Aarts, K. and Thomassen, J. (2008). Satisfaction with Democracy: Do Institutions Matter? Electoral Studies, 27(1), 5–18.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Achen, C. H. (1978). Measuring Representation. American Journal of Political Science, 22(3), 475–510.Google Scholar

Agnafors, M. (2013). Quality of Government: Toward a More Complex Definition. American Political Science Review, 107(3), 433–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alonso, S. and Ruiz-Rufino, R. (2007). Political Representation and Ethnic Conflict in New Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 46(2), 237–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altman, D. (2011). Direct Democracy Worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Alvarez, R. M. and Nagler, J. (2004). Party System Compactness: Measurement and Consequences. Political Analysis, 12(1), 46–62.Google Scholar

Amorim Neto, O. and Cox, G. W. (1997). Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 149–74.Google Scholar

Anckar, D. (2008). Microstate Democracy: Majority or Consensus; Diffusion or Problem-Solving? Democratisation, 15(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, C. J. and Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. J. (2002). Europeanization and the Transformation of the Democratic Polity, 1945–2000. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(5), 793–822.Google Scholar

Armingeon, K. (2002). The Effects of Negotiation Democracy: A Comparative Analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 41(1), 81–105.Google Scholar

Armingeon, K. (2004). Institutional Change in OECD Democracies, 1970–2000. Comparative European Politics, 2(2), 212–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armingeon, K. and Careja, R. (2008). Institutional Change and Stability in Postcommunist Countries, 1990–2002. European Journal of Political Research, 47(4), 436–66.Google Scholar

Armingeon, K., Careja, R., Weisstanner, D., Engler, S., Potolidis, P. and Gerber, M. (2012). Comparative Political Data Set III 1990–2010. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.Google Scholar

Armingeon, K., Careja, R., Weisstanner, D., Engler, S., Potolidis, P. and Gerber, M. (2014). Comparative Political Data Set III 1990–2012. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.Google Scholar

Armitage, D. (2000). The Ideological Origins of the British Empire. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., Steenbergen, M. R. and Steiner, J. (2005). The Deliberative Dimensions of Legislatures. Acta Politica, 40(2), 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, L. M. (2008). Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Benoit, K. (2004). Models of Electoral System Change. Electoral Studies, 23(3), 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, K. (2007). Electoral Laws as Political Consequences: Explaining the Origins and Change of Electoral Institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 363–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, K. and Laver, M. (2006). Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Benz, A. and Colino, C. (2011). Constitutional Change in Federations: A Framework for Analysis. Regional & Federal Studies, 21(4), 381–406.Google Scholar

Bernauer, J., Giger, N. and Rosset, J. (2015). Mind the Gap: Do Proportional Electoral Systems Foster a More Equal Representation of Women and Men, Poor and Rich? International Political Science Review, 36(1), 78–98.Google Scholar

Bernauer, J. and Munzert, S. (2014). Loyal to the Game? Strategic Policy Representation in Mixed Electoral Systems. Representation, 50(1), 83–97.Google Scholar

Bernauer, J. and Vatter, A. (2012). Can’t Get No Satisfaction with the Westminster Model? Winners, Losers and the Effects of Consensual and Direct Democratic Institutions on Satisfaction with Democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 51(4), 435–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernauer, J. and Vatter, A. (2015). United, but Unique? Patterns of Democracy in the USA. Paper presented at the 6ème Congrès des associations francophones de Science Politique, 5–7 February 2015, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Bernauer, J. and Vatter, A. (2017). Conflict, Choice or Geography? Explaining Empirical Patterns of Democracy in Continental Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 56(2), 251–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernauer, J., Vatter, A. and Giger, N. (2014). New Patterns of Democracy in the Countries of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2. In Thomassen, J., ed., Elections and Representative Democracy. Representation and Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 20–37.Google Scholar

Birchfield, V. and Crepaz, M. M. L. (1998). The Impact of Constitutional Structures and Collective and Competitive Veto Points on Income Inequality in Industrialized Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 34(2), 175–200.Google Scholar

Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E. and Gómez-Rubio, V. (2013). Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R, 2nd edn, New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Blais, A. (2010). Political Participation. In LeDuc, L., Niemi, R. G. and Norris, P., eds., Comparing Democracies 3: Elections and Voting in the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 165–83.Google Scholar

Blais, A. (2006). What Affects Voter Turnout? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, A., Singh, S. and Dumitrescu, D. (2014). Political Institutions, Perceptions of Representation, and the Turnout Decision. In Thomassen, J., ed., Elections and Representative Democracy. Representation and Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 99–112.Google Scholar

Blondel, J. and Battegazzorre, F. (2002). Majoritarian and Consensus Parliamentary Democracies: A Convergence towards ‘Cooperative Majoritarianism’. Quaderni di Scienza politica, 9(2), 225–51.Google Scholar

Blondel, J. and Battegazzorre, F. (2003). Have ‘Consociational’ Forms of Parliamentary Government Ceased to Exist in Western Europe but Is the Majoritarian Model on the Way of Becoming More ‘Cooperative’? (Working Paper No. 223). Barcelona: Institute of Political and Social Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar

Bochsler, D. (2010). The Nationalisation of Post-Communist Party Systems. Europe-Asia Studies, 62(5), 807–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bochsler, D., Hänggli, R. and Häusermann, S. (2015). Introduction: Consensus Lost? Disenchanted Democracy in Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 21(4), 475–90.Google Scholar

Bogaards, M. (2000). The Uneasy Relationship between Empirical and Normative Types in Consociational Theory. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12(4), 395–423.Google Scholar

Boix, C. (1999). Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 609–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and Redistribution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boix, C. (2011). Democracy, Development, and the International System. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 809–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bollen, K. (1993). Liberal Democracy: Validity and Method Factors in Cross-National Measures. American Journal of Political Science 37(4), 1207–30.Google Scholar

Bormann, N.-C. (2010). Patterns of Democracy and Its Critics. Living Reviews in Democracy 2. www.livingreviews.org/lrd-2010–3.Google Scholar

Bormann, N.-C. and Golder, M. (2013). Democratic Electoral Systems Around the World, 1946–2011. Electoral Systems, 32(2), 360–69.Google Scholar

Börzel, T. A. (1999). Towards Convergence in Europe? Institutional Adaptation to Europeanization in Germany and Spain. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(4), 573–96.Google Scholar

Brambor, T., Clark, W. R. and Golder, M. (2006). Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braumoeller, B. F. (2006). Explaining Variance: Or, Stuck in a Moment We Can’t Get Out Of. Political Analysis, 14(3), 268–90.Google Scholar

Braumoeller, B. F. and Mattiacci, E. (2010). Consensus, Constraint, and Peacekeeping Success: More May Be Better … and Worse (Typescript). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Brehm, J. (1993). The Phantom Respondents. Opinion Surveys and Political Representation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Bühlmann, M. and Kriesi, H. (2013). Models for Democracy. In Kriesi, H., Lavenex, S., Esser, F., Matthes, J., Bühlmann, M. and Bochsler, D., eds., Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 44–68.Google Scholar

Carter, E. and Farrell, D. M. (2010). Electoral Systems and Election Management. In LeDuc, L., Niemi, R. G. and Norris, P., eds., Comparing Democracies 3. Elections and Voting in the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar

Castles, F. G. (1999). Decentralization and the Post-War Political Economy. European Journal of Political Research, 36(1), 27–53.Google Scholar

Chang, E., Chu, Y.-H. and Wu, W.-C. (2014). Consenting to Lose or Expecting to Win? Inter-temporal Changes in Voters’ Winner-Loser Status and Satisfaction with Democracy. In Thomassen, J., ed., Elections and Representative Democracy. Representation and Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 232–53.Google Scholar

Cheibub, J. A. (2007). Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J. and Vreeland, J. R. (2009). Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice, 143(1/2), 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, C. H. and Head, R. C. (2015). A Concise History of Switzerland, 4th edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, W. R., Golder, M. and Golder, S. N. (2013). Principles of Comparative Politics, 2nd edn, Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Clucas, R. A. and Valdini, E. M. (2014). The Character of Democracy. How Institutions Shape Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Collier, R. B. and Collier, D. (2002). Shaping the Political Arena. Critical Junctures, the Labour Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley University Press.Google Scholar

Colomer, J. M. (2001). Political Institutions. Democracy and Social Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Colomer, J. M. (2005). It’s Parties That Choose Electoral Systems (Or, Duverger’s Laws Upside Down). Political Studies, 53(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Colomer, J. M. (2013). Elected Kings with the Name of Presidents: On the Origins of Presidentialism in the United States and Latin America. Revista Latinoamericana de Política Comparada, 7, 79–97.Google Scholar

Coppedge, M., Alvarez, A. and Maldonado, C. (2008). Two Persistent Dimensions of Democracy: Contestation and Inclusiveness. The Journal of Politics, 70(3), 632–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Fish, S., Hicken, A., Kroenig, M., Lindberg, S. I., McMann, K., Paxton, P., Semetko, H. A., Skaaning, S.-E., Staton, J. and Teorell, J. (2011). Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 247–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, G. W. (1997). Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crepaz, M. L. (2001). Veto Players, Globalization and the Redistributive Capacity of the State: A Panel Study of 15 OECD Countries. Journal of Public Policy, 21(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. (2002). How Democratic Is the American Constitution? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahlberg, S., Linde, J. and Holmberg, S. (2015). Democratic Discontent in Old and New Democracies: Assessing the Importance of Democratic Input and Governmental Output. Political Studies, 63(1), 18–37.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. J. (1985). Political Parties and Political Representation: Party Supporters and Party Elites in Nine Nations. Comparative Political Studies, 18(3), 267–99.Google Scholar

Dalziel, N. (2006). The Penguin Historical Atlas of the British Empire. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Danaci, D. (2011). Theoretische Grundlagen. In Vatter, A., ed., Vom Schächt-zum Minarettverbot. Religiöse Minderheiten in der direkten Demokratie. Zurich: NZZ Verlag, pp. 35–47.Google Scholar

Diamantopoulos, A. (2011). Incorporating Formative Measures into Covariance-Based Structural Equation Models. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 335–58.Google Scholar

Doorenspleet, R. and Pellikaan, H. (2013). Which Type of Democracy Performs Best? Acta Politica, 48(3), 237–67.Google Scholar

Döring, H. and Manow, P. (2015). Parliament and Government Composition Database (ParlGov). An Infrastructure for Empirical Information on Parties, Elections and Governments in Modern Democracies. www.parlgov.org.Google Scholar

Dumont, J.-C., Spielvogel, G. and Widmaier, S. (2010). International Migrants in Developed, Emerging and Developing Countries: An Extended Profile (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No.114). www.oecd.org/els/workingpapers.Google Scholar

Easton, D. (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Eder, C. and Magin, R. (2008a). Direkte Demokratie. In Freitag, M. and Vatter, A., eds., Die Demokratien der deutschen Bundesländer: Politische Institutionen im Vergleich. Opladen: Budrich, pp. 257–308.Google Scholar

Eder, C. and Magin, R. (2008b). Volksgesetzgebung in den deutschen Bundesländern: Ein Vorschlag zu ihrer empirischen Erfassung aus subnational-vergleichender Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 39(2), 358–78.Google Scholar

Elazar, D. J. (1984). American Federalism. A View from the State, 3rd edn, New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Erk, J. (2008). Explaining Federalism: State, Society and Congruence in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany and Switzerland. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ezrow, L. and Xezonakis, G. (2011). Citizen Satisfaction with Democracy and Parties’ Policy Offerings. Comparative Political Studies, 44(9), 1152–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fearon, J. D. (2003). Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 195–222.Google Scholar

Feld, L. P. and Kirchgässner, G. (2000). Direct Democracy, Political Culture, and the Outcome of Economic Policy: A Report on the Swiss Experience. European Journal of Political Economy, 16(2), 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferree, K. E., Powell, G. B. and Scheiner, E. (2014). Context, Electoral Rules, and Party Systems. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 421–39.Google Scholar

Fish, M. S. (2001). The Inner Asian Anomaly: Mongolia’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 34(3), 323–38.Google Scholar

Fish, S. M. and Kroenig, M. (2009). The Handbook of National Legislatures: A Global Survey. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flick, M. (2008). Landesverfassungen und ihre Veränderbarkeit. In Freitag, M. and Vatter, A., eds., Die Demokratien der deutschen Bundesländer: Politische Institutionen im Vergleich. Opladen: Budrich, pp. 221–36.Google Scholar

Flinders, M. (2005). Majoritarian Democracy in Britain: New Labour and the Constitution. West European Politics, 28(1), 61–93.Google Scholar

Flinders, M. (2008). Deliberative Democracy, Elite Politics and Electoral Reform. Policy Studies, 29(4), 371–92.Google Scholar

Flinders, M. (2010). Democratic Drift: Majoritarian Modification and Democratic Anomie in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fortin, J. (2008). Patterns of Democracy? Counterevidence from Nineteen Post-Communist Countries. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 2(2), 198–220.Google Scholar

Franzese, R. J. and Hays, J. C.. (2008). Interdependence in Comparative Politics: Substance, Theory, Empirics, Substance. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4/5), 742–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freitag, M. and Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2010). Stumbling Block or Stepping Stone? The Influence of Direct Democracy on Individual Participation in Parliamentary Elections. Electoral Studies, 29(3), 472–83.Google Scholar

Freitag, M. and Vatter, A., eds. (2008). Die Demokratien der deutschen Bundesländer: Politische Institutionen im Vergleich. Opladen: Budrich.Google Scholar

Freitag, M. and Vatter, A. (2009). Patterns of Democracy: A Sub-National Analysis of the German Länder. Acta Politica, 44(4), 410–38.Google Scholar

Freitag, M., Vatter, A. and Mueller, S. (2015). Switzerland’s Immigration Challenge. Swiss Political Science Review, 21(1), 1–4.Google Scholar

Frey, B. S. and Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, Economy and Institutions. Economic Journal, 110(466), 918–38.Google Scholar

Gallagher, M. (2014). Electoral Institutions and Representation. In LeDuc, L., Niemi, R. G. and Norris, P., eds., Comparing Democracies 3: Elections and Voting in the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 11–31.Google Scholar

Gallagher, M. (2015). Election Indices Dataset. www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_gallagher.Google Scholar

Gallagher, M. and Uleri, P. V., eds. (1996). The Referendum Experience in Europe. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ganghof, S. (2005). Normative Modelle, institutionelle Typen und beobachtbare Verhaltensmuster: Ein Vorschlag zum Vergleich parlamentarischer Demokratien. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 46(3), 406–31.Google Scholar

Ganghof, S. (2007). Die Konvergenz von Steuersystemen: Zur Rolle von Modernisierungs- und Globalisierungsprozessen. In Holzinger, K., Jörgens, H. and Knill, C., eds., Transfer, Diffusion und Konvergenz von Politiken. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 407–29.Google Scholar

Ganghof, S. (2012). Resilient Patterns of Democracy: A Comparative Analysis. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 6(2), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelman, A. and Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerber, E. and Hug, S. (2001). Legislative Response to Direct Legislation. In Mendelson, M. and Parkin, A., eds., Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Houndsmills: Palgrave, pp. 88–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerring, J. and Thacker, S. C. (2008). A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, J., Thacker, S. C. and Moreno, C. (2005). Centripetal Democratic Governance: A Theory and Global Inquiry. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 567–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilley, B. (2006). The Meaning and Measure of State Legitimacy: Results for 72 Countries. European Journal of Political Research, 45(3), 499–525.Google Scholar

Giuliano, M. (2011a). Patterns of Democracy Reloaded: Thirty-Five Democracies and the Challenge of Change (Working Paper). Milan: Università degli studi di Milano.Google Scholar

Giuliano, M. (2011b). A Longitudinal Perspective on Models of Democracy. Paper Presented at the 1st EPSA Annual General Conference, 14–16 June 2011, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar

Glaeser, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2004). Do Institutions Cause Growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 9(3), 271–303.Google Scholar

Golder, M. and Lloyd, G. (2014). Re-evaluating the Relationship between Electoral Rules and Ideological Congruence. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 200–12.Google Scholar

Golder, M. and Stramski, J. (2010). Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 90–106.Google Scholar

Graber, R. (2017). Demokratie und Revolten: Die Entstehung der direkten Demokratie in der Schweiz. Zurich: Chronos.Google Scholar

Gray, V., Hanson, R. L. and Kousser, T., eds. (2013). Politics in the American States. A Comparative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage/CQ Press.Google Scholar

Grofman, B. (2000). Lijphart and the New Institutionalism. In Crepaz, M. L., Koelble, T. and Wilsford, D., eds., Democracy and Institutions: The Life Work of Arend Lijphart. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 43–73.Google Scholar

Grofman, B., Owen, G. and Collet, C. (1999). Rethinking the Partisan Effects of Higher Turnout: So What’s the Question? Public Choice, 99(3), 357–76.Google Scholar

Ha, E. (2008). Globalization, Veto Players, and Welfare Spending. Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 783–813.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Hainmueller, J. and Hangartner, D. (2013). Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigrant Discrimination. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 159–87.Google Scholar

Hajnal, Z. J., Gerber, E. R. and Louch, H. (2002). Minorities and Direct Legislation: Evidence from California Ballot Proposition Elections. Journal of Politics, 64(1), 154–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–57.Google Scholar

Heichel, S., Pape, J. and Sommerer, T. (2005). Is There Convergence in Convergence Research? An Overview of Empirical Studies on Policy Convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 817–40.Google Scholar

Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy, 3rd edn, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Héritier, A. (2007). Explaining Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hernandez, M. I. (2015). Effectiveness and Legitimacy in Democratic Reform: The Case of Transparency Reform in Mexico. Latin American Policy, 6(2), 278–303.Google Scholar

Hill, K. Q. (1994). Democracy in the Fifty States. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Holzinger, K. (2006). Methodological Pitfalls of Convergence Analysis. European Union Politics, 7(2), 271–87.Google Scholar

Holzinger, K., Jörgens, H. and Knill, C., eds. (2007). Transfer, Diffusion und Konvergenz von Politiken. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Honaker, J. and King, G. (2010). What to Do about Missing Values in Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 561–81.Google Scholar

Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Schakel, A. H. (2010). The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hug, S. (2010). The Effect of Misclassifications in Probit Models: Monte Carlo Simulations and Applications. Political Analysis, 18(1), 78–102.Google Scholar

Immergut, E. M. (1992). Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why some Democracies Redistribute More than Others. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 165–81.Google Scholar

Jackman, S. (2001). Multidimensional Analysis of Roll Call Data via Bayesian Simulation: Identification, Estimation, Inference, and Model Checking. Political Analysis, 9(3), 227–41.Google Scholar

Jackman, S. (2004). What Do We Learn from Graduate Admissions Committees? A Multiple Rater, Latent Variable Model, with Incomplete Discrete and Continuous Indicators. Political Analysis, 12(4), 400–24.Google Scholar

Jackman, S. (2009). Bayesian Analysis for the Social Sciences. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Jochem, S. (2012). Die politischen Systeme Skandinaviens. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Jung, S. (1996) Lijpharts Demokratietypen und die direkte Demokratie. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 6(3), 623–47.Google Scholar

Jung, S. (2001). Die Logik direkter Demokratie. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar

Kaiser, A., Lehnert, M., Miller, B. and Sieberer, U. (2002). The Democratic Quality of Institutional Regimes: A Conceptual Framework. Political Studies, 50(2), 313–31.Google Scholar

Karakoc, E. (2013). Economic Inequality and Its Asymmetric Effect on Civic Engagement: Evidence from Post-Communist Countries. European Political Science Review, 5(2), 197–223.Google Scholar

Keman, H. (2000). Federalism and Policy Performance. In Wachtendorfer-Schmidt, U., ed., Federalism and Political Performance. London: Routledge, pp. 196–227.Google Scholar

King, G. (1989). Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Klarner, C. E. (2003). Measurement of the Partisan Balance of State Government. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 3(3), 309–19.Google Scholar

Klarner, Carl (2013). State Partisan Balance Data, 1937–2011 (Harvard Dataverse V1). http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/20403.Google Scholar

Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I. and McDonald, M. (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Knill, C. (2005). Introduction: Cross-National Policy Convergence: Concepts, Approaches and Explanatory Factors. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 764–74.Google Scholar

Kölz, A. (1992). Neuere schweizerische Verfassungsgeschichte. Ihre Grundlinien vom Ende der alten Eidgenossenschaft bis 1848. Berne: Stämpfli.Google Scholar

Koopmans, R., Michalowski, I. and Waibel, S. (2012). Citizenship Rights for Immigrants: National Political Processes and Cross-National Convergence in Western Europe, 1980–2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117(4), 1202–45.Google Scholar

Kostadinova, T. (2003). Voter Turnout Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 42(6), 741–59.Google Scholar

Kruschke, J. K. (2010). Bayesian Data Analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(5), 658–76.Google Scholar

Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R. (1979). Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12(1), 3–27.Google Scholar

Landwehr, C. (2009). Political Conflict and Political Preferences: Communicative Interaction between Facts, Norms and Interests. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

Laver, M., Benoit, K. and Garry, J. (2003). Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmbruch, G. (1967). Proporzdemokratie. Politisches System und politische Kultur in der Schweiz und in Österreich. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Lewis, W. A. (1965). Politics in West Africa. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1968). The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1985). Power-Sharing in South Africa. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1996). The Puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation. American Political Science Review, 90(2), 258–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1997a). Reflections: Dimensions of Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 31(1/2), 195–204.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1997b). Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (2003). Measurement Validity and Institutional Engineering: Reflections on Rein Taagepera’s Meta-Study. Political Studies, 51(1), 20–25.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (2008). Thinking about Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, 2nd edn, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Linde, J. and Ekman, J. (2003). Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics. European Journal of Political Research, 42(3), 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindgren, K.-O. and Persson, T. (2010). Input and Output Legitimacy: Synergy or Trade-Off? Empirical Evidence from an EU Survey. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(4), 449–67.Google Scholar

Linz, J. J. (1990). The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 1(1), 51–69.Google Scholar

Lizzeri, A. and Persico, N. (2004). Why Did the Elites Extend the Suffrage? Democracy and the Scope of Government, with an Application to Britain’s ‘Age of Reform’. The Quarterly Journal of Economic, 119(2), 707–65.Google Scholar

Llavador, H. and Oxoby, R. J. (2005). Partisan Competition, Growth, and the Franchise. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 1155–92.Google Scholar

Lorenz, A. (2005). How to Measure Constitutional Rigidity: Four Concepts and Two Alternatives. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17(3), 339–61.Google Scholar

Löwenstein, K. (1964). Der britische Parlamentarismus. Enstehung und Gestalt. Reinbeck: Rowohlt.Google Scholar

Lowndes, V. and Roberts, M. (2014). Why Institutions Matter: The New Political Institutionalism in Political Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lundell, K. and Lauri, K (2003). A Comparative Data Set on Political Institutions. Turku: Abo Akademi, Department of Political Science.Google Scholar

Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (2010). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K., eds., Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, S. (2001). Two Models of Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 12(3), 170–75.Google Scholar

Mair, P. (2002). Comparing Party Systems. In LeDuc, L., Niemi, R. G. and Norris, P., eds., Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting. London: Sage, pp. 88–107.Google Scholar

Maleki, A. and Hendriks, F. (2015). The Relation between Cultural Values and Models of Democracy: A Cross-National Study. Democratization, 22(6), 1–30.Google Scholar

Manatschal, A. (2013). Kantonale Integrationspolitik im Vergleich: Eine Untersuchung der Determinanten und Auswirkungen subnationaler Politikvielfalt. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Manatschal, A. and Bernauer, J. (2016). Consenting to Exclude? Empirical Patterns of Democracy and Immigrant Integration Policy. West European Politics, 39(2), 183–204.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’. Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking Representation. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 515–28.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F. and Warren, M. E. (2012). A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy. In Parkinson, J., and Mansbridge, J. J., eds., Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26Google Scholar

Marko, J. and Poier, K. (2006). Die Verfassungssysteme der Bundesländer: Institutionen und Verfahren repräsentativer und direkter Demokratie. In Dachs, H., ed., Politik in Österreich: Das Handbuch. Vienna: Manz Verlag, pp. 943–58.Google Scholar

Maissen, T. (2010). Geschichte der Schweiz. Baden: hier + jetzt.Google Scholar

Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). For the Many or the Few: How the Initiative Process Changes American Government. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Mayntz, R. and Scharpf, F. W. (1995). Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus. In Mayntz, R. and Scharpf, F. W., eds., Gesellschaftliche Selbstregulierung und politische Steuerung. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 39–72.Google Scholar

McGann, A. J. and Latner, M. (2012). The Calculus of Consensus Democracy: Rethinking Patterns of Democracy without Veto Players. Comparative Political Studies, 46(7), 823–50.Google Scholar

McRae, K. D., ed. (1974). Consociational Democracy: Political Accommodation in Segmented Societies. Toronto, ON: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar

Mead, L. M. (2004). State Political Culture and Welfare Reform. Policy Studies Journal, 32(2), 271–96.Google Scholar

Milanovic, B. (2013). Global Income Inequality in Numbers: In History and Now. Global Policy, 4(2), 198–208.Google Scholar

Miller, W. E. and Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency Influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57(1), 45–56.Google Scholar

Morel, L. and Qvortrup, M., eds. (2018). The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Morris, S. D. and Klesner, J. L. (2010). Corruption and Trust: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence From Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43(10), 1258–85.Google Scholar

Moser, R. G. and Scheiner, E. (2012). Electoral Systems and Political Context: How the Effects of Rules Vary Across New and Established Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mueller, S. (2015). Theorising Decentralisation: Comparative Evidence from Subnational Switzerland. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

Müller-Rommel, F. (2008). Demokratiemuster und Leistungsbilanz von Regierungen: Kritische Anmerkungen zu Arend Lijphart’s ‘Patterns of Democracy’. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 2(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Munzert, S. and Bauer, P. C. (2013). Political Depolarization in German Public Opinion, 1980–2010. Political Science Research and Methods, 1(1), 67–89.Google Scholar

Nagel, J. H. (2000). Expanding the Spectrum of Democracies: Reflections on Proportional Representation in New Zealand. In Crepaz, M. L., Koelble, T. and Wilsford, D., eds., Democracy and Institutions: The Life Work of Arend Lijphart. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 113–27.Google Scholar

Navia, P. (2010). Democracy to the Extent Possible in Chile. Latin American Research Review (Special Issue: Living in Actually Existing Democracies), 45, 298–328.Google Scholar

Neidhart, L. (1970). Plebiszit und pluralitäre Demokratie: Eine Analyse der Funktion des schweizerischen Gesetzesreferendums. Berne: Francke.Google Scholar

Neumayer, E. and Plümper, T. (2016). W. Political Science Research and Methods, 4(1), 175–93.Google Scholar

Norris, P. (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Norris, P., ed. (2005). Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

North, D. C. and Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–32.Google Scholar

Norton, E.C., Hua, W. and Ai, C. (2004). Computing Interaction Effects and Standard Errors in Logit and Probit Models. Stata Journal 4(2), 154–67.Google Scholar

Olvera, A. J. (2010). The Elusive Democracy: Political Parties, Democratic Institutions, and Civil Society in Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 45(4), 79–107.Google Scholar

Owen, D. and Smith, G. (2015). Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn. Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(2), 213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkinson, J. and Mansbridge, J. J., eds. (2012). Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Paxton, P., Kunovich, S. and Hughes, M. M. (2007). Gender in Politics. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 263–84.Google Scholar

Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. E. (2003). Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pfetsch, F. R., ed. (1990). Ursprünge der zweiten Republik: Prozesse der Verfassungsgebung in den Westzonen und in der Bundesrepublik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Plümper, T. and Schneider, C. J. (2009). The Analysis of Policy Convergence, or: How to Chase a Black Cat in a Dark Room. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(7), 990–1011.Google Scholar

Polillo, S. and Guillen, M. F. (2005). Globalization Pressures and the State: The Worldwide Spread of Central Bank Independence. American Journal of Sociology, 110(6), 1764–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, G. B. (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. B. (2004). Political Representation in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 273–96.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A. (2009). Conquered or Granted? A History of Suffrage Extensions. British Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 291–321.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A. and Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990, vol. 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Quinn, K. M. (2004). Bayesian Factor Analysis for Mixed Ordinal and Continuous Responses. Political Analysis, 12(4), 338–53.Google Scholar

Rabe-Hesketh, S. and Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, 2nd edn, College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar

Reher, S. (2015). Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Relationship between Priority Congruence and Satisfaction with Democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 54(1), 160–81.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W., Wanna, J. and Weller, P. (2009). Comparing Westminster. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. (2006). What Kind of Democracy Is Emerging in Eastern Europe? Post-Soviet Affairs, 22(1), 37–64.Google Scholar

Roller, E. (2005). Performance of Democracies: Political Institutions and Public Policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rothstein, B. (2011). The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rothstein, B. and Teorell, J. (2015). Getting to Sweden, Part II: Breaking with Corruption in the Nineteenth Century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 38(3), 238–54.Google Scholar

Sarsfield, R. and Echegaray, F. (2006). Opening the Black Box: How Satisfaction with Democracy and Its Perceived Efficacy Affect Regime Preference in Latin America. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 153–73.Google Scholar

Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scarrow, S. E. (2010). Political Parties and Party Systems. In LeDuc, L., Niemi, R. G. and Norris, P., eds., Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting. London: Sage, pp. 45–64.Google Scholar

Scharpf, F. W. (1970). Demokratietheorie zwischen Utopie und Anpassung. Constance: Universitätsverlag Konstanz.Google Scholar

Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. G. (2000). Demokratietheorien: Eine Einführung, 3rd edn, Opladen: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. G. (2003). Die ‘komplexe Demokratietheorie’ nach drei Jahrzehnten. In Mayntz, R. and Streeck, W., eds., Die Reformierbarkeit der Demokratie: Innovation und Blockaden: Festschrift für Fritz W. Scharpf. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 152–172.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. G. (2010). Demokratietheorien: Eine Einführung, 5th edn, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. G. and Lijphart, A. (1997). Nominations and Reflections: Dimensions of Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 31(1), 193–204.Google Scholar

Schnapp, K.-U. and Harfst, P. (2005). Parlamentarische Informations und Kontrollressourcen in 22 westlichen Demokratien. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 36(2), 348–70.Google Scholar

Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. and Mishler, W. (2005). An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation. Journal of Politics, 67(2), 407–28.Google Scholar

Seawright, J. and Collier, D. (2014). Rival Strategies of Validation Tools for Evaluating Measures of Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 47(1), 111–38.Google Scholar

Selb, P. (2006). Räumliche Regressionsmodelle. In Behnke, J., Gschwend, T., Schindler, D. and Schnapp, K.-U., eds., Methoden der Politikwissenschaft: Neuere qualitative und quantitative Analyseverfahren. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 297–308.Google Scholar

Selb, P. (2009). A Deeper Look at the Proportionality-Turnout Nexus. Comparative Political Studies, 42(4), 527–48.Google Scholar

Selb, P. (2012). Strategic Adaptation to New Electoral Systems. European Journal of Political Research, 51(5), 583–606.Google Scholar

Selb, P. and Lachat, R. (2009). The More, the Better? Counterfactual Evidence on the Effect of Compulsory Voting on the Consistency of Party Choice. European Journal of Political Research, 48(5), 573–97.Google Scholar

Selb, P. and Munzert, S. (2013). Voter Overrepresentation, Vote Misreporting, and Turnout Bias in Postelection Surveys. Electoral Studies, 32(1), 186–96.Google Scholar

Setälä, M. (2006). On the Problems of Responsibility and Accountability in Referendums. European Journal of Political Research, 45(4), 699–721.Google Scholar

Shikano, S. (2006). Bootstrap und Jackknife. In Behnke, J., Gschwend, T., Schindler, D. and Schnapp, K.-U., eds., Methoden der Politikwissenschaft: Neuere qualitative und quantitative Analyseverfahren. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 69–79.Google Scholar

Shugart, M. S. (2003). ‘Extreme’ Electoral Systems and the Appeal of the Mixed-Member Alternative. In Shugart, M. S. and Wattenberg, M. P., eds., Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–53.Google Scholar

Shvetsova, O. (1999). A Survey of Post-Communist Electoral Institutions: 1990–1998. Electoral Studies, 18(3), 397–409.Google Scholar

Siaroff, A. (2003). Varieties of Parliamentarianism in the Advanced Industrial Democracies. International Political Science Review, 24(4), 445–64.Google Scholar

Siaroff, A. (2009). Comparing Political Regimes: A Thematic Introduction to Comparative Politics. North York, ON: Higher Education University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Simeon, R. (2009). Constitutional Design and Change in Federal Systems: Issues and Questions. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 39(2), 241–61.Google Scholar

Singh, S., Karakoç, E. and Blais, A. (2012). Differentiating Winners: How Elections Affect Satisfaction with Democracy. Electoral Studies, 31(1), 201–11.Google Scholar

Singh, S. P. (2015). Compulsory Voting and the Turnout Decision Calculus. Political Studies, 63(3), 548–68.Google Scholar

Smith, G. (1976). The Functional Properties of the Referendum. European Journal of Political Research, 4(1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Squire, P. and Moncrief, G. (2015). State Legislatures Today: Politics under the Domes, 2nd edn, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Stadelmann-Steffen, I. and Vatter, A. (2012). Does Satisfaction with Democracy Really Increase Happiness? Direct Democracy and Individual Satisfaction in Switzerland. Political Behavior, 34(3), 535–59.Google Scholar

Steenbergen, M. R. and Jones, B. S. (2002). Modeling Multilevel Data Structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 218–37.Google Scholar

Steiner, J. (1974). Amicable Agreement Versus Majority Rule: Conflict Resolution in Switzerland. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Steiner, J. (2012). The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy: Empirical Research and Normative Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Steiner, J. (2018). The Foundation of Deliberative Democracy and Participatory Governance. In Heinelt, H., ed., Handbook of Participatory Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 33–52.Google Scholar

Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörnli, M. and Steenbergen, M. R. (2004). Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stroschein, S. (2014). Consociational Settlements and Reconstruction: Bosnia in Comparative Perspective (1995–Present). Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 656(1), 97–115.Google Scholar

Suksi, M. (1993). Bringing in the People: A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Swank, D. (2005). Globalisation, Domestic Politics, and Welfare State Retrenchment in Capitalist Democracies. Social Policy and Society, 4(2), 183–95.Google Scholar

Taagepera, R. (2002). Nationwide Threshold of Representation. Electoral Studies, 21(3), 383–401.Google Scholar

Taagepera, R. (2003). Arend Lijphart’s Dimensions of Democracy: Logical Connections and Institutional Design. Political Studies, 51(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Taylor, S. L., Shugart, M. S., Lijphart, A. and Grofman, B. (2014). A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Teorell, J., Charron, N., Samanni, M., Holmberg, S. and Rothstein, B. (2012). The Quality of Government Dataset (Version 6Apr11). Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg. www.qog.pol.gu.se/data/datadownloads/qogstandarddata.Google Scholar

Teorell, J., Charron, N., Samanni, M., Holmberg, S. and Rothstein, B. (2015). The Quality of Government Dataset (Version Jan15). Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg. www.qog.pol.gu.se/data/datadownloads/qogstandarddata.Google Scholar

Thomassen, J. (1994). Empirical Research into Political Representation: Failing Democracy or Failing Models. In Kent Jennings, M. and Mann, T. E., eds., Elections at Home and Abroad: Essays in Honor of Warren Miller. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 237–65.Google Scholar

Treier, S. and Jackman, S. (2008). Democracy as a Latent Variable. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 201–17.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarianism, Multicameralism and Multipartism. British Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 289–325.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Vatter, A. (2000). Consensus and Direct Democracy: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages. European Journal of Political Research, 38(2), 171–92.Google Scholar

Vatter, A. (2002). Kantonale Demokratien im Vergleich: Entstehungsgründe, Interaktionen und Wirkungen politischer Institutionen in den Schweizer Kantonen. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar

Vatter, A. (2007). Lijphart Goes Regional: Different Patterns of Consensus in Swiss Democracies. West European Politics, 30(1), 148–71.Google Scholar

Vatter, A. (2009). Lijphart Expanded: Three Dimensions of Democracy in Advanced OECD Countries? European Political Science Review, 1(1), 125–54.Google Scholar

Vatter, A., ed. (2011). Vom Schächt- zum Minarettverbot. Religiöse Minderheiten in der direkten Demokratie. Zurich: Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung.Google Scholar

Vatter, A. (2016). Switzerland on the Road from a Consociational to a Centrifugal Democracy? Swiss Political Science Review, 22(1), 59–74.Google Scholar

Vatter, A. (2018). Das politische System der Schweiz, 3rd edn, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Vatter, A. and Bernauer, J. (2009). The Missing Dimension of Democracy: Institutional Patterns in 25 EU Member States between 1997 and 2006. European Union Politics, 10(3), 335–59.Google Scholar

Vatter, A. and Bernauer, J. (2011). Consensus Democracy Indicators in 35 Democracies: Political Data Set 1997–2006 (Release 2.1). Bern and Constance: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern and Department of Politics and Management, University of Konstanz.Google Scholar

Vatter, A. and Danaci, D. (2010). Mehrheitstyrannei durch Volksentscheide? Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 51(2), 205–22.Google Scholar

Vatter, A., Flinders, M. and Bernauer, J. (2014). A Global Trend toward Democratic Convergence? A Lijphartian Analysis of Advanced Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 47(6), 903–29.Google Scholar

Vatter, A. and Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2013). Subnational Patterns of Democracy in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. West European Politics, 36(1), 71–96.Google Scholar

Weldon, S. and Dalton, R. (2014). Democratic Structures and Democratic Participation: The Limits of Consensualism Theory. In Thomassen, J., ed., Elections and Representative Democracy: Representation and Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–31.Google Scholar

Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de Winter, L. (2005). Theoretical, Conceptual, and Methodological Problems in Applying Lijphart’s Patterns of Democracy to Autonomous Regions in Europe. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, 14–19 April 2005, Granada, Spain.Google Scholar

de Winter, L., Swyngedouw, M. and Dumont, P. (2006). Party System(s) and Electoral Behaviour in Belgium: From Stability to Balkanisation. West European Politics, 29(5), 933–56.Google Scholar

Woldendorp, J. J., Keman, H. and Budge, I. (2000). Party Government in Forty-Eight Democracies (1945–1998). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Woodberry, R. D. 2012. The Missionary Roots of Liberal Democracy. American Political Science Review, 106(2), 244–74.Google Scholar

Wyss, D., Beste, S. and Bächtiger, A. (2015). A Decline in the Quality of Debate? The Evolution of Cognitive Complexity in Swiss Parliamentary Debates on Immigration (1968–2014). Swiss Political Science Review, 21(4), 636–53.Google Scholar