Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:22:34.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Interpretations of uncertainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

D. R. Cox
Affiliation:
Nuffield College, Oxford
Get access

Summary

Summary. This chapter discusses the nature of probability as it is used to represent both variability and uncertainty in the various approaches to statistical inference. After some preliminary remarks, the way in which a frequency notion of probability can be used to assess uncertainty is reviewed. Then two contrasting notions of probability as representing degree of belief in an uncertain event or hypothesis are examined.

General remarks

We can now consider some issues involved in formulating and comparing the different approaches.

In some respects the Bayesian formulation is the simpler and in other respects the more difficult. Once a likelihood and a prior are specified to a reasonable approximation all problems are, in principle at least, straightforward. The resulting posterior distribution can be manipulated in accordance with the ordinary laws of probability. The difficulties centre on the concepts underlying the definition of the probabilities involved and then on the numerical specification of the prior to sufficient accuracy.

Sometimes, as in certain genetical problems, it is reasonable to think of θ as generated by a stochastic mechanism. There is no dispute that the Bayesian approach is at least part of a reasonable formulation and solution in such situations. In other cases to use the formulation in a literal way we have to regard probability as measuring uncertainty in a sense not necessarily directly linked to frequencies. We return to this issue later.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Interpretations of uncertainty
  • D. R. Cox, Nuffield College, Oxford
  • Book: Principles of Statistical Inference
  • Online publication: 17 March 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813559.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Interpretations of uncertainty
  • D. R. Cox, Nuffield College, Oxford
  • Book: Principles of Statistical Inference
  • Online publication: 17 March 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813559.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Interpretations of uncertainty
  • D. R. Cox, Nuffield College, Oxford
  • Book: Principles of Statistical Inference
  • Online publication: 17 March 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813559.006
Available formats
×