Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T20:36:42.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Hero K. Hussain
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
Isaac R. Francis
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

When determining the prognosis of patients with solid tumors, tumor staging and tumor grading are important factors to take into account. Tumor staging describes the extent of tumor in the primary organ and throughout the body. Staging is important for planning treatment, estimating prognosis, providing a standardized platform to evaluate new treatments, and comparing the results of different studies. In the majority of solid organ tumors, staging is determined at the time of surgery and by pathological examination of the resected specimen using the Tumor–Node–Metastasis (TNM) classification.

In addition to tumor burden, histological tumor-grading systems have been shown to offer prognostic information on some cancers such as prostate, breast, and kidney. Tumor burden and grade cannot be assessed in most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), because only about a third of the patients will undergo surgical therapies and some of these patients may have received local therapies prior to surgery limiting the histological examination.

The presence of underlying liver cirrhosis in patients with HCC adds an important dimension that cannot be ignored when discussing prognosis and treatment for these patients, and it is what differentiates HCC from other solid tumors. The majority of patients with HCC have underlying cirrhosis, and the degree of hepatic dysfunction determines which treatment can be applied. Another important factor in the prognosis of patients with HCC is performance status, although it is not HCC-specific. Performance status has been shown to be an important prognostic factor in HCC.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Compton, CC, Fielding, LP, Burgart, LJ, et al. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124: 979–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Gleason, DF, Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group. Histologic grading and staging of prostatic carcinoma. In: Tannenbaum, M, ed. Urologic pathology: The prostate. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1977: 171–87.Google Scholar
Bruix, J and Sherman, M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2005; 42: 1208–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llovet, JM and Bruix, J. Early diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2000; 14: 991–1008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llovet, JM, Bustamante, J, Castells, A, et al. Natural history of untreated nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma: Rationale for the design and evaluation of therapeutic trials. Hepatology 1999; 29: 62–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marrero, JA, Fontana, RJ, Barrat, A, et al. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of 7 staging systems in an American cohort. Hepatology 2005; 41: 707–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, YP, Lo, CM, Liu, CL, Wong, BC, Fan, ST, and Wong, J. Natural history of untreated nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1995–2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,The United Network for Organ Sharing [cited May 20, 2009]. Available from: http://www.unos.org/PoliciesandBylaws2/policies/pdfs/policy_8.pdf
Okuda, K, Ohtsuki, T, Obata, H, et al. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patients. Cancer 1985; 56: 918–28.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llovet, JM, Bru, C, and Bruix, J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: The BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 1999; 19: 329–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) Investigators. Prospective validation of the CLIP score: A new prognostic system for patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2000; 31: 840–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevret, S, Trinchet, JC, Mathieu, D, Rached, AA, Beaugrand, M, and Chastang, C. For the Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hépatocellulaire. A new prognostic classification for predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 1999; 31: 133–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, TW, Tang, AM, Zee, B, et al. Construction of the Chinese University Prognostic Index for hepatocellular carcinoma and comparison with the TNM staging system, the Okuda staging system, and the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program staging system: A study based on 926 patients. Cancer 2002; 94: 1760–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kudo, M, Chung, H, and Osaki, Y. Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score): Its value and limitations, and a proposal for a new staging system, the Japan Integrated Staging score (JIS score). J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 207–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toyoda, H, Kumada, T, Kiriyama, S, et al. Comparison of the usefulness of three staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP, BCLC, and JIS) in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1764–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudo, M, Chung, H, Haji, S, et al. Validation of a new prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: The JIS score compared with the CLIP score. Hepatology 2004; 40: 1396–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tateishi, R, Yoshida, H, Shiina, S, et al. Proposal of a new prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of 403 patients. Gut 2005; 54: 419–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cillo, U, Bassanellos, M, Vitale, A, et al. The critical issue of hepatocellular carcinoma prognostic classification: Which is the best tool available?J Hepatol 2004; 40: 124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, YH, Chen, CH, Chang, TT, et al. Evaluation of predictive value of CLIP, Okuda, TNM and JIS staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing surgery. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 20: 765–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×