits and Costs of Digital Technology
- Chapter 18 Returns to Investment in Reducing Postharvest Food Losses and Increasing Agricultural Productivity Growth
- Chapter 19 Benefits and Costs of the Gender Equality Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 20 Benefits and Costs of the Food and Nutrition Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 21 Benefits and Costs of the Population and Demography Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 22 Benefits and Costs of Two Science and Technology Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 23 Global Benefits and Costs of Achieving Universal Coverage of Basic Water and Sanitation Services as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
- Chapter 24 Benefits and Costs of the Poverty Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 25 Good Governance and the Sustainable Development Goals
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Chapter 6 - Benefits and Costs of the Education Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 May 2018
Edited by
Book contents
- Prioritizing Development
- Prioritizing Development
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Benefits and Costs of Air Pollution Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 2 Targets for Biodiversity and Deforestation
- Chapter 3 Benefits and Costs of the Climate Change Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 4 Beyond Civil War
- Chapter 5 Data Revolution
- Chapter 6 Benefits and Costs of the Education Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 7 Benefits and Costs of the Energy Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 8 Benefits and Costs of the IFF Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 9 Benefits and Costs of the Trade Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 10 Benefits and Costs of the Health Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 11 Benefits and Costs of the Noncommunicable Disease Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 12 Benefits and Costs of the Women’s Health Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 13 Benefits and Costs of TB Control for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 14 Benefits and Costs of the Infant Mortality Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 15 Benefits and Costs of the HIV/AIDS Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 16 Benefits and Costs of the Malaria Targets for the Post-2015 Consensus Project
- Chapter 17 Benefits and Costs of Digital Technology
- Chapter 18 Returns to Investment in Reducing Postharvest Food Losses and Increasing Agricultural Productivity Growth
- Chapter 19 Benefits and Costs of the Gender Equality Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 20 Benefits and Costs of the Food and Nutrition Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 21 Benefits and Costs of the Population and Demography Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 22 Benefits and Costs of Two Science and Technology Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 23 Global Benefits and Costs of Achieving Universal Coverage of Basic Water and Sanitation Services as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
- Chapter 24 Benefits and Costs of the Poverty Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
- Chapter 25 Good Governance and the Sustainable Development Goals
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Within education, the targets that have the highest benefit-cost ratios are:
• Reducing by 50% the number of children who are not attending preschool in sub-Saharan Africa, which has a benefit-cost ratio of 28 to 39.
• Increasing the primary education enrollment ratio in sub-Saharan Africa from 75% to 100%, which has a benefit-cost ratio between 8.0 and 8.5.
These findings can be explained in terms of the relative scarcity of human capital in Africa versus other regions.
Other valuable targets are:
• Improving school quality by increasing student test scores by one standard deviation, which has a benefit-cost ratio between 3.0 and 5.0.
• Ensuring secondary school completion which has a 2.1 to 4.4 benefit-cost ratio.
However, the following targets are relatively ineffective or there is large uncertainty regarding the benefit-cost ratio:
• Providing vocational education within the main school system.
• Education and training programs for older workers.
An overall conclusion of the paper is that the vast majority of the Post-2015 education targets could not be achieved by 2030, hence the need to prioritize based on the findings of cost-benefit analysis.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Prioritizing DevelopmentA Cost Benefit Analysis of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, pp. 119 - 142Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Asghar, Zahid, Attique, Nazia, Urooj, Amena, and Mahmood, Naushin (2010). “Measuring impact of education and socio-economic factors on health for Pakistan,” The Pakistan Development Review 48(4): 653–74.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit V., Cole, Shawn, Duflo, Esther, and Linden, Leigh (2007). “Remedying education: evidence from two randomized experiments in India.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(3): 1235–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrman, J. R., Cheng, Y., and Todd, P.. (2004) “Evaluating pre-school programs when length of exposure to the program varies: a nonparametric approach.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86(1): 108–32.Google Scholar
Behrman, Jere R., Ross, David, and Sabot, Richard (2008). “Improving quality versus increasing the quantity of schooling: estimates of rates of return from rural Pakistan.” Journal of Development Economics 85(1–2): 94–104.Google Scholar
Blundell, R., Dearden, L., Meghir, C., and Sianesi, B. (1999) “Human capital investment: the returns from education and training to the individual, the firm and the economy.” Fiscal Studies 20(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Bruns, Barbara, Mingat, Alain, and Rakotomalala, Ramahatra (2003). Achieving Universal Primary Education by 2015: A Chance for Every Child. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Bialik, Carl (2013). “No easy lessons in assessing preschool payoff,” Wall Street Journal, p. A2.Google Scholar
Carneiro, P., Dearden, Lorraine, and Vignoles, Anna (2010). “The economics of vocational education and training.” In Peterson, P., Baker, E. and McGaw, B. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education, Vol 8. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 255–61.Google Scholar
Carneiro, P. and Heckman, J. (2003). “Human capital policy.” In Heckman, James and Krueger, Alan (eds.), Inequality in America: What Role for Human Capital Policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Center for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) (2012). Post-2015 Development Agenda: Goals, Targets and Indicators Special Report. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Hilger, N., Saez, E., Schanzenbach, D. W., and Yagan, D.. (2011). “How does your kindergarten classroom affect your earnings? Evidence from Project STAR.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4): 1593–1660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, Shin-Yi, Liu, Jin-Tan, Grossman, Michael, and Joyce, Ted (2010), “Parental education and child health: evidence from a natural experiment in Taiwan.” Applied Economics 2(1): 33–61.Google Scholar
Clemens, M. (2004). The Long Walk to School: International education goals in historical perspective. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, Working Paper 37.Google Scholar
Clemens, M, Kenny, C., and Moss, J. (2007). “The trouble with the MDGs: confronting expectations of aid and development success.” World Development 35(5): 735–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colclough, Christopher, and Lewin, Keith (1993). Educating All the Children: Strategies for Primary Schooling in the South. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cunha, F., Heckman, J. J., Lochner, L. J., and Masterov, D. V. (2006). “Interpreting the evidence on life cycle skill formation.” In Hanushek, E. A. and Welch, F. (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 697–812.Google Scholar
Dearden, L., McIntosh, S., Myck, M., and Vignoles, A. (2002), “The returns to academic and vocational qualifications in Britain,” Bulletin of Economic Research, 54: 249–74.Google Scholar
Delamonica, Enrique, Mehrotra, Santosh, and Vandemoortele, Jan (2001). “Is EFA affordable? Estimating the global minimum cost of ‘education for all’.” Innocenti Working Paper No. 87. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
Devarajan, Shantayana, Miller, Margaret, and Swanson, Eric (2002). “Goals for development: history, prospects and costs.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 2819. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Dickerson, A. P. (2005), “A study on rates of return to investment in level 3 and higher Qualifications.” Department of Trade and Industry, December 2005.Google Scholar
European Commission (2000). “Lisbon European Council 23–24 March 2000.” European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission (2009). “Progress towards the Lisbon objectives: Benchmarks and indicators.” European Commission.Google Scholar
Foster, A. and Rosenzweig, M. (1994). “Human resources, technical adoption, and externalities.” Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Fund for Peace (2013). “Failed states index.” Fund for Peace. http://ffp.statesindex.org/rankings-2013-sortable.Google Scholar
Gertler, Paul, Heckman, James, Pinto, Rodrigo, et al. (2013). “Labor market returns to early childhood stimulation: a 20-year followup to an experimental intervention in Jamaica.” NBER Working Paper No. 19185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glewwe, Paul (1996). “The relevance of standard estimates of rates of return to schooling for education policy: a critical assessment.” Journal of Development Economics 51(2): 267–90.Google Scholar
Glewwe, Paul (1999). “Why does mother’s schooling raise child health in developing countries? Evidence from Morocco.” Journal of Human Resources 34(1): 124–59.Google Scholar
Glewwe, Paul, Zhao, Meng, and Binder, Melissa (2006). “Achieving universal basic and secondary education: How much will it cost?” American Academy of Arts and Sciences. www.amacad.org/multimedia/pdfs/publications/researchpapersmonographs/Glwwe.pdf.Google Scholar
Global Campaign for Education (2003). Must Try Harder: A School Report on 22 Rich Countries’ Aid to Basic Education in Developing Countries. Brussels: Global Campaign for Education.Google Scholar
Gould, J. R. (1972). “On investment criteria for mutually exclusive projects.” Economica 39 (153): 70–7.Google Scholar
Groot, W. and van den Brink, H. Maassen (2007). “The health effects of education.” Economics of Education Review 26(2), 186–200.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A. (1999). “Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21(2): 143–163.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A. (2003). The Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies. Economic Journal. 113(485), 64–98.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A. (2007). “The alchemy of ‘costing out’ an adequate education.” In West, M. R. and Peterson, P. E. (eds.), School Money Trials: The Legal Pursuit of Educational Adequacy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A. and Woessmann, Ludger (2011). “Educational outcomes.” Economic Policy. July.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. (2000). “Policies to foster human capital.” Research in Economics 54: 3–56.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J., (2008). “Schools, Skills, and Synapses.” Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor. IZA DP No. 3515.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. (2011), “Effective child development strategies.” In Zigler, Edward, Gilliam, Walter S., and Barnett, W. Steven (eds.), The pre-K debates - Current Controversies and Issues. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J., and Kautz, T. (2012). “Hard Evidence on Soft Skills.” IZA DP No. 6580.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, J. (1958). “On the Theory of Optimal Investment Decision.” Journal of Political Economy 66(4): 329–52.Google Scholar
Janssens, Wendy, Van Der Gaag, Jacques, and Tanaka, Shinichiro (2001). Arab Republic of Egypt: An Economic Analysis of Early Childhood Education Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Jung, Haeil and Hasan, Amer (2014). “The Impact of Early Childhood Education on Early Achievement Gaps: Evidence from the Indonesia Early Childhood Education and Development (ECED) Project.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6794.Google Scholar
Krafft, Caroline (2013). “Is School the Best Route to Skills? Returns to Vocational School and Vocational Skills in Egypt.” Minnesota Population Center Working Paper Series No. 2013–09. Minnesota Population Center Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
Kremer, M., Brannen, Conner, and Glennerster, Rachel (2013). “The challenge of education and learning in the developing world.” Science 340: 297–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lassibille, G. and Gomez, M. L. Navarro (1990). “Forecast of primary-education expenditure in developing countries in the year 2000.” Prospects 20(4): 513–24.Google Scholar
Levin, H., Belfiel, Clive, Muennig, Peter, and Rouse, Cecilia (2007). “The public returns to public educational investments in African-American males.” Economics of Education Review 26(6): 699–708.Google Scholar
Lindelow, Magnus (2008). “Health as a family matter: do intra-household education externalities matter for maternal and child health?” Journal of Development Studies 44(4): 562–85.Google Scholar
McEwan, Patrick J. (2013). “Improving learning in primary schools of developing countries: a meta-analysis of randomized experiments.” Mimeo. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College.Google Scholar
Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Moenjak, Thammarak and Worswick, Christopher (2003). “Vocational education in Thailand: a study of choice and returns.” Economics of Education Review 22(1): 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newhouse, D. and Suryadarma, D. (2011). “The value of vocational education: high school type and labor market outcomes in Indonesia.” The World Bank Economic Review 25(2): 296–322.Google Scholar
North-South Institute (2013). “Post-2015 Tracking Tool.” http://cidpnsi.ca/blog/portfolio/tracking-post-2015/cidpnsi.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/NSI-Post-2015-Tracking-Tool-Database-September-2013.xlsx.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008). Costs and Benefits in Vocational Education and Training. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013a). Education at a Glance, 2013. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013b). PISA 2012 Results. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Orazem, P., Glewwe, P., and Patrinos, H. (2008). “The Challenge of Education.” Copenhagen Consensus Center.Google Scholar
Oxfam (2002). “Broken promises? Why donors must deliver on the EFA action plan.” Global Campaign for Education Briefing Paper, September 23.Google Scholar
Patrinos, H. (2007), “Living conditions of children.” In Lomborg, Bjorn (ed.), Solutions for the World’s Biggest Problems: Costs and Benefits, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 358–75. (Also: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4251, The World Bank.)Google Scholar
Patrinos, H. and Sakellariou, C. (2011). “Quality of schooling, returns to schooling and the 1981 vouchers reform in Chile.” World Development 39(12): 2245–56.Google Scholar
Psacharopoulos, George (1989). “Why educational reforms fail: a comparative analysis.” International Review of Education 35(2): 179–95.Google Scholar
Psacharopoulos, G. (1995). “The Profitability of Investment in Education: Concepts and Methods.” The World Bank, Human Capital Development and Operations Policy, Working Papers, no. 63.Google Scholar
Psacharopoulos, G. and Layard, R. (1979). “Human capital and earnings: British evidence and a critique.” Review of Economic Studies 46(3): 485–503.Google Scholar
Psacharopoulos, G. and Loxley, W. (1985). Diversified Secondary Education and Development: Evidence from Colombia and Tanzania, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Psacharopoulos, G. and Mattson, R. (1998). ‘Estimating the returns to education: a sensitivity analysis of methods and sample size.’ Journal of Educational Development and Administration 12(3): 271–287.Google Scholar
Psacharopoulos, G. and Patrinos, H. (2002). “Returns to investment in education: A further update.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2881.Google Scholar
Pugatch, Todd (2012). “Safety valve or sinkhole? Vocational schooling in South Africa.” IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 7015. IZA Discussion Paper Series. Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Said, Mona and El-Hamidi, Fatma (2008). “Taking technical education seriously in MENA: determinants, labor market implications and policy lessons.” Economic Research Forum Working Paper Series No. 450.Google Scholar
Salehi-Isfahani, Djavad, Tunali, Insan, and Assaad, Ragui (2009). “A comparative study of returns to education of urban men in Egypt, Iran, and Turkey.” Middle East Development Journal 12/01(02): 145–187.Google Scholar
Schultz, T. Paul (2002). “Why governments should invest more to educate girls.” World Development 30(2): 207–25.Google Scholar
Summers, Lawrence H. (1992). “Investing in all the people.” The Pakistan Development Review 31(4): pp. 367–404.Google Scholar
Temple, J. A and Reynolds, A. J. (2007). “Benefits and costs of investments in preschool education: evidence from the Child-Parent Centers and related programs.” Economics of Education Review 26(1): 126–44.Google Scholar
UNESCO (1961a). “Conference of Africa States on the development of education in Africa: Final report.” Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0007/000774/077416e.Google Scholar
UNESCO (1961b). “Outline of a plan for African educational development.” http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0007/000774/077414e.pdf, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0007/000774/077416e.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2010). Education and the Millennium Development Goals. Paris: UNESCO, www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/ED/GMR/pdf/gmr2010/MDG2010_Facts_and_Figures_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2011). Financing education in sub-Saharan Africa. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Institute of Statistics.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2013). Education transforms lives, Global Monitoring Report, 2013. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2014). Education for All Global Monitoring Report. Teaching and Learning: Achieving quality for all 2013/4. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
United Nations (2013). “A new global partnership: eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development – Report of the High-level panel of eminent persons on the Post-2015 development agenda.” New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations (2014). “Open working group brief: sustainable development goal on equitable learning.” New York: National Assembly, United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2013). “The Millennium Development Goals Report, 2013.” www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/MDG/english/mdg-report-2013-english.pdf.Google Scholar
Winthrop, R. and Graff, C. (2010). Beyond Madrasas: Assessing the Links between Education and Militancy in Pakistan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Woessmann, L. (2007). “International evidence on expenditure and class size: a review.” In Loveless, Tom and Hess, Frederick M. (eds.), Brookings Papers on Education Policy 2006/2007. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution: 245–272.Google Scholar
Word, E., Johnston, J., Bain, H. P., et al. (1990). “Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR), Tennessee’s K–3 class size study: Final summary report, 1985–1990.” Nashville: Tennessee State Department of Education.Google Scholar
World Bank (2002). “Arab Republic of Egypt Strategic Options for Early Childhood Education.” Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2014). World Bank Indicators. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/variableselection/selectvariables.aspx?source=education-statistics-~-all-indicators#.Google Scholar
World Conference on Education for All (WCEFA) (1990). Meeting Basic Learning Needs: A New Vision for the 1990’s. New York: The World Bank, UNESCO, UNICEF.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by