Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Online publication date: May 2010

Chapter 12 - Reproductive toxicology


1. PhillipsKP, TanphaichitrN. Human exposure to endocrine disrupters and semen quality. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2008; 11: 188–220.
2. KumarS. Occupational exposure associated with reproductive dysfunction. J Occup Health 2004; 46: 19.
3. BrazilC, ShannaSH, TollnerCR, et al. Study for Future Families Research Group. Quality control of laboratory methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study. J Androl 2004; 25: 645–56.
4. CooperTG, BrazilC, SwanSH, OverstreetJW. Ejaculate volume is seriously underestimated when semen is pipetted or decanted into cylinders from the collection vessel. J Androl 2007; 28: 1–4.
5. BrazilC, SwanSH, DrobnisEZ, et al. Study for Future Families Research Group. Standardized methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study. J Androl 2004; 25: 635–44.
6. HaugenTB. In search of an accurate and rapid method for sperm counting. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2007; 67: 436–8.
7. TomlinsonM, TurnerJ, PowellG, SakkasD. One-step disposable chambers for sperm concentration and motility assessment: how do they compare with the World Health Organization’s recommended methods?Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 121–4.
8. Douglas-HamiltonDH, SmithNG, KusterCE, et al. Capillary-loaded particle fluid dynamics: effect on estimation of sperm concentration. J Androl 2005; 26: 115–22.
9. Stokes-RinerA, ThurstonSW, BrazilC, et al. One semen sample or 2? Insights from a study of fertile men. J Androl 2007; 28: 38–43.
10. JørgensenN, AugerJ, GiwercmanA, et al. Semen analysis performed by different laboratory teams: an intervariation study. Int J Androl 1997; 20: 201–8.
11. AugerJ, EustacheF, DucotB, et al. Intra- and inter-individual variability in human sperm concentration, motility and vitality assessment during a workshop involving ten laboratories. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 2360–8.
12. BjörndahlL, BarrattCL, FraserLR, et al. ESHRE basic semen analysis courses 1995–1999: immediate beneficial effects of standardized training. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1299–305.
13. PerreaultSD, AitkenRJ, BakerHW, et al. Integrating new tests of sperm genetic integrity into semen analysis: breakout group discussion. Adv Exp Med Biol 2003; 518: 253–68.
14. ChohanKR, GriffinJT, LafromboiseM, et al. Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm. J Androl 2006; 27: 53–9.
15. EvensonDP, WixonR. Environmental toxicants cause sperm DNA fragmentation as detected by the Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA®). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005; 207: 532–7.
16. FernándezJL, MurielL, RiveroMT, et al. The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation. J Androl 2003; 24: 59–66.