Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Censorship and the law: the Caroline inheritance
- Chapter 2 Print in the time of Parliament: 1625–1629
- Chapter 3 Transformational literalism: the reactionary redefinition of the courts of High Commission and Star Chamber
- Chapter 4 Censorship and the Puritan press
- Chapter 5 The printers and press control in the 1630s
- Chapter 6 The end of censorship
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 6 - The end of censorship
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Censorship and the law: the Caroline inheritance
- Chapter 2 Print in the time of Parliament: 1625–1629
- Chapter 3 Transformational literalism: the reactionary redefinition of the courts of High Commission and Star Chamber
- Chapter 4 Censorship and the Puritan press
- Chapter 5 The printers and press control in the 1630s
- Chapter 6 The end of censorship
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
In England on Edge, David Cressy reminds us that between the time the Long Parliament convened in 1640 and civil war broke out in 1642 print culture in England underwent radical changes that transformed its political and social circumstances. One of the English Revolution's “most revolutionary features,” according to Cressy, was “the explosion of print” in the opening years of the Long Parliament.
There were more items published in 1641, than in any year in the previous history of English printing (2,177 in the English Short Title Catalogue, of which the bookseller George Thomason collected 721). More appeared in 1642 than at any time again before the eighteenth century (4,188 in ESTC, including 2,134 in Thomason). If anyone doubts there was revolution in mid-Stuart England they have only to look at these peaks.
For most historians, the sharp rise in printed titles resulted from the end of Caroline censorship. According to Fredrick Siebert, “the printers of the realm found themselves free for the first time to print what they pleased” when the “controls of King, council, Star Chamber, and High Commission” weakened or disappeared. Bibliographical historians, including D. F. McKenzie and Sheila Lambert, however, have challenged the claims made for the impact of the “lapse of licensing.” When the historical understanding of Caroline press censorship is itself as vexed as this study has found it to be, that historiographical interpretations differ on censorship in the closing years of Charles's reign should be expected.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Press Censorship in Caroline England , pp. 208 - 234Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008