References
Aberbach, J.D., Putnam, R.D., & Rockman, B.A. (1981). Bureaucrats and politicians in western democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464.
Ackrill, R., Kay, A., & Zahariadis, N. (2013). Ambiguity, multiple streams, and EU policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 871–887.
Ainsworth, S., & Sened, I. (1993). The role of lobbyists: Entrepreneurs with two audiences. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 834–866.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 170–211.
Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology and Health, 26(9), 1113–1127.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Anderson, S.E., DeLeo, R.A., & Taylor, K. (2019). Policy entrepreneurs, legislators, and agenda setting: Information and influence. Policy Studies Journal, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12331. Arieli, T., & Cohen, N. (2013). Policy entrepreneurs and post-conflict cross-border cooperation: A conceptual framework and the Israeli–Jordanian case. Policy Sciences, 46(3), 237–256.
Arnold, G. (2015). Street-level policy entrepreneurship. Public Management Review, 17(3), 307–327.
Arnold, G. (in press). Does entrepreneurship work? Understanding what policy entrepreneurs do and whether it matters. Policy Studies Journal.
Arrow, K.J. (1985). Informational structure of the firm. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 303–307.
Attewell, A. (1998). Florence Nightingale (1820–1910). Prospects, 28(1), 151–166.
Baarspul, H.C., & Wilderom, C.P. (2011). Do employees behave differently in public- vs. private-sector organizations? A state-of-the-art review. Public Management Review, 13(7), 967–1002.
Baines, D., & Armstrong, P. (2019). Non‐job work/unpaid caring: Gendered industrial relations in long‐term care. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(7), 934–947.
Baines, D., Cunningham, I., & Shields, J. (2017). Filling the gaps: Unpaid (and precarious) work in the nonprofit social services. Critical Social Policy, 37(4), 625–645.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Macmillan.
Bartlett, W., & Pagliarello, M.C. (2016). Agenda-setting for vet policy in the western Balkans: Employability versus social inclusion. European Journal of Education, 51(3), 305–319.
Barzelay, M. (2001). The New Public Management: Improving research and policy dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Batra, R., & Ray, M.L. (1986). Situational effects of advertising repetition: The moderating influence of motivation, ability, and opportunity to respond. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(4), 432–445.
Baumgartner, F.R., & Jones, B.D. (2010). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Béland, D. (2005). Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective. Social Policy and Administration, 39(1), 1–18.
Bendor, J., Taylor, S., & Van Gaalen, R. (1987). Politicians, bureaucrats, and asymmetric information. American Journal of Political Science, 31(4), 796–828.
Bernier, L., & Hafsi, T. (2007). The changing nature of public entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 488–503.
Birkland, T.A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18(01), 53–74.
Bovens, M., & Zouridis, S. (2002). Street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 174–184.
Bridson, E.Y. (1996). Iatrogenic epidemics of puerperal fever in the 18th and 19th centuries. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 53(2), 134–139.
Brodkin, E.Z. (1997). Inside the welfare contract: Discretion and accountability in state welfare administration. Social Service Review, 71(1), 1–33.
Brodkin, E.Z. (2007). Bureaucracy redux: Management reformism and the welfare state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 1–17.
Brodkin, E.Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i253–i277.
Brodkin, E.Z. (2012). Reflections on street-level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940–949.
Brouwer, S. (2015). Policy entrepreneurs in water governance. London: Springer.
Brouwer, S., & Huitema, D. (2018). Policy entrepreneurs and strategies for change. Regional Environmental Change, 18(5), 1259–1272.
Burke, J.P. (1987). A prescriptive view of the implementation process: When should bureaucrats exercise discretion? Review of Policy Research, 7(1), 217–231.
Byrd, M.E., Costello, J., Shelton, C.R., Thomas, P.A., & Petrarca, D. (2004). An active learning experience in health policy for baccalaureate nursing students. Public Health Nursing, 21(5), 501–506.
Bysted, R., & Hansen, J.R. (2015). Comparing public and private sector employees’ innovative behaviour: Understanding the role of job and organizational characteristics, job types, and subsectors. Public Management Review, 17(5), 698–717.
Bysted, R., & Jespersen, K.R. (2014). Exploring managerial mechanisms that influence innovative work behaviour: Comparing private and public employees. Public Management Review, 16(2), 217–241.
Caiden, G.E. (1991). What really is public maladministration? Public Administration Review, 51(6), 486–493.
Cairney, P., & Jones, M.D. (2016). Kingdon’s multiple streams approach: What is the empirical impact of this universal theory? Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 37–58.
Callaghan, T., & Sylvester, S. (2019). Private citizens as policy entrepreneurs: Evidence from autism mandates and parental political mobilization. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12346. Campbell, J. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Carter, K.C., & Carter, B.R. (2017). Childbed fever: A scientific biography of Ignaz Semmelweis. Milton Park: Routledge.
Clark, P., & Wilson, J. (1961). Incentive systems: A theory of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6(2), 129–166.
Clausen, T.H., Demircioglu, M.A., & Alsos, G.A. (2020). Intensity of innovation in public sector organizations: The role of push and pull factors. Public Administration, 98(1), 159–176.
Cobb, R.W., & Elder, C.D. (1981). Communication and public policy. In Nimmo, D. & Sanders, K. (Eds.), Handbook of political communication (pp. 391–416). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Cobb, R.W. & Elder, C.D. (1983). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cohen, I.B. (1984). Florence Nightingale. Scientific American, 250(3), 128–137.
Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
Cohen, N. (2012). Policy entrepreneurs and the design of public policy: The case of the national health insurance law in Israel. Journal of Social Research & Policy, 3(1), 5–26.
Cohen, N. (2016). Policy entrepreneurs and agenda setting. In Zahariadis, N. (Ed.), Handbook of public policy agenda-setting (pp. 180–199). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Cohen, N. (2018). How culture affects street-level bureaucrats’ bending the rules in the context of informal payments for health care: The Israeli case. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 175–187.
Cohen, N., & Arieli, T. (2011). Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and the snowball sampling. Journal of Peace Research, 48(4), 423–436.
Cohen, N., Benish, A., & Shamriz-Ilouz, A. (2016). When the clients can choose: Dilemmas of street-level workers in choice-based social services. Social Service Review, 90(4), 620–646.
Cohen, N., & Gershgoren, S. (2016). The incentives of street-level bureaucrats and inequality in tax assessments. Administration and Society, 48(3), 267–289.
Cohen, N., & Golan-Nadir, N. (2020). Why do street-level bureaucrats risk themselves for others? The case of Israeli police officers. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(4), 480–494.
Cohen, N., & Hertz, U. (2020). Street-level bureaucrats’ social value orientation on and off duty. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 442–453.
Cohen, N., & Klenk, T. (2019). Policy re-design from the street level. In Hupe, P. (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy: The ground floor of government in context (pp. 209–222). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Cohen, N., & Naor, M. (2013). Reducing dependence on oil? How policy entrepreneurs utilize the National Security Agenda to recruit government support: The case of electric transportation in Israel. Energy Policy, 56, 582–590.
Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Considine, M., Lewis, J. M., O’Sullivan, S., & Sol, E. (2015). Getting welfare to work: Street-level governance in Australia, the UK, and the Netherlands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crow, D.A. (2010). Policy entrepreneurs, issue experts, and water rights policy change in Colorado. Review of Policy Research, 27(3), 299–315.
Crowley, J.E. (2003). The politics of child support in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, R.A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale University Press.
deLeon, L. (1996). Ethics and entrepreneurship. Policy Studies Journal, 24(3), 495–510.
Demircioglu, M.A. (2020. The effects of organizational and demographic context for innovation implementation in public organizations. Public Management Review, 22(12), 1852–1875. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1668467. Demircioglu, M.A., & Audretsch, D.B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 1681–1691.
de Vries, J. (2010). Is New Public Management really dead? OECD Journal on Budgeting, 10(1), 1–5.
de Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166.
Díaz-García, M.C., & Jiménez-Moreno, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial intention: The role of gender. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(3), 261–283.
DiMaggio, P.J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Zucker, L. (Ed.), Institutional patterns and culture (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Domanski, M.D. (1998). Prototypes of social work political participation: An empirical model. Social Work, 43(2), 156–167.
Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Downs, G.W. (1976). Bureaucracy, innovation, and public policy, Lexington: Lexington Books.
Drucker, P.F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: Harper & Row.
Dunleavy, P. (1992). Democracy, bureaucracy and public choice. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Durose, C. (2007). Beyond “street level bureaucrats”: Re-interpreting the role of front line public sector workers. Critical Policy Analysis, 1(2), 217–234.
Evans, T. (2013). Organisational rules and discretion in adult social work. British Journal of Social Work, 43(4), 739–758.
Evans, T. (2016). Professional discretion in welfare services: Beyond street-level bureaucracy. Milton Park: Routledge.
Faling, M., Biesbroek, R., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., & Termeer, K. (2019). Policy entrepreneurship across boundaries: A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Policy, 39(2), 393–422.
Fayolle, A. (2018). Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education. In Fayolle, A. (Ed.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship education (pp. 127–138). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2008). From craft to science: Teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(7), 569–593.
Fayolle, A., & Liñán, F. (2014). The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 663–666.
Figueira-McDonough, J. (1993). Policy practice: The neglected side of social work intervention. Social Work, 38(2), 179–188.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2002). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Folgheraiter, F. , & Raineri, M. L. (2012). A critical analysis of the social work definition according to the relational paradigm. International Social Work, 55(4), 473–487.
Frisch-Aviram, N., Beeri, I., & Cohen, N. (2020). Entrepreneurship in the policy process: Linking behavior and context using a systematic review of policy entrepreneurship literature. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 188–197.
Frisch-Aviram, N., Cohen, N., & Beeri, I. (2018). Low-level bureaucrats, local government regimes and policy entrepreneurship. Policy Sciences, 51(1), 39–57.
Frisch-Aviram, N., Cohen, N., & Beeri, I. (2020). Wind(ow) of change: A systematic review of policy entrepreneurship characteristics and strategies. Policy Studies Journal, 48(3), 612–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12339. Gal, J., & Weiss-Gal, I. (Eds.) (2013). Social workers affecting social policy: An international perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
Gal, J., & Weiss-Gal, I. (2015). The “why” and the “how” of policy practice: An eight-country comparison. British Journal of Social Work, 45(4), 1083–1101.
Garen, J.E. (1994). Executive compensation and principal-agent theory. Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1175–1199.
Gartner, W.B. (1988). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11–32.
Gofen, A. (2013). Mind the gap: Dimensions and influence of street-level divergence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 473–493.
Goldfinch, S., & Hart, P.T. (2003). Leadership and institutional reform: Engineering macroeconomic policy change in Australia. Governance, 16(2), 235–270.
Gollwitzer, P.M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503.
Goodman, K.W. (2005). Ethics, evidence, and public policy. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 48(4), 548–556.
Goyal, N., Howlett, M., & Chindarkar, N. (2020). Who coupled which stream(s)? Policy entrepreneurship and innovation in the energy–water nexus in Gujarat, India. Public Administration and Development, 40(1), 49–64.
Green, A. (2020). Li Wenliang. The Lancet, 395(10225), 682.
Greenwood, S. (2007). Bad for business? Entrepreneurs and democracy in the Arab world. Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 837–860.
Gulick, L. (1955). Next steps in public administration. Public Administration Review, 15(2), 73–76.
Gunn, A. (2017). Policy entrepreneurs and policy formulation. In Howlett, M. & Mukherjee, I. (Eds.), Handbook of policy formulation (pp. 265–282). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Halperin, S., & Heath, O. (2016). Political research: Methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hébert, R.F., & Link, A.N. (2009). A history of entrepreneurship. London: Routledge.
Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance. London: Sage.
Hopkins, V. (2016). Institutions, incentives, and policy entrepreneurship. Policy Studies Journal, 44(3), 332–348.
Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (Eds.). (2015). Understanding street-level bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.
Hung, K., Sirakaya-Turk, E., & Ingram, L.J. (2011). Testing the efficacy of an integrative model for community participation. Journal of Travel Research, 50(3), 276–288.
Hupe, P. (2019). Conceptualizing street-level bureaucracy in context. In Hupe, P. (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy: The ground floor of government in context (pp. 31–48). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A public service gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569.
Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299.
Hupe, P., Hill, M., & Buffat, A. (Eds.). (2016). Understanding street-level bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.
Jabotinsky, H., & Cohen, N. (2020). Regulatory policy entrepreneurship and reforms: A comparison of competition and financial regulation. Journal of Public Policy, 40(4), 628–650.
Jakobsen, M., Jacobsen, C.B., & Serritzlew, S. (2019). Managing the behavior of public frontline employees through change-oriented training: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), 556–571.
Johannisson, B. (1991). University training for entrepreneurship: Swedish approaches. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 3(1), 67–82.
Jones, M.D., Peterson, H.L., Pierce, J.J., et al. (2016). A river runs through it: A multiple streams meta-review. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 13–36.
Kaufman, H. (1960). The forest ranger: A study in administrative behavior. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Keiser, L.R. (2010). Understanding street-level bureaucrats’ decision making: Determining eligibility in the Social Security Disability Program. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 247–257.
Kelly, M. (1994). Theories of justice and street-level discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(2), 119–140.
Kickert, W. (2007). The study of public management in Europe and the US: A comparative analysis of national distinctiveness. London: Routledge.
Kickert, W. (2011). Public management reform in continental Europe: National distinctiveness. In Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to New Public Management (pp. 97–112). Surrey: Ashgate.
Kingdon, J.W. (1995[1984]). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
Klenk, T., & Cohen, N. (2019). Dealing with hybridization in street-level bureaucracy research. In Hupe, P. (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy (pp. 142–156). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Knill, C. & Tosun, J. (2012). Public policy. A new introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Koehn, P.H. (2009). Globalization, decentralization, and public entrepreneurship: Reorienting bureaucracy in the People’s Republic of China. In Farazmand, A. (Ed.), Bureaucracy and administration (pp. 409–432). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Kosar, K.R. (2011). Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas endure. Public Administration Review, 71(2), 299–302.
Lapuente, V., & Suzuki, K. (2020). Politicization, bureaucratic legalism, and innovative attitudes in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 454–467.
Lavee, E. (2020). Who is in charge? The provision of informal personal resources at the street level. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa025. Lavee, E., & Cohen, N. (2019). How street-level bureaucrats become policy entrepreneurs: The case of urban renewal. Governance, 32(3), 475–492.
Lavee, E., Cohen, N., & Nouman, H. (2018). Reinforcing public responsibility? Influences and practices in street-level bureaucrats’ engagement in policy design. Public Administration, 96(2), 333–348.
Lavee, E., & Strier, R. (2019). Transferring emotional capital as coerced discretion: Street-level bureaucrats reconciling structural deficiencies. Public Administration, 97(4), 910–925.
Lazarus, R.S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
Leadbeater, C., & Goss, S. (1999). Civic entrepreneurship. London: Demos.
Levin, L., Goor, Y., & Tayri, M.T. (2013). Agency advocacy and organisational development: A feasible policy practice alliance. British Journal of Social Work, 43(3), 522–541.
Lewis, E. (1984). Public entrepreneurship: Toward a theory of bureaucratic political power. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Liebenberg, L., Ungar, M. & Ikeda, J. (2013). Neo-liberalism and responsibilisation in the discourse of social service workers. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(3), 1006–1021.
Lieberherr, E., & Thomann, E. (2019). Street-level bureaucracy research and accountability beyond hierarchy. In Hupe, P. (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy: The ground floor of government in context (pp. 223–239). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Liñán, F. (2004). Intention-based models of entrepreneurship education. Piccolla Impresa/Small Business, 3(1), 11–35.
Liñán, F., & Chen, Y.W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593–617.
Lipsky, M. (2010[1980]) Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage.
Locke, E.A. (1991). The motivation sequence, the motivation hub, and the motivation core. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 288–299.
Longest, B. (2016). Health policymaking in the United States (6th ed.). Chicago: Health Administration Press.
Lu, H., Mayer, A.L., Wellstead, A.M., & Zhou, S. (2020). Can the dual identity of policy entrepreneur and policy implementer promote successful policy adoption? Vertical greening policymaking in Shanghai, China. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 13(1), 113–128.
Luke, D.F. (1995). Building indigenous entrepreneurial capacity: Trends and issues. In Rasheed, S. & Fashole, D. (Eds.), Development management in Africa: Toward dynamism, empowerment and entrepreneurship (pp. 149–171). Boulder: Westview Press.
MacInnis, D.J. & Jaworski, B.J. (1989). Information processing from advertisements: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 1–23.
MacInnis, D.J., Moorman, C., & Jaworski, B.J. (1991). Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 32–53.
Mair, J., Robinson, J., & Hockert, K. (Eds.) (2006). Social entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mallett, A., & Cherniak, D. (2018). Views from above: Policy entrepreneurship and climate policy change on electricity in the Canadian Arctic. Regional Environmental Change, 18(5), 1323–1336.
March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen/Oslo/Tromo: Universitetsforlaget.
Martin, B.C., McNally, J.J., & Kay, M.J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211–224.
May, P. J., & Winter, S. C. (2009). Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 453–476.
Mayer, A.K. (2011). Does education increase political participation? The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 633–645.
Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Maynard-Moody, S., & Portillo, S. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy theory. In Durant, R.F. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 252–277). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mayo, E. (1923). The irrational factor in society. Journal of Personnel Research, 110, 419–426.
McDonald, L. (2001). Florence Nightingale and the early origins of evidence-based nursing. Evidence-Based Nursing, 4(3), 68–69.
McFadgen, B.K. (2019). Connecting policy change, experimentation, and entrepreneurs: Advancing conceptual and empirical insights. Ecology and Society, 24(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10673-240130. Mebane, F., & Blendon, R.J. (2001). Political strategy 101: How to make health policy and influence political people. Journal of Child Neurology, 16(7), 513–519.
Meier, K.J. (2019). Theoretical frontiers in representative bureaucracy: New directions for research. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(1), 39–56.
Meier, K.J., & Bohte, J. (2001). Structure and discretion: Missing links in representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 455–470.
Meier, K.J., & O’Toole, L.J. (2006). Political control versus bureaucratic values: Reframing the debate. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 177–192.
Meijerink, S., & Huitema, D. (2010). Policy entrepreneurs and change strategies: Lessons from sixteen case studies of water transitions around the globe. Ecology and Society, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03509-150221. Meyers, M. K., Vorsanger, S. (2007). Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of public policy. In Peters, G. & Jon, P. (Eds.), The handbook of public administration (pp. 153–163). London: Sage.
Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 738–770.
Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Mintrom, M. (2013). Policy entrepreneurs and controversial science: Governing human embryonic stem cell research. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(3), 442–457.
Mintrom, M., & Luetjens, J. (2017). Policy entrepreneurs and problem framing: The case of climate change. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(8), 1362–1377.
Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.
Mintrom, M., & Salisbury, C. (2014). Policy entrepreneurs, creative teamwork, and policy change. In Alexander, D. & Lewis, J.M. (Eds.), Making public policy decisions: Expertise, skills and experience (pp. 129–145). London: Routledge.
Mintrom, M., Salisbury, C., & Luetjens, J. (2014). Policy entrepreneurs and promotion of Australian state knowledge economies. Australian Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 423–438.
Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1996). Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 24(3), 420–434.
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Moe, T.M. (1980). The organization of interests: Incentives and the internal dynamics of political interest groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Monteiro, L.A. (1985). Florence Nightingale on public health nursing. American Journal of Public Health, 75(2), 181–186.
Mosher, F. C. (1982). Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press.
Murray, H. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nakamura, R.T., & Smallwood, F. (1980). The politics of policy implementation, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Navot, D., & Cohen, N. (2015). How policy entrepreneurs reduce corruption in Israel. Governance, 28(1), 61–76.
Neff, C. (2012). Australian beach safety and the politics of shark attacks. Coastal Management, 40(1), 88–106.
Ng, E. S., Gossett, C. W., & Winter, R. (2016). Millennials and public service renewal: Introduction on millennials and public service motivation (PSM). Public Administration Quarterly, 40(3), 412–428.
Nicholson-Crotty, S., Grissom, J.A., Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Redding, C. (2016). Disentangling the causal mechanisms of representative bureaucracy: Evidence from assignment of students to gifted programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 745–757.
Niskanen, W.A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. New York: Aldine-Atherton.
Oborn, E., Barrett, M., & Exworthy, M. (2011). Policy entrepreneurship in the development of public sector strategy. Public Administration, 89(2), 325–344.
O’Brien-Larivée, C. (2011). A service-learning experience to teach baccalaureate nursing students about health policy. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(6), 332–336.
Oliver, T.R., & Paul-Shaheen, P. (1997). Translating ideas into actions: Entrepreneurial leadership in state health care reforms. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 22(3), 721–788.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Osborne, S.P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Unlocking public entrepreneurship and public economies. EGDI Discussion Paper 2005/01, Expert Group on Development Issues, United Nations University.
Palmer, J.R. (2015). How do policy entrepreneurs influence policy change? Framing and boundary work in EU transport biofuels policy. Environmental Politics, 24(2), 270–287.
Pastor Seller, E., Verde Diego, C., & Lima Fernandez, A.I. (2019). Impact of neo-liberalism in Spain: Research from social work in relation to the public system of social services. European Journal of Social Work, 22(2), 277–288.
Petchey, R., Williams, J., & Carter, Y. (2008). From street-level bureaucrats to street-level policy entrepreneurs? Central policy and local action in lottery-funded community cancer care. Social Policy & Administration, 42(1), 59–76.
Peters, B.G. (1987). Politicians and bureaucrats in the politics of policy making, In Lane, J.E. (Ed.), Bureaucracy and public choice (pp. 256–282). London: Sage.
Peters, B.G. (2001). The politics of bureaucracy. London: Routledge.
Peters, B.G. & Pierre, J. (Eds.) (2004). Politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective: The quest for control. London: Routledge.
Petridou, E., & Mintrom, M. (in press). A research agenda for the study of policy entrepreneurs. Policy Studies Journal.
Pierre, J., & Peters, B.G. (2017). The shirking bureaucrat: A theory in search of evidence? Policy & Politics, 45(2), 157–172.
Pitt, D., & Aubin, J.M. (2012). Joseph Lister: Father of modern surgery. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 55(5), E8.
Plein, L.C. (1994). Agenda setting, problem definition, and policy studies. Policy Studies Journal, 22(4), 701–704.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Porter, R. (1997). The greatest benefit to mankind: A medical history of humanity from antiquity to the present. London: HarperCollins.
Pradhan, R. (2020). Doctors push back as Congress takes aim at surprise medical bills. National Public Radio. https://n.pr/2ZUi9ES. Pralle, S. (2006). The “mouse that roared”: Agenda setting in Canadian pesticides politics. Policy Studies Journal, 34(2), 171–194.
Prottas, J.M. (1979). People processing: The street-level bureaucrat in public service bureaucracies. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2007). Implementing public policy. In Fischer, F., Miller, G.J. & Sidney, M.S. (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics and methods (pp. 89–107). New York: Dekker.
Raaphorst, N., Groeneveld, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2018). Do tax officials use double standards in evaluating citizen‐clients? A policy‐capturing study among Dutch frontline tax officials. Public Administration, 96(1), 134–153.
Rabe, B. (2004). Statehouse and greenhouse: The stealth politics of American climate change policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Raimondo, E., & Newcomer, K.E. (2017). Mixed-methods inquiry in public administration: The interaction of theory, methodology, and praxis. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 183–201.
Ramamurti, R. (1986). Effective leadership of public sector organizations: The case of public entrepreneurs. In Nagel, S. (Ed.), Research in public policy analysis and management, vol. 3 (pp. 69–88). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Riccucci, N.M. (2005). Street-level bureaucrats and intrastate variation in the implementation of temporary assistance for needy families policies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 89–111.
Ridde, V. (2009). Policy implementation in an African state: An extension of Kingdon’s multiple-streams approach. Public Administration, 87(4), 938–954.
Ringius, L. (2001). Radioactive waste disposal at sea: Public ideas, transnational policy entrepreneurs, and environmental regimes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roberts, N.C., & King, P.J. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2), 147–175.
Sætren, H. (2009). Explaining radical policy change against all odds: The role of leadership, institutions, program design and policy windows. In Raffel, J.A. (Ed.), Public sector leadership: International challenges and perspectives (pp. 53–72). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Sætren, H. (2014). Implementing the third generation research paradigm in policy implementation research: An empirical assessment. Public Policy and Administration, 29(2), 84–105.
Sætren, H. (2016). From controversial policy idea to successful program implementation: The role of the policy entrepreneur, manipulation strategy, program design, institutions and open policy windows in relocating Norwegian central agencies. Policy Sciences, 49(1), 71–88.
Sager, F., Thomann, E., Zollinger, C. van der Heiden, N. & Mavrot, C. (2014). Street-level bureaucrats and new modes of governance: How conflicting roles affect the implementation of the Swiss ordinance on veterinary medicinal products. Public Management Review, 16(4), 481–502.
Salisbury, R.H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 1–32.
Salisbury, R.H. (1984). Interest representation: The dominance of institutions. American Political Science Review, 78(1), 64–76.
Sandfort, J. R. (2000). Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 729–756.
Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1992). Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. The American Political Science Review, 86(3), 737–747.
Schneider, M., Teske, P. & Mintrom, M. (1995). Public entrepreneurs: Agents for change in American government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Schnellenbach, J. (2007). Public entrepreneurship and the economics of reform. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(2), 183–202.
Schott, C., & van Kleef, D. (2019). Mixed-methods designs in street-level bureaucracy research. In Hupe, P. (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy (pp. 294–303). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1994[1942]). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1947). The creative response in economic history. Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149–159.
Schwarz, N., & Bohner, G. (2001). The construction of attitudes. In Tesser, A. & Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes, vol. 1 (pp. 436–457). Oxford: Blackwell.
Scott, P.G. (1997). Assessing determinants of bureaucratic discretion: An experiment in street-level decision making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 35–58.
Scott, S.G., & Bruce, R.A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
Selden, S.C. (1997). The promise of the representative bureaucracy: Diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. Armonk: ME Sharpe.
Self, P. (2000). Rolling back the state: Economic dogma and political choice. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Shpaizman, I., Swed, O., & Pedahzur, A. (2016). Policy change inch by inch: Policy entrepreneurs in the Holy Basin of Jerusalem. Public Administration, 94(4), 1042–1058.
Soss, J. , Fording, R.C., Schram, S.F., & Schram, S. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sowa, J.E., & Selden, S.C. (2003). Administrative discretion and active representation: An expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700–710.
Spenceley, S.M., Reutter, L., & Allen, M.N. (2006). The road less traveled: Nursing advocacy at the policy level. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 7, 180–194.
Stevenson, H.H., & Jarillo, J.C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17–27.
Strier, R., & Feldman, G. (2018). Reengineering social work’s political passion: Policy practice and neo-liberalism. British Journal of Social Work, 48(3), 751–768.
Sullivan, M., Weerawardena, J., & Carnegie, K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualisation. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 76–88.
Taylor, F. (1947[1911]). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Row.
Thomann, E. (2019). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as a tool for street-level bureaucracy research. In Hupe, P. (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy (pp. 370–391). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Thomann, E., Hupe, P.L. & Sager, F. (2018). Serving many masters: Public accountability in private policy implementation. Governance, 31(2), 299–319.
Thomann, E., & Sager, F. (2017). Moving beyond legal compliance: Innovative approaches to EU multilevel implementation. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(9), 1253–1268.
Tkachev, A., & Kolvereid, L. (1999). Self-employment intentions among Russian students. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 11(3), 269–280.
Tullock, G. (1967). The politics of bureaucracy. New York: Public Affairs Press.
Tummers, L.G. (2011). Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement new policies: A policy alienation framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(3), 555–581.
Tummers, L.G. (2013). Policy alienation and the power of professionals: Confronting new policies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547.
Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., & Steijn, B. (2009). Policy alienation of public professionals: Application in a new public management context. Public Management Review, 11(5), 685-706.
Tummers, L., Steijn, B., & Bekkers, V. (2012). Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement public policies: Content, context, and personality characteristics. Public Administration, 90, 716–736.
Turale, S. (2015). Writing about nursing and health policy perspectives. International Nursing Review, 62(4), 433–434.
Vazire, S., & Mehl, M.R. (2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1202–1216.
Walker, R.M. (2006). Innovation type and diffusion: An empirical analysis of local government. Public Administration, 84(2), 311–335.
Watkins-Hayes, C. (2009). The new welfare bureaucrats: Entanglements of race, class, and policy reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Webb, T.L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268.
Weber, M. (2009). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Milton Park: Routledge.
Weiss-Gal, I. & Gal, J. (2014). Social workers as policy actors. Journal of Social Policy, 43(01), 19–36.
Westley, F. (2002). The devil in the dynamics: Adaptive management on the front lines. In Gunderson, L.H. & Holling, C.S. (Eds.), Understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 333–360). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Wharf, B. & McKenzie, B. (1998). Connecting policy to practice in the human services. New York: Oxford University Press.
Whyte, W.F. (1943). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wiggins, J. (2004). Motivation, ability and opportunity to participate: A reconceptulization of the RAND model of audience development. International Journal of Arts Management, 7(1), 22–33.
Wilkins, V.M., & Keiser, L.R. (2006). Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 87–102.
Wilson, J. (1973). Political organizations. New York: Basic Books.
Wilson, J. (1980). The politics of regulation. New York: Basic Books.
Wilson, J. (1989). Bureaucracy: What governments do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222.
Wood, B.D., & Vedlitz, A. (2007). Issue definition, information processing, and the politics of global warming. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 552–568.
Wood, B.D., & Waterman, R.W. (1993). The dynamics of political-bureaucratic adaptation. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 497–528.
Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2005). Re-approaching the politics/administration dichotomy and its impact on administrative ethics. Public Integrity, 7(2), 110–127.
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R.W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342.
Zacka, B. (2017). When the state meets the street: Public service and moral agency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zahariadis, N. (2003). Ambiguity and choice in public policy: Political decision making in modern democracies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Zahariadis, N. (2008). Ambiguity and choice in European public policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 514–530.
Zahariadis, N. (2016a). Delphic oracles: Ambiguity, institutions, and multiple streams. Policy Sciences, 49(1), 3–12.
Zahariadis, N. (2016b). Political leadership, multiple streams and the emotional endowment effect: A comparison of American and Greek foreign policies. In Zohlnhӧfer, R. & Rüb, F.W. (Eds.), Decision-making under ambiguity and time constraints (pp. 147–166). Colchester: ECPR Press.
Zahariadis, N., & Exadaktylos, T. (2016). Policies that succeed and programs that fail: Ambiguity, conflict, and crisis in Greek higher education. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 59–82.
Zauderer, C.R., Ballestas, H.C., Cardoza, M.P., Hood, P., & Neville, S.M. (2007). United we stand: Preparing nursing students for political activism. Journal of the New York State Nurses’ Association, 39(2), 4–7.
Zhu, X. (2008). Strategy of Chinese policy entrepreneurs in the third sector: Challenges of “technical infeasibility.” Policy Sciences, 41(4), 315–334.
