Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: September 2014

Chapter 18 - Fluid responsiveness assessment

from Section 3 - Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Perioperative Environment


1. JozwiakM, SilvaS, PersichiniR, et al. Extravascular lung water is an independent prognostic factor in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2013;41:472–80.
2. VincentJL, SakrY, SprungCL, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 2006;34:344–53.
3. MarikPE, MonnetX, TeboulJL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intens Care 2011;1:1.
4. MonnetX, PersichiniR, KtariM, JozwiakM, RichardC, TeboulJL. Precision of the transpulmonary thermodilution measurements. Crit Care 2011;15:R204.
5. MichardF, TeboulJL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002;121:2000–8.
6. MarikPE, BaramM, VahidB. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008;134:172–8.
7. MarikPE, CavallazziR. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 2013;41:1774–81.
8. RichardC, MonnetX, TeboulJL. Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in 2011. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011;17:296–302.
9. MichardF, TeboulJL. Using heart–lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000;4:282–9.
10. ChemlaD, HebertJL, CoiraultC. Total arterial compliance estimated by stroke volume-to-aortic pulse pressure ratio in humans. Am J Physiol 1998;274:H500–5.
11. CannessonM, Le ManachY, HoferCK, et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a “gray zone” approach. Anesthesiology 2011;115:231–41.
12. MarikPE, CavallazziR, VasuT, HiraniA. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009;37:2642–7.
13. MonnetX, DresM, FerreA, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients: comparison with four other dynamic indices. Br J Anaesth 2012;109:330–8.
14. Solus-BiguenetH, FleyfelM, TavernierB, et al. Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:808–16.
15. CannessonM, AttofY, RosamelP, et al. Respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesthesiology 2007;106:1105–11.
16. CannessonM, DesebbeO, RosamelP, et al. Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:200–6.
17. MonnetX, GuerinL, JozwiakM, et al. Pleth variability index is a weak predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients receiving norepinephrine. Br J Anaesth 2013;110:207–13.
18. MonnetX, LamiaB, TeboulJL. Pulse oximeter as a sensor of fluid responsiveness: do we have our finger on the best solution?Crit Care 2005;9:429–30.
19. BiaisM, CottenceauV, PetitL, MassonF, CochardJF, SztarkF. Impact of norepinephrine on the relationship between pleth variability index and pulse pressure variations in ICU adult patients. Crit Care 2011;15:R168.
20. HeenenS, De BackerD, VincentJL. How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted?Crit Care 2006;10:R102.
21. MonnetX, RienzoM, OsmanD, et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1402–7.
22. De BackerD, HeenenS, PiagnerelliM, KochM, VincentJL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intens Care Med 2005;31:517–23.
23. MullerL, LouartG, BousquetPJ, et al. The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intens Care Med 2010;36:496–503.
24. MonnetX, BleibtreuA, FerréA, et al. Passive leg raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med 2012;40:152–7.
25. de WaalEE, RexS, KruitwagenCL, KalkmanCJ, BuhreWF. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. Crit Care Med 2009;37:510–15.
26. De BackerD, TacconeFS, HolstenR, IbrahimiF, VincentJL. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2009;110:1092–7.
27. JacquesD, BendjelidK, DunerretS, CollingJ, PiriouV, VialeJP. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during increased intra-abdominal pressure: an experimental study. Crit Care 2011;15:R33.
28. FeisselM, MichardF, FallerJP, TeboulJL. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intens Care Med 2004;30:1834–7.
29. Vieillard-BaronA, CherguiK, RabillerA, et al. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intens Care Med 2004;30:1734–9.
30. MonnetX, TeboulJL. Passive leg raising. Intens Care Med 2008;34:659–63.
31. CavallaroF, SandroniC, MaranoC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intens Care Med 2010;36:1475–1483.
32. JabotJ, TeboulJL, RichardC, MonnetX. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: importance of the postural change. Intens Care Med 2009;35:85–90.
33. MonnetX, BatailleA, MagalhaesE, et al. End-tidal carbon dioxide is better than arterial pressure for predicting volume responsiveness by the passive leg raising test. Intens Care Med 2013;39:93–100.
34. MahjoubY, TouzeauJ, AirapetianN, et al. The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med 2010;38:1824–9.
35. MonnetX, OsmanD, RidelC, LamiaB, RichardC, TeboulJL. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2009;37:951–6.
36. SilvaS, JozwiakM, TeboulJL, PersichiniR, RichardC, MonnetX. End-expiratory occlusion test predicts preload responsiveness independently of positive end-expiratory pressure during acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2013;41:1692–701.
37. MullerL, ToumiM, BousquetPJ, et al. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology 2011;115:541–7.
38. CecconiM, CorredorC, ArulkumaranN, et al. Clinical review: goal-directed therapy-what is the evidence in surgical patients? The effect on different risk groups. Crit Care 2013;17:209.
39. HamiltonMA, CecconiM, RhodesA. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011;112:1392–402.
40. TeboulJL, MonnetX. Detecting volume responsiveness and unresponsiveness in intensive care unit patients: two different problems, only one solution. Crit Care 2009;13:175.