Ahearn, J. F. and Birlhofer, A. (2011): Nuclear Power. In Wiener, J. B., Rogers, M. D., Hammit, J. K. and Sand, P. H. (eds.): The Reality of Precaution. Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe. Earthscan: London, pp. 121–41.Google Scholar

ASN (2011): Complementary Safety Assessments of the French Nuclear Power Plants (European “Stress Tests”). French Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN), December.Google Scholar

Barke, R. P. and Jenking-Smith, H. C. (1993): Politics and Scientific Expertise: Scientists, Risk Perception, and Nuclear Waste Policy. Risk Communication, 13 (4): 425–39.Google Scholar

Bastide, S., Moatti, J.-P., Pages, J. -P. and Fagnani, F. (1989): Risk Perception and the Social Acceptability of Technologies: The French Case. Risk Analysis 9: 215–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgartner, F. R. (1989): Independent and Politicized Policy Communities: Education and Nuclear Energy in France and in the United States. Governance, 2 (1): 42–66.Google Scholar

Beck, U. (1992): Risk Society – Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Bella, D. A., Mosher, C. D. and Calvo, S. N. (1988): Technocracy and Trust: Nuclear Waste Controversy. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 114: 27–39.Google Scholar

Bosch, S. and Peyke, G. (2011): Gegenwind für die Erneuerbaren – Räumliche Neuorientierung der Wind-, Solar- und Bioenergie vor dem Hintergrund einer verringerten Akzeptanz sowie zunehmender Flächennutzungskonflikte im ländlichen Raum. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 69 (2): 105–18.Google Scholar

Bruhns, H. and Keilhacker, M. (2011) “Energiewende” Wohin führt der Weg? Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 46–47: 22–29.Google Scholar

Buchholz, W. (2011): Energiepolitische Implikationen einer Energiewende. Ifo-TUM Symposium zur Energiewende in Deutschland. Manuskript.Google Scholar

Corey, G. R. (1979): A Brief Review of the Accident at Three Mile Island, IAEA Bulletin, 21(5): 54–59.Google Scholar

Delmas, M. and Heiman, B. (2001): Government Credible Commitment to the French and American Nuclear Power Industries. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20 (3): 433–456.Google Scholar

Deubner, C. (1979): The Expansion of West-German Capital and the Founding of Euratom. International Organisation, 33: 203–28.Google Scholar

DGEMP (1993): Reforme de l’organisation electrique et gaziere francaise (the Mandil report). Paris: DGEMP.Google Scholar

EC (2011): Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Interim Report on the Comprehensive Risk and Safety Assessments (”Stress Tests”) of Nuclear Power Plants in the European Union. COM(2011) 784. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/safety/doc/com_2011_0784.pdf.Google Scholar

Economist (2014): Sunny, windy, costly and dirty. The Economist, 18 January 2014. www.economist.com/news/europe/21594336-germanys-new-super-minister-energy-and-economy-has-his-work-cut-out-sunny-windy-costly.Google Scholar

Ewald, F. (2002): The Return of Descartes’s Malicious Demon: An Outline of a Philosophy of Precaution. In Baker, T. and Simon, J. (eds.): Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 273–302.Google Scholar

Ethik-Kommission (2011): Deutschlands Energiewende – Ein Gemeinschaftswerk für die Zukunft. Bericht der Ethik-Kommission “Sichere Energieversorgung” an die Bundesregierung Deutschland. Berlin: Kanzleramt.Google Scholar

French Government (1994): Debat national Energie & Environnement- Rapport de Synthese (the Souviron report). Paris: French Government.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1999): Risk and Responsibility. Modern Law Review, 62: 1–10.Google Scholar

Hall, P. A. (2001): The Evolution of Varieties of Capitalism In Hancké, B., Rhodes, M., and Thatcher, M. (eds.): Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press: 39–85.Google Scholar

Hatch, M. T. (1986): Politics and Nuclear Power – Energy Policy in Western Europe. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar

Hecht, G. (1998): The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jones, C., and Ladurie, E. L. R. (1999): The Cambridge Illustrated History of France. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Joskow, P. L. and Parsons, J. E. (2012): The Future of Nuclear Power After Fukushima. MIT CEEPR, Working Paper 2012–001. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kern, K., Koenen, S., and Löffelsend, T. (2003): Die Umweltpolitik der rot-grünen Koalition: Strategien zwischen nationaler Pfadabhängigkeit und globaler Politikkonvergenz. Discussion Paper. Abteilung Zivilgesellschaft und transnationale Netzwerke des Forschungsschwerpunkts Zivilgesellschaft, Konflikte und Demokratie des Wissenschaftszentrums Berlin für Sozialforschung, No. SP IV 2003–103. Berlin: WZB.Google Scholar

Kingdon, J. (1984): Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Le JDD (2013): L’État va prolonger le nucléaire de dix ans. www.lejdd.fr/Economie/L-Etat-va-prolonger-le-nucleaire-de-dix-ans-633771Google Scholar

Löfstedt, R. (2005): Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Milward, A. (1992): The European Rescue of the Nation-State. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Nachhaltigkeitsbeirat Baden-Württemberg (Sustainability Council of Baden-Württemberg) (2012): Energiewende. Implikationen für Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgart: NBBW.Google Scholar

Patel, T. (2014): French Regulator Orders EDF to Make Additional Atomic Safeguards. http://sortirdunucleaire.org/French-Regulator-Orders-EDF-to-Make-Additional.Google Scholar

Pecebois, J. and Mandil, C. (2012): Energies 2050. Policy Brief 263. http://archives.strategie.gouv.fr/cas/en/content/energy-2050-policy-brief-263-february-2012.html.Google Scholar

Peters, E. and Slovic, P. (1996): The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power. Applied Social Psychology, 26 (16): 1427–53Google Scholar

Pierson, P. (2000): Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review. 94: 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renn, O. (1995): Perzeption, Akzeptanz und Akzeptabilität der Kernenergie. In Michaelis, H. and Salander, H. (eds.): Handbuch Kernenergie. Kompendium der Energiewirtschaft und Energiepolitik. Frankfurt am Main: VVEW-Publisher, pp. 752–76.Google Scholar

Renn, O. (2008): Risk Governance. Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Renn, O. (2011): Energiesicherung. Zwischen Systemanforderungen und Akzeptanz. Transfer, 12: 20–22Google Scholar

Renn, O. und Dreyer, M. (2013): Risiken der Energiewende: Möglichkeiten der Risikosteuerung mithilfe eines Risk-Governance-Ansatzes. DIW Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 82 (3): 29–44.Google Scholar

Rucht, D (1990): Campaigns, skirmishes and battles: anti-nuclear movements in the USA, France and West Germany. Organization & Environment, 4: 193–222Google Scholar

Rucht, D. (1994): The Anti-nuclear Power Movement and the State in France. In Flam, H. (ed.): States and Anti-Nuclear Movements. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 129–62.Google Scholar

Rüdig, W. (2000): Phasing Out Nuclear Energy in Germany. German Politics, 9: 43–80.Google Scholar

Slovic, P. (1987): Perception of Risk. Science, 236: 280–85.Google Scholar

Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1981): Perceived Risk: Psychological Factors and Social Implications. Proceedings of the Royal Society. London A376: 17–34.Google Scholar

Wasserman, S. and Renn, O. (2013): Offene Fragen der Energiewende: Aufbau und Design von Kapazitätsmärkten. GAIA, Ökologische Perspektiven für Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft, 22 (4): 237–41.Google Scholar

WEC (2012): World Energy Perspective: Nuclear Energy One Year After Fukushima. World Energy Council, London. www.worldenergy.org/documents/world_energy_perspective__nuclear_energy_one_year_after_fukushima_world_energy_council_march_2012_1.pdf.Google Scholar